Loading…
Meta-cognitive impairment in processing ingredients: the effects of jargon, list length and aids on young consumers’ evaluations of cosmetic products
Purpose This study aims to examine the nonidentical impacts of identical panel information that discloses cosmetic ingredients by their English (i.e. low jargon; e.g. vitamin E) versus scientific names (i.e. high jargon; tocopherol instead) presented in short versus crowded panel on young consumers’...
Saved in:
Published in: | Young consumers 2022-03, Vol.23 (1), p.129-143 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c287t-e2d2900897ce7182a09395a41e41077f3cdb9e5dcaa7f7a3eb28c13cf2c405c83 |
container_end_page | 143 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 129 |
container_title | Young consumers |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Özdinç, Yalım |
description | Purpose
This study aims to examine the nonidentical impacts of identical panel information that discloses cosmetic ingredients by their English (i.e. low jargon; e.g. vitamin E) versus scientific names (i.e. high jargon; tocopherol instead) presented in short versus crowded panel on young consumers’ confidence in processing ingredients information and product judgements. In the same context, this study also explores the effects of declarative aids provided within the ingredients panel.
Design/methodology/approach
This study conducted four experiments by using a 2 (jargon: high, low) × 2 (ingredients list: short, long) between-subjects analysis of variance design.
Findings
Young consumers’ processing-confidence and product evaluations increase (decrease) when the panel is brief (crowded) and presents cosmetic ingredients in low (high) jargon (Experiments 1, 2). However, when it discloses a factual aid [i.e. ingredient functions; e.g. tocopherol (antioxidant)], confidence in processing even the high-jargon information, as well as product judgements, increases irrespective of the panel’s length (Experiment 3). Moreover, a fictitious aid (e.g. dryness-fighting “atomic robots”) stimulates the same effect and bolsters processing confidence and product evaluations irrespective of both jargon and panel’s length (Experiment 4).
Originality/value
Despite their heavy use of over-the-counter beauty/cosmetic products, little do we know how young consumers consult and use on-pack ingredients information provided in one format versus the other. To the best of the author’s knowledge, this study is the first experimental work investigating the cosmetics-consuming youth’s reactions to panel format and aids to processing. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/YC-03-2021-1286 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1108_YC_03_2021_1286</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2640995440</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c287t-e2d2900897ce7182a09395a41e41077f3cdb9e5dcaa7f7a3eb28c13cf2c405c83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUctKxDAULaLg-Fi7Dbg1mkfbtO5k8AUjbnThKsT0tpOhTcYkHXDnX4i_55eYMm4EV_d5zuGem2UnlJxTSqqLlzkmHDPCKKasKneyGRVFhQWjbHfKc4F5Scv97CCEFSElEyWdZZ8PEBXWrrMmmg0gM6yV8QPYiIxFa-80hGBsl6rOQ2PSIFyiuAQEbQs6BuRatFK-c_YM9SZE1IPt4hIp2yBlmjS36N2NiUE7G8YBfPj--EKwUf2ookm9iUG7MEA0elJsxkR7lO21qg9w_BsPs-eb66f5HV483t7PrxZYs0pEDKxhNSFVLTQIWjFFal4XKqeQUyJEy3XzWkPRaKVEKxSHV1ZpynXLdE4KXfHD7HTLm4TfRghRrtzobZKUrMxJXRd5TtLWxXZLexeCh1auvRmUf5eUyMl9-TKXhMvJfTm5nxDnWwSki1Xf_AP48y7-A8edib4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2640995440</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Meta-cognitive impairment in processing ingredients: the effects of jargon, list length and aids on young consumers’ evaluations of cosmetic products</title><source>ABI/INFORM Collection</source><source>Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list)</source><creator>Özdinç, Yalım</creator><creatorcontrib>Özdinç, Yalım</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
This study aims to examine the nonidentical impacts of identical panel information that discloses cosmetic ingredients by their English (i.e. low jargon; e.g. vitamin E) versus scientific names (i.e. high jargon; tocopherol instead) presented in short versus crowded panel on young consumers’ confidence in processing ingredients information and product judgements. In the same context, this study also explores the effects of declarative aids provided within the ingredients panel.
Design/methodology/approach
This study conducted four experiments by using a 2 (jargon: high, low) × 2 (ingredients list: short, long) between-subjects analysis of variance design.
Findings
Young consumers’ processing-confidence and product evaluations increase (decrease) when the panel is brief (crowded) and presents cosmetic ingredients in low (high) jargon (Experiments 1, 2). However, when it discloses a factual aid [i.e. ingredient functions; e.g. tocopherol (antioxidant)], confidence in processing even the high-jargon information, as well as product judgements, increases irrespective of the panel’s length (Experiment 3). Moreover, a fictitious aid (e.g. dryness-fighting “atomic robots”) stimulates the same effect and bolsters processing confidence and product evaluations irrespective of both jargon and panel’s length (Experiment 4).
Originality/value
Despite their heavy use of over-the-counter beauty/cosmetic products, little do we know how young consumers consult and use on-pack ingredients information provided in one format versus the other. To the best of the author’s knowledge, this study is the first experimental work investigating the cosmetics-consuming youth’s reactions to panel format and aids to processing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1747-3616</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-7212</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/YC-03-2021-1286</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Between-subjects design ; Cognitive ability ; Confidence ; Consumers ; Cosmetics ; Descriptive labeling ; Experiments ; Federal regulation ; Information processing ; Ingredients ; Metacognition ; Packaging ; Skin ; Terminology</subject><ispartof>Young consumers, 2022-03, Vol.23 (1), p.129-143</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c287t-e2d2900897ce7182a09395a41e41077f3cdb9e5dcaa7f7a3eb28c13cf2c405c83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2640995440/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2640995440?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,27924,27925,36060,44363,74767</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Özdinç, Yalım</creatorcontrib><title>Meta-cognitive impairment in processing ingredients: the effects of jargon, list length and aids on young consumers’ evaluations of cosmetic products</title><title>Young consumers</title><description>Purpose
This study aims to examine the nonidentical impacts of identical panel information that discloses cosmetic ingredients by their English (i.e. low jargon; e.g. vitamin E) versus scientific names (i.e. high jargon; tocopherol instead) presented in short versus crowded panel on young consumers’ confidence in processing ingredients information and product judgements. In the same context, this study also explores the effects of declarative aids provided within the ingredients panel.
Design/methodology/approach
This study conducted four experiments by using a 2 (jargon: high, low) × 2 (ingredients list: short, long) between-subjects analysis of variance design.
Findings
Young consumers’ processing-confidence and product evaluations increase (decrease) when the panel is brief (crowded) and presents cosmetic ingredients in low (high) jargon (Experiments 1, 2). However, when it discloses a factual aid [i.e. ingredient functions; e.g. tocopherol (antioxidant)], confidence in processing even the high-jargon information, as well as product judgements, increases irrespective of the panel’s length (Experiment 3). Moreover, a fictitious aid (e.g. dryness-fighting “atomic robots”) stimulates the same effect and bolsters processing confidence and product evaluations irrespective of both jargon and panel’s length (Experiment 4).
Originality/value
Despite their heavy use of over-the-counter beauty/cosmetic products, little do we know how young consumers consult and use on-pack ingredients information provided in one format versus the other. To the best of the author’s knowledge, this study is the first experimental work investigating the cosmetics-consuming youth’s reactions to panel format and aids to processing.</description><subject>Between-subjects design</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Confidence</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Cosmetics</subject><subject>Descriptive labeling</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Federal regulation</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Ingredients</subject><subject>Metacognition</subject><subject>Packaging</subject><subject>Skin</subject><subject>Terminology</subject><issn>1747-3616</issn><issn>1758-7212</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNptUctKxDAULaLg-Fi7Dbg1mkfbtO5k8AUjbnThKsT0tpOhTcYkHXDnX4i_55eYMm4EV_d5zuGem2UnlJxTSqqLlzkmHDPCKKasKneyGRVFhQWjbHfKc4F5Scv97CCEFSElEyWdZZ8PEBXWrrMmmg0gM6yV8QPYiIxFa-80hGBsl6rOQ2PSIFyiuAQEbQs6BuRatFK-c_YM9SZE1IPt4hIp2yBlmjS36N2NiUE7G8YBfPj--EKwUf2ookm9iUG7MEA0elJsxkR7lO21qg9w_BsPs-eb66f5HV483t7PrxZYs0pEDKxhNSFVLTQIWjFFal4XKqeQUyJEy3XzWkPRaKVEKxSHV1ZpynXLdE4KXfHD7HTLm4TfRghRrtzobZKUrMxJXRd5TtLWxXZLexeCh1auvRmUf5eUyMl9-TKXhMvJfTm5nxDnWwSki1Xf_AP48y7-A8edib4</recordid><startdate>20220323</startdate><enddate>20220323</enddate><creator>Özdinç, Yalım</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220323</creationdate><title>Meta-cognitive impairment in processing ingredients: the effects of jargon, list length and aids on young consumers’ evaluations of cosmetic products</title><author>Özdinç, Yalım</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c287t-e2d2900897ce7182a09395a41e41077f3cdb9e5dcaa7f7a3eb28c13cf2c405c83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Between-subjects design</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Confidence</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Cosmetics</topic><topic>Descriptive labeling</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Federal regulation</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Ingredients</topic><topic>Metacognition</topic><topic>Packaging</topic><topic>Skin</topic><topic>Terminology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Özdinç, Yalım</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Young consumers</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Özdinç, Yalım</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Meta-cognitive impairment in processing ingredients: the effects of jargon, list length and aids on young consumers’ evaluations of cosmetic products</atitle><jtitle>Young consumers</jtitle><date>2022-03-23</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>129</spage><epage>143</epage><pages>129-143</pages><issn>1747-3616</issn><eissn>1758-7212</eissn><abstract>Purpose
This study aims to examine the nonidentical impacts of identical panel information that discloses cosmetic ingredients by their English (i.e. low jargon; e.g. vitamin E) versus scientific names (i.e. high jargon; tocopherol instead) presented in short versus crowded panel on young consumers’ confidence in processing ingredients information and product judgements. In the same context, this study also explores the effects of declarative aids provided within the ingredients panel.
Design/methodology/approach
This study conducted four experiments by using a 2 (jargon: high, low) × 2 (ingredients list: short, long) between-subjects analysis of variance design.
Findings
Young consumers’ processing-confidence and product evaluations increase (decrease) when the panel is brief (crowded) and presents cosmetic ingredients in low (high) jargon (Experiments 1, 2). However, when it discloses a factual aid [i.e. ingredient functions; e.g. tocopherol (antioxidant)], confidence in processing even the high-jargon information, as well as product judgements, increases irrespective of the panel’s length (Experiment 3). Moreover, a fictitious aid (e.g. dryness-fighting “atomic robots”) stimulates the same effect and bolsters processing confidence and product evaluations irrespective of both jargon and panel’s length (Experiment 4).
Originality/value
Despite their heavy use of over-the-counter beauty/cosmetic products, little do we know how young consumers consult and use on-pack ingredients information provided in one format versus the other. To the best of the author’s knowledge, this study is the first experimental work investigating the cosmetics-consuming youth’s reactions to panel format and aids to processing.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/YC-03-2021-1286</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1747-3616 |
ispartof | Young consumers, 2022-03, Vol.23 (1), p.129-143 |
issn | 1747-3616 1758-7212 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1108_YC_03_2021_1286 |
source | ABI/INFORM Collection; Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list) |
subjects | Between-subjects design Cognitive ability Confidence Consumers Cosmetics Descriptive labeling Experiments Federal regulation Information processing Ingredients Metacognition Packaging Skin Terminology |
title | Meta-cognitive impairment in processing ingredients: the effects of jargon, list length and aids on young consumers’ evaluations of cosmetic products |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T00%3A18%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Meta-cognitive%20impairment%20in%20processing%20ingredients:%20the%20effects%20of%20jargon,%20list%20length%20and%20aids%20on%20young%20consumers%E2%80%99%20evaluations%20of%20cosmetic%20products&rft.jtitle=Young%20consumers&rft.au=%C3%96zdin%C3%A7,%20Yal%C4%B1m&rft.date=2022-03-23&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=129&rft.epage=143&rft.pages=129-143&rft.issn=1747-3616&rft.eissn=1758-7212&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/YC-03-2021-1286&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2640995440%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c287t-e2d2900897ce7182a09395a41e41077f3cdb9e5dcaa7f7a3eb28c13cf2c405c83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2640995440&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |