Scholarly research in Library and Information Science: an analysis based on ISI Web of Science

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to present a quantitative analysis of the Library and Information Science (LIS) scholarly literature published worldwide. Design/methodology/approach The ISI Web of Science database was used as a source for extracting the data of published documents during the pe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Performance measurement and metrics 2020-01, Vol.21 (1), p.18-32
Main Authors: Ahmad, Khurshid, Sheikh, Arslan, Rafi, Muhammad
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Author productivity
Authorship
Bibliometrics
Citation analysis
Citations
Collaboration
Documents
Librarians
Library and information science
Library science
Professionals
Research methodology
Researchers
Scientific papers
Scientometrics
Trends
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose The purpose of this paper is to present a quantitative analysis of the Library and Information Science (LIS) scholarly literature published worldwide. Design/methodology/approach The ISI Web of Science database was used as a source for extracting the data of published documents during the period 2003–2017. The analysis of the published literature was based on the following indicators: research productivity of each county, annual publications, annual citations, highly cited articles, highly cited LIS journals, most productive institutions in the field of LIS and most prolific authors. The types of documents included in this study were research articles, conference proceeding papers, book reviews and editorials. Findings The findings revealed that the USA had the highest overall output of LIS scholarly publications. The year 2016 was identified as the most productive year for the number of publications, whereas 2017 was identified as the most productive year for the number of citations. “Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of Science versus Scopus and Google Scholar” was the most highly cited article. The Journal of Medical Library Association was the most highly cited journal in LIS. Indiana University from the USA was the most productive LIS research institution. Mike Thelwall, from the UK, is identified as the most prolific author in LIS. Originality/value The study will be of interest for those researchers, who intend to conduct bibliometric research studies in LIS.
ISSN:1467-8047
1758-6925
DOI:10.1108/PMM-06-2019-0024