Loading…

US Decennial Census return rates: the role of social capital

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to assess whether additional information about a community’s level of social capital can help to better predict a return rate from that area, in order to better target resources to improve mail-in responses. Design/methodology/approach Two-sample two-stage least...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of social economics 2019-05, Vol.46 (5), p.648-668
Main Author: Hotchkiss, Julie L
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-254be25fc11c08c5dc0c6462d671c9b64e02c7d0e641dc5a506486a4f2c36a573
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-254be25fc11c08c5dc0c6462d671c9b64e02c7d0e641dc5a506486a4f2c36a573
container_end_page 668
container_issue 5
container_start_page 648
container_title International journal of social economics
container_volume 46
creator Hotchkiss, Julie L
description Purpose The purpose of this paper is to assess whether additional information about a community’s level of social capital can help to better predict a return rate from that area, in order to better target resources to improve mail-in responses. Design/methodology/approach Two-sample two-stage least squares is used to apply determinants of six different measures of social capital from the Social Capital Community Benchmark Survey to observations in the Decennial Census (DC) which are then aggregated to the census tract level. The probability of a census tract having a high level of each social capital measure is estimated. Multivariate regression is used to identify the importance of high community social capital for predicting census mail-in return rates. Findings The analysis reveals that a higher level of trust contributes the most to increasing return rates and a high level of political activism decreases return rates. Additionally, higher levels of sociability contribute negatively to DC return rates, which is consistent with sociability being linked to a more insular (i.e. family and friends) focus. Practical implications While contributing statistically significantly to the predictability of census tract response rates, the cost of acquiring measures of social capital for each census tract may not to be viewed worth the gain in predictive power. Social implications Higher levels of trust contribute positively to survey participation, suggesting that any social, economic or political environment that diminishes trust will undercut civic engagement. Political activism and (insular) sociability decrease participation. Originality/value This paper combines non-public and public data to obtain measures of social capital along more dimensions than are typically studied, and finds that not all types of social capital are related to feelings of social integration in the same way.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/IJSE-07-2018-0377
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1108_IJSE_07_2018_0377</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2217424441</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-254be25fc11c08c5dc0c6462d671c9b64e02c7d0e641dc5a506486a4f2c36a573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkD1PwzAURS0EEqXwA9gsMRueHX8VsaBSoKgSQ-lsuS8volWaFDsd-PckKgsS01vOve_qMHYt4VZK8Hfzt-VMgBMKpBdQOHfCRtIZL6yT6pSNoAArvJoU5-wi5y0AGO9hxB5WS_5ESE2ziTWfUpMPmSfqDqnhKXaU73n3STy1NfG24rnFgcO433SxvmRnVawzXf3eMVs9zz6mr2Lx_jKfPi4EFtp1Qhm9JmUqlBLBoykR0Gqryn4bTtZWEyh0JZDVskQTDVjtbdSVwsJG44oxuzn27lP7daDchW3bD-xfBqWk00prLXtKHilMbc6JqrBPm11M30FCGCSFQVIAFwZJYZDUZ-CYoR2lWJf_Rv54LX4ABkJmpg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2217424441</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>US Decennial Census return rates: the role of social capital</title><source>Criminology Collection</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list)</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Hotchkiss, Julie L</creator><creatorcontrib>Hotchkiss, Julie L</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose The purpose of this paper is to assess whether additional information about a community’s level of social capital can help to better predict a return rate from that area, in order to better target resources to improve mail-in responses. Design/methodology/approach Two-sample two-stage least squares is used to apply determinants of six different measures of social capital from the Social Capital Community Benchmark Survey to observations in the Decennial Census (DC) which are then aggregated to the census tract level. The probability of a census tract having a high level of each social capital measure is estimated. Multivariate regression is used to identify the importance of high community social capital for predicting census mail-in return rates. Findings The analysis reveals that a higher level of trust contributes the most to increasing return rates and a high level of political activism decreases return rates. Additionally, higher levels of sociability contribute negatively to DC return rates, which is consistent with sociability being linked to a more insular (i.e. family and friends) focus. Practical implications While contributing statistically significantly to the predictability of census tract response rates, the cost of acquiring measures of social capital for each census tract may not to be viewed worth the gain in predictive power. Social implications Higher levels of trust contribute positively to survey participation, suggesting that any social, economic or political environment that diminishes trust will undercut civic engagement. Political activism and (insular) sociability decrease participation. Originality/value This paper combines non-public and public data to obtain measures of social capital along more dimensions than are typically studied, and finds that not all types of social capital are related to feelings of social integration in the same way.