Loading…

Rights of access to healthcare for undocumented migrants: understanding the Italian and British national health systems

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyse the levels of access to healthcare available to undocumented migrants in the Italian and British health systems through a comparative analysis of health policies for this population in these two national health systems. Design/methodology/approach It b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of human rights in healthcare 2018-08, Vol.11 (4), p.232-243
Main Authors: da Costa Leite Borges, Danielle, Guidi, Caterina Francesca
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-d81d6c65efd12a2243679de47a44c2a43c1c3c83a44b36d18b0fa4fd6a56c2543
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-d81d6c65efd12a2243679de47a44c2a43c1c3c83a44b36d18b0fa4fd6a56c2543
container_end_page 243
container_issue 4
container_start_page 232
container_title International journal of human rights in healthcare
container_volume 11
creator da Costa Leite Borges, Danielle
Guidi, Caterina Francesca
description Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyse the levels of access to healthcare available to undocumented migrants in the Italian and British health systems through a comparative analysis of health policies for this population in these two national health systems. Design/methodology/approach It builds on textual and legal analysis to explore the different meanings that the principle of universal access to healthcare might have according to literature and legal documents in the field, especially those from the human rights domain. Then, the concept of universal access, in theory, is contrasted with actual health policies in each of the selected countries to establish its meaning in practice and according to the social context. The analysis relies on policy papers, data on health expenditure, legal statutes and administrative regulations and is informed by one research question: What background conditions better explain more universal and comprehensive health systems for undocumented migrants? Findings By answering this research question the paper concludes that the Italian health system is more comprehensive than the British health system insofar it guarantees access free of charge to different levels of care, including primary, emergency, preventive and maternity care, while the rule in the British health system is the recovering of charges for the provision of services, with few exceptions. One possible legal explanation for the differences in access between Italy and UK is the fact that the right to health is not recognised as a fundamental constitutional right in the latter as it is in the former. Originality/value The paper contributes to ongoing debates on Universal Health Coverage and migration, and dialogues with recent discussions on social justice and welfare state typologies.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/IJHRH-01-2018-0006
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1108_IJHRH_01_2018_0006</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2089857054</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-d81d6c65efd12a2243679de47a44c2a43c1c3c83a44b36d18b0fa4fd6a56c2543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkVtLAzEQhYMoWGr_gE8Bn1cz2VvWNy1qKwWh6HOYJtluyl5qkkX89-62RRB8mpnDOcPwDSHXwG4BmLhbvi7Wi4hBxBmIiDGWnZEJZ2kWJQWw89-e8Usy8343OCAXvBAwIV9ru62Cp11JUSnjPQ0drQzWoVLoDC07R_tWd6pvTBuMpo3dOmyDvx9l43zAVtt2S0Nl6DJgbbGlg0QfnQ3WV7TFYLsW69NS6r99MI2_Ihcl1t7MTnVKPp6f3ueLaPX2spw_rCIVQx4iLUBnKktNqYEj50mc5YU2SY5JojgmsQIVKxEP4ybONIgNKzEpdYZppniaxFNyc9y7d91nb3yQu653wz1eciYKkebs4OJHl3Kd986Ucu9sg-5bApMjY3lgLBnIkbEcGQ8hOIZMYxzW-v_Mn7_EP7GXf58</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2089857054</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rights of access to healthcare for undocumented migrants: understanding the Italian and British national health systems</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list)</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>da Costa Leite Borges, Danielle ; Guidi, Caterina Francesca</creator><creatorcontrib>da Costa Leite Borges, Danielle ; Guidi, Caterina Francesca</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyse the levels of access to healthcare available to undocumented migrants in the Italian and British health systems through a comparative analysis of health policies for this population in these two national health systems. Design/methodology/approach It builds on textual and legal analysis to explore the different meanings that the principle of universal access to healthcare might have according to literature and legal documents in the field, especially those from the human rights domain. Then, the concept of universal access, in theory, is contrasted with actual health policies in each of the selected countries to establish its meaning in practice and according to the social context. The analysis relies on policy papers, data on health expenditure, legal statutes and administrative regulations and is informed by one research question: What background conditions better explain more universal and comprehensive health systems for undocumented migrants? Findings By answering this research question the paper concludes that the Italian health system is more comprehensive than the British health system insofar it guarantees access free of charge to different levels of care, including primary, emergency, preventive and maternity care, while the rule in the British health system is the recovering of charges for the provision of services, with few exceptions. One possible legal explanation for the differences in access between Italy and UK is the fact that the right to health is not recognised as a fundamental constitutional right in the latter as it is in the former. Originality/value The paper contributes to ongoing debates on Universal Health Coverage and