Loading…
Influence of Different Configurations of Nonideal Calibration Standards on Vector Network Analyzer Performance
To perform system error correction of a microwave vector network analyzer (VNA), several calibration procedures are applied, several of which are derived from the well-known short-open-load-through (SOLT) calibration method where lumped one-port circuits like short circuits, open circuits, and low-r...
Saved in:
Published in: | IEEE transactions on instrumentation and measurement 2012-07, Vol.61 (7), p.2034-2041 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-faf3ddd35ad93a69b51b20f3658d26273d66321878f606e0224f011266f89cc93 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-faf3ddd35ad93a69b51b20f3658d26273d66321878f606e0224f011266f89cc93 |
container_end_page | 2041 |
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 2034 |
container_title | IEEE transactions on instrumentation and measurement |
container_volume | 61 |
creator | Stumper, U. Schrader, T. |
description | To perform system error correction of a microwave vector network analyzer (VNA), several calibration procedures are applied, several of which are derived from the well-known short-open-load-through (SOLT) calibration method where lumped one-port circuits like short circuits, open circuits, and low-reflective loads are used as calibration standards. These derived calibration algorithms only use three calibration standard connections-instead of six for SOLT; hence, the calibration time is considerably reduced. Various configurations of high- and low-reflective standards at test ports 1 and 2 of the VNA are possible. Using inaccurate calibration standard modeling, the VNA calibration is incorrect, and hence, inaccurate -parameters of a device under test (DUT) are measured. In this paper, it is theoretically and experimentally shown how, due to non-ideal calibration standard modeling, the deviations of measured -parameters of the DUT from their hardware-defined true values depend on the inaccurate calibration standard modeling, on the configurations of the calibration standards at the test ports, on the reflection values of the calibration standards, and on the -parameter values of the DUTs themselves. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/TIM.2012.2182889 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1109_TIM_2012_2182889</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>6165355</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>1315665593</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-faf3ddd35ad93a69b51b20f3658d26273d66321878f606e0224f011266f89cc93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkclLxDAUxoMoOC53wUvAi5eOWZrX5ijjNuAGLteSaV6k2kk0aRH9680w4sHTO3y_720fIQecTTln-uRxfjMVjIup4LWoa71BJlypqtAAYpNMGON1oUsF22QnpVfGWAVlNSF-7l0_om-RBkfPOucwoh_oLHjXvYzRDF3waaXdBt9ZND2dmb5brAX6MBhvTbSZ8PQZ2yFEeovDZ4hv9NSb_usbI73H6EJcmjxkj2w50yfc_6275Oni_HF2VVzfXc5np9dFK0U5FM44aa2VylgtDeiF4gvBnARVWwGikhZA5kOr2gEDZEKUjnEuAFyt21bLXXK87vsew8eIaWiWXWqx743HMKaGS64AlNIyo0f_0Ncwxrx7pphgrMxvLDPF1lQbQ0oRXfMeu6WJXxlqVgE0OYBmFUDzG0C2HK4tHSL-4cBBSaXkD9qwgXE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1020041554</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of Different Configurations of Nonideal Calibration Standards on Vector Network Analyzer Performance</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Journals</source><creator>Stumper, U. ; Schrader, T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stumper, U. ; Schrader, T.</creatorcontrib><description>To perform system error correction of a microwave vector network analyzer (VNA), several calibration procedures are applied, several of which are derived from the well-known short-open-load-through (SOLT) calibration method where lumped one-port circuits like short circuits, open circuits, and low-reflective loads are used as calibration standards. These derived calibration algorithms only use three calibration standard connections-instead of six for SOLT; hence, the calibration time is considerably reduced. Various configurations of high- and low-reflective standards at test ports 1 and 2 of the VNA are possible. Using inaccurate calibration standard modeling, the VNA calibration is incorrect, and hence, inaccurate -parameters of a device under test (DUT) are measured. In this paper, it is theoretically and experimentally shown how, due to non-ideal calibration standard modeling, the deviations of measured -parameters of the DUT from their hardware-defined true values depend on the inaccurate calibration standard modeling, on the configurations of the calibration standards at the test ports, on the reflection values of the calibration standards, and on the -parameter values of the DUTs themselves.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-9456</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-9662</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TIM.2012.2182889</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IEIMAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Attenuators ; Calibration ; Calibration standards ; Circuits ; Equations ; Mathematical analysis ; Mathematical model ; microwave measurements ; Microwaves ; Networks ; Ports ; S -parameters ; Scattering parameters ; Sensitivity ; sensitivity coefficients ; uncertainty of measurement ; vector network analyzer (VNA) ; Vectors (mathematics) ; VNA calibration</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on instrumentation and measurement, 2012-07, Vol.61 (7), p.2034-2041</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) Jul 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-faf3ddd35ad93a69b51b20f3658d26273d66321878f606e0224f011266f89cc93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-faf3ddd35ad93a69b51b20f3658d26273d66321878f606e0224f011266f89cc93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6165355$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,54771</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stumper, U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schrader, T.</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of Different Configurations of Nonideal Calibration Standards on Vector Network Analyzer Performance</title><title>IEEE transactions on instrumentation and measurement</title><addtitle>TIM</addtitle><description>To perform system error correction of a microwave vector network analyzer (VNA), several calibration procedures are applied, several of which are derived from the well-known short-open-load-through (SOLT) calibration method where lumped one-port circuits like short circuits, open circuits, and low-reflective loads are used as calibration standards. These derived calibration algorithms only use three calibration standard connections-instead of six for SOLT; hence, the calibration time is considerably reduced. Various configurations of high- and low-reflective standards at test ports 1 and 2 of the VNA are possible. Using inaccurate calibration standard modeling, the VNA calibration is incorrect, and hence, inaccurate -parameters of a device under test (DUT) are measured. In this paper, it is theoretically and experimentally shown how, due to non-ideal calibration standard modeling, the deviations of measured -parameters of the DUT from their hardware-defined true values depend on the inaccurate calibration standard modeling, on the configurations of the calibration standards at the test ports, on the reflection values of the calibration standards, and on the -parameter values of the DUTs themselves.