Loading…

Reliability of Solid-State Drives Based on NAND Flash Memory

This paper reviews the reliability of solid-state drives (SSDs) based on NAND Flash memory from the perspectives of failure mechanisms, design mitigations, qualification methods, and field failure rates. NAND reliability is dominated by gradual memory-cell degradation in late life and defects such a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Proceedings of the IEEE 2017-09, Vol.105 (9), p.1725-1750
Main Authors: Mielke, Neal R., Frickey, Robert E., Kalastirsky, Ivan, Quan, Minyan, Ustinov, Dmitry, Vasudevan, Venkatesh J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-a250d64aefe486e90f76efa2e88993ae11d957025bc869976f1562a0219421ec3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-a250d64aefe486e90f76efa2e88993ae11d957025bc869976f1562a0219421ec3
container_end_page 1750
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1725
container_title Proceedings of the IEEE
container_volume 105
creator Mielke, Neal R.
Frickey, Robert E.
Kalastirsky, Ivan
Quan, Minyan
Ustinov, Dmitry
Vasudevan, Venkatesh J.
description This paper reviews the reliability of solid-state drives (SSDs) based on NAND Flash memory from the perspectives of failure mechanisms, design mitigations, qualification methods, and field failure rates. NAND reliability is dominated by gradual memory-cell degradation in late life and defects such as interconnect shorts earlier in life. Design mitigations exist for these mechanisms. Qualification methods standardized in JEDEC JESD218 are designed to evaluate the mechanisms and mitigations, over a full drive lifetime, in the laboratory. Full-lifetime qualification provides confidence in the long-term reliability of SSDs that cannot be achieved by the early-life qualifications performed on hard disk drives. If NAND mechanisms are sufficiently suppressed, field reliability will be dominated by non-NAND mechanisms such as firmware bugs, power-loss events, radiation-induced soft errors, and failures in non-NAND components. A wide range of design validation and qualification tests are necessary to evaluate these non-NAND mechanisms. Published field reliability statistics indicate that SSDs are more reliable on average than HDDs, but they are not immune to failure, and there is wide variation among models. The NAND and non-NAND mechanisms are illustrated through new case studies of SSD internal qualification and field reliability data.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/JPROC.2017.2725738
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1109_JPROC_2017_2725738</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>7998601</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>2174445002</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-a250d64aefe486e90f76efa2e88993ae11d957025bc869976f1562a0219421ec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEtPAjEUhRujiYj-Ad00cT1425m-EjcI4iMIBnTdlJk7sWRgsB1M-PcOQlydzfnuPfkIuWbQYwzM3ev7bDrocWCqxxUXKtUnpMOE0AnnQp6SDgDTieHMnJOLGJcAkAqZdsj9DCvvFr7yzY7WJZ3XlS-SeeMapMPgfzDSBxexoPWaTvqTIR1VLn7RN1zVYXdJzkpXRbw6Zpd8jh4_Bs_JePr0MuiPkzyVrEkcF1DIzGGJmZZooFQSS8dRa2NSh4wVRijgYpFraYySJROSO2jXZpxhnnbJ7eHuJtTfW4yNXdbbsG5fWs5UlmUCgLctfmjloY4xYGk3wa9c2FkGdm_J_lmye0v2aKmFbg6QR8R_QBmjJbD0F-vsYMo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2174445002</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reliability of Solid-State Drives Based on NAND Flash Memory</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Journals</source><creator>Mielke, Neal R. ; Frickey, Robert E. ; Kalastirsky, Ivan ; Quan, Minyan ; Ustinov, Dmitry ; Vasudevan, Venkatesh J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mielke, Neal R. ; Frickey, Robert E. ; Kalastirsky, Ivan ; Quan, Minyan ; Ustinov, Dmitry ; Vasudevan, Venkatesh J.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper reviews the reliability of solid-state drives (SSDs) based on NAND Flash memory from the perspectives of failure mechanisms, design mitigations, qualification methods, and field failure rates. NAND reliability is dominated by gradual memory-cell degradation in late life and defects such as interconnect shorts earlier in life. Design mitigations exist for these mechanisms. Qualification methods standardized in JEDEC JESD218 are designed to evaluate the mechanisms and mitigations, over a full drive lifetime, in the laboratory. Full-lifetime qualification provides confidence in the long-term reliability of SSDs that cannot be achieved by the early-life qualifications performed on hard disk drives. If NAND mechanisms are sufficiently suppressed, field reliability will be dominated by non-NAND mechanisms such as firmware bugs, power-loss events, radiation-induced soft errors, and failures in non-NAND components. A wide range of design validation and qualification tests are necessary to evaluate these non-NAND mechanisms. Published field reliability statistics indicate that SSDs are more reliable on average than HDDs, but they are not immune to failure, and there is wide variation among models. The NAND and non-NAND mechanisms are illustrated through new case studies of SSD internal qualification and field reliability data.