Promotion and tenure: Carnegie reclassification triggers a revision

• Published in: Library management 2015-06, Vol.36 (4/5), p.340-350
• Main Authors: Shropshire, Sandra, Semenza, Jenny Lynne, Kearns, Karen
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Academic libraries; Assessments; Benchmarks; Classification; Collection development; College campuses; College presidents; Committees; Employee promotions; Health sciences; HR in libraries; Job descriptions; Librarians; Librarianship/library management; Libraries; Library & information science; Literature reviews; Peer review; Policies; Promotion; Tenure; Universities; University administration; Workloads
• ISSN: 0143-5124; 1758-7921
• DOI: 10.1108/LM-09-2014-0113

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide a comprehensive assessment of promotion and tenure for librarians in light of increased scrutiny and expectations by the administration of Idaho State University (ISU). This increased rigour was prompted by a move up in the Carnegie Classification System. Design/methodology/approach – A literature review was performed using library databases, as well as assessing peer institution promotion and tenure documents. Additionally ongoing feedback from University administrators was solicited. The process took for the creation of a new promotion and tenure document for ISU library took two years from the beginning of the project to the final approved document. Findings – The study found a dearth of performance benchmarks in both literature and peer institution policies and required the authors, along with other library faculty, to create evidence based benchmarks for ISU aligned with traditional standards of teaching, research and service. Originality/value – This paper is an inclusive assessment of the literature on faculty promotion and tenure, the policies of ISU’s peer institutions, and the change of Carnegie Classification’s impact on the ISU policies.