Loading…
Reliability of Solid-State Drives Based on NAND Flash Memory
This paper reviews the reliability of solid-state drives (SSDs) based on NAND Flash memory from the perspectives of failure mechanisms, design mitigations, qualification methods, and field failure rates. NAND reliability is dominated by gradual memory-cell degradation in late life and defects such a...
Saved in:
Published in: | Proceedings of the IEEE 2017-09, Vol.105 (9), p.1725-1750 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-a250d64aefe486e90f76efa2e88993ae11d957025bc869976f1562a0219421ec3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-a250d64aefe486e90f76efa2e88993ae11d957025bc869976f1562a0219421ec3 |
container_end_page | 1750 |
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1725 |
container_title | Proceedings of the IEEE |
container_volume | 105 |
creator | Mielke, Neal R. Frickey, Robert E. Kalastirsky, Ivan Quan, Minyan Ustinov, Dmitry Vasudevan, Venkatesh J. |
description | This paper reviews the reliability of solid-state drives (SSDs) based on NAND Flash memory from the perspectives of failure mechanisms, design mitigations, qualification methods, and field failure rates. NAND reliability is dominated by gradual memory-cell degradation in late life and defects such as interconnect shorts earlier in life. Design mitigations exist for these mechanisms. Qualification methods standardized in JEDEC JESD218 are designed to evaluate the mechanisms and mitigations, over a full drive lifetime, in the laboratory. Full-lifetime qualification provides confidence in the long-term reliability of SSDs that cannot be achieved by the early-life qualifications performed on hard disk drives. If NAND mechanisms are sufficiently suppressed, field reliability will be dominated by non-NAND mechanisms such as firmware bugs, power-loss events, radiation-induced soft errors, and failures in non-NAND components. A wide range of design validation and qualification tests are necessary to evaluate these non-NAND mechanisms. Published field reliability statistics indicate that SSDs are more reliable on average than HDDs, but they are not immune to failure, and there is wide variation among models. The NAND and non-NAND mechanisms are illustrated through new case studies of SSD internal qualification and field reliability data. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/JPROC.2017.2725738 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1109_JPROC_2017_2725738</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>7998601</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>2174445002</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-a250d64aefe486e90f76efa2e88993ae11d957025bc869976f1562a0219421ec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEtPAjEUhRujiYj-Ad00cT1425m-EjcI4iMIBnTdlJk7sWRgsB1M-PcOQlydzfnuPfkIuWbQYwzM3ev7bDrocWCqxxUXKtUnpMOE0AnnQp6SDgDTieHMnJOLGJcAkAqZdsj9DCvvFr7yzY7WJZ3XlS-SeeMapMPgfzDSBxexoPWaTvqTIR1VLn7RN1zVYXdJzkpXRbw6Zpd8jh4_Bs_JePr0MuiPkzyVrEkcF1DIzGGJmZZooFQSS8dRa2NSh4wVRijgYpFraYySJROSO2jXZpxhnnbJ7eHuJtTfW4yNXdbbsG5fWs5UlmUCgLctfmjloY4xYGk3wa9c2FkGdm_J_lmye0v2aKmFbg6QR8R_QBmjJbD0F-vsYMo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2174445002</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reliability of Solid-State Drives Based on NAND Flash Memory</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Journals</source><creator>Mielke, Neal R. ; Frickey, Robert E. ; Kalastirsky, Ivan ; Quan, Minyan ; Ustinov, Dmitry ; Vasudevan, Venkatesh J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mielke, Neal R. ; Frickey, Robert E. ; Kalastirsky, Ivan ; Quan, Minyan ; Ustinov, Dmitry ; Vasudevan, Venkatesh J.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper reviews the reliability of solid-state drives (SSDs) based on NAND Flash memory from the perspectives of failure mechanisms, design mitigations, qualification methods, and field failure rates. NAND reliability is dominated by gradual memory-cell degradation in late life and defects such as interconnect shorts earlier in life. Design mitigations exist for these mechanisms. Qualification methods standardized in JEDEC JESD218 are designed to evaluate the mechanisms and mitigations, over a full drive lifetime, in the laboratory. Full-lifetime qualification provides confidence in the long-term reliability of SSDs that cannot be achieved by the early-life qualifications performed on hard disk drives. If NAND mechanisms are sufficiently suppressed, field reliability will be dominated by non-NAND mechanisms such as firmware bugs, power-loss events, radiation-induced soft errors, and failures in non-NAND components. A wide range of design validation and qualification tests are necessary to evaluate these non-NAND mechanisms. Published field reliability statistics indicate that SSDs are more reliable on average than HDDs, but they are not immune to failure, and there is wide variation among models. The NAND and non-NAND mechanisms are illustrated through new case studies of SSD internal qualification and field reliability data.