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-9219</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-2256</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/JPROC.2017.2725738</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IEEPAD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Confidence ; Data retention ; Data storage ; Design defects ; Disk drives ; Drives ; endurance ; Error analysis ; Failure ; Failure mechanisms ; Failure rates ; Firmware ; Flash memories ; Flash memory (computers) ; Integrated circuits ; JEDEC ; NAND flash memory ; Qualifications ; Radiation effects ; reliability ; Reliability analysis ; Reliability engineering ; Soft errors ; Solid state devices ; Solid-state circuits ; solid-state drives (SSDs) ; Statistical tests</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the IEEE, 2017-09, Vol.105 (9), p.1725-1750</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-a250d64aefe486e90f76efa2e88993ae11d957025bc869976f1562a0219421ec3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-a250d64aefe486e90f76efa2e88993ae11d957025bc869976f1562a0219421ec3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7956-2772</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7998601$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,54795</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mielke, Neal R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frickey, Robert E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalastirsky, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quan, Minyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ustinov, Dmitry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasudevan, Venkatesh J.</creatorcontrib><title>Reliability of Solid-State Drives Based on NAND Flash Memory</title><title>Proceedings of the IEEE</title><addtitle>JPROC</addtitle><description>This paper reviews the reliability of solid-state drives (SSDs) based on NAND Flash memory from the perspectives of failure mechanisms, design mitigations, qualification methods, and field failure rates. NAND reliability is dominated by gradual memory-cell degradation in late life and defects such as interconnect shorts earlier in life. Design mitigations exist for these mechanisms. Qualification methods standardized in JEDEC JESD218 are designed to evaluate the mechanisms and mitigations, over a full drive lifetime, in the laboratory. Full-lifetime qualification provides confidence in the long-term reliability of SSDs that cannot be achieved by the early-life qualifications performed on hard disk drives. If NAND mechanisms are sufficiently suppressed, field reliability will be dominated by non-NAND mechanisms such as firmware bugs, power-loss events, radiation-induced soft errors, and failures in non-NAND components. A wide range of design validation and qualification tests are necessary to evaluate these non-NAND mechanisms. Published field reliability statistics indicate that SSDs are more reliable on average than HDDs, but they are not immune to failure, and there is wide variation among models. The NAND and non-NAND mechanisms are illustrated through new case studies of SSD internal qualification and field reliability data.</description><subject>Confidence</subject><subject>Data retention</subject><subject>Data storage</subject><subject>Design defects</subject><subject>Disk drives</subject><subject>Drives</subject><subject>endurance</subject><subject>Error analysis</subject><subject>Failure</subject><subject>Failure mechanisms</subject><subject>Failure rates</subject><subject>Firmware</subject><subject>Flash memories</subject><subject>Flash memory (computers)</subject><subject>Integrated circuits</subject><subject>JEDEC</subject><subject>NAND flash memory</subject><subject>Qualifications</subject><subject>Radiation effects</subject><subject>reliability</subject><subject>Reliability analysis</subject><subject>Reliability engineering</subject><subject>Soft errors</subject><subject>Solid state devices</subject><subject>Solid-state circuits</subject><subject>solid-state drives (SSDs)</subject><subject>Statistical tests</subject><issn>0018-9219</issn><issn>1558-2256</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kEtPAjEUhRujiYj-Ad00cT1425m-EjcI4iMIBnTdlJk7sWRgsB1M-PcOQlydzfnuPfkIuWbQYwzM3ev7bDrocWCqxxUXKtUnpMOE0AnnQp6SDgDTieHMnJOLGJcAkAqZdsj9DCvvFr7yzY7WJZ3XlS-SeeMapMPgfzDSBxexoPWaTvqTIR1VLn7RN1zVYXdJzkpXRbw6Zpd8jh4_Bs_JePr0MuiPkzyVrEkcF1DIzGGJmZZooFQSS8dRa2NSh4wVRijgYpFraYySJROSO2jXZpxhnnbJ7eHuJtTfW4yNXdbbsG5fWs5UlmUCgLctfmjloY4xYGk3wa9c2FkGdm_J_lmye0v2aKmFbg6QR8R_QBmjJbD0F-vsYMo</recordid><startdate>20170901</startdate><enddate>20170901</enddate><creator>Mielke, Neal R.</creator><creator>Frickey, Robert E.</creator><creator>Kalastirsky, Ivan</creator><creator>Quan, Minyan</creator><creator>Ustinov, Dmitry</creator><creator>Vasudevan, Venkatesh J.