Loading…
Motion planning for humanoid robot dynamically stepping over consecutive large obstacles
Purpose – Humanoid robots should have the ability of walking in complex environment and overcoming large obstacles in rescue mission. Previous research mainly discusses the problem of humanoid robots stepping over or on/off one obstacle statically or dynamically. As an extreme case, this paper aims...
Saved in:
Published in: | Industrial robot 2016-03, Vol.43 (2), p.204-220 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-263cfacab875038c6bce768a6fc148770a48ffc2a23fb09a5966b08b2d31933e3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-263cfacab875038c6bce768a6fc148770a48ffc2a23fb09a5966b08b2d31933e3 |
container_end_page | 220 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 204 |
container_title | Industrial robot |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Guo, Fayong Mei, Tao Luo, Minzhou Ceccarelli, Marco Zhao, Ziyi Li, Tao Zhao, Jianghai |
description | Purpose
– Humanoid robots should have the ability of walking in complex environment and overcoming large obstacles in rescue mission. Previous research mainly discusses the problem of humanoid robots stepping over or on/off one obstacle statically or dynamically. As an extreme case, this paper aims to demonstrate how the robots can step over two large obstacles continuously.
Design/methodology/approach
– The robot model uses linear inverted pendulum (LIP) model. The motion planning procedure includes feasibility analysis with constraints, footprints planning, legs trajectory planning with collision-free constraint, foot trajectory adapter and upper body motion planning.
Findings
– The motion planning with the motion constraints is a key problem, which can be considered as global optimization issue with collision-free constraint, kinematic limits and balance constraint. With the given obstacles, the robot first needs to determine whether it can achieve stepping over, if feasible, and then the robot gets the motion trajectory for the legs, waist and upper body using consecutive obstacles stepping over planning algorithm which is presented in this paper.
Originality/value
– The consecutive stepping over problem is proposed in this paper. First, the paper defines two consecutive stepping over conditions, sparse stepping over (SSO) and tight stepping over (TSO). Then, a novel feasibility analysis method with condition (SSO/TSO) decision criterion is proposed for consecutive obstacles stepping over. The feasibility analysis method’s output is walking parameters with obstacles’ information. Furthermore, a modified legs trajectory planning method with center of mass trajectory compensation using upper body motion is proposed. Finally, simulations and experiments for SSO and TSO are carried out by using the XT-I humanoid robot platform with the aim to verify the validity and feasibility of the novel methods proposed in this paper. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/IR-08-2015-0157 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1108_IR_08_2015_0157</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1808066062</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-263cfacab875038c6bce768a6fc148770a48ffc2a23fb09a5966b08b2d31933e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkc1LAzEQxYMoWKtnrwEvXtImm90ke5TiR6EiFIXeQjZN6pZssia7hf737lIvioeZufzeY-YNALcEzwjBYr5cIyxQhkmBhuJnYEJ4IVDBS3IOJpjkFJUl2VyCq5T2GOOCETYBm9fQ1cHD1inva7-DNkT42TfKh3oLY6hCB7dHr5paK-eOMHWmbUcuHEyEOvhkdN_VBwOdijsDQ5U6pZ1J1-DCKpfMzc-cgo-nx_fFC1q9PS8XDyukaU46lDGqrdKqErzAVGhWacOZUMxqkgvOscqFtTpTGbUVLlVRMlZhUWVbSkpKDZ2C-5NvG8NXb1Inmzpp44Z7TOiTJAILzBhm2YDe_UH3oY9-2E4SzgemHC2nYH6idAwpRWNlG-tGxaMkWI5Jy-VaDn1MWo5JD4rZSWEaE5Xb_iP49Rr6DS47f4I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1776609193</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Motion planning for humanoid robot dynamically stepping over consecutive large obstacles</title><source>ABI/INFORM global</source><source>Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list)</source><source>Emerald Archive</source><creator>Guo, Fayong ; Mei, Tao ; Luo, Minzhou ; Ceccarelli, Marco ; Zhao, Ziyi ; Li, Tao ; Zhao, Jianghai</creator><creatorcontrib>Guo, Fayong ; Mei, Tao ; Luo, Minzhou ; Ceccarelli, Marco ; Zhao, Ziyi ; Li, Tao ; Zhao, Jianghai</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
– Humanoid robots should have the ability of walking in complex environment and overcoming large obstacles in rescue mission. Previous research mainly discusses the problem of humanoid robots stepping over or on/off one obstacle statically or dynamically. As an extreme case, this paper aims to demonstrate how the robots can step over two large obstacles continuously.
Design/methodology/approach
– The robot model uses linear inverted pendulum (LIP) model. The motion planning procedure includes feasibility analysis with constraints, footprints planning, legs trajectory planning with collision-free constraint, foot trajectory adapter and upper body motion planning.
Findings
– The motion planning with the motion constraints is a key problem, which can be considered as global optimization issue with collision-free constraint, kinematic limits and balance constraint. With the given obstacles, the robot first needs to determine whether it can achieve stepping over, if feasible, and then the robot gets the motion trajectory for the legs, waist and upper body using consecutive obstacles stepping over planning algorithm which is presented in this paper.
Originality/value
– The consecutive stepping over problem is proposed in this paper. First, the paper defines two consecutive stepping over conditions, sparse stepping over (SSO) and tight stepping over (TSO). Then, a novel feasibility analysis method with condition (SSO/TSO) decision criterion is proposed for consecutive obstacles stepping over. The feasibility analysis method’s output is walking parameters with obstacles’ information. Furthermore, a modified legs trajectory planning method with center of mass trajectory compensation using upper body motion is proposed. Finally, simulations and experiments for SSO and TSO are carried out by using the XT-I humanoid robot platform with the aim to verify the validity and feasibility of the novel methods proposed in this paper.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0143-991X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-5791</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/IR-08-2015-0157</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IDRBAT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bedford: Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Engineering ; Feasibility analysis ; Humanoid ; Industrial engineering, design & manufacturing ; Kinematics ; Legs ; Motion planning ; Obstacles ; Robots ; Studies ; Trajectories ; Trajectory planning ; Walking</subject><ispartof>Industrial robot, 2016-03, Vol.43 (2), p.204-220</ispartof><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-263cfacab875038c6bce768a6fc148770a48ffc2a23fb09a5966b08b2d31933e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-263cfacab875038c6bce768a6fc148770a48ffc2a23fb09a5966b08b2d31933e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IR-08-2015-0157/full/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1776609193?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2365,11688,27924,27925,36060,36061,44363,53210,53338</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guo, Fayong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mei, Tao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Minzhou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ceccarelli, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Ziyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Tao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Jianghai</creatorcontrib><title>Motion planning for humanoid robot dynamically stepping over consecutive large obstacles</title><title>Industrial robot</title><description>Purpose
– Humanoid robots should have the ability of walking in complex environment and overcoming large obstacles in rescue mission. Previous research mainly discusses the problem of humanoid robots stepping over or on/off one obstacle statically or dynamically. As an extreme case, this paper aims to demonstrate how the robots can step over two large obstacles continuously.
Design/methodology/approach
– The robot model uses linear inverted pendulum (LIP) model. The motion planning procedure includes feasibility analysis with constraints, footprints planning, legs trajectory planning with collision-free constraint, foot trajectory adapter and upper body motion planning.
Findings
– The motion planning with the motion constraints is a key problem, which can be considered as global optimization issue with collision-free constraint, kinematic limits and balance constraint. With the given obstacles, the robot first needs to determine whether it can achieve stepping over, if feasible, and then the robot gets the motion trajectory for the legs, waist and upper body using consecutive obstacles stepping over planning algorithm which is presented in this paper.
Originality/value
– The consecutive stepping over problem is proposed in this paper. First, the paper defines two consecutive stepping over conditions, sparse stepping over (SSO) and tight stepping over (TSO). Then, a novel feasibility analysis method with condition (SSO/TSO) decision criterion is proposed for consecutive obstacles stepping over. The feasibility analysis method’s output is walking parameters with obstacles’ information. Furthermore, a modified legs trajectory planning method with center of mass trajectory compensation using upper body motion is proposed. Finally, simulations and experiments for SSO and TSO are carried out by using the XT-I humanoid robot platform with the aim to verify the validity and feasibility of the novel methods proposed in this paper.</description><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Feasibility analysis</subject><subject>Humanoid</subject><subject>Industrial engineering, design & manufacturing</subject><subject>Kinematics</subject><subject>Legs</subject><subject>Motion planning</subject><subject>Obstacles</subject><subject>Robots</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Trajectories</subject><subject>Trajectory planning</subject><subject>Walking</subject><issn>0143-991X</issn><issn>1758-5791</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNptkc1LAzEQxYMoWKtnrwEvXtImm90ke5TiR6EiFIXeQjZN6pZssia7hf737lIvioeZufzeY-YNALcEzwjBYr5cIyxQhkmBhuJnYEJ4IVDBS3IOJpjkFJUl2VyCq5T2GOOCETYBm9fQ1cHD1inva7-DNkT42TfKh3oLY6hCB7dHr5paK-eOMHWmbUcuHEyEOvhkdN_VBwOdijsDQ5U6pZ1J1-DCKpfMzc-cgo-nx_fFC1q9PS8XDyukaU46lDGqrdKqErzAVGhWacOZUMxqkgvOscqFtTpTGbUVLlVRMlZhUWVbSkpKDZ2C-5NvG8NXb1Inmzpp44Z7TOiTJAILzBhm2YDe_UH3oY9-2E4SzgemHC2nYH6idAwpRWNlG-tGxaMkWI5Jy-VaDn1MWo5JD4rZSWEaE5Xb_iP49Rr6DS47f4I</recordid><startdate>20160321</startdate><enddate>20160321</enddate><creator>Guo, Fayong</creator><creator>Mei, Tao</creator><creator>Luo, Minzhou</creator><creator>Ceccarelli, Marco</creator><creator>Zhao, Ziyi</creator><creator>Li, Tao</creator><creator>Zhao, Jianghai</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160321</creationdate><title>Motion planning for humanoid robot dynamically stepping over consecutive large obstacles</title><author>Guo, Fayong ; Mei, Tao ; Luo, Minzhou ; Ceccarelli, Marco ; Zhao, Ziyi ; Li, Tao ; Zhao, Jianghai</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-263cfacab875038c6bce768a6fc148770a48ffc2a23fb09a5966b08b2d31933e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Feasibility analysis</topic><topic>Humanoid</topic><topic>Industrial engineering, design & manufacturing</topic><topic>Kinematics</topic><topic>Legs</topic><topic>Motion planning</topic><topic>Obstacles</topic><topic>Robots</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Trajectories</topic><topic>Trajectory planning</topic><topic>Walking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guo, Fayong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mei, Tao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Minzhou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ceccarelli, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Ziyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Tao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Jianghai</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer science database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM global</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Industrial robot</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guo, Fayong</au><au>Mei, Tao</au><au>Luo, Minzhou</au><au>Ceccarelli, Marco</au><au>Zhao, Ziyi</au><au>Li, Tao</au><au>Zhao, Jianghai</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Motion planning for humanoid robot dynamically stepping over consecutive large obstacles</atitle><jtitle>Industrial robot</jtitle><date>2016-03-21</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>204</spage><epage>220</epage><pages>204-220</pages><issn>0143-991X</issn><eissn>1758-5791</eissn><coden>IDRBAT</coden><abstract>Purpose
– Humanoid robots should have the ability of walking in complex environment and overcoming large obstacles in rescue mission. Previous research mainly discusses the problem of humanoid robots stepping over or on/off one obstacle statically or dynamically. As an extreme case, this paper aims to demonstrate how the robots can step over two large obstacles continuously.
Design/methodology/approach
– The robot model uses linear inverted pendulum (LIP) model. The motion planning procedure includes feasibility analysis with constraints, footprints planning, legs trajectory planning with collision-free constraint, foot trajectory adapter and upper body motion planning.
Findings
– The motion planning with the motion constraints is a key problem, which can be considered as global optimization issue with collision-free constraint, kinematic limits and balance constraint. With the given obstacles, the robot first needs to determine whether it can achieve stepping over, if feasible, and then the robot gets the motion trajectory for the legs, waist and upper body using consecutive obstacles stepping over planning algorithm which is presented in this paper.
Originality/value
– The consecutive stepping over problem is proposed in this paper. First, the paper defines two consecutive stepping over conditions, sparse stepping over (SSO) and tight stepping over (TSO). Then, a novel feasibility analysis method with condition (SSO/TSO) decision criterion is proposed for consecutive obstacles stepping over. The feasibility analysis method’s output is walking parameters with obstacles’ information. Furthermore, a modified legs trajectory planning method with center of mass trajectory compensation using upper body motion is proposed. Finally, simulations and experiments for SSO and TSO are carried out by using the XT-I humanoid robot platform with the aim to verify the validity and feasibility of the novel methods proposed in this paper.</abstract><cop>Bedford</cop><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/IR-08-2015-0157</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0143-991X |
ispartof | Industrial robot, 2016-03, Vol.43 (2), p.204-220 |
issn | 0143-991X 1758-5791 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1108_IR_08_2015_0157 |
source | ABI/INFORM global; Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list); Emerald Archive |
subjects | Engineering Feasibility analysis Humanoid Industrial engineering, design & manufacturing Kinematics Legs Motion planning Obstacles Robots Studies Trajectories Trajectory planning Walking |
title | Motion planning for humanoid robot dynamically stepping over consecutive large obstacles |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T00%3A29%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Motion%20planning%20for%20humanoid%20robot%20dynamically%20stepping%20over%20consecutive%20large%20obstacles&rft.jtitle=Industrial%20robot&rft.au=Guo,%20Fayong&rft.date=2016-03-21&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=204&rft.epage=220&rft.pages=204-220&rft.issn=0143-991X&rft.eissn=1758-5791&rft.coden=IDRBAT&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/IR-08-2015-0157&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1808066062%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-263cfacab875038c6bce768a6fc148770a48ffc2a23fb09a5966b08b2d31933e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1776609193&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |