XPM Efficiency Versus Symbol Rate

Cross-Phase Modulation (XPM) limits the information capacity of optical fibers, due to the power fluctuations in one channel affecting the phases of the other channels. A decade ago, we showed that splitting a channel into multiple subcarriers could reduce the effect of XPM on multi-channel systems,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of lightwave technology 2022-05, Vol.40 (9), p.2850-2861
Main Authors: Lowery, Arthur J., Du, Liang B. Y.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Chirp
cross-phase modulation
Dispersion
enhanced Gaussian noise
fiber nonlinearity
Fluctuations
Frequency modulation
Mathematical models
Modulation
Nyquist sub-carriers
OFDM
Optical fiber amplifiers
optical fiber communications
Optical fiber dispersion
Optical fibers
Parameter identification
Phase modulation
Subcarriers
symbol rate optimization
Symbols
XPM efficiency
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Cross-Phase Modulation (XPM) limits the information capacity of optical fibers, due to the power fluctuations in one channel affecting the phases of the other channels. A decade ago, we showed that splitting a channel into multiple subcarriers could reduce the effect of XPM on multi-channel systems, due to a reduction in the intensity fluctuations at frequencies where walk-off is low. As commercial systems now take advantage of this effect, it is appropriate to give a more detailed and quantitative explanation of it; in particular to show that the optimal subcarrier rate scales with the square-root of the chirp rate of the symbols, which depends only on the accumulated dispersion in the fiber. Simulations show that the optimal symbol rate is when the time-spread of the symbols due to dispersion is between 2.5× to 6.5× of their transmitted (central pulse) widths. This paper presents simple arguments backed by simulations to identify the key parameters that determine the optimal subcarrier rate. In particular, we show that there is an optimal balance between the intrinsic intensity fluctuations of transmitted symbols (which are lower-frequency for lower symbol rates) and the intensity fluctuations due to chirp (which are lower-frequency for higher symbol rates). We also discuss why the traditional XPM-efficiency equation is not appropriate when data is transmitted, because it assumes the XPM contributions of all spans in an amplified link are equal, rather than increasing with distance.
ISSN:0733-8724
1558-2213
DOI:10.1109/JLT.2022.3148414