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0306-8293</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-6712</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/IJSE-07-2018-0377</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Activism ; Census of Population ; Censuses ; Citizen participation ; Community ; Per capita ; Political activism ; Political culture ; Political participation ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Population ; Power ; Probability ; Response rates ; Sociability ; Social capital ; Social integration ; Social participation ; Social power ; Trust</subject><ispartof>International journal of social economics, 2019-05, Vol.46 (5), p.648-668</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-254be25fc11c08c5dc0c6462d671c9b64e02c7d0e641dc5a506486a4f2c36a573</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-254be25fc11c08c5dc0c6462d671c9b64e02c7d0e641dc5a506486a4f2c36a573</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0955-2488</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2217424441?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,11667,12825,12826,21355,21373,21374,27321,27901,27902,30976,33200,33588,33746,33751,34507,36037,43709,43790,44091,44339</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hotchkiss, Julie L</creatorcontrib><title>US Decennial Census return rates: the role of social capital</title><title>International journal of social economics</title><description>Purpose The purpose of this paper is to assess whether additional information about a community’s level of social capital can help to better predict a return rate from that area, in order to better target resources to improve mail-in responses. Design/methodology/approach Two-sample two-stage least squares is used to apply determinants of six different measures of social capital from the Social Capital Community Benchmark Survey to observations in the Decennial Census (DC) which are then aggregated to the census tract level. The probability of a census tract having a high level of each social capital measure is estimated. Multivariate regression is used to identify the importance of high community social capital for predicting census mail-in return rates. Findings The analysis reveals that a higher level of trust contributes the most to increasing return rates and a high level of political activism decreases return rates. Additionally, higher levels of sociability contribute negatively to DC return rates, which is consistent with sociability being linked to a more insular (i.e. family and friends) focus. Practical implications While contributing statistically significantly to the predictability of census tract response rates, the cost of acquiring measures of social capital for each census tract may not to be viewed worth the gain in predictive power. Social implications Higher levels of trust contribute positively to survey participation, suggesting that any social, economic or political environment that diminishes trust will undercut civic engagement. Political activism and (insular) sociability decrease participation. Originality/value This paper combines non-public and public data to obtain measures of social capital along more dimensions than are typically studied, and finds that not all types of social capital are related to feelings of social integration in the same way.</description><subject>Activism</subject><subject>Census of Population</subject><subject>Censuses</subject><subject>Citizen participation</subject><subject>Community</subject><subject>Per capita</subject><subject>Political activism</subject><subject>Political culture</subject><subject>Political participation</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Response rates</subject><subject>Sociability</subject><subject>Social capital</subject><subject>Social integration</subject><subject>Social participation</subject><subject>Social power</subject><subject>Trust</subject><issn>0306-8293</issn><issn>1758-6712</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>BGRYB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M0O</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><recordid>eNptkD1PwzAURS0EEqXwA9gsMRueHX8VsaBSoKgSQ-lsuS8volWaFDsd-PckKgsS01vOve_qMHYt4VZK8Hfzt-VMgBMKpBdQOHfCRtIZL6yT6pSNoAArvJoU5-wi5y0AGO9hxB5WS_5ESE2ziTWfUpMPmSfqDqnhKXaU73n3STy1NfG24rnFgcO433SxvmRnVawzXf3eMVs9zz6mr2Lx_jKfPi4EFtp1Qhm9JmUqlBLBoykR0Gqryn4bTtZWEyh0JZDVskQTDVjtbdSVwsJG44oxuzn27lP7daDchW3bD-xfBqWk00prLXtKHilMbc6JqrBPm11M30FCGCSFQVIAFwZJYZDUZ-CYoR2lWJf_Rv54LX4ABkJmpg</recordid><startdate>20190501</startdate><enddate>20190501</enddate><creator>Hotchkiss, Julie