Loading…

Optimal Placement of GIC Blocking Devices Considering Equipment Thermal Limits and Power System Operation Constraints

A practical mitigation of the geomagnetic disturbance (GMD) consequences in power systems is not possible without taking into account the equipment thermal limits and operational constraints. This paper presents such limitations, develops the required equations and characteristics, and proposes a ge...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:IEEE transactions on power delivery 2018-02, Vol.33 (1), p.200-208
Main Authors: Rezaei-Zare, Afshin, Etemadi, Amir H.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:A practical mitigation of the geomagnetic disturbance (GMD) consequences in power systems is not possible without taking into account the equipment thermal limits and operational constraints. This paper presents such limitations, develops the required equations and characteristics, and proposes a general and comprehensive approach to incorporate these limits in any short-term or long-term geomagnetically induced current (GIC) mitigating solution. As an application, this study formulates the limits in the context of an optimal placement of the GIC blocking devices at the neutral point of the power transformers in the IEEE 118-bus benchmark study system. The proposed optimization problem takes into account synchronous generator real/reactive power capability, acceptable bus voltage magnitudes, transformer hot-spot heating, transmission-line thermal limits, capacitor bank harmonic loading, and synchronous generator rotor heating. This paper shows that the existing standards significantly underestimate the generator rotor heating under the GMD conditions and propose more accurate alternatives. The study results show that considering the equipment thermal limits results in a noticeably different solution when compared with the case of ignoring such limits.
ISSN:0885-8977
1937-4208
DOI:10.1109/TPWRD.2017.2711502