</description><subject>Attenuators</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Calibration standards</subject><subject>Circuits</subject><subject>Equations</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Mathematical model</subject><subject>microwave measurements</subject><subject>Microwaves</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>Ports</subject><subject>S -parameters</subject><subject>Scattering parameters</subject><subject>Sensitivity</subject><subject>sensitivity coefficients</subject><subject>uncertainty of measurement</subject><subject>vector network analyzer (VNA)</subject><subject>Vectors (mathematics)</subject><subject>VNA calibration</subject><issn>0018-9456</issn><issn>1557-9662</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkclLxDAUxoMoOC53wUvAi5eOWZrX5ijjNuAGLteSaV6k2kk0aRH9680w4sHTO3y_720fIQecTTln-uRxfjMVjIup4LWoa71BJlypqtAAYpNMGON1oUsF22QnpVfGWAVlNSF-7l0_om-RBkfPOucwoh_oLHjXvYzRDF3waaXdBt9ZND2dmb5brAX6MBhvTbSZ8PQZ2yFEeovDZ4hv9NSb_usbI73H6EJcmjxkj2w50yfc_6275Oni_HF2VVzfXc5np9dFK0U5FM44aa2VylgtDeiF4gvBnARVWwGikhZA5kOr2gEDZEKUjnEuAFyt21bLXXK87vsew8eIaWiWXWqx743HMKaGS64AlNIyo0f_0Ncwxrx7pphgrMxvLDPF1lQbQ0oRXfMeu6WJXxlqVgE0OYBmFUDzG0C2HK4tHSL-4cBBSaXkD9qwgXE</recordid><startdate>20120701</startdate><enddate>20120701</enddate><creator>Stumper, U.</creator><creator>Schrader, T.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120701</creationdate><title>Influence of Different Configurations of Nonideal Calibration Standards on Vector Network Analyzer Performance</title><author>Stumper, U. ; Schrader, T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-faf3ddd35ad93a69b51b20f3658d26273d66321878f606e0224f011266f89cc93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Attenuators</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Calibration standards</topic><topic>Circuits</topic><topic>Equations</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Mathematical model</topic><topic>microwave measurements</topic><topic>Microwaves</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>Ports</topic><topic>S -parameters</topic><topic>Scattering parameters</topic><topic>Sensitivity</topic><topic>sensitivity coefficients</topic><topic>uncertainty of measurement</topic><topic>vector network analyzer (VNA)</topic><topic>Vectors (mathematics)</topic><topic>VNA calibration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stumper, U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schrader, T.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998–Present</collection><collection>IEEE/IET Electronic Library</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on instrumentation and measurement</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stumper, U.</au><au>Schrader, T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of Different Configurations of Nonideal Calibration Standards on Vector Network Analyzer Performance</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on instrumentation and measurement</jtitle><stitle>TIM</stitle><date>2012-07-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>2034</spage><epage>2041</epage><pages>2034-2041</pages><issn>0018-9456</issn><eissn>1557-9662</eissn><coden>IEIMAO</coden><abstract>To perform system error correction of a microwave vector network analyzer (VNA), several calibration procedures are applied, several of which are derived from the well-known short-open-load-through (SOLT) calibration method where lumped one-port circuits like short circuits, open circuits, and low-reflective loads are used as calibration standards. These derived calibration algorithms only use three calibration standard connections-instead of six for SOLT; hence, the calibration time is considerably reduced. Various configurations of high- and low-reflective standards at test ports 1 and 2 of the VNA are possible. Using inaccurate calibration standard modeling, the VNA calibration is incorrect, and hence, inaccurate -parameters of a device under test (DUT) are measured. In this paper, it is theoretically and experimentally shown how, due to non-ideal calibration standard modeling, the deviations of measured -parameters of the DUT from their hardware-defined true values depend on the inaccurate calibration standard modeling, on the configurations of the calibration standards at the test ports, on the reflection values of the calibration standards, and on the -parameter values of the DUTs themselves.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TIM.2012.2182889</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0018-9456 |
ispartof | IEEE transactions on instrumentation and measurement, 2012-07, Vol.61 (7), p.2034-2041 |
issn | 0018-9456 1557-9662 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1109_TIM_2012_2182889 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Journals |
subjects | Attenuators Calibration Calibration standards Circuits Equations Mathematical analysis Mathematical model microwave measurements Microwaves Networks Ports S -parameters Scattering parameters Sensitivity sensitivity coefficients uncertainty of measurement vector network analyzer (VNA) Vectors (mathematics) VNA calibration |
title | Influence of Different Configurations of Nonideal Calibration Standards on Vector Network Analyzer Performance |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T03%3A45%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20Different%20Configurations%20of%20Nonideal%20Calibration%20Standards%20on%20Vector%20Network%20Analyzer%20Performance&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20instrumentation%20and%20measurement&rft.au=Stumper,%20U.&rft.date=2012-07-01&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=2034&rft.epage=2041&rft.pages=2034-2041&rft.issn=0018-9456&rft.eissn=1557-9662&rft.coden=IEIMAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TIM.2012.2182889&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1315665593%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-faf3ddd35ad93a69b51b20f3658d26273d66321878f606e0224f011266f89cc93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1020041554&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=6165355&rfr_iscdi=true |