Loading…

Upper bounds for the performance of turbo-like codes and low density parity check codes

Researchers have investigated many upper bound techniques applicable to error probabilities on the maximum likelihood (ML) decoding performance of turbo-like codes and low density parity check (LDPC) codes in recent years for a long codeword block size. This is because it is trivial for a short code...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of communications and networks 2008, 10(1), , pp.5-9
Main Authors: Chung, Kyuhyuk, Heo, Jun
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-d0a3e2be0f6339fc8b8176df9816b9f5dc86ffb07a017cef7bada0e5df48ae673
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-d0a3e2be0f6339fc8b8176df9816b9f5dc86ffb07a017cef7bada0e5df48ae673
container_end_page 9
container_issue 1
container_start_page 5
container_title Journal of communications and networks
container_volume 10
creator Chung, Kyuhyuk
Heo, Jun
description Researchers have investigated many upper bound techniques applicable to error probabilities on the maximum likelihood (ML) decoding performance of turbo-like codes and low density parity check (LDPC) codes in recent years for a long codeword block size. This is because it is trivial for a short codeword block size. Previous research efforts, such as the simple bound technique [20] recently proposed, developed upper bounds for LDPC codes and turbo-like codes using ensemble codes or the uniformly interleaved assumption. This assumption bounds the performance averaged over all ensemble codes or all interleavers. Another previous research effort [21] obtained the upper bound of turbo-like code with a particular interleaver using a truncated union bound which requires information of the minimum Hamming distance and the number of codewords with the minimum Hamming distance. However, it gives the reliable bound only in the region of the error floor where the minimum Hamming distance is dominant, i.e., in the region of high signal-to-noise ratios. Therefore, currently an upper bound on ML decoding performance for turbo-like code with a particular interleaver and LDPC code with a particular parity check matrix cannot be calculated because of heavy complexity so that only average bounds for ensemble codes can be obtained using a uniform interleaver assumption. In this paper, we propose a new bound technique on ML decoding performance for turbo-like code with a particular interleaver and LDPC code with a particular parity check matrix using ML estimated weight distributions and we also show that the practical iterative decoding performance is approximately suboptimal in ML sense because the simulation performance of iterative decoding is worse than the proposed upper bound and no wonder, even worse than ML decoding performance. In order to show this point, we compare the simulation results with the proposed upper bound and previous bounds. The proposed bound technique is based on the simple bound with an approximate weight distribution including several exact smallest distance terms, not with the ensemble distribution or the uniform interleaver assumption. This technique also shows a tighter upper bound than any other previous bound techniques for turbo-like code with a particular interleaver and LDPC code with a particular parity check matrix.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/JCN.2008.6388322
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>nrf_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1109_JCN_2008_6388322</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>6388322</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_626550</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-d0a3e2be0f6339fc8b8176df9816b9f5dc86ffb07a017cef7bada0e5df48ae673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kM9LwzAUx4soOKd3wUsugpfO_GjS9DiGPyZDQTY8hjR5cbVdU5IN2X9vZ6en7-O9z_cdPklyTfCEEFzcv8xeJxRjORFMSkbpSTIiRS5SzjNy2s-UFillOT5PLmL8wjgjLCOj5GPVdRBQ6Xetjcj5gLZrQP2qHze6NYC8Q9tdKH3aVDUg4y1EpFuLGv-NLLSx2u5Rp8MhzBpMPSCXyZnTTYSrY46T1ePDcvacLt6e5rPpIjWsoNvUYs2AloCdYKxwRpaS5MK6QhJRFo5bI4VzJc41JrkBl5faagzcukxqEDkbJ3fD3zY4VZtKeV395qdXdVDT9-VcCSo4xz2KB9QEH2MAp7pQbXTYK4LVwaHqHaqDQ3V02Fduh0qno9GNC72RKv73KKY844L03M3AVQDwf_778gMa5XtE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Upper bounds for the performance of turbo-like codes and low density parity check codes</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Journals</source><creator>Chung, Kyuhyuk ; Heo, Jun</creator><creatorcontrib>Chung, Kyuhyuk ; Heo, Jun</creatorcontrib><description>Researchers have investigated many upper bound techniques applicable to error probabilities on the maximum likelihood (ML) decoding performance of turbo-like codes and low density parity check (LDPC) codes in recent years for a long codeword block size. This is because it is trivial for a short codeword block size. Previous research efforts, such as the simple bound technique [20] recently proposed, developed upper bounds for LDPC codes and turbo-like codes using ensemble codes or the uniformly interleaved assumption. This assumption bounds the performance averaged over all ensemble codes or all interleavers. Another previous research effort [21] obtained the upper bound of turbo-like code with a particular interleaver using a truncated union bound which requires information of the minimum Hamming distance and the number of codewords with the minimum Hamming distance. However, it gives the reliable bound only in the region of the error floor where the minimum Hamming distance is dominant, i.e., in the region of high signal-to-noise ratios. Therefore, currently an upper bound on ML decoding performance for turbo-like code with a particular interleaver and LDPC code with a particular parity check matrix cannot be calculated because of heavy complexity so that only average bounds for ensemble codes can be obtained using a uniform interleaver assumption. In this paper, we propose a new bound technique on ML decoding performance for turbo-like code with a particular interleaver and LDPC code with a particular parity check matrix using ML estimated weight distributions and we also show that the practical iterative decoding performance is approximately suboptimal in ML sense because the simulation performance of iterative decoding is worse than the proposed upper bound and no wonder, even worse than ML decoding performance. In order to show this point, we compare the simulation results with the proposed upper bound and previous bounds. The proposed bound technique is based on the simple bound with an approximate weight distribution including several exact smallest distance terms, not with the ensemble distribution or the uniform interleaver assumption. This technique also shows a tighter upper bound than any other previous bound techniques for turbo-like code with a particular interleaver and LDPC code with a particular parity check matrix.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1229-2370</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1976-5541</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/JCN.2008.6388322</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Séoul: Editorial Department of Journal of Communications and Networks</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Coding, codes ; Decoding ; Educational institutions ; Exact sciences and technology ; Information, signal and communications theory ; Iterative decoding ; Low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes ; maximum likelihood (ML) decoding ; Signal and communications theory ; Telecommunications and information theory ; Transfer functions ; Turbo codes ; turbo-like codes ; Upper bound ; weight distributions ; 전자/정보통신공학</subject><ispartof>Journal of Communications and Networks, 2008, 10(1), , pp.5-9</ispartof><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-d0a3e2be0f6339fc8b8176df9816b9f5dc86ffb07a017cef7bada0e5df48ae673</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-d0a3e2be0f6339fc8b8176df9816b9f5dc86ffb07a017cef7bada0e5df48ae673</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6388322$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,54796</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=20254561$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART001253402$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chung, Kyuhyuk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heo, Jun</creatorcontrib><title>Upper bounds for the performance of turbo-like codes and low density parity check codes</title><title>Journal of communications and networks</title><addtitle>JCN</addtitle><description>Researchers have investigated many upper bound techniques applicable to error probabilities on the maximum likelihood (ML) decoding performance of turbo-like codes and low density parity check (LDPC) codes in recent years for a long codeword block size. This is because it is trivial for a short codeword block size. Previous research efforts, such as the simple bound technique [20] recently proposed, developed upper bounds for LDPC codes and turbo-like codes using ensemble codes or the uniformly interleaved assumption. This assumption bounds the performance averaged over all ensemble codes or all interleavers. Another previous research effort [21] obtained the upper bound of turbo-like code with a particular interleaver using a truncated union bound which requires information of the minimum Hamming distance and the number of codewords with the minimum Hamming distance. However, it gives the reliable bound only in the region of the error floor where the minimum Hamming distance is dominant, i.e., in the region of high signal-to-noise ratios. Therefore, currently an upper bound on ML decoding performance for turbo-like code with a particular interleaver and LDPC code with a particular parity check matrix cannot be calculated because of heavy complexity so that only average bounds for ensemble codes can be obtained using a uniform interleaver assumption. In this paper, we propose a new bound technique on ML decoding performance for turbo-like code with a particular interleaver and LDPC code with a particular parity check matrix using ML estimated weight distributions and we also show that the practical iterative decoding performance is approximately suboptimal in ML sense because the simulation performance of iterative decoding is worse than the proposed upper bound and no wonder, even worse than ML decoding performance. In order to show this point, we compare the simulation results with the proposed upper bound and previous bounds. The proposed bound technique is based on the simple bound with an approximate weight distribution including several exact smallest distance terms, not with the ensemble distribution or the uniform interleaver assumption. This technique also shows a tighter upper bound than any other previous bound techniques for turbo-like code with a particular interleaver and LDPC code with a particular parity check matrix.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Coding, codes</subject><subject>Decoding</subject><subject>Educational institutions</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Information, signal and communications theory</subject><subject>Iterative decoding</subject><subject>Low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes</subject><subject>maximum likelihood (ML) decoding</subject><subject>Signal and communications theory</subject><subject>Telecommunications and information theory</subject><subject>Transfer functions</subject><subject>Turbo codes</subject><subject>turbo-like codes</subject><subject>Upper bound</subject><subject>weight distributions</subject><subject>전자/정보통신공학</subject><issn>1229-2370</issn><issn>1976-5541</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kM9LwzAUx4soOKd3wUsugpfO_GjS9DiGPyZDQTY8hjR5cbVdU5IN2X9vZ6en7-O9z_cdPklyTfCEEFzcv8xeJxRjORFMSkbpSTIiRS5SzjNy2s-UFillOT5PLmL8wjgjLCOj5GPVdRBQ6Xetjcj5gLZrQP2qHze6NYC8Q9tdKH3aVDUg4y1EpFuLGv-NLLSx2u5Rp8MhzBpMPSCXyZnTTYSrY46T1ePDcvacLt6e5rPpIjWsoNvUYs2AloCdYKxwRpaS5MK6QhJRFo5bI4VzJc41JrkBl5faagzcukxqEDkbJ3fD3zY4VZtKeV395qdXdVDT9-VcCSo4xz2KB9QEH2MAp7pQbXTYK4LVwaHqHaqDQ3V02Fduh0qno9GNC72RKv73KKY844L03M3AVQDwf_778gMa5XtE</recordid><startdate>20080301</startdate><enddate>20080301</enddate><creator>Chung, Kyuhyuk</creator><creator>Heo, Jun</creator><general>Editorial Department of Journal of Communications and Networks</general><general>Korean Institute of Communication Sciences</general><general>한국통신학회</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ACYCR</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080301</creationdate><title>Upper bounds for the performance of turbo-like codes and low density parity check codes</title><author>Chung, Kyuhyuk ; Heo, Jun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-d0a3e2be0f6339fc8b8176df9816b9f5dc86ffb07a017cef7bada0e5df48ae673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Coding, codes</topic><topic>Decoding</topic><topic>Educational institutions</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Information, signal and communications theory</topic><topic>Iterative decoding</topic><topic>Low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes</topic><topic>maximum likelihood (ML) decoding</topic><topic>Signal and communications theory</topic><topic>Telecommunications and information theory</topic><topic>Transfer functions</topic><topic>Turbo codes</topic><topic>turbo-like codes</topic><topic>Upper bound</topic><topic>weight distributions</topic><topic>전자/정보통신공학</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chung, Kyuhyuk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heo, Jun</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Korean Citation Index</collection><jtitle>Journal of communications and networks</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chung, Kyuhyuk</au><au>Heo, Jun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Upper bounds for the performance of turbo-like codes and low density parity check codes</atitle><jtitle>Journal of communications and networks</jtitle><stitle>JCN</stitle><date>2008-03-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>5</spage><epage>9</epage><pages>5-9</pages><issn>1229-2370</issn><eissn>1976-5541</eissn><abstract>Researchers have investigated many upper bound techniques applicable to error probabilities on the maximum likelihood (ML) decoding performance of turbo-like codes and low density parity check (LDPC) codes in recent years for a long codeword block size. This is because it is trivial for a short codeword block size. Previous research efforts, such as the simple bound technique [20] recently proposed, developed upper bounds for LDPC codes and turbo-like codes using ensemble codes or the uniformly interleaved assumption. This assumption bounds the performance averaged over all ensemble codes or all interleavers. Another previous research effort [21] obtained the upper bound of turbo-like code with a particular interleaver using a truncated union bound which requires information of the minimum Hamming distance and the number of codewords with the minimum Hamming distance. However, it gives the reliable bound only in the region of the error floor where the minimum Hamming distance is dominant, i.e., in the region of high signal-to-noise ratios. Therefore, currently an upper bound on ML decoding performance for turbo-like code with a particular interleaver and LDPC code with a particular parity check matrix cannot be calculated because of heavy complexity so that only average bounds for ensemble codes can be obtained using a uniform interleaver assumption. In this paper, we propose a new bound technique on ML decoding performance for turbo-like code with a particular interleaver and LDPC code with a particular parity check matrix using ML estimated weight distributions and we also show that the practical iterative decoding performance is approximately suboptimal in ML sense because the simulation performance of iterative decoding is worse than the proposed upper bound and no wonder, even worse than ML decoding performance. In order to show this point, we compare the simulation results with the proposed upper bound and previous bounds. The proposed bound technique is based on the simple bound with an approximate weight distribution including several exact smallest distance terms, not with the ensemble distribution or the uniform interleaver assumption. This technique also shows a tighter upper bound than any other previous bound techniques for turbo-like code with a particular interleaver and LDPC code with a particular parity check matrix.</abstract><cop>Séoul</cop><pub>Editorial Department of Journal of Communications and Networks</pub><doi>10.1109/JCN.2008.6388322</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1229-2370
ispartof Journal of Communications and Networks, 2008, 10(1), , pp.5-9
issn 1229-2370
1976-5541
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1109_JCN_2008_6388322
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Journals
subjects Applied sciences
Coding, codes
Decoding
Educational institutions
Exact sciences and technology
Information, signal and communications theory
Iterative decoding
Low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes
maximum likelihood (ML) decoding
Signal and communications theory
Telecommunications and information theory
Transfer functions
Turbo codes
turbo-like codes
Upper bound
weight distributions
전자/정보통신공학
title Upper bounds for the performance of turbo-like codes and low density parity check codes
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T04%3A18%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-nrf_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Upper%20bounds%20for%20the%20performance%20of%20turbo-like%20codes%20and%20low%20density%20parity%20check%20codes&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20communications%20and%20networks&rft.au=Chung,%20Kyuhyuk&rft.date=2008-03-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=5&rft.epage=9&rft.pages=5-9&rft.issn=1229-2370&rft.eissn=1976-5541&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/JCN.2008.6388322&rft_dat=%3Cnrf_cross%3Eoai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_626550%3C/nrf_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-d0a3e2be0f6339fc8b8176df9816b9f5dc86ffb07a017cef7bada0e5df48ae673%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=6388322&rfr_iscdi=true