Loading…
Myths of Automation, Part 2: Some Very Human Consequences
In a previous essay, the myths of automation were described by reference to "deadly sins." Here, a case study is presented that illustrates the myths and their consequences. Indeed, the case study takes the word "deadly" quite literally. This article relies on material from an Ar...
Saved in:
Published in: | IEEE intelligent systems 2014-03, Vol.29 (2), p.82-85 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-25a01030576fdf5fbd53cce6f54032c93cf2a990e5b650d8d708e1a173d0cd83 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-25a01030576fdf5fbd53cce6f54032c93cf2a990e5b650d8d708e1a173d0cd83 |
container_end_page | 85 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 82 |
container_title | IEEE intelligent systems |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Hoffman, Robert R. Hawley, John K. Bradshaw, Jeffrey M. |
description | In a previous essay, the myths of automation were described by reference to "deadly sins." Here, a case study is presented that illustrates the myths and their consequences. Indeed, the case study takes the word "deadly" quite literally. This article relies on material from an Army Research Laboratory (ARL) review of Patriot missile fratricide incidents. It should be noted, however, that the example recounted here is not a singularity. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/MIS.2014.25 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1109_MIS_2014_25</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>6832882</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>3350147761</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-25a01030576fdf5fbd53cce6f54032c93cf2a990e5b650d8d708e1a173d0cd83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkM1LAzEQxYMoWKsnj14CIgi6NR87u1lvpagttCi0eA1pNsEtu5ua7B7635vS0oNzmQfzm5nHQ-iWkhGlpHhZzJYjRmg6YnCGBrRIaUJZkZ5HDXud5ewSXYWwIYRxQsUAFYtd9xOws3jcd65RXeXaZ_ylfIfZK166xuBv43d42jeqxRPXBvPbm1abcI0urKqDuTn2IVq9v60m02T--TGbjOeJ5mnaJQwUoYQTyDNbWrDrErjWJrOQEs50wbVlqiiIgXUGpBRlToShiua8JLoUfIgeD2e33sXPoZNNFbSpa9Ua1wdJAYqcAo81RPf_0I3rfRvNRSqNDnLKWaSeDpT2LgRvrNz6qlF-JymR-xRlTFHuU5QMIv1wvKmCVrX1qtVVOK0wARkIoJG7O3CVMeY0zgRnQjD-B7dRd08</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1540577132</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Myths of Automation, Part 2: Some Very Human Consequences</title><source>Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</source><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Journals</source><creator>Hoffman, Robert R. ; Hawley, John K. ; Bradshaw, Jeffrey M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hoffman, Robert R. ; Hawley, John K. ; Bradshaw, Jeffrey M.</creatorcontrib><description>In a previous essay, the myths of automation were described by reference to "deadly sins." Here, a case study is presented that illustrates the myths and their consequences. Indeed, the case study takes the word "deadly" quite literally. This article relies on material from an Army Research Laboratory (ARL) review of Patriot missile fratricide incidents. It should be noted, however, that the example recounted here is not a singularity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1541-1672</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1941-1294</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/MIS.2014.25</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IISYF7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: IEEE</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Army ; Automation ; Cognition ; Computer science; control theory; systems ; Control theory. Systems ; Exact sciences and technology ; Human ; human-centered computing ; Intelligent systems ; Missiles ; Patriot missile ; Personnel ; Robotics ; Semantics ; Singularities ; Training ; undisciplined automation</subject><ispartof>IEEE intelligent systems, 2014-03, Vol.29 (2), p.82-85</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) Mar-Apr 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-25a01030576fdf5fbd53cce6f54032c93cf2a990e5b650d8d708e1a173d0cd83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-25a01030576fdf5fbd53cce6f54032c93cf2a990e5b650d8d708e1a173d0cd83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6832882$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,34135,54796</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28565851$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hoffman, Robert R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawley, John K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradshaw, Jeffrey M.</creatorcontrib><title>Myths of Automation, Part 2: Some Very Human Consequences</title><title>IEEE intelligent systems</title><addtitle>MIS</addtitle><description>In a previous essay, the myths of automation were described by reference to "deadly sins." Here, a case study is presented that illustrates the myths and their consequences. Indeed, the case study takes the word "deadly" quite literally. This article relies on material from an Army Research Laboratory (ARL) review of Patriot missile fratricide incidents. It should be noted, however, that the example recounted here is not a singularity.