Loading…

Urban-biased policy, government intervention and urban-rural income gap: evidence from provincial government work reports in China

PurposeThis paper aims to test the causal relationship between urban-biased policy and urban-rural income gap and further examine the moderating role of government intervention.Design/methodology/approachBased on the provincial Government Work Reports and the long-term policy practice of implementin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Kybernetes 2024-11, Vol.53 (11), p.4929-4947
Main Authors: Nie, Changfei, Wang, Haohui, Feng, Yuan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-309222c6758fd83e70ee1bc2b50b6264507c03a3505f92b25946bd17982a01db3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-309222c6758fd83e70ee1bc2b50b6264507c03a3505f92b25946bd17982a01db3
container_end_page 4947
container_issue 11
container_start_page 4929
container_title Kybernetes
container_volume 53
creator Nie, Changfei
Wang, Haohui
Feng, Yuan
description PurposeThis paper aims to test the causal relationship between urban-biased policy and urban-rural income gap and further examine the moderating role of government intervention.Design/methodology/approachBased on the provincial Government Work Reports and the long-term policy practice of implementing the target responsibility system, the authors construct a unique indicator of urban-biased policy in China. Further, applying the panel data of 30 Chinese provinces in 2003–2018, the authors explore the causal relationship between urban-biased policy and urban-rural income gap.FindingsThe results show that urban-biased policy has contributed to the widen urban-rural income gap in China, which supports Lipton's urban-biased hypothesis. Further research shows that the stronger the government intervention, the bigger the role of urban-biased policy in widening urban-rural income gap.Originality/valueOn the one hand, this study not only investigates the direct effect of urban-biased policy on urban-rural income gap, but also examines the moderating effect from the perspective of government intervention, which helps to enrich the relevant studies of urban-biased theory. On the other hand, the authors' findings provide the latest empirical evidence for urban-biased policy to widen urban-rural income gap and presents a reference and warning for China and other developing countries about balancing the relationship between equity and efficiency during economic development.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/K-01-2023-0084
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1108_K_01_2023_0084</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3125871013</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-309222c6758fd83e70ee1bc2b50b6264507c03a3505f92b25946bd17982a01db3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplUTtPwzAQthBIlMLKbIkVl7Odh8OGKl5qJRYqsVlOcikpjR2cNKgrvxyXMoCY7qTvcXffEXLOYcI5qKsZA84ECMkAVHRARjyNFUuVkodkBDJRLMrEyzE56boVABeJgBH5XPjcWJbXpsOStm5dF9tLunQDetug7Wlte_RD6GpnqbEl3XwL_MabdQAL1yBdmvaa4lCXaAuklXcNbb0bAloH0i-zD-ffqMfW-b4LYjp9ra05JUeVWXd49lPHZHF3-zx9YPOn-8fpzZwVEuKeSciEEEUSjqpKJTEFRJ4XIo8hT0QSxZAWII2MIa4ykYs4i5K85GmmhAFe5nJMLva-Ybf3DXa9XrmNt2GkllzEKuXAZWBN9qzCu67zWOnW143xW81B73LWMw1c73LWu5yDgO0F2GDIpPzP__MX-QXf-X7B</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3125871013</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Urban-biased policy, government intervention and urban-rural income gap: evidence from provincial government work reports in China</title><source>Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list)</source><creator>Nie, Changfei ; Wang, Haohui ; Feng, Yuan</creator><creatorcontrib>Nie, Changfei ; Wang, Haohui ; Feng, Yuan</creatorcontrib><description>PurposeThis paper aims to test the causal relationship between urban-biased policy and urban-rural income gap and further examine the moderating role of government intervention.Design/methodology/approachBased on the provincial Government Work Reports and the long-term policy practice of implementing the target responsibility system, the authors construct a unique indicator of urban-biased policy in China. Further, applying the panel data of 30 Chinese provinces in 2003–2018, the authors explore the causal relationship between urban-biased policy and urban-rural income gap.FindingsThe results show that urban-biased policy has contributed to the widen urban-rural income gap in China, which supports Lipton's urban-biased hypothesis. Further research shows that the stronger the government intervention, the bigger the role of urban-biased policy in widening urban-rural income gap.Originality/valueOn the one hand, this study not only investigates the direct effect of urban-biased policy on urban-rural income gap, but also examines the moderating effect from the perspective of government intervention, which helps to enrich the relevant studies of urban-biased theory. On the other hand, the authors' findings provide the latest empirical evidence for urban-biased policy to widen urban-rural income gap and presents a reference and warning for China and other developing countries about balancing the relationship between equity and efficiency during economic development.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0368-492X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-7883</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/K-01-2023-0084</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Agricultural production ; Developing countries ; Economic development ; Economic growth ; Housing prices ; Income ; Income inequality ; Industrial development ; LDCs ; Market prices ; Public services ; Rural areas ; Rural development ; Subnational government ; Urbanization</subject><ispartof>Kybernetes, 2024-11, Vol.53 (11), p.4929-4947</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-309222c6758fd83e70ee1bc2b50b6264507c03a3505f92b25946bd17982a01db3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-309222c6758fd83e70ee1bc2b50b6264507c03a3505f92b25946bd17982a01db3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5242-8936 ; 0000-0003-0958-2142</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nie, Changfei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Haohui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, Yuan</creatorcontrib><title>Urban-biased policy, government intervention and urban-rural income gap: evidence from provincial government work reports in China</title><title>Kybernetes</title><description>PurposeThis paper aims to test the causal relationship between urban-biased policy and urban-rural income gap and further examine the moderating role of government intervention.Design/methodology/approachBased on the provincial Government Work Reports and the long-term policy practice of implementing the target responsibility system, the authors construct a unique indicator of urban-biased policy in China. Further, applying the panel data of 30 Chinese provinces in 2003–2018, the authors explore the causal relationship between urban-biased policy and urban-rural income gap.FindingsThe results show that urban-biased policy has contributed to the widen urban-rural income gap in China, which supports Lipton's urban-biased hypothesis. Further research shows that the stronger the government intervention, the bigger the role of urban-biased policy in widening urban-rural income gap.Originality/valueOn the one hand, this study not only investigates the direct effect of urban-biased policy on urban-rural income gap, but also examines the moderating effect from the perspective of government intervention, which helps to enrich the relevant studies of urban-biased theory. On the other hand, the authors' findings provide the latest empirical evidence for urban-biased policy to widen urban-rural income gap and presents a reference and warning for China and other developing countries about balancing the relationship between equity and efficiency during economic development.</description><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Economic growth</subject><subject>Housing prices</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Income inequality</subject><subject>Industrial development</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Market prices</subject><subject>Public services</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Rural development</subject><subject>Subnational government</subject><subject>Urbanization</subject><issn>0368-492X</issn><issn>1758-7883</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplUTtPwzAQthBIlMLKbIkVl7Odh8OGKl5qJRYqsVlOcikpjR2cNKgrvxyXMoCY7qTvcXffEXLOYcI5qKsZA84ECMkAVHRARjyNFUuVkodkBDJRLMrEyzE56boVABeJgBH5XPjcWJbXpsOStm5dF9tLunQDetug7Wlte_RD6GpnqbEl3XwL_MabdQAL1yBdmvaa4lCXaAuklXcNbb0bAloH0i-zD-ffqMfW-b4LYjp9ra05JUeVWXd49lPHZHF3-zx9YPOn-8fpzZwVEuKeSciEEEUSjqpKJTEFRJ4XIo8hT0QSxZAWII2MIa4ykYs4i5K85GmmhAFe5nJMLva-Ybf3DXa9XrmNt2GkllzEKuXAZWBN9qzCu67zWOnW143xW81B73LWMw1c73LWu5yDgO0F2GDIpPzP__MX-QXf-X7B</recordid><startdate>20241112</startdate><enddate>20241112</enddate><creator>Nie, Changfei</creator><creator>Wang, Haohui</creator><creator>Feng, Yuan</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5242-8936</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0958-2142</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241112</creationdate><title>Urban-biased policy, government intervention and urban-rural income gap: evidence from provincial government work reports in China</title><author>Nie, Changfei ; Wang, Haohui ; Feng, Yuan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-309222c6758fd83e70ee1bc2b50b6264507c03a3505f92b25946bd17982a01db3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Economic growth</topic><topic>Housing prices</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Income inequality</topic><topic>Industrial development</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Market prices</topic><topic>Public services</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Rural development</topic><topic>Subnational government</topic><topic>Urbanization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nie, Changfei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Haohui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, Yuan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Kybernetes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nie, Changfei</au><au>Wang, Haohui</au><au>Feng, Yuan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Urban-biased policy, government intervention and urban-rural income gap: evidence from provincial government work reports in China</atitle><jtitle>Kybernetes</jtitle><date>2024-11-12</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>4929</spage><epage>4947</epage><pages>4929-4947</pages><issn>0368-492X</issn><eissn>1758-7883</eissn><abstract>PurposeThis paper aims to test the causal relationship between urban-biased policy and urban-rural income gap and further examine the moderating role of government intervention.Design/methodology/approachBased on the provincial Government Work Reports and the long-term policy practice of implementing the target responsibility system, the authors construct a unique indicator of urban-biased policy in China. Further, applying the panel data of 30 Chinese provinces in 2003–2018, the authors explore the causal relationship between urban-biased policy and urban-rural income gap.FindingsThe results show that urban-biased policy has contributed to the widen urban-rural income gap in China, which supports Lipton's urban-biased hypothesis. Further research shows that the stronger the government intervention, the bigger the role of urban-biased policy in widening urban-rural income gap.Originality/valueOn the one hand, this study not only investigates the direct effect of urban-biased policy on urban-rural income gap, but also examines the moderating effect from the perspective of government intervention, which helps to enrich the relevant studies of urban-biased theory. On the other hand, the authors' findings provide the latest empirical evidence for urban-biased policy to widen urban-rural income gap and presents a reference and warning for China and other developing countries about balancing the relationship between equity and efficiency during economic development.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/K-01-2023-0084</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5242-8936</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0958-2142</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0368-492X
ispartof Kybernetes, 2024-11, Vol.53 (11), p.4929-4947
issn 0368-492X
1758-7883
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1108_K_01_2023_0084
source Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list)
subjects Agricultural production
Developing countries
Economic development
Economic growth
Housing prices
Income
Income inequality
Industrial development
LDCs
Market prices
Public services
Rural areas
Rural development
Subnational government
Urbanization
title Urban-biased policy, government intervention and urban-rural income gap: evidence from provincial government work reports in China
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T13%3A38%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Urban-biased%20policy,%20government%20intervention%20and%20urban-rural%20income%20gap:%20evidence%20from%20provincial%20government%20work%20reports%20in%20China&rft.jtitle=Kybernetes&rft.au=Nie,%20Changfei&rft.date=2024-11-12&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=4929&rft.epage=4947&rft.pages=4929-4947&rft.issn=0368-492X&rft.eissn=1758-7883&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/K-01-2023-0084&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3125871013%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-309222c6758fd83e70ee1bc2b50b6264507c03a3505f92b25946bd17982a01db3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3125871013&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true