Results of benchmark tests for different numerical BPM algorithms

Some key results of a benchmark test, initiated in 1992 by the Working Group 2 of COST Project 240 at a modelling workshop in Teupitz, Germany, are presented. A great number of BPM algorithms, such as the FTBPM, various types of FDBPMs, wide angle approximations and adaptive FE-BPM are compared. The...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of lightwave technology 1995-02, Vol.13 (2), p.216-224
Main Authors: Nolting, H.-P., Marz, R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Applied sciences
Benchmark testing
Circuit properties
Circuit simulation
Circuit testing
Costs
Electric, optical and optoelectronic circuits
Electronics
Exact sciences and technology
Integrated optics
Integrated optics. Optical fibers and wave guides
Optical and optoelectronic circuits
Optical propagation
Optical refraction
Optical variables control
Optical waveguides
Refractive index
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Some key results of a benchmark test, initiated in 1992 by the Working Group 2 of COST Project 240 at a modelling workshop in Teupitz, Germany, are presented. A great number of BPM algorithms, such as the FTBPM, various types of FDBPMs, wide angle approximations and adaptive FE-BPM are compared. The quasi-analytic character of the benchmark tests gains a deeper insight into the absolute accuracy.< >
ISSN:0733-8724
1558-2213
DOI:10.1109/50.365209