Loading…

Adaptive Low Power Listening for Wireless Sensor Networks

Most sensor networks require application-specific network-wide performance guarantees, suggesting the need for global and flexible network optimization. The dynamic and nonuniform local states of individual nodes in sensor networks complicate global optimization. Here, we present a cross-layer frame...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:IEEE transactions on mobile computing 2007-08, Vol.6 (8), p.988-1004
Main Authors: Jurdak, R., Baldi, P., Lopes, C.V.
Format: Magazinearticle
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Most sensor networks require application-specific network-wide performance guarantees, suggesting the need for global and flexible network optimization. The dynamic and nonuniform local states of individual nodes in sensor networks complicate global optimization. Here, we present a cross-layer framework for optimizing global power consumption and balancing the load in sensor networks through greedy local decisions. Our framework enables each node to use its local and neighborhood state information to adapt its routing and MAC layer behavior. The framework employs a flexible cost function at the routing layer and adaptive duty cycles at the MAC layer in order to adapt a node's behavior to its local state. We identify three state aspects that impact energy consumption: 1) number of descendants in the routing tree, 2) radio duty cycle, and 3) role. We conduct experiments on a test-bed of 14 mica2 sensor nodes to compare the state representations and to evaluate the framework's energy benefits. The experiments show that the degree of load balancing increases for expanded state representations. The experiments also reveal that all state representations in our framework reduce global power consumption in the range of one-third for a time-driven monitoring network and in the range of one-fifth for an event-driven target tracking network.
ISSN:1536-1233
1558-0660
DOI:10.1109/TMC.2007.1037