Loading…
Analytical models to estimate the structural behaviour of fused deposition modelling components
Purpose The purpose of this study is to evaluate the capability and performance of analytical models to predict the structural mechanical behaviour of parts fabricated by fused deposition modelling (FDM). Design/methodology/approach A total of eight existing and newly proposed analytical models, tai...
Saved in:
Published in: | Rapid prototyping journal 2021-06, Vol.27 (4), p.658-670 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-d16675c5173675cc8cbc3389c4f87907aae424cdec0e8248c058f3997b63b5553 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-d16675c5173675cc8cbc3389c4f87907aae424cdec0e8248c058f3997b63b5553 |
container_end_page | 670 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 658 |
container_title | Rapid prototyping journal |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Cerda-Avila, Steffany N Medellín-Castillo, Hugo I Lim, Theodore |
description | Purpose
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the capability and performance of analytical models to predict the structural mechanical behaviour of parts fabricated by fused deposition modelling (FDM).
Design/methodology/approach
A total of eight existing and newly proposed analytical models, tailored to satisfy the structural behaviour of FDM parts, are evaluated in terms of their capability to predict the ultimate tensile stress (UTS) and the elastic modulus (E) of parts made of polylactic acid (PLA) by the FDM process. This evaluation is made by comparing the structural properties predicted by these models with the experimental results obtained from tensile tests on FDM specimens fabricated with variable infill percentage, perimeter layers and build orientation.
Findings
Some analytical models are able to predict with high accuracy (prediction errors smaller than 5%) the structural behaviour of FDM and categories of similar additive manufactured parts. The most accurate model is Gibson’s and Ashby, followed by the efficiency model and the two new proposed exponential and variant Duckworth models.
Research limitations/implications
The study has been limited to uniaxial loading conditions along three different build orientations.
Practical implications
The structural properties of FDM parts can be predicted by analytical models based on the process parameters and material properties. Product engineers can use these models during the design for the additive manufacturing process.
Originality/value
Existing methods to estimate the structural properties of FDM parts are based on experimental tests; however, such methods are time-consuming and costly. In this work, the use of analytical models to predict the structural properties of FDM parts is proposed and evaluated. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/RPJ-07-2020-0145 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1108_RPJ_07_2020_0145</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2535760129</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-d16675c5173675cc8cbc3389c4f87907aae424cdec0e8248c058f3997b63b5553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkM1LxDAUxIMouK7ePQY8x31JmiY9LoufLCii59CmqdulbWqSCvvfm7JeBE_zDjOPmR9C1xRuKQW1ent9JiAJAwYEaCZO0IJKoYjMJZymmwtBmMjyc3QRwh6AskzAAun1UHaH2Jqyw72rbRdwdNiG2PZltDjuLA7RTyZOPjkquyu_Wzd57BrcTMHWuLajC21s3XDMd-3wiY3rRzfYIYZLdNaUXbBXv7pEH_d375tHsn15eNqst8RwSiOpaZ5LYQSVfFajTGU4V4XJGiULkGVpM5aZ2hqwimXKgFANLwpZ5bwSQvAlujn-Hb37mlJ_vU8107agmeBC5mlwkVxwdBnvQvC20aNPQ_1BU9AzRp0wapB6xqhnjCmyOkZsbxOC-r_EH_D8B7wedIU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2535760129</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analytical models to estimate the structural behaviour of fused deposition modelling components</title><source>ABI/INFORM global</source><source>Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list)</source><creator>Cerda-Avila, Steffany N ; Medellín-Castillo, Hugo I ; Lim, Theodore</creator><creatorcontrib>Cerda-Avila, Steffany N ; Medellín-Castillo, Hugo I ; Lim, Theodore</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the capability and performance of analytical models to predict the structural mechanical behaviour of parts fabricated by fused deposition modelling (FDM).
Design/methodology/approach
A total of eight existing and newly proposed analytical models, tailored to satisfy the structural behaviour of FDM parts, are evaluated in terms of their capability to predict the ultimate tensile stress (UTS) and the elastic modulus (E) of parts made of polylactic acid (PLA) by the FDM process. This evaluation is made by comparing the structural properties predicted by these models with the experimental results obtained from tensile tests on FDM specimens fabricated with variable infill percentage, perimeter layers and build orientation.
Findings
Some analytical models are able to predict with high accuracy (prediction errors smaller than 5%) the structural behaviour of FDM and categories of similar additive manufactured parts. The most accurate model is Gibson’s and Ashby, followed by the efficiency model and the two new proposed exponential and variant Duckworth models.
Research limitations/implications
The study has been limited to uniaxial loading conditions along three different build orientations.
Practical implications
The structural properties of FDM parts can be predicted by analytical models based on the process parameters and material properties. Product engineers can use these models during the design for the additive manufacturing process.
Originality/value
Existing methods to estimate the structural properties of FDM parts are based on experimental tests; however, such methods are time-consuming and costly. In this work, the use of analytical models to predict the structural properties of FDM parts is proposed and evaluated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1355-2546</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-7670</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/RPJ-07-2020-0145</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Additive manufacturing ; Cost analysis ; Deposition ; Fused deposition modeling ; Material properties ; Mechanical properties ; Modulus of elasticity ; Polylactic acid ; Process parameters ; Rapid prototyping ; Structural behavior ; Tensile strength ; Tensile stress ; Tensile tests</subject><ispartof>Rapid prototyping journal, 2021-06, Vol.27 (4), p.658-670</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-d16675c5173675cc8cbc3389c4f87907aae424cdec0e8248c058f3997b63b5553</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-d16675c5173675cc8cbc3389c4f87907aae424cdec0e8248c058f3997b63b5553</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2535760129?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,11667,27901,27902,36037,44339</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cerda-Avila, Steffany N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medellín-Castillo, Hugo I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Theodore</creatorcontrib><title>Analytical models to estimate the structural behaviour of fused deposition modelling components</title><title>Rapid prototyping journal</title><description>Purpose
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the capability and performance of analytical models to predict the structural mechanical behaviour of parts fabricated by fused deposition modelling (FDM).
Design/methodology/approach
A total of eight existing and newly proposed analytical models, tailored to satisfy the structural behaviour of FDM parts, are evaluated in terms of their capability to predict the ultimate tensile stress (UTS) and the elastic modulus (E) of parts made of polylactic acid (PLA) by the FDM process. This evaluation is made by comparing the structural properties predicted by these models with the experimental results obtained from tensile tests on FDM specimens fabricated with variable infill percentage, perimeter layers and build orientation.
Findings
Some analytical models are able to predict with high accuracy (prediction errors smaller than 5%) the structural behaviour of FDM and categories of similar additive manufactured parts. The most accurate model is Gibson’s and Ashby, followed by the efficiency model and the two new proposed exponential and variant Duckworth models.
Research limitations/implications
The study has been limited to uniaxial loading conditions along three different build orientations.
Practical implications
The structural properties of FDM parts can be predicted by analytical models based on the process parameters and material properties. Product engineers can use these models during the design for the additive manufacturing process.
Originality/value
Existing methods to estimate the structural properties of FDM parts are based on experimental tests; however, such methods are time-consuming and costly. In this work, the use of analytical models to predict the structural properties of FDM parts is proposed and evaluated.</description><subject>Additive manufacturing</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Deposition</subject><subject>Fused deposition modeling</subject><subject>Material properties</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Modulus of elasticity</subject><subject>Polylactic acid</subject><subject>Process parameters</subject><subject>Rapid prototyping</subject><subject>Structural behavior</subject><subject>Tensile strength</subject><subject>Tensile stress</subject><subject>Tensile tests</subject><issn>1355-2546</issn><issn>1758-7670</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNptkM1LxDAUxIMouK7ePQY8x31JmiY9LoufLCii59CmqdulbWqSCvvfm7JeBE_zDjOPmR9C1xRuKQW1ent9JiAJAwYEaCZO0IJKoYjMJZymmwtBmMjyc3QRwh6AskzAAun1UHaH2Jqyw72rbRdwdNiG2PZltDjuLA7RTyZOPjkquyu_Wzd57BrcTMHWuLajC21s3XDMd-3wiY3rRzfYIYZLdNaUXbBXv7pEH_d375tHsn15eNqst8RwSiOpaZ5LYQSVfFajTGU4V4XJGiULkGVpM5aZ2hqwimXKgFANLwpZ5bwSQvAlujn-Hb37mlJ_vU8107agmeBC5mlwkVxwdBnvQvC20aNPQ_1BU9AzRp0wapB6xqhnjCmyOkZsbxOC-r_EH_D8B7wedIU</recordid><startdate>20210604</startdate><enddate>20210604</enddate><creator>Cerda-Avila, Steffany N</creator><creator>Medellín-Castillo, Hugo I</creator><creator>Lim, Theodore</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0W</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210604</creationdate><title>Analytical models to estimate the structural behaviour of fused deposition modelling components</title><author>Cerda-Avila, Steffany N ; Medellín-Castillo, Hugo I ; Lim, Theodore</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-d16675c5173675cc8cbc3389c4f87907aae424cdec0e8248c058f3997b63b5553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Additive manufacturing</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Deposition</topic><topic>Fused deposition modeling</topic><topic>Material properties</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Modulus of elasticity</topic><topic>Polylactic acid</topic><topic>Process parameters</topic><topic>Rapid prototyping</topic><topic>Structural behavior</topic><topic>Tensile strength</topic><topic>Tensile stress</topic><topic>Tensile tests</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cerda-Avila, Steffany N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medellín-Castillo, Hugo I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Theodore</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM global</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>DELNET Engineering & Technology Collection</collection><jtitle>Rapid prototyping journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cerda-Avila, Steffany N</au><au>Medellín-Castillo, Hugo I</au><au>Lim, Theodore</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analytical models to estimate the structural behaviour of fused deposition modelling components</atitle><jtitle>Rapid prototyping journal</jtitle><date>2021-06-04</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>658</spage><epage>670</epage><pages>658-670</pages><issn>1355-2546</issn><eissn>1758-7670</eissn><abstract>Purpose
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the capability and performance of analytical models to predict the structural mechanical behaviour of parts fabricated by fused deposition modelling (FDM).
Design/methodology/approach
A total of eight existing and newly proposed analytical models, tailored to satisfy the structural behaviour of FDM parts, are evaluated in terms of their capability to predict the ultimate tensile stress (UTS) and the elastic modulus (E) of parts made of polylactic acid (PLA) by the FDM process. This evaluation is made by comparing the structural properties predicted by these models with the experimental results obtained from tensile tests on FDM specimens fabricated with variable infill percentage, perimeter layers and build orientation.
Findings
Some analytical models are able to predict with high accuracy (prediction errors smaller than 5%) the structural behaviour of FDM and categories of similar additive manufactured parts. The most accurate model is Gibson’s and Ashby, followed by the efficiency model and the two new proposed exponential and variant Duckworth models.
Research limitations/implications
The study has been limited to uniaxial loading conditions along three different build orientations.
Practical implications
The structural properties of FDM parts can be predicted by analytical models based on the process parameters and material properties. Product engineers can use these models during the design for the additive manufacturing process.
Originality/value
Existing methods to estimate the structural properties of FDM parts are based on experimental tests; however, such methods are time-consuming and costly. In this work, the use of analytical models to predict the structural properties of FDM parts is proposed and evaluated.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/RPJ-07-2020-0145</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1355-2546 |
ispartof | Rapid prototyping journal, 2021-06, Vol.27 (4), p.658-670 |
issn | 1355-2546 1758-7670 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1108_RPJ_07_2020_0145 |
source | ABI/INFORM global; Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list) |
subjects | Additive manufacturing Cost analysis Deposition Fused deposition modeling Material properties Mechanical properties Modulus of elasticity Polylactic acid Process parameters Rapid prototyping Structural behavior Tensile strength Tensile stress Tensile tests |
title | Analytical models to estimate the structural behaviour of fused deposition modelling components |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T02%3A49%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analytical%20models%20to%20estimate%20the%20structural%20behaviour%20of%20fused%20deposition%20modelling%20components&rft.jtitle=Rapid%20prototyping%20journal&rft.au=Cerda-Avila,%20Steffany%20N&rft.date=2021-06-04&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=658&rft.epage=670&rft.pages=658-670&rft.issn=1355-2546&rft.eissn=1758-7670&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/RPJ-07-2020-0145&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2535760129%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-d16675c5173675cc8cbc3389c4f87907aae424cdec0e8248c058f3997b63b5553%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2535760129&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |