Loading…

Meta-cognitive impairment in processing ingredients: the effects of jargon, list length and aids on young consumers’ evaluations of cosmetic products

Purpose This study aims to examine the nonidentical impacts of identical panel information that discloses cosmetic ingredients by their English (i.e. low jargon; e.g. vitamin E) versus scientific names (i.e. high jargon; tocopherol instead) presented in short versus crowded panel on young consumers’...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Young consumers 2022-03, Vol.23 (1), p.129-143
Main Author: Özdinç, Yalım
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c287t-e2d2900897ce7182a09395a41e41077f3cdb9e5dcaa7f7a3eb28c13cf2c405c83
container_end_page 143
container_issue 1
container_start_page 129
container_title Young consumers
container_volume 23
creator Özdinç, Yalım
description Purpose This study aims to examine the nonidentical impacts of identical panel information that discloses cosmetic ingredients by their English (i.e. low jargon; e.g. vitamin E) versus scientific names (i.e. high jargon; tocopherol instead) presented in short versus crowded panel on young consumers’ confidence in processing ingredients information and product judgements. In the same context, this study also explores the effects of declarative aids provided within the ingredients panel. Design/methodology/approach This study conducted four experiments by using a 2 (jargon: high, low) × 2 (ingredients list: short, long) between-subjects analysis of variance design. Findings Young consumers’ processing-confidence and product evaluations increase (decrease) when the panel is brief (crowded) and presents cosmetic ingredients in low (high) jargon (Experiments 1, 2). However, when it discloses a factual aid [i.e. ingredient functions; e.g. tocopherol (antioxidant)], confidence in processing even the high-jargon information, as well as product judgements, increases irrespective of the panel’s length (Experiment 3). Moreover, a fictitious aid (e.g. dryness-fighting “atomic robots”) stimulates the same effect and bolsters processing confidence and product evaluations irrespective of both jargon and panel’s length (Experiment 4). Originality/value Despite their heavy use of over-the-counter beauty/cosmetic products, little do we know how young consumers consult and use on-pack ingredients information provided in one format versus the other. To the best of the author’s knowledge, this study is the first experimental work investigating the cosmetics-consuming youth’s reactions to panel format and aids to processing.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/YC-03-2021-1286
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1108_YC_03_2021_1286</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2640995440</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c287t-e2d2900897ce7182a09395a41e41077f3cdb9e5dcaa7f7a3eb28c13cf2c405c83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUctKxDAULaLg-Fi7Dbg1mkfbtO5k8AUjbnThKsT0tpOhTcYkHXDnX4i_55eYMm4EV_d5zuGem2UnlJxTSqqLlzkmHDPCKKasKneyGRVFhQWjbHfKc4F5Scv97CCEFSElEyWdZZ8PEBXWrrMmmg0gM6yV8QPYiIxFa-80hGBsl6rOQ2PSIFyiuAQEbQs6BuRatFK-c_YM9SZE1IPt4hIp2yBlmjS36N2NiUE7G8YBfPj--EKwUf2ookm9iUG7MEA0elJsxkR7lO21qg9w_BsPs-eb66f5HV483t7PrxZYs0pEDKxhNSFVLTQIWjFFal4XKqeQUyJEy3XzWkPRaKVEKxSHV1ZpynXLdE4KXfHD7HTLm4TfRghRrtzobZKUrMxJXRd5TtLWxXZLexeCh1auvRmUf5eUyMl9-TKXhMvJfTm5nxDnWwSki1Xf_AP48y7-A8edib4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2640995440</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Meta-cognitive impairment in processing ingredients: the effects of jargon, list length and aids on young consumers’ evaluations of cosmetic products</title><source>ABI/INFORM Collection</source><source>Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list)</source><creator>Özdinç, Yalım</creator><creatorcontrib>Özdinç, Yalım</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose This study aims to examine the nonidentical impacts of identical panel information that discloses cosmetic ingredients by their English (i.e. low jargon; e.g. vitamin E) versus scientific names (i.e. high jargon; tocopherol instead) presented in short versus crowded panel on young consumers’ confidence in processing ingredients information and product judgements. In the same context, this study also explores the effects of declarative aids provided within the ingredients panel. Design/methodology/approach This study conducted four experiments by using a 2 (jargon: high, low) × 2 (ingredients list: short, long) between-subjects analysis of variance design. Findings Young consumers’ processing-confidence and product evaluations increase (decrease) when the panel is brief (crowded) and presents cosmetic ingredients in low (high) jargon (Experiments 1, 2). However, when it discloses a factual aid [i.e. ingredient functions; e.g. tocopherol (antioxidant)], confidence in processing even the high-jargon information, as well as product judgements, increases irrespective of the panel’s length (Experiment 3). Moreover, a fictitious aid (e.g. dryness-fighting “atomic robots”) stimulates the same effect and bolsters processing confidence and product evaluations irrespective of both jargon and panel’s length (Experiment 4). Originality/value Despite their heavy use of over-the-counter beauty/cosmetic products, little do we know how young consumers consult and use on-pack ingredients information provided in one format versus the other. To the best of the author’s knowledge, this study is the first experimental work investigating the cosmetics-consuming youth’s reactions to panel format and aids to processing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1747-3616</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-7212</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/YC-03-2021-1286</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Between-subjects design ; Cognitive ability ; Confidence ; Consumers ; Cosmetics ; Descriptive labeling ; Experiments ; Federal regulation ; Information processing ; Ingredients ; Metacognition ; Packaging ; Skin ; Terminology</subject><ispartof>Young consumers, 2022-03, Vol.23 (1), p.129-143</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c287t-e2d2900897ce7182a09395a41e41077f3cdb9e5dcaa7f7a3eb28c13cf2c405c83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2640995440/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2640995440?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,27924,27925,36060,44363,74767</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Özdinç, Yalım</creatorcontrib><title>Meta-cognitive impairment in processing ingredients: the effects of jargon, list length and aids on young consumers’ evaluations of cosmetic products</title><title>Young consumers</title><description>Purpose This study aims to examine the nonidentical impacts of identical panel information that discloses cosmetic ingredients by their English (i.e. low jargon; e.g. vitamin E) versus scientific names (i.e. high jargon; tocopherol instead) presented in short versus crowded panel on young consumers’ confidence in processing ingredients information and product judgements. In the same context, this study also explores the effects of declarative aids provided within the ingredients panel. Design/methodology/approach This study conducted four experiments by using a 2 (jargon: high, low) × 2 (ingredients list: short, long) between-subjects analysis of variance design. Findings Young consumers’ processing-confidence and product evaluations increase (decrease) when the panel is brief (crowded) and presents cosmetic ingredients in low (high) jargon (Experiments 1, 2). However, when it discloses a factual aid [i.e. ingredient functions; e.g. tocopherol (antioxidant)], confidence in processing even the high-jargon information, as well as product judgements, increases irrespective of the panel’s length (Experiment 3). Moreover, a fictitious aid (e.g. dryness-fighting “atomic robots”) stimulates the same effect and bolsters processing confidence and product evaluations irrespective of both jargon and panel’s length (Experiment 4). Originality/value Despite their heavy use of over-the-counter beauty/cosmetic products, little do we know how young consumers consult and use on-pack ingredients information provided in one format versus the other. To the best of the author’s knowledge, this study is the first experimental work investigating the cosmetics-consuming youth’s reactions to panel format and aids to processing.</description><subject>Between-subjects design</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Confidence</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Cosmetics</subject><subject>Descriptive labeling</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Federal regulation</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Ingredients</subject><subject>Metacognition</subject><subject>Packaging</subject><subject>Skin</subject><subject>Terminology</subject><issn>1747-3616</issn><issn>1758-7212</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNptUctKxDAULaLg-Fi7Dbg1mkfbtO5k8AUjbnThKsT0tpOhTcYkHXDnX4i_55eYMm4EV_d5zuGem2UnlJxTSqqLlzkmHDPCKKasKneyGRVFhQWjbHfKc4F5Scv97CCEFSElEyWdZZ8PEBXWrrMmmg0gM6yV8QPYiIxFa-80hGBsl6rOQ2PSIFyiuAQEbQs6BuRatFK-c_YM9SZE1IPt4hIp2yBlmjS36N2NiUE7G8YBfPj--EKwUf2ookm9iUG7MEA0elJsxkR7lO21qg9w_BsPs-eb66f5HV483t7PrxZYs0pEDKxhNSFVLTQIWjFFal4XKqeQUyJEy3XzWkPRaKVEKxSHV1ZpynXLdE4KXfHD7HTLm4TfRghRrtzobZKUrMxJXRd5TtLWxXZLexeCh1auvRmUf5eUyMl9-TKXhMvJfTm5nxDnWwSki1Xf_AP48y7-A8edib4</recordid><startdate>20220323</startdate><enddate>20220323</enddate><creator>Özdinç, Yalım</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220323</creationdate><title>Meta-cognitive impairment in processing ingredients: the effects of jargon, list length and aids on young consumers’ evaluations of cosmetic products</title><author>Özdinç, Yalım</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c287t-e2d2900897ce7182a09395a41e41077f3cdb9e5dcaa7f7a3eb28c13cf2c405c83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Between-subjects design</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Confidence</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Cosmetics</topic><topic>Descriptive labeling</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Federal regulation</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Ingredients</topic><topic>Metacognition</topic><topic>Packaging</topic><topic>Skin</topic><topic>Terminology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Özdinç, Yalım</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Young consumers</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Özdinç, Yalım</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Meta-cognitive impairment in processing ingredients: the effects of jargon, list length and aids on young consumers’ evaluations of cosmetic products</atitle><jtitle>Young consumers</jtitle><date>2022-03-23</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>129</spage><epage>143</epage><pages>129-143</pages><issn>1747-3616</issn><eissn>1758-7212</eissn><abstract>Purpose This study aims to examine the nonidentical impacts of identical panel information that discloses cosmetic ingredients by their English (i.e. low jargon; e.g. vitamin E) versus scientific names (i.e. high jargon; tocopherol instead) presented in short versus crowded panel on young consumers’ confidence in processing ingredients information and product judgements. In the same context, this study also explores the effects of declarative aids provided within the ingredients panel. Design/methodology/approach This study conducted four experiments by using a 2 (jargon: high, low) × 2 (ingredients list: short, long) between-subjects analysis of variance design. Findings Young consumers’ processing-confidence and product evaluations increase (decrease) when the panel is brief (crowded) and presents cosmetic ingredients in low (high) jargon (Experiments 1, 2). However, when it discloses a factual aid [i.e. ingredient functions; e.g. tocopherol (antioxidant)], confidence in processing even the high-jargon information, as well as product judgements, increases irrespective of the panel’s length (Experiment 3). Moreover, a fictitious aid (e.g. dryness-fighting “atomic robots”) stimulates the same effect and bolsters processing confidence and product evaluations irrespective of both jargon and panel’s length (Experiment 4). Originality/value Despite their heavy use of over-the-counter beauty/cosmetic products, little do we know how young consumers consult and use on-pack ingredients information provided in one format versus the other. To the best of the author’s knowledge, this study is the first experimental work investigating the cosmetics-consuming youth’s reactions to panel format and aids to processing.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/YC-03-2021-1286</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1747-3616
ispartof Young consumers, 2022-03, Vol.23 (1), p.129-143
issn 1747-3616
1758-7212
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1108_YC_03_2021_1286
source ABI/INFORM Collection; Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list)
subjects Between-subjects design
Cognitive ability
Confidence
Consumers
Cosmetics
Descriptive labeling
Experiments
Federal regulation
Information processing
Ingredients
Metacognition
Packaging
Skin
Terminology
title Meta-cognitive impairment in processing ingredients: the effects of jargon, list length and aids on young consumers’ evaluations of cosmetic products
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T00%3A18%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Meta-cognitive%20impairment%20in%20processing%20ingredients:%20the%20effects%20of%20jargon,%20list%20length%20and%20aids%20on%20young%20consumers%E2%80%99%20evaluations%20of%20cosmetic%20products&rft.jtitle=Young%20consumers&rft.au=%C3%96zdin%C3%A7,%20Yal%C4%B1m&rft.date=2022-03-23&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=129&rft.epage=143&rft.pages=129-143&rft.issn=1747-3616&rft.eissn=1758-7212&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/YC-03-2021-1286&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2640995440%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c287t-e2d2900897ce7182a09395a41e41077f3cdb9e5dcaa7f7a3eb28c13cf2c405c83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2640995440&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true