Loading…
Upper bounds for the performance of turbo-like codes and low density parity check codes
Researchers have investigated many upper bound techniques applicable to error probabilities on the maximum likelihood (ML) decoding performance of turbo-like codes and low density parity check (LDPC) codes in recent years for a long codeword block size. This is because it is trivial for a short code...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of communications and networks 2008, 10(1), , pp.5-9 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-d0a3e2be0f6339fc8b8176df9816b9f5dc86ffb07a017cef7bada0e5df48ae673 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-d0a3e2be0f6339fc8b8176df9816b9f5dc86ffb07a017cef7bada0e5df48ae673 |
container_end_page | 9 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 5 |
container_title | Journal of communications and networks |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Chung, Kyuhyuk Heo, Jun |
description | Researchers have investigated many upper bound techniques applicable to error probabilities on the maximum likelihood (ML) decoding performance of turbo-like codes and low density parity check (LDPC) codes in recent years for a long codeword block size. This is because it is trivial for a short codeword block size. Previous research efforts, such as the simple bound technique [20] recently proposed, developed upper bounds for LDPC codes and turbo-like codes using ensemble codes or the uniformly interleaved assumption. This assumption bounds the performance averaged over all ensemble codes or all interleavers. Another previous research effort [21] obtained the upper bound of turbo-like code with a particular interleaver using a truncated union bound which requires information of the minimum Hamming distance and the number of codewords with the minimum Hamming distance. However, it gives the reliable bound only in the region of the error floor where the minimum Hamming distance is dominant, i.e., in the region of high signal-to-noise ratios. Therefore, currently an upper bound on ML decoding performance for turbo-like code with a particular interleaver and LDPC code with a particular parity check matrix cannot be calculated because of heavy complexity so that only average bounds for ensemble codes can be obtained using a uniform interleaver assumption. In this paper, we propose a new bound technique on ML decoding performance for turbo-like code with a particular interleaver and LDPC code with a particular parity check matrix using ML estimated weight distributions and we also show that the practical iterative decoding performance is approximately suboptimal in ML sense because the simulation performance of iterative decoding is worse than the proposed upper bound and no wonder, even worse than ML decoding performance. In order to show this point, we compare the simulation results with the proposed upper bound and previous bounds. The proposed bound technique is based on the simple bound with an approximate weight distribution including several exact smallest distance terms, not with the ensemble distribution or the uniform interleaver assumption. This technique also shows a tighter upper bound than any other previous bound techniques for turbo-like code with a particular interleaver and LDPC code with a particular parity check matrix. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/JCN.2008.6388322 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>nrf_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1109_JCN_2008_6388322</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>6388322</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_626550</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-d0a3e2be0f6339fc8b8176df9816b9f5dc86ffb07a017cef7bada0e5df48ae673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kM9LwzAUx4soOKd3wUsugpfO_GjS9DiGPyZDQTY8hjR5cbVdU5IN2X9vZ6en7-O9z_cdPklyTfCEEFzcv8xeJxRjORFMSkbpSTIiRS5SzjNy2s-UFillOT5PLmL8wjgjLCOj5GPVdRBQ6Xetjcj5gLZrQP2qHze6NYC8Q9tdKH3aVDUg4y1EpFuLGv-NLLSx2u5Rp8MhzBpMPSCXyZnTTYSrY46T1ePDcvacLt6e5rPpIjWsoNvUYs2AloCdYKxwRpaS5MK6QhJRFo5bI4VzJc41JrkBl5faagzcukxqEDkbJ3fD3zY4VZtKeV395qdXdVDT9-VcCSo4xz2KB9QEH2MAp7pQbXTYK4LVwaHqHaqDQ3V02Fduh0qno9GNC72RKv73KKY844L03M3AVQDwf_778gMa5XtE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Upper bounds for the performance of turbo-like codes and low density parity check codes</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Journals</source><creator>Chung, Kyuhyuk ; Heo, Jun</creator><creatorcontrib>Chung, Kyuhyuk ; Heo, Jun</creatorcontrib><description>Researchers have investigated many upper bound techniques applicable to error probabilities on the maximum likelihood (ML) decoding performance of turbo-like codes and low density parity check (LDPC) codes in recent years for a long codeword block size. This is because it is trivial for a short codeword block size. Previous research efforts, such as the simple bound technique [20] recently proposed, developed upper bounds for LDPC codes and turbo-like codes using ensemble codes or the uniformly interleaved assumption. This assumption bounds the performance averaged over all ensemble codes or all interleavers. Another previous research effort [21] obtained the upper bound of turbo-like code with a particular interleaver using a truncated union bound which requires information of the minimum Hamming distance and the number of codewords with the minimum Hamming distance. However, it gives the reliable bound only in the region of the error floor where the minimum Hamming distance is dominant, i.e., in the region of high signal-to-noise ratios. Therefore, currently an upper bound on ML decoding performance for turbo-like code with a particular interleaver and LDPC code with a particular parity check matrix cannot be calculated because of heavy complexity so that only average bounds for ensemble codes can be obtained using a uniform interleaver assumption. In this paper, we propose a new bound technique on ML decoding performance for turbo-like code with a particular interleaver and LDPC code with a particular parity check matrix using ML estimated weight distributions and we also show that the practical iterative decoding performance is approximately suboptimal in ML sense because the simulation performance of iterative decoding is worse than the proposed upper bound and no wonder, even worse than ML decoding performance. In order to show this point, we compare the simulation results with the proposed upper bound and previous bounds. The proposed bound technique is based on the simple bound with an approximate weight distribution including several exact smallest distance terms, not with the ensemble distribution or the uniform interleaver assumption. This technique also shows a tighter upper bound than any other previous bound techniques for turbo-like code with a particular interleaver and LDPC code with a particular parity check matrix.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1229-2370</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1976-5541</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/JCN.2008.6388322</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Séoul: Editorial Department of Journal of Communications and Networks</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Coding, codes ; Decoding ; Educational institutions ; Exact sciences and technology ; Information, signal and communications theory ; Iterative decoding ; Low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes ; maximum likelihood (ML) decoding ; Signal and communications theory ; Telecommunications and information theory ; Transfer functions ; Turbo codes ; turbo-like codes ; Upper bound ; weight distributions ; 전자/정보통신공학</subject><ispartof>Journal of Communications and Networks, 2008, 10(1), , pp.5-9</ispartof><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-d0a3e2be0f6339fc8b8176df9816b9f5dc86ffb07a017cef7bada0e5df48ae673</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-d0a3e2be0f6339fc8b8176df9816b9f5dc86ffb07a017cef7bada0e5df48ae673</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6388322$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,54796</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20254561$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART001253402$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chung, Kyuhyuk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heo, Jun</creatorcontrib><title>Upper bounds for the performance of turbo-like codes and low density parity check codes</title><title>Journal of communications and networks</title><addtitle>JCN</addtitle><description>Researchers have investigated many upper bound techniques applicable to error probabilities on the maximum likelihood (ML) decoding performance of turbo-like codes and low density parity check (LDPC) codes in recent years for a long codeword block size. This is because it is trivial for a short codeword block size. Previous research efforts, such as the simple bound technique [20] recently proposed, developed upper bounds for LDPC codes and turbo-like codes using ensemble codes or the uniformly interleaved assumption. This assumption bounds the performance averaged over all ensemble codes or all interleavers. Another previous research effort [21] obtained the upper bound of turbo-like code with a particular interleaver using a truncated union bound which requires information of the minimum Hamming distance and the number of codewords with the minimum Hamming distance. However, it gives the reliable bound only in the region of the error floor where the minimum Hamming distance is dominant, i.e., in the region of high signal-to-noise ratios. Therefore, currently an upper bound on ML decoding performance for turbo-like code with a particular interleaver and LDPC code with a particular parity check matrix cannot be calculated because of heavy complexity so that only average bounds for ensemble codes can be obtained using a uniform interleaver assumption. In this paper, we propose a new bound technique on ML decoding performance for turbo-like code with a particular interleaver and LDPC code with a particular parity check matrix using ML estimated weight distributions and we also show that the practical iterative decoding performance is approximately suboptimal in ML sense because the simulation performance of iterative decoding is worse than the proposed upper bound and no wonder, even worse than ML decoding performance. In order to show this point, we compare the simulation results with the proposed upper bound and previous bounds. The proposed bound technique is based on the simple bound with an approximate weight distribution including several exact smallest distance terms, not with the ensemble distribution or the uniform interleaver assumption. This technique also shows a tighter upper bound than any other previous bound techniques for turbo-like code with a particular interleaver and LDPC code with a particular parity check matrix.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Coding, codes</subject><subject>Decoding</subject><subject>Educational institutions</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Information, signal and communications theory</subject><subject>Iterative decoding</subject><subject>Low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes</subject><subject>maximum likelihood (ML) decoding</subject><subject>Signal and communications theory</subject><subject>Telecommunications and information theory</subject><subject>Transfer functions</subject><subject>Turbo codes</subject><subject>turbo-like codes</subject><subject>Upper bound</subject><subject>weight distributions</subject><subject>전자/정보통신공학</subject><issn>1229-2370</issn><issn>1976-5541</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kM9LwzAUx4soOKd3wUsugpfO_GjS9DiGPyZDQTY8hjR5cbVdU5IN2X9vZ6en7-O9z_cdPklyTfCEEFzcv8xeJxRjORFMSkbpSTIiRS5SzjNy2s-UFillOT5PLmL8wjgjLCOj5GPVdRBQ6Xetjcj5gLZrQP2qHze6NYC8Q9tdKH3aVDUg4y1EpFuLGv-NLLSx2u5Rp8MhzBpMPSCXyZnTTYSrY46T1ePDcvacLt6e5rPpIjWsoNvUYs2AloCdYKxwRpaS5MK6QhJRFo5bI4VzJc41JrkBl5faagzcukxqEDkbJ3fD3zY4VZtKeV395qdXdVDT9-VcCSo4xz2KB9QEH2MAp7pQbXTYK4LVwaHqHaqDQ3V02Fduh0qno9GNC72RKv73KKY844L03M3AVQDwf_778gMa5XtE</recordid><startdate>20080301</startdate><enddate>20080301</enddate><creator>Chung, Kyuhyuk</creator><creator>Heo, Jun</creator><general>Editorial