Numerical Simulations of Photoluminescence for the Precise Determination of Emitter Contact Recombination Parameters

One major loss mechanism for currently relevant solar cells [e.g., passivated emitter and rear cells (PERC)] is locally enhanced recombination at the interface between semiconductor and metalization. For investigating these losses in detail, a reliable detection technique is crucial. The photovoltai...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:IEEE journal of photovoltaics 2019-11, Vol.9 (6), p.1759-1767
Main Authors: Herrmann, David, Lohmuller, Sabrina, Hoffler, Hannes, Fell, Andreas, Brand, Andreas Arnold, Wolf, Andreas
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Ablation
Carrier density
Computer simulation
Current density
Dark current
Emitters
Laser ablation
Mathematical models
Measurement by laser beam
Metalization
Nonuniformity
Numerical models
Photoluminescence
Photovoltaic cells
Photovoltaic systems
quokka3
recombination
Solar cells
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:One major loss mechanism for currently relevant solar cells [e.g., passivated emitter and rear cells (PERC)] is locally enhanced recombination at the interface between semiconductor and metalization. For investigating these losses in detail, a reliable detection technique is crucial. The photovoltaics community frequently applies an area-weighted model to extract the local dark saturation current density in the metalized area of the emitter j 0,met -e.g., from photoluminescence imaging (PLI) data. However, this model does not account for the nonuniformity of the excess carrier density Δn within the sample during the measurement. Therefore, we compare numerical PLI simulations using Quokka3 to PLI measurements, to quantitatively reveal the impact of the nonuniformity of Δn. Test structures with locally laser-ablated passivation on one side-serving as ideal test structures-are used for the experimental verification. Additionally, we show results on metalized samples. We find that the results (j 0,met* ) using the simulative approach for the laser-ablated samples exceed the results using the conventional area-weighted approach by more than 20%. For the metalized samples, we see a similar trend where the area-weighted approach again underestimates the results (j 0,met ), in this case by up to 20%. Based on our investigations, we show that the deviation between the results arises due to the assumption of uniform Δn applied by the area-weighted approach.
ISSN:2156-3381
2156-3403
DOI:10.1109/JPHOTOV.2019.2938400