Loading…

Influence of Different Configurations of Nonideal Calibration Standards on Vector Network Analyzer Performance

To perform system error correction of a microwave vector network analyzer (VNA), several calibration procedures are applied, several of which are derived from the well-known short-open-load-through (SOLT) calibration method where lumped one-port circuits like short circuits, open circuits, and low-r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:IEEE transactions on instrumentation and measurement 2012-07, Vol.61 (7), p.2034-2041
Main Authors: Stumper, U., Schrader, T.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-faf3ddd35ad93a69b51b20f3658d26273d66321878f606e0224f011266f89cc93
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-faf3ddd35ad93a69b51b20f3658d26273d66321878f606e0224f011266f89cc93
container_end_page 2041
container_issue 7
container_start_page 2034
container_title IEEE transactions on instrumentation and measurement
container_volume 61
creator Stumper, U.
Schrader, T.
description To perform system error correction of a microwave vector network analyzer (VNA), several calibration procedures are applied, several of which are derived from the well-known short-open-load-through (SOLT) calibration method where lumped one-port circuits like short circuits, open circuits, and low-reflective loads are used as calibration standards. These derived calibration algorithms only use three calibration standard connections-instead of six for SOLT; hence, the calibration time is considerably reduced. Various configurations of high- and low-reflective standards at test ports 1 and 2 of the VNA are possible. Using inaccurate calibration standard modeling, the VNA calibration is incorrect, and hence, inaccurate -parameters of a device under test (DUT) are measured. In this paper, it is theoretically and experimentally shown how, due to non-ideal calibration standard modeling, the deviations of measured -parameters of the DUT from their hardware-defined true values depend on the inaccurate calibration standard modeling, on the configurations of the calibration standards at the test ports, on the reflection values of the calibration standards, and on the -parameter values of the DUTs themselves.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/TIM.2012.2182889
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1109_TIM_2012_2182889</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>6165355</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>1315665593</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-faf3ddd35ad93a69b51b20f3658d26273d66321878f606e0224f011266f89cc93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkclLxDAUxoMoOC53wUvAi5eOWZrX5ijjNuAGLteSaV6k2kk0aRH9680w4sHTO3y_720fIQecTTln-uRxfjMVjIup4LWoa71BJlypqtAAYpNMGON1oUsF22QnpVfGWAVlNSF-7l0_om-RBkfPOucwoh_oLHjXvYzRDF3waaXdBt9ZND2dmb5brAX6MBhvTbSZ8PQZ2yFEeovDZ4hv9NSb_usbI73H6EJcmjxkj2w50yfc_6275Oni_HF2VVzfXc5np9dFK0U5FM44aa2VylgtDeiF4gvBnARVWwGikhZA5kOr2gEDZEKUjnEuAFyt21bLXXK87vsew8eIaWiWXWqx743HMKaGS64AlNIyo0f_0Ncwxrx7pphgrMxvLDPF1lQbQ0oRXfMeu6WJXxlqVgE0OYBmFUDzG0C2HK4tHSL-4cBBSaXkD9qwgXE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1020041554</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of Different Configurations of Nonideal Calibration Standards on Vector Network Analyzer Performance</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Journals</source><creator>Stumper, U. ; Schrader, T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stumper, U. ; Schrader, T.</creatorcontrib><description>To perform system error correction of a microwave vector network analyzer (VNA), several calibration procedures are applied, several of which are derived from the well-known short-open-load-through (SOLT) calibration method where lumped one-port circuits like short circuits, open circuits, and low-reflective loads are used as calibration standards. These derived calibration algorithms only use three calibration standard connections-instead of six for SOLT; hence, the calibration time is considerably reduced. Various configurations of high- and low-reflective standards at test ports 1 and 2 of the VNA are possible. Using inaccurate calibration standard modeling, the VNA calibration is incorrect, and hence, inaccurate -parameters of a device under test (DUT) are measured. In this paper, it is theoretically and experimentally shown how, due to non-ideal calibration standard modeling, the deviations of measured -parameters of the DUT from their hardware-defined true values depend on the inaccurate calibration standard modeling, on the configurations of the calibration standards at the test ports, on the reflection values of the calibration standards, and on the -parameter values of the DUTs themselves.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-9456</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-9662</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TIM.2012.2182889</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IEIMAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Attenuators ; Calibration ; Calibration standards ; Circuits ; Equations ; Mathematical analysis ; Mathematical model ; microwave measurements ; Microwaves ; Networks ; Ports ; S -parameters ; Scattering parameters ; Sensitivity ; sensitivity coefficients ; uncertainty of measurement ; vector network analyzer (VNA) ; Vectors (mathematics) ; VNA calibration</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on instrumentation and measurement, 2012-07, Vol.61 (7), p.2034-2041</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) Jul 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-faf3ddd35ad93a69b51b20f3658d26273d66321878f606e0224f011266f89cc93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-faf3ddd35ad93a69b51b20f3658d26273d66321878f606e0224f011266f89cc93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6165355$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,54771</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stumper, U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schrader, T.</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of Different Configurations of Nonideal Calibration Standards on Vector Network Analyzer Performance</title><title>IEEE transactions on instrumentation and measurement</title><addtitle>TIM</addtitle><description>To perform system error correction of a microwave vector network analyzer (VNA), several calibration procedures are applied, several of which are derived from the well-known short-open-load-through (SOLT) calibration method where lumped one-port circuits like short circuits, open circuits, and low-reflective loads are used as calibration standards. These derived calibration algorithms only use three calibration standard connections-instead of six for SOLT; hence, the calibration time is considerably reduced. Various configurations of high- and low-reflective standards at test ports 1 and 2 of the VNA are possible. Using inaccurate calibration standard modeling, the VNA calibration is incorrect, and hence, inaccurate -parameters of a device under test (DUT) are measured. In this paper, it is theoretically and experimentally shown how, due to non-ideal calibration standard modeling, the deviations of measured -parameters of the DUT from their hardware-defined true values depend on the inaccurate calibration standard modeling, on the configurations of the calibration standards at the test ports, on the reflection values of the calibration standards, and on the -parameter values of the DUTs themselves.