Loading…

A multi-stage approach for design concept evaluation based on complex network and bounded confidence to achieve consensus

PurposeA successful process of design concept evaluation has positive influence on subsequent processes. This study aims to consider the evaluation information at multiple stages and the interaction among evaluators and improve the credibility of evaluation results.Design/methodology/approachThis pa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Kybernetes 2024-11, Vol.53 (11), p.4074-4099
Main Authors: Hu, Yukun, Yu, Suihuai, Chen, Dengkai, Chu, Jianjie, Yang, Yanpu, Ao, Qing
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c260t-c721ce142a78256c1c175cfc44c20e5db6d7c137898199e9a8cc79e3df21abce3
container_end_page 4099
container_issue 11
container_start_page 4074
container_title Kybernetes
container_volume 53
creator Hu, Yukun
Yu, Suihuai
Chen, Dengkai
Chu, Jianjie
Yang, Yanpu
Ao, Qing
description PurposeA successful process of design concept evaluation has positive influence on subsequent processes. This study aims to consider the evaluation information at multiple stages and the interaction among evaluators and improve the credibility of evaluation results.Design/methodology/approachThis paper proposes a multi-stage approach for design concept evaluation based on complex network and bounded confidence. First, a network is constructed according to the evaluation data. Depending on the consensus degree of evaluation opinions, the number of evaluation rounds is determined. Then, bounded confidence rules are applied for the modification of preference information. Last, a planning function is constructed to calculate the weight of each stage and aggregate information at multiple evaluation stages.FindingsThe results indicate that the opinions of the evaluators tend to be consistent after multiple stages of interactive adjustment, and the ordering of design concept alternatives tends to be stable with the progress of the evaluation.Research limitations/implicationsUpdating preferences according to the bounded confidence rules, only the opinions within the trust threshold are considered. The attribute information of the node itself is inadequately considered.Originality/valueThis method addresses the need for considering the evaluation information at each stage and minimizes the impact of disagreements within the evaluation group on the evaluation results.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/K-11-2022-1565
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1108_K_11_2022_1565</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3125871489</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c260t-c721ce142a78256c1c175cfc44c20e5db6d7c137898199e9a8cc79e3df21abce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplUTtPwzAQthBIlMLKbInZxee8nLGqeKmVWEBiixz7UlKSONhJof8eR2VBTCfd9zh93xFyDXwBwOXtmgEwwYVgkKTJCZlBlkiWSRmdkhmPUsniXLydkwvvd5yDSAWfkcOStmMz1MwPaotU9b2zSr_Tyjpq0NfbjmrbaewHinvVjGqobUdL5dFQO2Ft3-A37XD4su6Dqs7Q0o6dCXDQVbXBIKaDpcG0xj1OW4-dH_0lOatU4_Hqd87J6_3dy-qRbZ4fnlbLDdMi5QPTmQCNEAuVSZGkGnSIpSsdx1pwTEyZmkxDlMlcQp5jrqTWWY6RqQSoUmM0JzdH35Dsc0Q_FDs7ui6cLCIQicwglnlgLY4s7az3Dquid3Wr3KEAXkz1FuswiqneYqo3CNhRgC061Zj__D_viH4AHUN8nw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3125871489</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A multi-stage approach for design concept evaluation based on complex network and bounded confidence to achieve consensus</title><source>Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list)</source><creator>Hu, Yukun ; Yu, Suihuai ; Chen, Dengkai ; Chu, Jianjie ; Yang, Yanpu ; Ao, Qing</creator><creatorcontrib>Hu, Yukun ; Yu, Suihuai ; Chen, Dengkai ; Chu, Jianjie ; Yang, Yanpu ; Ao, Qing</creatorcontrib><description>PurposeA successful process of design concept evaluation has positive influence on subsequent processes. This study aims to consider the evaluation information at multiple stages and the interaction among evaluators and improve the credibility of evaluation results.Design/methodology/approachThis paper proposes a multi-stage approach for design concept evaluation based on complex network and bounded confidence. First, a network is constructed according to the evaluation data. Depending on the consensus degree of evaluation opinions, the number of evaluation rounds is determined. Then, bounded confidence rules are applied for the modification of preference information. Last, a planning function is constructed to calculate the weight of each stage and aggregate information at multiple evaluation stages.FindingsThe results indicate that the opinions of the evaluators tend to be consistent after multiple stages of interactive adjustment, and the ordering of design concept alternatives tends to be stable with the progress of the evaluation.Research limitations/implicationsUpdating preferences according to the bounded confidence rules, only the opinions within the trust threshold are considered. The attribute information of the node itself is inadequately considered.Originality/valueThis method addresses the need for considering the evaluation information at each stage and minimizes the impact of disagreements within the evaluation group on the evaluation results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0368-492X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-7883</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/K-11-2022-1565</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Data envelopment analysis ; Decision making ; Design analysis ; Fuzzy sets ; Literature reviews ; Methods ; Preferences ; Product design ; Product development ; Product life cycle</subject><ispartof>Kybernetes, 2024-11, Vol.53 (11), p.4074-4099</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c260t-c721ce142a78256c1c175cfc44c20e5db6d7c137898199e9a8cc79e3df21abce3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1103-8162</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hu, Yukun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Suihuai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Dengkai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chu, Jianjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Yanpu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ao, Qing</creatorcontrib><title>A multi-stage approach for design concept evaluation based on complex network and bounded confidence to achieve consensus</title><title>Kybernetes</title><description>PurposeA successful process of design concept evaluation has positive influence on subsequent processes. This study aims to consider the evaluation information at multiple stages and the interaction among evaluators and improve the credibility of evaluation results.Design/methodology/approachThis paper proposes a multi-stage approach for design concept evaluation based on complex network and bounded confidence. First, a network is constructed according to the evaluation data. Depending on the consensus degree of evaluation opinions, the number of evaluation rounds is determined. Then, bounded confidence rules are applied for the modification of preference information. Last, a planning function is constructed to calculate the weight of each stage and aggregate information at multiple evaluation stages.FindingsThe results indicate that the opinions of the evaluators tend to be consistent after multiple stages of interactive adjustment, and the ordering of design concept alternatives tends to be stable with the progress of the evaluation.Research limitations/implicationsUpdating preferences according to the bounded confidence rules, only the opinions within the trust threshold are considered. The attribute information of the node itself is inadequately considered.Originality/valueThis method addresses the need for considering the evaluation information at each stage and minimizes the impact of disagreements within the evaluation group on the evaluation results.</description><subject>Data envelopment analysis</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Design analysis</subject><subject>Fuzzy sets</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Product design</subject><subject>Product development</subject><subject>Product life cycle</subject><issn>0368-492X</issn><issn>1758-7883</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplUTtPwzAQthBIlMLKbInZxee8nLGqeKmVWEBiixz7UlKSONhJof8eR2VBTCfd9zh93xFyDXwBwOXtmgEwwYVgkKTJCZlBlkiWSRmdkhmPUsniXLydkwvvd5yDSAWfkcOStmMz1MwPaotU9b2zSr_Tyjpq0NfbjmrbaewHinvVjGqobUdL5dFQO2Ft3-A37XD4su6Dqs7Q0o6dCXDQVbXBIKaDpcG0xj1OW4-dH_0lOatU4_Hqd87J6_3dy-qRbZ4fnlbLDdMi5QPTmQCNEAuVSZGkGnSIpSsdx1pwTEyZmkxDlMlcQp5jrqTWWY6RqQSoUmM0JzdH35Dsc0Q_FDs7ui6cLCIQicwglnlgLY4s7az3Dquid3Wr3KEAXkz1FuswiqneYqo3CNhRgC061Zj__D_viH4AHUN8nw</recordid><startdate>20241112</startdate><enddate>20241112</enddate><creator>Hu, Yukun</creator><creator>Yu, Suihuai</creator><creator>Chen, Dengkai</creator><creator>Chu, Jianjie</creator><creator>Yang, Yanpu</creator><creator>Ao, Qing</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1103-8162</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241112</creationdate><title>A multi-stage approach for design concept evaluation based on complex network and bounded confidence to achieve consensus</title><author>Hu, Yukun ; Yu, Suihuai ; Chen, Dengkai ; Chu, Jianjie ; Yang, Yanpu ; Ao, Qing</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c260t-c721ce142a78256c1c175cfc44c20e5db6d7c137898199e9a8cc79e3df21abce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Data envelopment analysis</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Design analysis</topic><topic>Fuzzy sets</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Product design</topic><topic>Product development</topic><topic>Product life cycle</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hu, Yukun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Suihuai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Dengkai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chu, Jianjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Yanpu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ao, Qing</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database‎ (1962 - current)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Kybernetes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hu, Yukun</au><au>Yu, Suihuai</au><au>Chen, Dengkai</au><au>Chu, Jianjie</au><au>Yang, Yanpu</au><au>Ao, Qing</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A multi-stage approach for design concept evaluation based on complex network and bounded confidence to achieve consensus</atitle><jtitle>Kybernetes</jtitle><date>2024-11-12</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>4074</spage><epage>4099</epage><pages>4074-4099</pages><issn>0368-492X</issn><eissn>1758-7883</eissn><abstract>PurposeA successful process of design concept evaluation has positive influence on subsequent processes. This study aims to consider the evaluation information at multiple stages and the interaction among evaluators and improve the credibility of evaluation results.Design/methodology/approachThis paper proposes a multi-stage approach for design concept evaluation based on complex network and bounded confidence. First, a network is constructed according to the evaluation data. Depending on the consensus degree of evaluation opinions, the number of evaluation rounds is determined. Then, bounded confidence rules are applied for the modification of preference information. Last, a planning function is constructed to calculate the weight of each stage and aggregate information at multiple evaluation stages.FindingsThe results indicate that the opinions of the evaluators tend to be consistent after multiple stages of interactive adjustment, and the ordering of design concept alternatives tends to be stable with the progress of the evaluation.Research limitations/implicationsUpdating preferences according to the bounded confidence rules, only the opinions within the trust threshold are considered. The attribute information of the node itself is inadequately considered.Originality/valueThis method addresses the need for considering the evaluation information at each stage and minimizes the impact of disagreements within the evaluation group on the evaluation results.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/K-11-2022-1565</doi><tpages>26</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1103-8162</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0368-492X
ispartof Kybernetes, 2024-11, Vol.53 (11), p.4074-4099
issn 0368-492X
1758-7883
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1108_K_11_2022_1565
source Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list)
subjects Data envelopment analysis
Decision making
Design analysis
Fuzzy sets
Literature reviews
Methods
Preferences
Product design
Product development
Product life cycle
title A multi-stage approach for design concept evaluation based on complex network and bounded confidence to achieve consensus
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T19%3A39%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20multi-stage%20approach%20for%20design%20concept%20evaluation%20based%20on%20complex%20network%20and%20bounded%20confidence%20to%20achieve%20consensus&rft.jtitle=Kybernetes&rft.au=Hu,%20Yukun&rft.date=2024-11-12&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=4074&rft.epage=4099&rft.pages=4074-4099&rft.issn=0368-492X&rft.eissn=1758-7883&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/K-11-2022-1565&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3125871489%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c260t-c721ce142a78256c1c175cfc44c20e5db6d7c137898199e9a8cc79e3df21abce3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3125871489&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true