Loading…
A multi-stage approach for design concept evaluation based on complex network and bounded confidence to achieve consensus
PurposeA successful process of design concept evaluation has positive influence on subsequent processes. This study aims to consider the evaluation information at multiple stages and the interaction among evaluators and improve the credibility of evaluation results.Design/methodology/approachThis pa...
Saved in:
Published in: | Kybernetes 2024-11, Vol.53 (11), p.4074-4099 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c260t-c721ce142a78256c1c175cfc44c20e5db6d7c137898199e9a8cc79e3df21abce3 |
container_end_page | 4099 |
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 4074 |
container_title | Kybernetes |
container_volume | 53 |
creator | Hu, Yukun Yu, Suihuai Chen, Dengkai Chu, Jianjie Yang, Yanpu Ao, Qing |
description | PurposeA successful process of design concept evaluation has positive influence on subsequent processes. This study aims to consider the evaluation information at multiple stages and the interaction among evaluators and improve the credibility of evaluation results.Design/methodology/approachThis paper proposes a multi-stage approach for design concept evaluation based on complex network and bounded confidence. First, a network is constructed according to the evaluation data. Depending on the consensus degree of evaluation opinions, the number of evaluation rounds is determined. Then, bounded confidence rules are applied for the modification of preference information. Last, a planning function is constructed to calculate the weight of each stage and aggregate information at multiple evaluation stages.FindingsThe results indicate that the opinions of the evaluators tend to be consistent after multiple stages of interactive adjustment, and the ordering of design concept alternatives tends to be stable with the progress of the evaluation.Research limitations/implicationsUpdating preferences according to the bounded confidence rules, only the opinions within the trust threshold are considered. The attribute information of the node itself is inadequately considered.Originality/valueThis method addresses the need for considering the evaluation information at each stage and minimizes the impact of disagreements within the evaluation group on the evaluation results. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/K-11-2022-1565 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1108_K_11_2022_1565</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3125871489</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c260t-c721ce142a78256c1c175cfc44c20e5db6d7c137898199e9a8cc79e3df21abce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplUTtPwzAQthBIlMLKbInZxee8nLGqeKmVWEBiixz7UlKSONhJof8eR2VBTCfd9zh93xFyDXwBwOXtmgEwwYVgkKTJCZlBlkiWSRmdkhmPUsniXLydkwvvd5yDSAWfkcOStmMz1MwPaotU9b2zSr_Tyjpq0NfbjmrbaewHinvVjGqobUdL5dFQO2Ft3-A37XD4su6Dqs7Q0o6dCXDQVbXBIKaDpcG0xj1OW4-dH_0lOatU4_Hqd87J6_3dy-qRbZ4fnlbLDdMi5QPTmQCNEAuVSZGkGnSIpSsdx1pwTEyZmkxDlMlcQp5jrqTWWY6RqQSoUmM0JzdH35Dsc0Q_FDs7ui6cLCIQicwglnlgLY4s7az3Dquid3Wr3KEAXkz1FuswiqneYqo3CNhRgC061Zj__D_viH4AHUN8nw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3125871489</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A multi-stage approach for design concept evaluation based on complex network and bounded confidence to achieve consensus</title><source>Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list)</source><creator>Hu, Yukun ; Yu, Suihuai ; Chen, Dengkai ; Chu, Jianjie ; Yang, Yanpu ; Ao, Qing</creator><creatorcontrib>Hu, Yukun ; Yu, Suihuai ; Chen, Dengkai ; Chu, Jianjie ; Yang, Yanpu ; Ao, Qing</creatorcontrib><description>PurposeA successful process of design concept evaluation has positive influence on subsequent processes. This study aims to consider the evaluation information at multiple stages and the interaction among evaluators and improve the credibility of evaluation results.Design/methodology/approachThis paper proposes a multi-stage approach for design concept evaluation based on complex network and bounded confidence. First, a network is constructed according to the evaluation data. Depending on the consensus degree of evaluation opinions, the number of evaluation rounds is determined. Then, bounded confidence rules are applied for the modification of preference information. Last, a planning function is constructed to calculate the weight of each stage and aggregate information at multiple evaluation stages.FindingsThe results indicate that the opinions of the evaluators tend to be consistent after multiple stages of interactive adjustment, and the ordering of design concept alternatives tends to be stable with the progress of the evaluation.Research limitations/implicationsUpdating preferences according to the bounded confidence rules, only the opinions within the trust threshold are considered. The attribute information of the node itself is inadequately considered.Originality/valueThis method addresses the need for considering the evaluation information at each stage and minimizes the impact of disagreements within the evaluation group on the evaluation results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0368-492X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-7883</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/K-11-2022-1565</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Data envelopment analysis ; Decision making ; Design analysis ; Fuzzy sets ; Literature reviews ; Methods ; Preferences ; Product design ; Product development ; Product life cycle</subject><ispartof>Kybernetes, 2024-11, Vol.53 (11), p.4074-4099</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c260t-c721ce142a78256c1c175cfc44c20e5db6d7c137898199e9a8cc79e3df21abce3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1103-8162</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hu, Yukun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Suihuai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Dengkai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chu, Jianjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Yanpu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ao, Qing</creatorcontrib><title>A multi-stage approach for design concept evaluation based on complex network and bounded confidence to achieve consensus</title><title>Kybernetes</title><description>PurposeA successful process of design concept evaluation has positive influence on subsequent processes. This study aims to consider the evaluation information at multiple stages and the interaction among evaluators and improve the credibility of evaluation results.Design/methodology/approachThis paper proposes a multi-stage approach for design concept evaluation based on complex network and bounded confidence. First, a network is constructed according to the evaluation data. Depending on the consensus degree of evaluation opinions, the number of evaluation rounds is determined. Then, bounded confidence rules are applied for the modification of preference information. Last, a planning function is constructed to calculate the weight of each stage and aggregate information at multiple evaluation stages.FindingsThe results indicate that the opinions of the evaluators tend to be consistent after multiple stages of interactive adjustment, and the ordering of design concept alternatives tends to be stable with the progress of the evaluation.Research limitations/implicationsUpdating preferences according to the bounded confidence rules, only the opinions within the trust threshold are considered. The attribute information of the node itself is inadequately considered.Originality/valueThis method addresses the need for considering the evaluation information at each stage and minimizes the impact of disagreements within the evaluation group on the evaluation results.</description><subject>Data envelopment analysis</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Design analysis</subject><subject>Fuzzy sets</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Product design</subject><subject>Product development</subject><subject>Product life cycle</subject><issn>0368-492X</issn><issn>1758-7883</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplUTtPwzAQthBIlMLKbInZxee8nLGqeKmVWEBiixz7UlKSONhJof8eR2VBTCfd9zh93xFyDXwBwOXtmgEwwYVgkKTJCZlBlkiWSRmdkhmPUsniXLydkwvvd5yDSAWfkcOStmMz1MwPaotU9b2zSr_Tyjpq0NfbjmrbaewHinvVjGqobUdL5dFQO2Ft3-A37XD4su6Dqs7Q0o6dCXDQVbXBIKaDpcG0xj1OW4-dH_0lOatU4_Hqd87J6_3dy-qRbZ4fnlbLDdMi5QPTmQCNEAuVSZGkGnSIpSsdx1pwTEyZmkxDlMlcQp5jrqTWWY6RqQSoUmM0JzdH35Dsc0Q_FDs7ui6cLCIQicwglnlgLY4s7az3Dquid3Wr3KEAXkz1FuswiqneYqo3CNhRgC061Zj__D_viH4AHUN8nw</recordid><startdate>20241112</startdate><enddate>20241112</enddate><creator>Hu, Yukun</creator><creator>Yu, Suihuai</creator><creator>Chen, Dengkai</creator><creator>Chu, Jianjie</creator><creator>Yang, Yanpu</creator><creator>Ao, Qing</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1103-8162</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241112</creationdate><title>A multi-stage approach for design concept evaluation based on complex network and bounded confidence to achieve consensus</title><author>Hu, Yukun ; Yu, Suihuai ; Chen, Dengkai ; Chu, Jianjie ; Yang, Yanpu ; Ao, Qing</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c260t-c721ce142a78256c1c175cfc44c20e5db6d7c137898199e9a8cc79e3df21abce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Data envelopment analysis</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Design analysis</topic><topic>Fuzzy sets</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Product design</topic><topic>Product development</topic><topic>Product life cycle</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hu, Yukun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Suihuai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Dengkai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chu, Jianjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Yanpu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ao, Qing</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database (1962 - current)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Kybernetes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hu, Yukun</au><au>Yu, Suihuai</au><au>Chen, Dengkai</au><au>Chu, Jianjie</au><au>Yang, Yanpu</au><au>Ao, Qing</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A multi-stage approach for design concept evaluation based on complex network and bounded confidence to achieve consensus</atitle><jtitle>Kybernetes</jtitle><date>2024-11-12</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>4074</spage><epage>4099</epage><pages>4074-4099</pages><issn>0368-492X</issn><eissn>1758-7883</eissn><abstract>PurposeA successful process of design concept evaluation has positive influence on subsequent processes. This study aims to consider the evaluation information at multiple stages and the interaction among evaluators and improve the credibility of evaluation results.Design/methodology/approachThis paper proposes a multi-stage approach for design concept evaluation based on complex network and bounded confidence. First, a network is constructed according to the evaluation data. Depending on the consensus degree of evaluation opinions, the number of evaluation rounds is determined. Then, bounded confidence rules are applied for the modification of preference information. Last, a planning function is constructed to calculate the weight of each stage and aggregate information at multiple evaluation stages.FindingsThe results indicate that the opinions of the evaluators tend to be consistent after multiple stages of interactive adjustment, and the ordering of design concept alternatives tends to be stable with the progress of the evaluation.Research limitations/implicationsUpdating preferences according to the bounded confidence rules, only the opinions within the trust threshold are considered. The attribute information of the node itself is inadequately considered.Originality/valueThis method addresses the need for considering the evaluation information at each stage and minimizes the impact of disagreements within the evaluation group on the evaluation results.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/K-11-2022-1565</doi><tpages>26</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1103-8162</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0368-492X |
ispartof | Kybernetes, 2024-11, Vol.53 (11), p.4074-4099 |
issn | 0368-492X 1758-7883 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1108_K_11_2022_1565 |
source | Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list) |
subjects | Data envelopment analysis Decision making Design analysis Fuzzy sets Literature reviews Methods Preferences Product design Product development Product life cycle |
title | A multi-stage approach for design concept evaluation based on complex network and bounded confidence to achieve consensus |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T19%3A39%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20multi-stage%20approach%20for%20design%20concept%20evaluation%20based%20on%20complex%20network%20and%20bounded%20confidence%20to%20achieve%20consensus&rft.jtitle=Kybernetes&rft.au=Hu,%20Yukun&rft.date=2024-11-12&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=4074&rft.epage=4099&rft.pages=4074-4099&rft.issn=0368-492X&rft.eissn=1758-7883&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/K-11-2022-1565&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3125871489%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c260t-c721ce142a78256c1c175cfc44c20e5db6d7c137898199e9a8cc79e3df21abce3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3125871489&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |