Loading…

Comparison of MEMS PZT Cantilevers Based on d and d Modes for Vibration Energy Harvesting

d 31 and d 33 mode microelectromechanical systems piezoelectric energy harvesters (PEHs) were fabricated and compared to investigate their output powers converted from vibration. Both types of devices have the same dimensions in a cantilever structure and aim to effectively couple vibration from amb...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of microelectromechanical systems 2013-02, Vol.22 (1), p.26-33
Main Authors: Seon-Bae Kim, Hyejin Park, Seung-Hyun Kim, Wikle, H. Clyde, Jung-Hyun Park, Dong-Joo Kim
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:d 31 and d 33 mode microelectromechanical systems piezoelectric energy harvesters (PEHs) were fabricated and compared to investigate their output powers converted from vibration. Both types of devices have the same dimensions in a cantilever structure and aim to effectively couple vibration from ambient conditions. The resonant frequencies of the cantilevers are 243 Hz. Two types of devices were compared using mathematical equations based on an equivalent circuit model. The output power of the d 31 mode PEH was 2.15 μW and 2.33 μW in experiment and modeling, respectively. The d 33 mode PEHs generated output power ranging between 0.62 and 1.71 μW when the width of the interdigital electrode (IDE) is ranging from 8 to 16 μm and finger spacing is varied from 4 to 16 μm. The output power of the d 33 mode device strongly depends on the dimensions of IDE. The analysis of material constant and electrode design was conducted in conjunction with developing a mathematical equation. The result predicts that the output power of d 33 mode PEH can be higher than that of d 31 mode PEH when the finger width is reduced to 2 μm and finger spacing is between 8 and 20 μm.
ISSN:1057-7157
1941-0158
DOI:10.1109/JMEMS.2012.2213069