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7956-2772</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170901</creationdate><title>Reliability of Solid-State Drives Based on NAND Flash Memory</title><author>Mielke, Neal R. ; Frickey, Robert E. ; Kalastirsky, Ivan ; Quan, Minyan ; Ustinov, Dmitry ; Vasudevan, Venkatesh J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-a250d64aefe486e90f76efa2e88993ae11d957025bc869976f1562a0219421ec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Confidence</topic><topic>Data retention</topic><topic>Data storage</topic><topic>Design defects</topic><topic>Disk drives</topic><topic>Drives</topic><topic>endurance</topic><topic>Error analysis</topic><topic>Failure</topic><topic>Failure mechanisms</topic><topic>Failure rates</topic><topic>Firmware</topic><topic>Flash memories</topic><topic>Flash memory (computers)</topic><topic>Integrated circuits</topic><topic>JEDEC</topic><topic>NAND flash memory</topic><topic>Qualifications</topic><topic>Radiation effects</topic><topic>reliability</topic><topic>Reliability analysis</topic><topic>Reliability engineering</topic><topic>Soft errors</topic><topic>Solid state devices</topic><topic>Solid-state circuits</topic><topic>solid-state drives (SSDs)</topic><topic>Statistical tests</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mielke, Neal R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frickey, Robert E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalastirsky, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quan, Minyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ustinov, Dmitry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasudevan, Venkatesh J.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library Online</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the IEEE</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mielke, Neal R.</au><au>Frickey, Robert E.</au><au>Kalastirsky, Ivan</au><au>Quan, Minyan</au><au>Ustinov, Dmitry</au><au>Vasudevan, Venkatesh J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reliability of Solid-State Drives Based on NAND Flash Memory</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the IEEE</jtitle><stitle>JPROC</stitle><date>2017-09-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>105</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1725</spage><epage>1750</epage><pages>1725-1750</pages><issn>0018-9219</issn><eissn>1558-2256</eissn><coden>IEEPAD</coden><abstract>This paper reviews the reliability of solid-state drives (SSDs) based on NAND Flash memory from the perspectives of failure mechanisms, design mitigations, qualification methods, and field failure rates. NAND reliability is dominated by gradual memory-cell degradation in late life and defects such as interconnect shorts earlier in life. Design mitigations exist for these mechanisms. Qualification methods standardized in JEDEC JESD218 are designed to evaluate the mechanisms and mitigations, over a full drive lifetime, in the laboratory. Full-lifetime qualification provides confidence in the long-term reliability of SSDs that cannot be achieved by the early-life qualifications performed on hard disk drives. If NAND mechanisms are sufficiently suppressed, field reliability will be dominated by non-NAND mechanisms such as firmware bugs, power-loss events, radiation-induced soft errors, and failures in non-NAND components. A wide range of design validation and qualification tests are necessary to evaluate these non-NAND mechanisms. Published field reliability statistics indicate that SSDs are more reliable on average than HDDs, but they are not immune to failure, and there is wide variation among models. The NAND and non-NAND mechanisms are illustrated through new case studies of SSD internal qualification and field reliability data.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/JPROC.2017.2725738</doi><tpages>26</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7956-2772</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0018-9219
ispartof Proceedings of the IEEE, 2017-09, Vol.105 (9), p.1725-1750
issn 0018-9219
1558-2256
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1109_JPROC_2017_2725738
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Journals
subjects Confidence
Data retention
Data storage
Design defects
Disk drives
Drives
endurance
Error analysis
Failure
Failure mechanisms
Failure rates
Firmware
Flash memories
Flash memory (computers)
Integrated circuits
JEDEC
NAND flash memory
Qualifications
Radiation effects
reliability
Reliability analysis
Reliability engineering
Soft errors
Solid state devices
Solid-state circuits
solid-state drives (SSDs)
Statistical tests
title Reliability of Solid-State Drives Based on NAND Flash Memory
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T22%3A46%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reliability%20of%20Solid-State%20Drives%20Based%20on%20NAND%20Flash%20Memory&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20IEEE&rft.au=Mielke,%20Neal%20R.&rft.date=2017-09-01&rft.volume=105&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1725&rft.epage=1750&rft.pages=1725-1750&rft.issn=0018-9219&rft.eissn=1558-2256&rft.coden=IEEPAD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/JPROC.2017.2725738&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2174445002%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-a250d64aefe486e90f76efa2e88993ae11d957025bc869976f1562a0219421ec3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2174445002&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=7998601&rfr_iscdi=true