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-9219</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-2256</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/JPROC.2017.2725738</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IEEPAD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Confidence ; Data retention ; Data storage ; Design defects ; Disk drives ; Drives ; endurance ; Error analysis ; Failure ; Failure mechanisms ; Failure rates ; Firmware ; Flash memories ; Flash memory (computers) ; Integrated circuits ; JEDEC ; NAND flash memory ; Qualifications ; Radiation effects ; reliability ; Reliability analysis ; Reliability engineering ; Soft errors ; Solid state devices ; Solid-state circuits ; solid-state drives (SSDs) ; Statistical tests</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the IEEE, 2017-09, Vol.105 (9), p.1725-1750</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-a250d64aefe486e90f76efa2e88993ae11d957025bc869976f1562a0219421ec3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-a250d64aefe486e90f76efa2e88993ae11d957025bc869976f1562a0219421ec3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7956-2772</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7998601$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,54795</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mielke, Neal R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frickey, Robert E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalastirsky, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quan, Minyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ustinov, Dmitry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasudevan, Venkatesh J.</creatorcontrib><title>Reliability of Solid-State Drives Based on NAND Flash Memory</title><title>Proceedings of the IEEE</title><addtitle>JPROC</addtitle><description>This paper reviews the reliability of solid-state drives (SSDs) based on NAND Flash memory from the perspectives of failure mechanisms, design mitigations, qualification methods, and field failure rates. NAND reliability is dominated by gradual memory-cell degradation in late life and defects such as interconnect shorts earlier in life. Design mitigations exist for these mechanisms. Qualification methods standardized in JEDEC JESD218 are designed to evaluate the mechanisms and mitigations, over a full drive lifetime, in the laboratory. Full-lifetime qualification provides confidence in the long-term reliability of SSDs that cannot be achieved by the early-life qualifications performed on hard disk drives. If NAND mechanisms are sufficiently suppressed, field reliability will be dominated by non-NAND mechanisms such as firmware bugs, power-loss events, radiation-induced soft errors, and failures in non-NAND components. A wide range of design validation and qualification tests are necessary to evaluate these non-NAND mechanisms. Published field reliability statistics indicate that SSDs are more reliable on average than HDDs, but they are not immune to failure, and there is wide variation among models. The NAND and non-NAND mechanisms are illustrated through new case studies of SSD internal qualification and field reliability data.</description><subject>Confidence</subject><subject>Data retention</subject><subject>Data storage</subject><subject>Design defects</subject><subject>Disk drives</subject><subject>Drives</subject><subject>endurance</subject><subject>Error analysis</subject><subject>Failure</subject><subject>Failure mechanisms</subject><subject>Failure rates</subject><subject>Firmware</subject><subject>Flash memories</subject><subject>Flash memory (computers)</subject><subject>Integrated circuits</subject><subject>JEDEC</subject><subject>NAND flash memory</subject><subject>Qualifications</subject><subject>Radiation effects</subject><subject>reliability</subject><subject>Reliability analysis</subject><subject>Reliability engineering</subject><subject>Soft errors</subject><subject>Solid state devices</subject><subject>Solid-state circuits</subject><subject>solid-state drives (SSDs)</subject><subject>Statistical tests</subject><issn>0018-9219</issn><issn>1558-2256</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kEtPAjEUhRujiYj-Ad00cT1425m-EjcI4iMIBnTdlJk7sWRgsB1M-PcOQlydzfnuPfkIuWbQYwzM3ev7bDrocWCqxxUXKtUnpMOE0AnnQp6SDgDTieHMnJOLGJcAkAqZdsj9DCvvFr7yzY7WJZ3XlS-SeeMapMPgfzDSBxexoPWaTvqTIR1VLn7RN1zVYXdJzkpXRbw6Zpd8jh4_Bs_JePr0MuiPkzyVrEkcF1DIzGGJmZZooFQSS8dRa2NSh4wVRijgYpFraYySJROSO2jXZpxhnnbJ7eHuJtTfW4yNXdbbsG5fWs5UlmUCgLctfmjloY4xYGk3wa9c2FkGdm_J_lmye0v2aKmFbg6QR8R_QBmjJbD0F-vsYMo</recordid><startdate>20170901</startdate><enddate>20170901</enddate><creator>Mielke, Neal R.</creator><creator>Frickey, Robert E.</creator><creator>Kalastirsky, Ivan</creator><creator>Quan, Minyan</creator><creator>Ustinov, Dmitry</creator><creator>Vasudevan, Venkatesh J.