</description><subject>Attenuators</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Calibration standards</subject><subject>Circuits</subject><subject>Equations</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Mathematical model</subject><subject>microwave measurements</subject><subject>Microwaves</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>Ports</subject><subject>S -parameters</subject><subject>Scattering parameters</subject><subject>Sensitivity</subject><subject>sensitivity coefficients</subject><subject>uncertainty of measurement</subject><subject>vector network analyzer (VNA)</subject><subject>Vectors (mathematics)</subject><subject>VNA calibration</subject><issn>0018-9456</issn><issn>1557-9662</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkclLxDAUxoMoOC53wUvAi5eOWZrX5ijjNuAGLteSaV6k2kk0aRH9680w4sHTO3y_720fIQecTTln-uRxfjMVjIup4LWoa71BJlypqtAAYpNMGON1oUsF22QnpVfGWAVlNSF-7l0_om-RBkfPOucwoh_oLHjXvYzRDF3waaXdBt9ZND2dmb5brAX6MBhvTbSZ8PQZ2yFEeovDZ4hv9NSb_usbI73H6EJcmjxkj2w50yfc_6275Oni_HF2VVzfXc5np9dFK0U5FM44aa2VylgtDeiF4gvBnARVWwGikhZA5kOr2gEDZEKUjnEuAFyt21bLXXK87vsew8eIaWiWXWqx743HMKaGS64AlNIyo0f_0Ncwxrx7pphgrMxvLDPF1lQbQ0oRXfMeu6WJXxlqVgE0OYBmFUDzG0C2HK4tHSL-4cBBSaXkD9qwgXE</recordid><startdate>20120701</startdate><enddate>20120701</enddate><creator>Stumper, U.</creator><creator>Schrader, T.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120701</creationdate><title>Influence of Different Configurations of Nonideal Calibration Standards on Vector Network Analyzer Performance</title><author>Stumper, U. ; Schrader, T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-faf3ddd35ad93a69b51b20f3658d26273d66321878f606e0224f011266f89cc93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Attenuators</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Calibration standards</topic><topic>Circuits</topic><topic>Equations</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Mathematical model</topic><topic>microwave measurements</topic><topic>Microwaves</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>Ports</topic><topic>S -parameters</topic><topic>Scattering parameters</topic><topic>Sensitivity</topic><topic>sensitivity coefficients</topic><topic>uncertainty of measurement</topic><topic>vector network analyzer (VNA)</topic><topic>Vectors (mathematics)</topic><topic>VNA calibration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stumper, U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schrader, T.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998–Present</collection><collection>IEEE/IET Electronic Library</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on instrumentation and measurement</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stumper, U.</au><au>Schrader, T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of Different Configurations of Nonideal Calibration Standards on Vector Network Analyzer Performance</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on instrumentation and measurement</jtitle><stitle>TIM</stitle><date>2012-07-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>2034</spage><epage>2041</epage><pages>2034-2041</pages><issn>0018-9456</issn><eissn>1557-9662</eissn><coden>IEIMAO</coden><abstract>To perform system error correction of a microwave vector network analyzer (VNA), several calibration procedures are applied, several of which are derived from the well-known short-open-load-through (SOLT) calibration method where lumped one-port circuits like short circuits, open circuits, and low-reflective loads are used as calibration standards. These derived calibration algorithms only use three calibration standard connections-instead of six for SOLT; hence, the calibration time is considerably reduced. Various configurations of high- and low-reflective standards at test ports 1 and 2 of the VNA are possible. Using inaccurate calibration standard modeling, the VNA calibration is incorrect, and hence, inaccurate -parameters of a device under test (DUT) are measured. In this paper, it is theoretically and experimentally shown how, due to non-ideal calibration standard modeling, the deviations of measured -parameters of the DUT from their hardware-defined true values depend on the inaccurate calibration standard modeling, on the configurations of the calibration standards at the test ports, on the reflection values of the calibration standards, and on the -parameter values of the DUTs themselves.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TIM.2012.2182889</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0018-9456
ispartof IEEE transactions on instrumentation and measurement, 2012-07, Vol.61 (7), p.2034-2041
issn 0018-9456
1557-9662
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1109_TIM_2012_2182889
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Journals
subjects Attenuators
Calibration
Calibration standards
Circuits
Equations
Mathematical analysis
Mathematical model
microwave measurements
Microwaves
Networks
Ports
S -parameters
Scattering parameters
Sensitivity
sensitivity coefficients
uncertainty of measurement
vector network analyzer (VNA)
Vectors (mathematics)
VNA calibration
title Influence of Different Configurations of Nonideal Calibration Standards on Vector Network Analyzer Performance
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T03%3A45%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20Different%20Configurations%20of%20Nonideal%20Calibration%20Standards%20on%20Vector%20Network%20Analyzer%20Performance&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20instrumentation%20and%20measurement&rft.au=Stumper,%20U.&rft.date=2012-07-01&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=2034&rft.epage=2041&rft.pages=2034-2041&rft.issn=0018-9456&rft.eissn=1557-9662&rft.coden=IEIMAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TIM.2012.2182889&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1315665593%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-faf3ddd35ad93a69b51b20f3658d26273d66321878f606e0224f011266f89cc93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1020041554&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=6165355&rfr_iscdi=true