migration, and dialogues with recent discussions on social justice and welfare state typologies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2056-4902</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2056-4910</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/IJHRH-01-2018-0006</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Access ; Administrative law ; Comparative analysis ; Constitutional rights ; Documents ; Emergency medical care ; Exceptions ; Fees &amp; charges ; Health care ; Health care access ; Health care expenditures ; Health policy ; Health services ; Human rights ; Immigration ; Judicial reviews ; Legal documents ; Meaning ; Migrants ; Migration ; Noncitizens ; Population policy ; Prevention ; Preventive medicine ; Primary care ; Regulation ; Rules ; Social environment ; Social justice ; Statutes ; Undocumented immigrants ; Welfare state</subject><ispartof>International journal of human rights in healthcare, 2018-08, Vol.11 (4), p.232-243</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-d81d6c65efd12a2243679de47a44c2a43c1c3c83a44b36d18b0fa4fd6a56c2543</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-d81d6c65efd12a2243679de47a44c2a43c1c3c83a44b36d18b0fa4fd6a56c2543</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1009-4819</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2089857054/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2089857054?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,12827,21375,27847,27905,27906,30980,33592,43714,73970</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>da Costa Leite Borges, Danielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guidi, Caterina Francesca</creatorcontrib><title>Rights of access to healthcare for undocumented migrants: understanding the Italian and British national health systems</title><title>International journal of human rights in healthcare</title><description>Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyse the levels of access to healthcare available to undocumented migrants in the Italian and British health systems through a comparative analysis of health policies for this population in these two national health systems. Design/methodology/approach It builds on textual and legal analysis to explore the different meanings that the principle of universal access to healthcare might have according to literature and legal documents in the field, especially those from the human rights domain. Then, the concept of universal access, in theory, is contrasted with actual health policies in each of the selected countries to establish its meaning in practice and according to the social context. The analysis relies on policy papers, data on health expenditure, legal statutes and administrative regulations and is informed by one research question: What background conditions better explain more universal and comprehensive health systems for undocumented migrants? Findings By answering this research question the paper concludes that the Italian health system is more comprehensive than the British health system insofar it guarantees access free of charge to different levels of care, including primary, emergency, preventive and maternity care, while the rule in the British health system is the recovering of charges for the provision of services, with few exceptions. One possible legal explanation for the differences in access between Italy and UK is the fact that the right to health is not recognised as a fundamental constitutional right in the latter as it is in the former. Originality/value The paper contributes to ongoing debates on Universal Health Coverage and migration, and dialogues with recent discussions on social justice and welfare state typologies.</description><subject>Access</subject><subject>Administrative law</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Constitutional rights</subject><subject>Documents</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Exceptions</subject><subject>Fees &amp; charges</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health care access</subject><subject>Health care expenditures</subject><subject>Health policy</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Human rights</subject><subject>Immigration</subject><subject>Judicial reviews</subject><subject>Legal documents</subject><subject>Meaning</subject><subject>Migrants</subject><subject>Migration</subject><subject>Noncitizens</subject><subject>Population policy</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Preventive medicine</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Rules</subject><subject>Social environment</subject><subject>Social justice</subject><subject>Statutes</subject><subject>Undocumented immigrants</subject><subject>Welfare state</subject><issn>2056-4902</issn><issn>2056-4910</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><recordid>eNptkVtLAzEQhYMoWGr_gE8Bn1cz2VvWNy1qKwWh6HOYJtluyl5qkkX89-62RRB8mpnDOcPwDSHXwG4BmLhbvi7Wi4hBxBmIiDGWnZEJZ2kWJQWw89-e8Usy8343OCAXvBAwIV9ru62Cp11JUSnjPQ0drQzWoVLoDC07R_tWd6pvTBuMpo3dOmyDvx9l43zAVtt2S0Nl6DJgbbGlg0QfnQ3WV7TFYLsW69NS6r99MI2_Ihcl1t7MTnVKPp6f3ueLaPX2spw_rCIVQx4iLUBnKktNqYEj50mc5YU2SY5JojgmsQIVKxEP4ybONIgNKzEpdYZppniaxFNyc9y7d91nb3yQu653wz1eciYKkebs4OJHl3Kd986Ucu9sg-5bApMjY3lgLBnIkbEcGQ8hOIZMYxzW-v_Mn7_EP7GXf58</recordid><startdate>20180820</startdate><enddate>20180820</enddate><creator>da Costa Leite Borges, Danielle</creator><creator>Guidi, Caterina Francesca</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>LD-</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>QXPDG</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1009-4819</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180820</creationdate><title>Rights of access to healthcare for undocumented migrants: understanding the Italian and British national health systems</title><author>da Costa Leite Borges, Danielle ; Guidi, Caterina Francesca</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-d81d6c65efd12a2243679de47a44c2a43c1c3c83a44b36d18b0fa4fd6a56c2543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Access</topic><topic>Administrative law</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Constitutional rights</topic><topic>Documents</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Exceptions</topic><topic>Fees &amp; charges</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health care access</topic><topic>Health care expenditures</topic><topic>Health policy</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Human rights</topic><topic>Immigration</topic><topic>Judicial reviews</topic><topic>Legal documents</topic><topic>Meaning</topic><topic>Migrants</topic><topic>Migration</topic><topic>Noncitizens</topic><topic>Population policy</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Preventive medicine</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Rules</topic><topic>Social environment</topic><topic>Social justice</topic><topic>Statutes</topic><topic>Undocumented immigrants</topic><topic>Welfare state</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>da Costa Leite Borges, Danielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guidi, Caterina Francesca</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Ethnic NewsWatch</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Diversity Collection</collection><jtitle>International journal of human rights in healthcare</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>da Costa Leite Borges, Danielle</au><au>Guidi, Caterina Francesca</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rights of access to healthcare for undocumented migrants: understanding the Italian and British national health systems</atitle><jtitle>International journal of human rights in healthcare</jtitle><date>2018-08-20</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>232</spage><epage>243</epage><pages>232-243</pages><issn>2056-4902</issn><eissn>2056-4910</eissn><abstract>Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyse the levels of access to healthcare available to undocumented migrants in the Italian and British health systems through a comparative analysis of health policies for this population in these two national health systems. Design/methodology/approach It builds on textual and legal analysis to explore the different meanings that the principle of universal access to healthcare might have according to literature and legal documents in the field, especially those from the human rights domain. Then, the concept of universal access, in theory, is contrasted with actual health policies in each of the selected countries to establish its meaning in practice and according to the social context. The analysis relies on policy papers, data on health expenditure, legal statutes and administrative regulations and is informed by one research question: What background conditions better explain more universal and comprehensive health systems for undocumented migrants? Findings By answering this research question the paper concludes that the Italian health system is more comprehensive than the British health system insofar it guarantees access free of charge to different levels of care, including primary, emergency, preventive and maternity care, while the rule in the British health system is the recovering of charges for the provision of services, with few exceptions. One possible legal explanation for the differences in access between Italy and UK is the fact that the right to health is not recognised as a fundamental constitutional right in the latter as it is in the former. Originality/value The paper contributes to ongoing debates on Universal Health Coverage and migration, and dialogues with recent discussions on social justice and welfare state typologies.</abstract><cop>Bingley</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/IJHRH-01-2018-0006</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1009-4819</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2056-4902
ispartof International journal of human rights in healthcare, 2018-08, Vol.11 (4), p.232-243
issn 2056-4902
2056-4910
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1108_IJHRH_01_2018_0006
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Social Science Premium Collection; Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list); PAIS Index
subjects Access
Administrative law
Comparative analysis
Constitutional rights
Documents
Emergency medical care
Exceptions
Fees & charges
Health care
Health care access
Health care expenditures
Health policy
Health services
Human rights
Immigration
Judicial reviews
Legal documents
Meaning
Migrants
Migration
Noncitizens
Population policy
Prevention
Preventive medicine
Primary care
Regulation
Rules
Social environment
Social justice
Statutes
Undocumented immigrants
Welfare state
title Rights of access to healthcare for undocumented migrants: understanding the Italian and British national health systems
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T17%3A13%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rights%20of%20access%20to%20healthcare%20for%20undocumented%20migrants:%20understanding%20the%20Italian%20and%20British%20national%20health%20systems&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20human%20rights%20in%20healthcare&rft.au=da%20Costa%20Leite%20Borges,%20Danielle&rft.date=2018-08-20&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=232&rft.epage=243&rft.pages=232-243&rft.issn=2056-4902&rft.eissn=2056-4910&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/IJHRH-01-2018-0006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2089857054%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-d81d6c65efd12a2243679de47a44c2a43c1c3c83a44b36d18b0fa4fd6a56c2543%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2089857054&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true