Loading…
Rights of access to healthcare for undocumented migrants: understanding the Italian and British national health systems
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyse the levels of access to healthcare available to undocumented migrants in the Italian and British health systems through a comparative analysis of health policies for this population in these two national health systems. Design/methodology/approach It b...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of human rights in healthcare 2018-08, Vol.11 (4), p.232-243 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-d81d6c65efd12a2243679de47a44c2a43c1c3c83a44b36d18b0fa4fd6a56c2543 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-d81d6c65efd12a2243679de47a44c2a43c1c3c83a44b36d18b0fa4fd6a56c2543 |
container_end_page | 243 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 232 |
container_title | International journal of human rights in healthcare |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | da Costa Leite Borges, Danielle Guidi, Caterina Francesca |
description | Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to analyse the levels of access to healthcare available to undocumented migrants in the Italian and British health systems through a comparative analysis of health policies for this population in these two national health systems.
Design/methodology/approach
It builds on textual and legal analysis to explore the different meanings that the principle of universal access to healthcare might have according to literature and legal documents in the field, especially those from the human rights domain. Then, the concept of universal access, in theory, is contrasted with actual health policies in each of the selected countries to establish its meaning in practice and according to the social context. The analysis relies on policy papers, data on health expenditure, legal statutes and administrative regulations and is informed by one research question: What background conditions better explain more universal and comprehensive health systems for undocumented migrants?
Findings
By answering this research question the paper concludes that the Italian health system is more comprehensive than the British health system insofar it guarantees access free of charge to different levels of care, including primary, emergency, preventive and maternity care, while the rule in the British health system is the recovering of charges for the provision of services, with few exceptions. One possible legal explanation for the differences in access between Italy and UK is the fact that the right to health is not recognised as a fundamental constitutional right in the latter as it is in the former.
Originality/value
The paper contributes to ongoing debates on Universal Health Coverage and migration, and dialogues with recent discussions on social justice and welfare state typologies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/IJHRH-01-2018-0006 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1108_IJHRH_01_2018_0006</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2089857054</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-d81d6c65efd12a2243679de47a44c2a43c1c3c83a44b36d18b0fa4fd6a56c2543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkVtLAzEQhYMoWGr_gE8Bn1cz2VvWNy1qKwWh6HOYJtluyl5qkkX89-62RRB8mpnDOcPwDSHXwG4BmLhbvi7Wi4hBxBmIiDGWnZEJZ2kWJQWw89-e8Usy8343OCAXvBAwIV9ru62Cp11JUSnjPQ0drQzWoVLoDC07R_tWd6pvTBuMpo3dOmyDvx9l43zAVtt2S0Nl6DJgbbGlg0QfnQ3WV7TFYLsW69NS6r99MI2_Ihcl1t7MTnVKPp6f3ueLaPX2spw_rCIVQx4iLUBnKktNqYEj50mc5YU2SY5JojgmsQIVKxEP4ybONIgNKzEpdYZppniaxFNyc9y7d91nb3yQu653wz1eciYKkebs4OJHl3Kd986Ucu9sg-5bApMjY3lgLBnIkbEcGQ8hOIZMYxzW-v_Mn7_EP7GXf58</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2089857054</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rights of access to healthcare for undocumented migrants: understanding the Italian and British national health systems</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list)</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>da Costa Leite Borges, Danielle ; Guidi, Caterina Francesca</creator><creatorcontrib>da Costa Leite Borges, Danielle ; Guidi, Caterina Francesca</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to analyse the levels of access to healthcare available to undocumented migrants in the Italian and British health systems through a comparative analysis of health policies for this population in these two national health systems.
Design/methodology/approach
It builds on textual and legal analysis to explore the different meanings that the principle of universal access to healthcare might have according to literature and legal documents in the field, especially those from the human rights domain. Then, the concept of universal access, in theory, is contrasted with actual health policies in each of the selected countries to establish its meaning in practice and according to the social context. The analysis relies on policy papers, data on health expenditure, legal statutes and administrative regulations and is informed by one research question: What background conditions better explain more universal and comprehensive health systems for undocumented migrants?
Findings
By answering this research question the paper concludes that the Italian health system is more comprehensive than the British health system insofar it guarantees access free of charge to different levels of care, including primary, emergency, preventive and maternity care, while the rule in the British health system is the recovering of charges for the provision of services, with few exceptions. One possible legal explanation for the differences in access between Italy and UK is the fact that the right to health is not recognised as a fundamental constitutional right in the latter as it is in the former.
