Loading…

Audit sampling strategies and frauds: an evidence from Africa

Purpose This paper aims to investigate how professionals such as accountants, auditors, senior civil servants and academics perceive the use of audit sampling strategies adopted by professionals to increase detection rates of frauds and corruption within the public sector in Africa. It also examines...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Managerial auditing journal 2022-01, Vol.37 (1), p.170-192
Main Authors: Nagirikandalage, Padmi, Binsardi, Arnaz, Kooli, Kaouther
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-7e4664396e09ae5f86a3ee38ed5c82b2e113e2f531745064bb0fc5d2e50ffaa13
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-7e4664396e09ae5f86a3ee38ed5c82b2e113e2f531745064bb0fc5d2e50ffaa13
container_end_page 192
container_issue 1
container_start_page 170
container_title Managerial auditing journal
container_volume 37
creator Nagirikandalage, Padmi
Binsardi, Arnaz
Kooli, Kaouther
description Purpose This paper aims to investigate how professionals such as accountants, auditors, senior civil servants and academics perceive the use of audit sampling strategies adopted by professionals to increase detection rates of frauds and corruption within the public sector in Africa. It also examines the respondents’ perceived values regarding the reasons for committing frauds, types of fraud and corruption, as well as the aspects of audit sampling strategies to tackle frauds. Design/methodology/approach This research uses non-parametric statistics and logistic regression to analyse the respondents’ opinions regarding the state of frauds and corruption in Africa (particularly in Tunisia and non-Tunisia countries), the common factors behind people committing frauds, including the types of frauds and corruption and the respondents’ opinions on the use of audit sampling strategies (non-random and random) to examine the instances of frauds and corruption. Findings The findings indicate that most respondents prefer to use non-probabilistic audit sampling rather than more robust sampling strategies such as random sampling and systematic random sampling to detect frauds and corruption. In addition, although there are some minor statistical differences between the countries in terms of the respondents’ perceived values on skimming fraud and on the use of audit random sampling to tackle rampant corruption in Africa, the overall findings indicate that opinions do not significantly differ between the respondents from Tunisia and other countries in terms of the types of fraud, the reasons for committing fraud and the auditing sampling strategies used to investigate the frauds. Research limitations/implications This research serves as an analytical exploratory study to instigate further audit sampling research to combat rampant fraud and corruption in the public sector in Africa. Originality/value There are few or non-existent studies investigating the application of audit sampling strategies in Africa countries, particularly to examine the application of audit random sampling and audit non-random sampling strategies to detect fraudulent activities and corruption. Correspondingly, this research carries strategic implications for accountants and auditors to successfully detect fraudulent activities and corruption in Africa.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/MAJ-06-2020-2695
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1108_MAJ_06_2020_2695</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2614253281</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-7e4664396e09ae5f86a3ee38ed5c82b2e113e2f531745064bb0fc5d2e50ffaa13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkE1Lw0AQhhdRsFbvHgOe185-ZiN4CMX6QcWLnpdtdrakNEndTQT_vQn1Inial-F9ZuAh5JrBLWNgFq_lCwVNOXCgXBfqhMxYrgzNc6FOyQy4NlQXwM_JRUo7AMYlkzNyXw6-7rPkmsO-brdZ6qPrcVtjylzrsxDd4NPdmDP8qj22FY67rsnKEOvKXZKz4PYJr37nnHysHt6XT3T99vi8LNe0kgx6mqPUWopCIxQOVTDaCURh0KvK8A1HxgTyoATLpQItNxsIlfIcFYTgHBNzcnO8e4jd54Cpt7tuiO340nLNJFeCm6kFx1YVu5QiBnuIdePit2VgJ0l2lGRB20mSnSSNyOKIYIPR7f1_xB-t4gfVnGbA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2614253281</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Audit sampling strategies and frauds: an evidence from Africa</title><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list)</source><creator>Nagirikandalage, Padmi ; Binsardi, Arnaz ; Kooli, Kaouther</creator><creatorcontrib>Nagirikandalage, Padmi ; Binsardi, Arnaz ; Kooli, Kaouther</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose This paper aims to investigate how professionals such as accountants, auditors, senior civil servants and academics perceive the use of audit sampling strategies adopted by professionals to increase detection rates of frauds and corruption within the public sector in Africa. It also examines the respondents’ perceived values regarding the reasons for committing frauds, types of fraud and corruption, as well as the aspects of audit sampling strategies to tackle frauds. Design/methodology/approach This research uses non-parametric statistics and logistic regression to analyse the respondents’ opinions regarding the state of frauds and corruption in Africa (particularly in Tunisia and non-Tunisia countries), the common factors behind people committing frauds, including the types of frauds and corruption and the respondents’ opinions on the use of audit sampling strategies (non-random and random) to examine the instances of frauds and corruption. Findings The findings indicate that most respondents prefer to use non-probabilistic audit sampling rather than more robust sampling strategies such as random sampling and systematic random sampling to detect frauds and corruption. In addition, although there are some minor statistical differences between the countries in terms of the respondents’ perceived values on skimming fraud and on the use of audit random sampling to tackle rampant corruption in Africa, the overall findings indicate that opinions do not significantly differ between the respondents from Tunisia and other countries in terms of the types of fraud, the reasons for committing fraud and the auditing sampling strategies used to investigate the frauds. Research limitations/implications This research serves as an analytical exploratory study to instigate further audit sampling research to combat rampant fraud and corruption in the public sector in Africa. Originality/value There are few or non-existent studies investigating the application of audit sampling strategies in Africa countries, particularly to examine the application of audit random sampling and audit non-random sampling strategies to detect fraudulent activities and corruption. Correspondingly, this research carries strategic implications for accountants and auditors to successfully detect fraudulent activities and corruption in Africa.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-6902</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-7735</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/MAJ-06-2020-2695</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Accountability ; Audit engagements ; Audit quality ; Auditing ; Big Data ; Corporate governance ; Corruption ; COVID-19 ; Economic growth ; Fraud ; GDP ; Gross Domestic Product ; Public sector ; Public services ; Sampling techniques ; Transparency ; Trends</subject><ispartof>Managerial auditing journal, 2022-01, Vol.37 (1), p.170-192</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-7e4664396e09ae5f86a3ee38ed5c82b2e113e2f531745064bb0fc5d2e50ffaa13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-7e4664396e09ae5f86a3ee38ed5c82b2e113e2f531745064bb0fc5d2e50ffaa13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2614253281/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2614253281?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,27924,27925,36060,44363,74895</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nagirikandalage, Padmi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Binsardi, Arnaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kooli, Kaouther</creatorcontrib><title>Audit sampling strategies and frauds: an evidence from Africa</title><title>Managerial auditing journal</title><description>Purpose This paper aims to investigate how professionals such as accountants, auditors, senior civil servants and academics perceive the use of audit sampling strategies adopted by professionals to increase detection rates of frauds and corruption within the public sector in Africa. It also examines the respondents’ perceived values regarding the reasons for committing frauds, types of fraud and corruption, as well as the aspects of audit sampling strategies to tackle frauds. Design/methodology/approach This research uses non-parametric statistics and logistic regression to analyse the respondents’ opinions regarding the state of frauds and corruption in Africa (particularly in Tunisia and non-Tunisia countries), the common factors behind people committing frauds, including the types of frauds and corruption and the respondents’ opinions on the use of audit sampling strategies (non-random and random) to examine the instances of frauds and corruption. Findings The findings indicate that most respondents prefer to use non-probabilistic audit sampling rather than more robust sampling strategies such as random sampling and systematic random sampling to detect frauds and corruption. In addition, although there are some minor statistical differences between the countries in terms of the respondents’ perceived values on skimming fraud and on the use of audit random sampling to tackle rampant corruption in Africa, the overall findings indicate that opinions do not significantly differ between the respondents from Tunisia and other countries in terms of the types of fraud, the reasons for committing fraud and the auditing sampling strategies used to investigate the frauds. Research limitations/implications This research serves as an analytical exploratory study to instigate further audit sampling research to combat rampant fraud and corruption in the public sector in Africa. Originality/value There are few or non-existent studies investigating the application of audit sampling strategies in Africa countries, particularly to examine the application of audit random sampling and audit non-random sampling strategies to detect fraudulent activities and corruption. Correspondingly, this research carries strategic implications for accountants and auditors to successfully detect fraudulent activities and corruption in Africa.</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Audit engagements</subject><subject>Audit quality</subject><subject>Auditing</subject><subject>Big Data</subject><subject>Corporate governance</subject><subject>Corruption</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Economic growth</subject><subject>Fraud</subject><subject>GDP</subject><subject>Gross Domestic Product</subject><subject>Public sector</subject><subject>Public services</subject><subject>Sampling techniques</subject><subject>Transparency</subject><subject>Trends</subject><issn>0268-6902</issn><issn>1758-7735</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNptkE1Lw0AQhhdRsFbvHgOe185-ZiN4CMX6QcWLnpdtdrakNEndTQT_vQn1Inial-F9ZuAh5JrBLWNgFq_lCwVNOXCgXBfqhMxYrgzNc6FOyQy4NlQXwM_JRUo7AMYlkzNyXw6-7rPkmsO-brdZ6qPrcVtjylzrsxDd4NPdmDP8qj22FY67rsnKEOvKXZKz4PYJr37nnHysHt6XT3T99vi8LNe0kgx6mqPUWopCIxQOVTDaCURh0KvK8A1HxgTyoATLpQItNxsIlfIcFYTgHBNzcnO8e4jd54Cpt7tuiO340nLNJFeCm6kFx1YVu5QiBnuIdePit2VgJ0l2lGRB20mSnSSNyOKIYIPR7f1_xB-t4gfVnGbA</recordid><startdate>20220103</startdate><enddate>20220103</enddate><creator>Nagirikandalage, Padmi</creator><creator>Binsardi, Arnaz</creator><creator>Kooli, Kaouther</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X1</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220103</creationdate><title>Audit