L</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0955-2488</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190501</creationdate><title>US Decennial Census return rates: the role of social capital</title><author>Hotchkiss, Julie L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-254be25fc11c08c5dc0c6462d671c9b64e02c7d0e641dc5a506486a4f2c36a573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Activism</topic><topic>Census of Population</topic><topic>Censuses</topic><topic>Citizen participation</topic><topic>Community</topic><topic>Per capita</topic><topic>Political activism</topic><topic>Political culture</topic><topic>Political participation</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Response rates</topic><topic>Sociability</topic><topic>Social capital</topic><topic>Social integration</topic><topic>Social participation</topic><topic>Social power</topic><topic>Trust</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hotchkiss, Julie L</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>International journal of social economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hotchkiss, Julie L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>US Decennial Census return rates: the role of social capital</atitle><jtitle>International journal of social economics</jtitle><date>2019-05-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>648</spage><epage>668</epage><pages>648-668</pages><issn>0306-8293</issn><eissn>1758-6712</eissn><abstract>Purpose The purpose of this paper is to assess whether additional information about a community’s level of social capital can help to better predict a return rate from that area, in order to better target resources to improve mail-in responses. Design/methodology/approach Two-sample two-stage least squares is used to apply determinants of six different measures of social capital from the Social Capital Community Benchmark Survey to observations in the Decennial Census (DC) which are then aggregated to the census tract level. The probability of a census tract having a high level of each social capital measure is estimated. Multivariate regression is used to identify the importance of high community social capital for predicting census mail-in return rates. Findings The analysis reveals that a higher level of trust contributes the most to increasing return rates and a high level of political activism decreases return rates. Additionally, higher levels of sociability contribute negatively to DC return rates, which is consistent with sociability being linked to a more insular (i.e. family and friends) focus. Practical implications While contributing statistically significantly to the predictability of census tract response rates, the cost of acquiring measures of social capital for each census tract may not to be viewed worth the gain in predictive power. Social implications Higher levels of trust contribute positively to survey participation, suggesting that any social, economic or political environment that diminishes trust will undercut civic engagement. Political activism and (insular) sociability decrease participation. Originality/value This paper combines non-public and public data to obtain measures of social capital along more dimensions than are typically studied, and finds that not all types of social capital are related to feelings of social integration in the same way.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/IJSE-07-2018-0377</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0955-2488</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0306-8293
ispartof International journal of social economics, 2019-05, Vol.46 (5), p.648-668
issn 0306-8293
1758-6712
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1108_IJSE_07_2018_0377
source Criminology Collection; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Social Science Premium Collection; ABI/INFORM Global; Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list); Sociology Collection; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Activism
Census of Population
Censuses
Citizen participation
Community
Per capita
Political activism
Political culture
Political participation
Polls & surveys
Population
Power
Probability
Response rates
Sociability
Social capital
Social integration
Social participation
Social power
Trust
title US Decennial Census return rates: the role of social capital
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T15%3A43%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=US%20Decennial%20Census%20return%20rates:%20the%20role%20of%20social%20capital&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20social%20economics&rft.au=Hotchkiss,%20Julie%20L&rft.date=2019-05-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=648&rft.epage=668&rft.pages=648-668&rft.issn=0306-8293&rft.eissn=1758-6712&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/IJSE-07-2018-0377&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2217424441%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-254be25fc11c08c5dc0c6462d671c9b64e02c7d0e641dc5a506486a4f2c36a573%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2217424441&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true