Loading…

Speed-Sensorless Control of Induction Motors With an Open-Loop Synchronization Method

Speed estimation schemes based on the closed-loop synchronization (CLS) methods for speed-sensorless control of motor drives attract much popularity due to several advantages, for example, easy implementation, high flexibility, and acceptable performance. However, most of the existing CLS-based esti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:IEEE journal of emerging and selected topics in power electronics 2022-04, Vol.10 (2), p.1963-1977
Main Authors: Wang, Huimin, Yang, Yongheng, Chen, Dunzhi, Ge, Xinglai, Li, Songtao, Zuo, Yun
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Speed estimation schemes based on the closed-loop synchronization (CLS) methods for speed-sensorless control of motor drives attract much popularity due to several advantages, for example, easy implementation, high flexibility, and acceptable performance. However, most of the existing CLS-based estimation schemes may suffer from performance degradation during frequency ramps. Considering this, an attempt of the type-3 phase-locked loop (PLL)-based scheme is made. This solution, however, may adversely affect the system dynamics and stability margin. To address these issues, an open-loop synchronization (OLS) method is proposed for speed-sensorless control of induction motor drives in this article. In the proposed scheme, the estimated speed is obtained according to the sinusoidal signals and their time-delay signals, rather than increasing the system order. With this, system dynamics and stability margin are maintained. In practice, the disturbance of dc offsets is of concern in induction motor drives. Thus, a closed-loop flux observer is adopted to guarantee the estimation performance under dc offsets. The performance of the proposed OLS scheme is investigated and compared with that of the CLS schemes and the type-3 PLL scheme through experimental tests.
ISSN:2168-6777
2168-6785
DOI:10.1109/JESTPE.2021.3050805