sampling strategies and frauds: an evidence from Africa</title><author>Nagirikandalage, Padmi ; Binsardi, Arnaz ; Kooli, Kaouther</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-7e4664396e09ae5f86a3ee38ed5c82b2e113e2f531745064bb0fc5d2e50ffaa13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Audit engagements</topic><topic>Audit quality</topic><topic>Auditing</topic><topic>Big Data</topic><topic>Corporate governance</topic><topic>Corruption</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Economic growth</topic><topic>Fraud</topic><topic>GDP</topic><topic>Gross Domestic Product</topic><topic>Public sector</topic><topic>Public services</topic><topic>Sampling techniques</topic><topic>Transparency</topic><topic>Trends</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nagirikandalage, Padmi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Binsardi, Arnaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kooli, Kaouther</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Accounting &amp; Tax Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax &amp; Banking Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Managerial auditing journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nagirikandalage, Padmi</au><au>Binsardi, Arnaz</au><au>Kooli, Kaouther</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Audit sampling strategies and frauds: an evidence from Africa</atitle><jtitle>Managerial auditing journal</jtitle><date>2022-01-03</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>170</spage><epage>192</epage><pages>170-192</pages><issn>0268-6902</issn><eissn>1758-7735</eissn><abstract>Purpose This paper aims to investigate how professionals such as accountants, auditors, senior civil servants and academics perceive the use of audit sampling strategies adopted by professionals to increase detection rates of frauds and corruption within the public sector in Africa. It also examines the respondents’ perceived values regarding the reasons for committing frauds, types of fraud and corruption, as well as the aspects of audit sampling strategies to tackle frauds. Design/methodology/approach This research uses non-parametric statistics and logistic regression to analyse the respondents’ opinions regarding the state of frauds and corruption in Africa (particularly in Tunisia and non-Tunisia countries), the common factors behind people committing frauds, including the types of frauds and corruption and the respondents’ opinions on the use of audit sampling strategies (non-random and random) to examine the instances of frauds and corruption. Findings The findings indicate that most respondents prefer to use non-probabilistic audit sampling rather than more robust sampling strategies such as random sampling and systematic random sampling to detect frauds and corruption. In addition, although there are some minor statistical differences between the countries in terms of the respondents’ perceived values on skimming fraud and on the use of audit random sampling to tackle rampant corruption in Africa, the overall findings indicate that opinions do not significantly differ between the respondents from Tunisia and other countries in terms of the types of fraud, the reasons for committing fraud and the auditing sampling strategies used to investigate the frauds. Research limitations/implications This research serves as an analytical exploratory study to instigate further audit sampling research to combat rampant fraud and corruption in the public sector in Africa. Originality/value There are few or non-existent studies investigating the application of audit sampling strategies in Africa countries, particularly to examine the application of audit random sampling and audit non-random sampling strategies to detect fraudulent activities and corruption. Correspondingly, this research carries strategic implications for accountants and auditors to successfully detect fraudulent activities and corruption in Africa.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/MAJ-06-2020-2695</doi><tpages>23</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0268-6902
ispartof Managerial auditing journal, 2022-01, Vol.37 (1), p.170-192
issn 0268-6902
1758-7735
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1108_MAJ_06_2020_2695
source ABI/INFORM Global; Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list)
subjects Accountability
Audit engagements
Audit quality
Auditing
Big Data
Corporate governance
Corruption
COVID-19
Economic growth
Fraud
GDP
Gross Domestic Product
Public sector
Public services
Sampling techniques
Transparency
Trends
title Audit sampling strategies and frauds: an evidence from Africa
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T18%3A04%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Audit%20sampling%20strategies%20and%20frauds:%20an%20evidence%20from%20Africa&rft.jtitle=Managerial%20auditing%20journal&rft.au=Nagirikandalage,%20Padmi&rft.date=2022-01-03&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=170&rft.epage=192&rft.pages=170-192&rft.issn=0268-6902&rft.eissn=1758-7735&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/MAJ-06-2020-2695&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2614253281%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-7e4664396e09ae5f86a3ee38ed5c82b2e113e2f531745064bb0fc5d2e50ffaa13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2614253281&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true