Department of Journal of Communications and Networks</general><general>Korean Institute of Communication Sciences</general><general>한국통신학회</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ACYCR</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080301</creationdate><title>Upper bounds for the performance of turbo-like codes and low density parity check codes</title><author>Chung, Kyuhyuk ; Heo, Jun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-d0a3e2be0f6339fc8b8176df9816b9f5dc86ffb07a017cef7bada0e5df48ae673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Coding, codes</topic><topic>Decoding</topic><topic>Educational institutions</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Information, signal and communications theory</topic><topic>Iterative decoding</topic><topic>Low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes</topic><topic>maximum likelihood (ML) decoding</topic><topic>Signal and communications theory</topic><topic>Telecommunications and information theory</topic><topic>Transfer functions</topic><topic>Turbo codes</topic><topic>turbo-like codes</topic><topic>Upper bound</topic><topic>weight distributions</topic><topic>전자/정보통신공학</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chung, Kyuhyuk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heo, Jun</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Korean Citation Index</collection><jtitle>Journal of communications and networks</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chung, Kyuhyuk</au><au>Heo, Jun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Upper bounds for the performance of turbo-like codes and low density parity check codes</atitle><jtitle>Journal of communications and networks</jtitle><stitle>JCN</stitle><date>2008-03-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>5</spage><epage>9</epage><pages>5-9</pages><issn>1229-2370</issn><eissn>1976-5541</eissn><abstract>Researchers have investigated many upper bound techniques applicable to error probabilities on the maximum likelihood (ML) decoding performance of turbo-like codes and low density parity check (LDPC) codes in recent years for a long codeword block size. This is because it is trivial for a short codeword block size. Previous research efforts, such as the simple bound technique [20] recently proposed, developed upper bounds for LDPC codes and turbo-like codes using ensemble codes or the uniformly interleaved assumption. This assumption bounds the performance averaged over all ensemble codes or all interleavers. Another previous research effort [21] obtained the upper bound of turbo-like code with a particular interleaver using a truncated union bound which requires information of the minimum Hamming distance and the number of codewords with the minimum Hamming distance. However, it gives the reliable bound only in the region of the error floor where the minimum Hamming distance is dominant, i.e., in the region of high signal-to-noise ratios. Therefore, currently an upper bound on ML decoding performance for turbo-like code with a particular interleaver and LDPC code with a particular parity check matrix cannot be calculated because of heavy complexity so that only average bounds for ensemble codes can be obtained using a uniform interleaver assumption. In this paper, we propose a new bound technique on ML decoding performance for turbo-like code with a particular interleaver and LDPC code with a particular parity check matrix using ML estimated weight distributions and we also show that the practical iterative decoding performance is approximately suboptimal in ML sense because the simulation performance of iterative decoding is worse than the proposed upper bound and no wonder, even worse than ML decoding performance. In order to show this point, we compare the simulation results with the proposed upper bound and previous bounds. The proposed bound technique is based on the simple bound with an approximate weight distribution including several exact smallest distance terms, not with the ensemble distribution or the uniform interleaver assumption. This technique also shows a tighter upper bound than any other previous bound techniques for turbo-like code with a particular interleaver and LDPC code with a particular parity check matrix.</abstract><cop>Séoul</cop><pub>Editorial Department of Journal of Communications and Networks</pub><doi>10.1109/JCN.2008.6388322</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1229-2370 |
ispartof | Journal of Communications and Networks, 2008, 10(1), , pp.5-9 |
issn | 1229-2370 1976-5541 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1109_JCN_2008_6388322 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Journals |
subjects | Applied sciences Coding, codes Decoding Educational institutions Exact sciences and technology Information, signal and communications theory Iterative decoding Low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes maximum likelihood (ML) decoding Signal and communications theory Telecommunications and information theory Transfer functions Turbo codes turbo-like codes Upper bound weight distributions 전자/정보통신공학 |
title | Upper bounds for the performance of turbo-like codes and low density parity check codes |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T04%3A18%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-nrf_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Upper%20bounds%20for%20the%20performance%20of%20turbo-like%20codes%20and%20low%20density%20parity%20check%20codes&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20communications%20and%20networks&rft.au=Chung,%20Kyuhyuk&rft.date=2008-03-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=5&rft.epage=9&rft.pages=5-9&rft.issn=1229-2370&rft.eissn=1976-5541&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/JCN.2008.6388322&rft_dat=%3Cnrf_cross%3Eoai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_626550%3C/nrf_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-d0a3e2be0f6339fc8b8176df9816b9f5dc86ffb07a017cef7bada0e5df48ae673%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=6388322&rfr_iscdi=true |