The BOSCO Solar Cell: Simulation and Experiment

For bifacial applications, double-sided collecting solar cell structures can be beneficial. The recently introduced "BOth Sides COllecting and COntacted" (BOSCO) solar cell is such a structure and allows the use of standard module interconnection technology. The structure features emitter...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:IEEE journal of photovoltaics 2014-09, Vol.4 (5), p.1243-1251
Main Authors: Fertig, Fabian, Greulich, Johannes, Krauss, Karin, Clement, Florian, Biro, Daniel, Preu, Ralf, Rein, Stefan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Bifacial
double-sided collection
Lighting
multicrystalline silicon
Numerical models
Photovoltaic cells
Silicon
Solar energy
Surface emitting lasers
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:For bifacial applications, double-sided collecting solar cell structures can be beneficial. The recently introduced "BOth Sides COllecting and COntacted" (BOSCO) solar cell is such a structure and allows the use of standard module interconnection technology. The structure features emitter areas on both sides, which are interconnected by diffused vias. It favors the use of silicon substrates with low-to-medium diffusion length and low resistivity for the maximum benefit compared with other structures, such as Al-BSF and PERC. Within this study, we discuss the potential of the BOSCO cell structure and its applicability for certain silicon material types. Experimental results on different multicrystalline silicon (mc-Si) materials yield monofacial efficiencies (independently confirmed on a non-reflecting chuck) of 17.4% on large-area wafers from block-cast electronic-grade mc-Si and 16.9% for low-quality upgraded metallurgical-grade mc-Si. These values represent a gain of 0.6-0.7% abs compared with Al-BSF cells processed in parallel. The bifacial properties are investigated under outdoor testing conditions, yielding a gain in output power of 13% compared with monofacial operation.
ISSN:2156-3381
2156-3403
DOI:10.1109/JPHOTOV.2014.2333875