Conceptual Design of a Large Aperture Dipole for Testing of Cables and Insert Coils at High Field

• Published in: IEEE transactions on applied superconductivity 2018-04, Vol.28 (3), p.1-5
• Main Authors: Bruzzone, Pierluigi, Bottura, Luca, Cau, Francesca, de Rijk, Gjis, Ferracin, Paolo, Minervini, Joseph, Portone, Alfredo, Prestemon, Soren, Rochepault, Etienne, Ravaioli, Emmanuele, Sabbi, GianLuca, Testoni, Pietro
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Coils; Conductors; High field test facility; large aperture; Magnetic separation; Nb<inline-formula xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX"> _{3}</tex-math> </inline-formula>Sn magnets; Superconducting cables; Superconducting magnets; Test facilities; Wires
• ISSN: 1051-8223; 1558-2515
• DOI: 10.1109/TASC.2017.2785828

Advances in the performance of low- and high-temperature superconductors enable the development of advanced magnets for a range of applications, including tokamaks for fusion energy, dipoles, and quadrupoles for hadron colliders, and solenoids for nuclear magnetic resonance studies. The capability of testing prototype cables and insert coils at high field is critical to these developments. We present here the conceptual design of a test facility dipole with features suitable to support the advanced magnet development efforts of both Fusion and HEP communities. In particular, a background field of 15 T is provided over a minimum homogeneous length of 1000 mm, and the magnet clear bore of approximately 144 × 94 mm can accommodate large fusion conductors as well as prototype coils for high field dipoles, along with flexible cryogenic and mechanical provisions for sample characterization. Two technical solutions are considered. The first uses a forced flow cable-in-conduit conductor and follows the design developed by EFDA for the EDIPO magnet. The second uses a bath cooled Rutherford cable and follows a block-coil design similar to the CERN FRESCA2 dipole, and the LBNL HD and LD1 dipoles. Following a comparison between the two approaches, we present two designs for the Rutherford cable approach including performance objectives, key parameters, and preliminary magnetic, mechanical and quench protection analysis.