Loading…
Results of benchmark tests for different numerical BPM algorithms
Some key results of a benchmark test, initiated in 1992 by the Working Group 2 of COST Project 240 at a modelling workshop in Teupitz, Germany, are presented. A great number of BPM algorithms, such as the FTBPM, various types of FDBPMs, wide angle approximations and adaptive FE-BPM are compared. The...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Journal of lightwave technology 1995-02, Vol.13 (2), p.216-224 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-fff67e5d5654b12cb4546d3ac2904f4bbcac9cb5b4c32eee834d18004a6324453 |
|---|---|
| cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-fff67e5d5654b12cb4546d3ac2904f4bbcac9cb5b4c32eee834d18004a6324453 |
| container_end_page | 224 |
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 216 |
| container_title | Journal of lightwave technology |
| container_volume | 13 |
| creator | Nolting, H.-P. Marz, R. |
| description | Some key results of a benchmark test, initiated in 1992 by the Working Group 2 of COST Project 240 at a modelling workshop in Teupitz, Germany, are presented. A great number of BPM algorithms, such as the FTBPM, various types of FDBPMs, wide angle approximations and adaptive FE-BPM are compared. The quasi-analytic character of the benchmark tests gains a deeper insight into the absolute accuracy.< > |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1109/50.365209 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1109_50_365209</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>365209</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>28544598</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-fff67e5d5654b12cb4546d3ac2904f4bbcac9cb5b4c32eee834d18004a6324453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkElLBDEQhYMoOI4evHrKQQQPPWap9HIcBzcYUUTPIUknTrSXMek--O-N9KCngqqvHu89hE4pWVBKqitBFjwXjFR7aEaFKDPGKN9HM1JwnpUFg0N0FOMHIRSgLGZo-WLj2AwR9w5r25lNq8InHmxMK9cHXHvnbLDdgLuxtcEb1eDr50esmvc--GHTxmN04FQT7cluztHb7c3r6j5bP909rJbrzPCCDZlzLi-sqEUuQFNmNAjIa64Mqwg40NooUxktNBjOrLUlh5qWhIDKOQMQfI4uJt1t6L_GZFC2PhrbNKqz_RglK0XCqjKBlxNoQh9jsE5ug0-xviUl8rckKYicSkrs-U5UxRTNBdUZH_8eOAAXgiTsbMJ8cvZ_nTR-AIzEbhE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>28544598</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Results of benchmark tests for different numerical BPM algorithms</title><source>IEEE Xplore (Online service)</source><creator>Nolting, H.-P. ; Marz, R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Nolting, H.-P. ; Marz, R.</creatorcontrib><description>Some key results of a benchmark test, initiated in 1992 by the Working Group 2 of COST Project 240 at a modelling workshop in Teupitz, Germany, are presented. A great number of BPM algorithms, such as the FTBPM, various types of FDBPMs, wide angle approximations and adaptive FE-BPM are compared. The quasi-analytic character of the benchmark tests gains a deeper insight into the absolute accuracy.< ></description><identifier>ISSN: 0733-8724</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-2213</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/50.365209</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JLTEDG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: IEEE</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Benchmark testing ; Circuit properties ; Circuit simulation ; Circuit testing ; Costs ; Electric, optical and optoelectronic circuits ; Electronics ; Exact sciences and technology ; Integrated optics ; Integrated optics. Optical fibers and wave guides ; Optical and optoelectronic circuits ; Optical propagation ; Optical refraction ; Optical variables control ; Optical waveguides ; Refractive index</subject><ispartof>Journal of lightwave technology, 1995-02, Vol.13 (2), p.216-224</ispartof><rights>1995 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-fff67e5d5654b12cb4546d3ac2904f4bbcac9cb5b4c32eee834d18004a6324453</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-fff67e5d5654b12cb4546d3ac2904f4bbcac9cb5b4c32eee834d18004a6324453</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/365209$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,54796</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=3443550$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nolting, H.-P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marz, R.</creatorcontrib><title>Results of benchmark tests for different numerical BPM algorithms</title><title>Journal of lightwave technology</title><addtitle>JLT</addtitle><description>Some key results of a benchmark test, initiated in 1992 by the Working Group 2 of COST Project 240 at a modelling workshop in Teupitz, Germany, are presented. A great number of BPM algorithms, such as the FTBPM, various types of FDBPMs, wide angle approximations and adaptive FE-BPM are compared. The quasi-analytic character of the benchmark tests gains a deeper insight into the absolute accuracy.< ></description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Benchmark testing</subject><subject>Circuit properties</subject><subject>Circuit simulation</subject><subject>Circuit testing</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Electric, optical and optoelectronic circuits</subject><subject>Electronics</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Integrated optics</subject><subject>Integrated optics. Optical fibers and wave guides</subject><subject>Optical and optoelectronic circuits</subject><subject>Optical propagation</subject><subject>Optical refraction</subject><subject>Optical variables control</subject><subject>Optical waveguides</subject><subject>Refractive index</subject><issn>0733-8724</issn><issn>1558-2213</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkElLBDEQhYMoOI4evHrKQQQPPWap9HIcBzcYUUTPIUknTrSXMek--O-N9KCngqqvHu89hE4pWVBKqitBFjwXjFR7aEaFKDPGKN9HM1JwnpUFg0N0FOMHIRSgLGZo-WLj2AwR9w5r25lNq8InHmxMK9cHXHvnbLDdgLuxtcEb1eDr50esmvc--GHTxmN04FQT7cluztHb7c3r6j5bP909rJbrzPCCDZlzLi-sqEUuQFNmNAjIa64Mqwg40NooUxktNBjOrLUlh5qWhIDKOQMQfI4uJt1t6L_GZFC2PhrbNKqz_RglK0XCqjKBlxNoQh9jsE5ug0-xviUl8rckKYicSkrs-U5UxRTNBdUZH_8eOAAXgiTsbMJ8cvZ_nTR-AIzEbhE</recordid><startdate>19950201</startdate><enddate>19950201</enddate><creator>Nolting, H.-P.</creator><creator>Marz, R.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19950201</creationdate><title>Results of benchmark tests for different numerical BPM algorithms</title><author>Nolting, H.-P. ; Marz, R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-fff67e5d5654b12cb4546d3ac2904f4bbcac9cb5b4c32eee834d18004a6324453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Benchmark testing</topic><topic>Circuit properties</topic><topic>Circuit simulation</topic><topic>Circuit testing</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Electric, optical and optoelectronic circuits</topic><topic>Electronics</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Integrated optics</topic><topic>Integrated optics. Optical fibers and wave guides</topic><topic>Optical and optoelectronic circuits</topic><topic>Optical propagation</topic><topic>Optical refraction</topic><topic>Optical variables control</topic><topic>Optical waveguides</topic><topic>Refractive index</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nolting, H.-P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marz, R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of lightwave technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nolting, H.-P.</au><au>Marz, R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Results of benchmark tests for different numerical BPM algorithms</atitle><jtitle>Journal of lightwave technology</jtitle><stitle>JLT</stitle><date>1995-02-01</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>216</spage><epage>224</epage><pages>216-224</pages><issn>0733-8724</issn><eissn>1558-2213</eissn><coden>JLTEDG</coden><abstract>Some key results of a benchmark test, initiated in 1992 by the Working Group 2 of COST Project 240 at a modelling workshop in Teupitz, Germany, are presented. A great number of BPM algorithms, such as the FTBPM, various types of FDBPMs, wide angle approximations and adaptive FE-BPM are compared. The quasi-analytic character of the benchmark tests gains a deeper insight into the absolute accuracy.< ></abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/50.365209</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0733-8724 |
| ispartof | Journal of lightwave technology, 1995-02, Vol.13 (2), p.216-224 |
| issn | 0733-8724 1558-2213 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1109_50_365209 |
| source | IEEE Xplore (Online service) |
| subjects | Applied sciences Benchmark testing Circuit properties Circuit simulation Circuit testing Costs Electric, optical and optoelectronic circuits Electronics Exact sciences and technology Integrated optics Integrated optics. Optical fibers and wave guides Optical and optoelectronic circuits Optical propagation Optical refraction Optical variables control Optical waveguides Refractive index |
| title | Results of benchmark tests for different numerical BPM algorithms |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T07%3A26%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Results%20of%20benchmark%20tests%20for%20different%20numerical%20BPM%20algorithms&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20lightwave%20technology&rft.au=Nolting,%20H.-P.&rft.date=1995-02-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=216&rft.epage=224&rft.pages=216-224&rft.issn=0733-8724&rft.eissn=1558-2213&rft.coden=JLTEDG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/50.365209&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E28544598%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-fff67e5d5654b12cb4546d3ac2904f4bbcac9cb5b4c32eee834d18004a6324453%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=28544598&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=365209&rfr_iscdi=true |