Loading…
Monte Carlo Tree Search in Lines of Action
The success of Monte Carlo tree search (MCTS) in many games, where αβ-based search has failed, naturally raises the question whether Monte Carlo simulations will eventually also outperform traditional game-tree search in game domains where αβ -based search is now successful. The forte of αβ-based se...
Saved in:
Published in: | IEEE transactions on computational intelligence and AI in games. 2010-12, Vol.2 (4), p.239-250 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-ccb4b770cb22986dc875def0e036a57defba98eabeadcda326271a1d5eb611e63 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-ccb4b770cb22986dc875def0e036a57defba98eabeadcda326271a1d5eb611e63 |
container_end_page | 250 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 239 |
container_title | IEEE transactions on computational intelligence and AI in games. |
container_volume | 2 |
creator | Winands, M H M Bjornsson, Y Saito, J |
description | The success of Monte Carlo tree search (MCTS) in many games, where αβ-based search has failed, naturally raises the question whether Monte Carlo simulations will eventually also outperform traditional game-tree search in game domains where αβ -based search is now successful. The forte of αβ-based search are highly tactical deterministic game domains with a small to moderate branching factor, where efficient yet knowledge-rich evaluation functions can be applied effectively. In this paper, we describe an MCTS-based program for playing the game Lines of Action (LOA), which is a highly tactical slow-progression game exhibiting many of the properties difficult for MCTS. The program uses an improved MCTS variant that allows it to both prove the game-theoretical value of nodes in a search tree and to focus its simulations better using domain knowledge. This results in simulations superior in both handling tactics and ensuring game progression. Using the improved MCTS variant, our program is able to outperform even the world's strongest αβ-based LOA program. This is an important milestone for MCTS because the traditional game-tree search approach has been considered to be the better suited for playing LOA. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/TCIAIG.2010.2061050 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1109_TCIAIG_2010_2061050</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>5523941</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>2246774761</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-ccb4b770cb22986dc875def0e036a57defba98eabeadcda326271a1d5eb611e63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kM1qwzAQhEVpoSHNE-Qieiw41Y8lWUdj2sTg0kNd6E3I8po6pFYqOYe-fR0cspcdlpkd-BBaU7KhlOjnuijzcrthZDowIikR5AYtqE55QqTObq86-7pHqxj3ZBrOuWRygZ7e_DACLmw4eFwHAPwBNrhv3A-46geI2Hc4d2Pvhwd019lDhNVlL9Hn60td7JLqfVsWeZU4ntIxca5JG6WIaxjTmWxdpkQLHQHCpRVqko3VGdgGbOtay5lkilraCmgkpSD5Ej3Of4_B_54gjmbvT2GYKk2WSs0UF2oy8dnkgo8xQGeOof-x4c9QYs5YzIzFnLGYC5YptZ5TPQBcE0IwrlPK_wE_710M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>846927357</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Monte Carlo Tree Search in Lines of Action</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Journals</source><creator>Winands, M H M ; Bjornsson, Y ; Saito, J</creator><creatorcontrib>Winands, M H M ; Bjornsson, Y ; Saito, J</creatorcontrib><description>The success of Monte Carlo tree search (MCTS) in many games, where αβ-based search has failed, naturally raises the question whether Monte Carlo simulations will eventually also outperform traditional game-tree search in game domains where αβ -based search is now successful. The forte of αβ-based search are highly tactical deterministic game domains with a small to moderate branching factor, where efficient yet knowledge-rich evaluation functions can be applied effectively. In this paper, we describe an MCTS-based program for playing the game Lines of Action (LOA), which is a highly tactical slow-progression game exhibiting many of the properties difficult for MCTS. The program uses an improved MCTS variant that allows it to both prove the game-theoretical value of nodes in a search tree and to focus its simulations better using domain knowledge. This results in simulations superior in both handling tactics and ensuring game progression. Using the improved MCTS variant, our program is able to outperform even the world's strongest αβ-based LOA program. This is an important milestone for MCTS because the traditional game-tree search approach has been considered to be the better suited for playing LOA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1943-068X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2475-1502</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-0698</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2475-1510</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TCIAIG.2010.2061050</identifier><identifier>CODEN: TCIARR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Piscataway: IEEE</publisher><subject>Filling ; Game-tree solver ; Imaging phantoms ; Lines of Action (LOA) ; Monte Carlo tree search (MCTS) ; Studies</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on computational intelligence and AI in games., 2010-12, Vol.2 (4), p.239-250</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) Dec 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-ccb4b770cb22986dc875def0e036a57defba98eabeadcda326271a1d5eb611e63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-ccb4b770cb22986dc875def0e036a57defba98eabeadcda326271a1d5eb611e63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5523941$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27915,27916,54787</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Winands, M H M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bjornsson, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saito, J</creatorcontrib><title>Monte Carlo Tree Search in Lines of Action</title><title>IEEE transactions on computational intelligence and AI in games.</title><addtitle>TCIAIG</addtitle><description>The success of Monte Carlo tree search (MCTS) in many games, where αβ-based search has failed, naturally raises the question whether Monte Carlo simulations will eventually also outperform traditional game-tree search in game domains where αβ -based search is now successful. The forte of αβ-based search are highly tactical deterministic game domains with a small to moderate branching factor, where efficient yet knowledge-rich evaluation functions can be applied effectively. In this paper, we describe an MCTS-based program for playing the game Lines of Action (LOA), which is a highly tactical slow-progression game exhibiting many of the properties difficult for MCTS. The program uses an improved MCTS variant that allows it to both prove the game-theoretical value of nodes in a search tree and to focus its simulations better using domain knowledge. This results in simulations superior in both handling tactics and ensuring game progression. Using the improved MCTS variant, our program is able to outperform even the world's strongest αβ-based LOA program. This is an important milestone for MCTS because the traditional game-tree search approach has been considered to be the better suited for playing LOA.</description><subject>Filling</subject><subject>Game-tree solver</subject><subject>Imaging phantoms</subject><subject>Lines of Action (LOA)</subject><subject>Monte Carlo tree search (MCTS)</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>1943-068X</issn><issn>2475-1502</issn><issn>1943-0698</issn><issn>2475-1510</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kM1qwzAQhEVpoSHNE-Qieiw41Y8lWUdj2sTg0kNd6E3I8po6pFYqOYe-fR0cspcdlpkd-BBaU7KhlOjnuijzcrthZDowIikR5AYtqE55QqTObq86-7pHqxj3ZBrOuWRygZ7e_DACLmw4eFwHAPwBNrhv3A-46geI2Hc4d2Pvhwd019lDhNVlL9Hn60td7JLqfVsWeZU4ntIxca5JG6WIaxjTmWxdpkQLHQHCpRVqko3VGdgGbOtay5lkilraCmgkpSD5Ej3Of4_B_54gjmbvT2GYKk2WSs0UF2oy8dnkgo8xQGeOof-x4c9QYs5YzIzFnLGYC5YptZ5TPQBcE0IwrlPK_wE_710M</recordid><startdate>201012</startdate><enddate>201012</enddate><creator>Winands, M H M</creator><creator>Bjornsson, Y</creator><creator>Saito, J</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201012</creationdate><title>Monte Carlo Tree Search in Lines of Action</title><author>Winands, M H M ; Bjornsson, Y ; Saito, J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-ccb4b770cb22986dc875def0e036a57defba98eabeadcda326271a1d5eb611e63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Filling</topic><topic>Game-tree solver</topic><topic>Imaging phantoms</topic><topic>Lines of Action (LOA)</topic><topic>Monte Carlo tree search (MCTS)</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Winands, M H M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bjornsson, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saito, J</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE/IET Electronic Library</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on computational intelligence and AI in games.</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Winands, M H M</au><au>Bjornsson, Y</au><au>Saito, J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Monte Carlo Tree Search in Lines of Action</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on computational intelligence and AI in games.</jtitle><stitle>TCIAIG</stitle><date>2010-12</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>239</spage><epage>250</epage><pages>239-250</pages><issn>1943-068X</issn><issn>2475-1502</issn><eissn>1943-0698</eissn><eissn>2475-1510</eissn><coden>TCIARR</coden><abstract>The success of Monte Carlo tree search (MCTS) in many games, where αβ-based search has failed, naturally raises the question whether Monte Carlo simulations will eventually also outperform traditional game-tree search in game domains where αβ -based search is now successful. The forte of αβ-based search are highly tactical deterministic game domains with a small to moderate branching factor, where efficient yet knowledge-rich evaluation functions can be applied effectively. In this paper, we describe an MCTS-based program for playing the game Lines of Action (LOA), which is a highly tactical slow-progression game exhibiting many of the properties difficult for MCTS. The program uses an improved MCTS variant that allows it to both prove the game-theoretical value of nodes in a search tree and to focus its simulations better using domain knowledge. This results in simulations superior in both handling tactics and ensuring game progression. Using the improved MCTS variant, our program is able to outperform even the world's strongest αβ-based LOA program. This is an important milestone for MCTS because the traditional game-tree search approach has been considered to be the better suited for playing LOA.</abstract><cop>Piscataway</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TCIAIG.2010.2061050</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1943-068X |
ispartof | IEEE transactions on computational intelligence and AI in games., 2010-12, Vol.2 (4), p.239-250 |
issn | 1943-068X 2475-1502 1943-0698 2475-1510 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1109_TCIAIG_2010_2061050 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Journals |
subjects | Filling Game-tree solver Imaging phantoms Lines of Action (LOA) Monte Carlo tree search (MCTS) Studies |
title | Monte Carlo Tree Search in Lines of Action |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T06%3A32%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Monte%20Carlo%20Tree%20Search%20in%20Lines%20of%20Action&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20computational%20intelligence%20and%20AI%20in%20games.&rft.au=Winands,%20M%20H%20M&rft.date=2010-12&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=239&rft.epage=250&rft.pages=239-250&rft.issn=1943-068X&rft.eissn=1943-0698&rft.coden=TCIARR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TCIAIG.2010.2061050&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2246774761%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-ccb4b770cb22986dc875def0e036a57defba98eabeadcda326271a1d5eb611e63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=846927357&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=5523941&rfr_iscdi=true |