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Army</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Computer science; control theory; systems</subject><subject>Control theory. Systems</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>human-centered computing</subject><subject>Intelligent systems</subject><subject>Missiles</subject><subject>Patriot missile</subject><subject>Personnel</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Singularities</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>undisciplined automation</subject><issn>1541-1672</issn><issn>1941-1294</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>F2A</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkM1LAzEQxYMoWKsnj14CIgi6NR87u1lvpagttCi0eA1pNsEtu5ua7B7635vS0oNzmQfzm5nHQ-iWkhGlpHhZzJYjRmg6YnCGBrRIaUJZkZ5HDXud5ewSXYWwIYRxQsUAFYtd9xOws3jcd65RXeXaZ_ylfIfZK166xuBv43d42jeqxRPXBvPbm1abcI0urKqDuTn2IVq9v60m02T--TGbjOeJ5mnaJQwUoYQTyDNbWrDrErjWJrOQEs50wbVlqiiIgXUGpBRlToShiua8JLoUfIgeD2e33sXPoZNNFbSpa9Ua1wdJAYqcAo81RPf_0I3rfRvNRSqNDnLKWaSeDpT2LgRvrNz6qlF-JymR-xRlTFHuU5QMIv1wvKmCVrX1qtVVOK0wARkIoJG7O3CVMeY0zgRnQjD-B7dRd08</recordid><startdate>20140301</startdate><enddate>20140301</enddate><creator>Hoffman, Robert R.</creator><creator>Hawley, John K.</creator><creator>Bradshaw, Jeffrey M.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>IEEE Computer Society</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140301</creationdate><title>Myths of Automation, Part 2: Some Very Human Consequences</title><author>Hoffman, Robert R. ; Hawley, John K. ; Bradshaw, Jeffrey M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-25a01030576fdf5fbd53cce6f54032c93cf2a990e5b650d8d708e1a173d0cd83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Army</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Computer science; control theory; systems</topic><topic>Control theory. Systems</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>human-centered computing</topic><topic>Intelligent systems</topic><topic>Missiles</topic><topic>Patriot missile</topic><topic>Personnel</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Singularities</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>undisciplined automation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hoffman, Robert R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawley, John K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradshaw, Jeffrey M.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEL</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Library & Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><jtitle>IEEE intelligent systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hoffman, Robert R.</au><au>Hawley, John K.</au><au>Bradshaw, Jeffrey M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Myths of Automation, Part 2: Some Very Human Consequences</atitle><jtitle>IEEE intelligent systems</jtitle><stitle>MIS</stitle><date>2014-03-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>82</spage><epage>85</epage><pages>82-85</pages><issn>1541-1672</issn><eissn>1941-1294</eissn><coden>IISYF7</coden><abstract>In a previous essay, the myths of automation were described by reference to "deadly sins." Here, a case study is presented that illustrates the myths and their consequences. Indeed, the case study takes the word "deadly" quite literally. This article relies on material from an Army Research Laboratory (ARL) review of Patriot missile fratricide incidents. It should be noted, however, that the example recounted here is not a singularity.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/MIS.2014.25</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1541-1672 |
ispartof | IEEE intelligent systems, 2014-03, Vol.29 (2), p.82-85 |
issn | 1541-1672 1941-1294 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1109_MIS_2014_25 |
source | Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA); IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Journals |
subjects | Applied sciences Army Automation Cognition Computer science control theory systems Control theory. Systems Exact sciences and technology Human human-centered computing Intelligent systems Missiles Patriot missile Personnel Robotics Semantics Singularities Training undisciplined automation |
title | Myths of Automation, Part 2: Some Very Human Consequences |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T15%3A21%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Myths%20of%20Automation,%20Part%202:%20Some%20Very%20Human%20Consequences&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20intelligent%20systems&rft.au=Hoffman,%20Robert%20R.&rft.date=2014-03-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=82&rft.epage=85&rft.pages=82-85&rft.issn=1541-1672&rft.eissn=1941-1294&rft.coden=IISYF7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/MIS.2014.25&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3350147761%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-25a01030576fdf5fbd53cce6f54032c93cf2a990e5b650d8d708e1a173d0cd83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1540577132&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=6832882&rfr_iscdi=true |