Originality/value
The paper contributes to ongoing debates on Universal Health Coverage and migration, and dialogues with recent discussions on social justice and welfare state typologies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2056-4902</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2056-4910</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/IJHRH-01-2018-0006</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Access ; Administrative law ; Comparative analysis ; Constitutional rights ; Documents ; Emergency medical care ; Exceptions ; Fees & charges ; Health care ; Health care access ; Health care expenditures ; Health policy ; Health services ; Human rights ; Immigration ; Judicial reviews ; Legal documents ; Meaning ; Migrants ; Migration ; Noncitizens ; Population policy ; Prevention ; Preventive medicine ; Primary care ; Regulation ; Rules ; Social environment ; Social justice ; Statutes ; Undocumented immigrants ; Welfare state</subject><ispartof>International journal of human rights in healthcare, 2018-08, Vol.11 (4), p.232-243</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-d81d6c65efd12a2243679de47a44c2a43c1c3c83a44b36d18b0fa4fd6a56c2543</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-d81d6c65efd12a2243679de47a44c2a43c1c3c83a44b36d18b0fa4fd6a56c2543</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1009-4819</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2089857054/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2089857054?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,12827,21375,27847,27905,27906,30980,33592,43714,73970</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>da Costa Leite Borges, Danielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guidi, Caterina Francesca</creatorcontrib><title>Rights of access to healthcare for undocumented migrants: understanding the Italian and British national health systems</title><title>International journal of human rights in healthcare</title><description>Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to analyse the levels of access to healthcare available to undocumented migrants in the Italian and British health systems through a comparative analysis of health policies for this population in these two national health systems.
Design/methodology/approach
It builds on textual and legal analysis to explore the different meanings that the principle of universal access to healthcare might have according to literature and legal documents in the field, especially those from the human rights domain. Then, the concept of universal access, in theory, is contrasted with actual health policies in each of the selected countries to establish its meaning in practice and according to the social context. The analysis relies on policy papers, data on health expenditure, legal statutes and administrative regulations and is informed by one research question: What background conditions better explain more universal and comprehensive health systems for undocumented migrants?
Findings
By answering this research question the paper concludes that the Italian health system is more comprehensive than the British health system insofar it guarantees access free of charge to different levels of care, including primary, emergency, preventive and maternity care, while the rule in the British health system is the recovering of charges for the provision of services, with few exceptions. One possible legal explanation for the differences in access between Italy and UK is the fact that the right to health is not recognised as a fundamental constitutional right in the latter as it is in the former.
Originality/value
The paper contributes to ongoing debates on Universal Health Coverage and migration, and dialogues with recent discussions on social justice and welfare state typologies.</description><subject>Access</subject><subject>Administrative law</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Constitutional rights</subject><subject>Documents</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Exceptions</subject><subject>Fees & charges</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health care access</subject><subject>Health care expenditures</subject><subject>Health policy</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Human rights</subject><subject>Immigration</subject><subject>Judicial reviews</subject><subject>Legal documents</subject><subject>Meaning</subject><subject>Migrants</subject><subject>Migration</subject><subject>Noncitizens</subject><subject>Population policy</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Preventive medicine</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Rules</subject><subject>Social environment</subject><subject>Social justice</subject><subject>Statutes</subject><subject>Undocumented immigrants</subject><subject>Welfare state</subject><issn>2056-4902</issn><issn>2056-4910</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><recordid>eNptkVtLAzEQhYMoWGr_gE8Bn1cz2VvWNy1qKwWh6HOYJtluyl5qkkX89-62RRB8mpnDOcPwDSHXwG4BmLhbvi7Wi4hBxBmIiDGWnZEJZ2kWJQWw89-e8Usy8343OCAXvBAwIV9ru62Cp11JUSnjPQ0drQzWoVLoDC07R_tWd6pvTBuMpo3dOmyDvx9l43zAVtt2S0Nl6DJgbbGlg0QfnQ3WV7TFYLsW69NS6r99MI2_Ihcl1t7MTnVKPp6f3ueLaPX2spw_rCIVQx4iLUBnKktNqYEj50mc5YU2SY5JojgmsQIVKxEP4ybONIgNKzEpdYZppniaxFNyc9y7d91nb3yQu653wz1eciYKkebs4OJHl3Kd986Ucu9sg-5bApMjY3lgLBnIkbEcGQ8hOIZMYxzW-v_Mn7_EP7GXf58</recordid><startdate>20180820</startdate><enddate>20180820</enddate><creator>da Costa Leite Borges, Danielle</creator><creator>Guidi, Caterina Francesca</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>LD-</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>QXPDG</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1009-4819</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180820</creationdate><title>Rights of access to healthcare for undocumented migrants: understanding the Italian and British national health systems</title><author>da Costa Leite Borges, Danielle ; Guidi, Caterina Francesca</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-d81d6c65efd12a2243679de47a44c2a43c1c3c83a44b36d18b0fa4fd6a56c2543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Access</topic><topic>Administrative law</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Constitutional rights</topic><topic>Documents</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Exceptions</topic><topic>Fees & charges</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health care access</topic><topic>Health care expenditures</topic><topic>Health policy</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Human rights</topic><topic>Immigration</topic><topic>Judicial reviews</topic><topic>Legal documents</topic><topic>Meaning</topic><topic>Migrants</topic><topic>Migration</topic><topic>Noncitizens</topic><topic>Population policy</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Preventive medicine</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Rules</topic><topic>Social environment</topic><topic>Social justice</topic><topic>Statutes</topic><topic>Undocumented immigrants</topic><topic>Welfare state</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>da Costa Leite Borges, Danielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guidi, Caterina Francesca</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Ethnic NewsWatch</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Diversity Collection</collection><jtitle>International journal of human rights in healthcare</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>da Costa Leite Borges, Danielle</au><au>Guidi, Caterina Francesca</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rights of access to healthcare for undocumented migrants: understanding the Italian and British national health systems</atitle><jtitle>International journal of human rights in healthcare</jtitle><date>2018-08-20</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>232</spage><epage>243</epage><pages>232-243</pages><issn>2056-4902</issn><eissn>2056-4910</eissn><abstract>Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to analyse the levels of access to healthcare available to undocumented migrants in the Italian and British health systems through a comparative analysis of health policies for this population in these two national health systems.
Design/methodology/approach
It builds on textual and legal analysis to explore the different meanings that the principle of universal access to healthcare might have according to literature and legal documents in the field, especially those from the human rights domain. Then, the concept of universal access, in theory, is contrasted with actual health policies in each of the selected countries to establish its meaning in practice and according to the social context. The analysis relies on policy papers, data on health expenditure, legal statutes and administrative regulations and is informed by one research question: What background conditions better explain more universal and comprehensive health systems for undocumented migrants?
Findings
By answering this research question the paper concludes that the Italian health system is more comprehensive than the British health system insofar it guarantees access free of charge to different levels of care, including primary, emergency, preventive and maternity care, while the rule in the British health system is the recovering of charges for the provision of services, with few exceptions. One possible legal explanation for the differences in access between Italy and UK is the fact that the right to health is not recognised as a fundamental constitutional right in the latter as it is in the former.
Originality/value
The paper contributes to ongoing debates on Universal Health Coverage and migration, and dialogues with recent discussions on social justice and welfare state typologies.</abstract><cop>Bingley</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/IJHRH-01-2018-0006</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1009-4819</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2056-4902 |
ispartof | International journal of human rights in healthcare, 2018-08, Vol.11 (4), p.232-243 |
issn | 2056-4902 2056-4910 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1108_IJHRH_01_2018_0006 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Social Science Premium Collection; Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list); PAIS Index |
subjects | Access Administrative law Comparative analysis Constitutional rights Documents Emergency medical care Exceptions Fees & charges Health care Health care access Health care expenditures Health policy Health services Human rights Immigration Judicial reviews Legal documents Meaning Migrants Migration Noncitizens Population policy Prevention Preventive medicine Primary care Regulation Rules Social environment Social justice Statutes Undocumented immigrants Welfare state |
title | Rights of access to healthcare for undocumented migrants: understanding the Italian and British national health systems |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T17%3A13%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rights%20of%20access%20to%20healthcare%20for%20undocumented%20migrants:%20understanding%20the%20Italian%20and%20British%20national%20health%20systems&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20human%20rights%20in%20healthcare&rft.au=da%20Costa%20Leite%20Borges,%20Danielle&rft.date=2018-08-20&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=232&rft.epage=243&rft.pages=232-243&rft.issn=2056-4902&rft.eissn=2056-4910&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/IJHRH-01-2018-0006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2089857054%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-d81d6c65efd12a2243679de47a44c2a43c1c3c83a44b36d18b0fa4fd6a56c2543%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2089857054&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |