Homelessness among clients of Sydney’s supervised injecting facility

• Published in: Drugs and alcohol today 2017-12, Vol.17 (4), p.258-268
• Main Authors: M. Salmon, Allison, Belackova, Vendula, Schwanz, Ricardo Starling, Jauncey, Marianne, Hiley, Sarah, Demirkol, Apo
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adjustment; Alcohol; Boarding houses; Clients; Drug abuse; Drug use; Drugs; Gentrification; Health care; Health services; Homeless people; Housing; Imprisonment; Medical referrals; Mental health; Overdoses; Polls & surveys; Preventive medicine; Public health; Questionnaires; Referrals; Registration; Social services; Unemployment
• ISSN: 1745-9265; 2752-6739; 2042-8359; 2752-6747
• DOI: 10.1108/DAT-06-2017-0026

Purpose The Uniting Medically Supervised Injecting Centre (MSIC) opened in Sydney, Australia, in May 2001. Homelessness among people who inject drugs (PWID) in Australia has been increasing, and establishing how supervised injecting facilities (SIFs) might best support clients into housing is an important goal. The purpose of this paper is to update knowledge regarding the accommodation status of MSIC clients, thereby supporting a better understanding of the complex needs of these clients. Design/methodology/approach Client accommodation status at MSIC registration (first visit) and in a brief survey (conducted in May 2016) were compared; unstable accommodation was defined as rough sleeping, couch surfing, hostel, boarding house or crisis accommodation. The bivariate logistic regression analysis was used to explore the association between socio-demographics and accommodation status at both time points; a paired t-test was used to compare the visit records for those who reported stable and unstable accommodation in May 2016. Findings Of 232 clients who were present at MSIC during the week the Brief Survey was conducted, 107 participated. Most were male (79 per cent) with a mean age of 41.4 years. A total of 64 (60 per cent) identified as living in unstable accommodation; having increased from 40 per cent at the time of registration (first visit). There were significant positive associations between unstable accommodation status and unemployment, imprisonment and history of overdose, all measured at registration. In May 2016, unstable accommodation status was significantly associated with age of first injection and with unemployment status (as measured at registration); those living in unstable accommodation in May 2016 had a lower number of visits, a lower number of referrals to health and social services and a lower number of overdoses at MSIC than those living in a stable accommodation. Originality/value The rates of unstable accommodation among MSIC clients have been increasing. These findings highlight the importance of SIFs and drug consumption rooms as venue to address the essential needs of PWID, such as housing. The window of opportunity to support PWID who experience housing instability seems to be narrower than for those who live in stable accommodation.