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7956-2772</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170901</creationdate><title>Reliability of Solid-State Drives Based on NAND Flash Memory</title><author>Mielke, Neal R. ; Frickey, Robert E. ; Kalastirsky, Ivan ; Quan, Minyan ; Ustinov, Dmitry ; Vasudevan, Venkatesh J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-a250d64aefe486e90f76efa2e88993ae11d957025bc869976f1562a0219421ec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Confidence</topic><topic>Data retention</topic><topic>Data storage</topic><topic>Design defects</topic><topic>Disk drives</topic><topic>Drives</topic><topic>endurance</topic><topic>Error analysis</topic><topic>Failure</topic><topic>Failure mechanisms</topic><topic>Failure rates</topic><topic>Firmware</topic><topic>Flash memories</topic><topic>Flash memory (computers)</topic><topic>Integrated circuits</topic><topic>JEDEC</topic><topic>NAND flash memory</topic><topic>Qualifications</topic><topic>Radiation effects</topic><topic>reliability</topic><topic>Reliability analysis</topic><topic>Reliability engineering</topic><topic>Soft errors</topic><topic>Solid state devices</topic><topic>Solid-state circuits</topic><topic>solid-state drives (SSDs)</topic><topic>Statistical tests</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mielke, Neal R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frickey, Robert E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalastirsky, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quan, Minyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ustinov, Dmitry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasudevan, Venkatesh J.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library Online</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the IEEE</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mielke, Neal R.</au><au>Frickey, Robert E.</au><au>Kalastirsky, Ivan</au><au>Quan, Minyan</au><au>Ustinov, Dmitry</au><au>Vasudevan, Venkatesh J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reliability of Solid-State Drives Based on NAND Flash Memory</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the IEEE</jtitle><stitle>JPROC</stitle><date>2017-09-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>105</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1725</spage><epage>1750</epage><pages>1725-1750</pages><issn>0018-9219</issn><eissn>1558-2256</eissn><coden>IEEPAD</coden><abstract>This paper reviews the reliability of solid-state drives (SSDs) based on NAND Flash memory from the perspectives of failure mechanisms, design mitigations, qualification methods, and field failure rates. NAND reliability is dominated by gradual memory-cell degradation in late life and defects such as interconnect shorts earlier in life. Design mitigations exist for these mechanisms. Qualification methods standardized in JEDEC JESD218 are designed to evaluate the mechanisms and mitigations, over a full drive lifetime, in the laboratory. Full-lifetime qualification provides confidence in the long-term reliability of SSDs that cannot be achieved by the early-life qualifications performed on hard disk drives. If NAND mechanisms are sufficiently suppressed, field reliability will be dominated by non-NAND mechanisms such as firmware bugs, power-loss events, radiation-induced soft errors, and failures in non-NAND components. A wide range of design validation and qualification tests are necessary to evaluate these non-NAND mechanisms. Published field reliability statistics indicate that SSDs are more reliable on average than HDDs, but they are not immune to failure, and there is wide variation among models. The NAND and non-NAND mechanisms are illustrated through new case studies of SSD internal qualification and field reliability data.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/JPROC.2017.2725738</doi><tpages>26</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7956-2772</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0018-9219 |
ispartof | Proceedings of the IEEE, 2017-09, Vol.105 (9), p.1725-1750 |
issn | 0018-9219 1558-2256 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1109_JPROC_2017_2725738 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Journals |
subjects | Confidence Data retention Data storage Design defects Disk drives Drives endurance Error analysis Failure Failure mechanisms Failure rates Firmware Flash memories Flash memory (computers) Integrated circuits JEDEC NAND flash memory Qualifications Radiation effects reliability Reliability analysis Reliability engineering Soft errors Solid state devices Solid-state circuits solid-state drives (SSDs) Statistical tests |
title | Reliability of Solid-State Drives Based on NAND Flash Memory |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T22%3A46%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reliability%20of%20Solid-State%20Drives%20Based%20on%20NAND%20Flash%20Memory&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20IEEE&rft.au=Mielke,%20Neal%20R.&rft.date=2017-09-01&rft.volume=105&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1725&rft.epage=1750&rft.pages=1725-1750&rft.issn=0018-9219&rft.eissn=1558-2256&rft.coden=IEEPAD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/JPROC.2017.2725738&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2174445002%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-a250d64aefe486e90f76efa2e88993ae11d957025bc869976f1562a0219421ec3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2174445002&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=7998601&rfr_iscdi=true |