Loading…

Evaluation of Simulation Methods for Analysis of Geomagnetic Disturbance System Impacts

Geomagnetic Disturbance (GMD) impacts a power system by causing the circulation of quasi-dc Geomagnetically-induced Currents (GICs) in transmission lines and high-voltage transformer windings leading to transformer saturation, increased reactive power losses, and voltage regulation problems. Utility...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:IEEE transactions on power delivery 2021-06, Vol.36 (3), p.1509-1516
Main Authors: Haddadi, Aboutaleb, Hassani, Reza, Mahseredjian, Jean, Gerin-Lajoie, Luc, Rezaei-Zare, Afshin
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-d3a08cfab2d32d526760eb0ec776ccb96d90d67bbbc1a2d06f38b1f888aae7c13
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-d3a08cfab2d32d526760eb0ec776ccb96d90d67bbbc1a2d06f38b1f888aae7c13
container_end_page 1516
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1509
container_title IEEE transactions on power delivery
container_volume 36
creator Haddadi, Aboutaleb
Hassani, Reza
Mahseredjian, Jean
Gerin-Lajoie, Luc
Rezaei-Zare, Afshin
description Geomagnetic Disturbance (GMD) impacts a power system by causing the circulation of quasi-dc Geomagnetically-induced Currents (GICs) in transmission lines and high-voltage transformer windings leading to transformer saturation, increased reactive power losses, and voltage regulation problems. Utility planners use various analysis methods and simulation tools to analyze GMD system impacts. These techniques can be broadly categorized into load-flow-based (LF), transient stability type (TS), and electromagnetic transient type (EMT) methods. These methods are based on different modeling assumptions and solution techniques. There is a need for evaluation of these assumptions and cross-examination of results to ensure their accuracy. Such an evaluation is essential to ensure that planners performing required GMD vulnerability assessments have confidence in the results. This paper evaluates the LF, TS, and EMT methods through cross-examination of their results. The objective is to identify their limitations, assess the consistency of their results, and provide assumptions on their use for analysis of GMD system impacts. The study is conducted in consistence with the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) GMD guidelines and standards.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/TPWRD.2020.3010195
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1109_TPWRD_2020_3010195</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>9145646</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>2530113108</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-d3a08cfab2d32d526760eb0ec776ccb96d90d67bbbc1a2d06f38b1f888aae7c13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kNFKwzAUQIMoOKc_oC8FnztvkrZJHsemczBR3GSPJUlT7WibmaTC_t7ODp8uF865XA5CtxgmGIN42Lxt3-cTAgQmFDBgkZ6hERaUxQkBfo5GwHkac8HYJbryfgcACQgYoe3jj6w7GSrbRraM1lXT1cP2YsKXLXxUWhdNW1kffOWPyMLYRn62JlQ6mlc-dE7JVptoffDBNNGy2Usd_DW6KGXtzc1pjtHH0-Nm9hyvXhfL2XQVayLSEBdUAtelVKSgpEhJxjIwCoxmLNNaiawQUGRMKaWxJAVkJeUKl5xzKQ3TmI7R_XB37-x3Z3zId7Zz_bs-J2mfAlMMvKfIQGlnvXemzPeuaqQ75BjyY8D8L2B-DJifAvbS3SBVxph_QeAkzZKM_gKASG4F</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2530113108</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of Simulation Methods for Analysis of Geomagnetic Disturbance System Impacts</title><source>IEEE Xplore (Online service)</source><creator>Haddadi, Aboutaleb ; Hassani, Reza ; Mahseredjian, Jean ; Gerin-Lajoie, Luc ; Rezaei-Zare, Afshin</creator><creatorcontrib>Haddadi, Aboutaleb ; Hassani, Reza ; Mahseredjian, Jean ; Gerin-Lajoie, Luc ; Rezaei-Zare, Afshin</creatorcontrib><description>Geomagnetic Disturbance (GMD) impacts a power system by causing the circulation of quasi-dc Geomagnetically-induced Currents (GICs) in transmission lines and high-voltage transformer windings leading to transformer saturation, increased reactive power losses, and voltage regulation problems. Utility planners use various analysis methods and simulation tools to analyze GMD system impacts. These techniques can be broadly categorized into load-flow-based (LF), transient stability type (TS), and electromagnetic transient type (EMT) methods. These methods are based on different modeling assumptions and solution techniques. There is a need for evaluation of these assumptions and cross-examination of results to ensure their accuracy. Such an evaluation is essential to ensure that planners performing required GMD vulnerability assessments have confidence in the results. This paper evaluates the LF, TS, and EMT methods through cross-examination of their results. The objective is to identify their limitations, assess the consistency of their results, and provide assumptions on their use for analysis of GMD system impacts. The study is conducted in consistence with the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) GMD guidelines and standards.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-8977</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-4208</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TPWRD.2020.3010195</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ITPDE5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Circuit faults ; Coils (windings) ; Electric power systems ; Electromagnetic transient ; Evaluation ; Flow stability ; geomagnetic disturbance ; geomagnetically induced current ; Geomagnetism ; Load modeling ; Load-Flow ; Magnetization ; power system modeling ; power system simulation ; Power system stability ; Reactive power ; Stability analysis ; System reliability ; Transient stability ; Transmission lines ; Voltage control ; Voltage transformers</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on power delivery, 2021-06, Vol.36 (3), p.1509-1516</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-d3a08cfab2d32d526760eb0ec776ccb96d90d67bbbc1a2d06f38b1f888aae7c13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-d3a08cfab2d32d526760eb0ec776ccb96d90d67bbbc1a2d06f38b1f888aae7c13</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0534-561X ; 0000-0001-6791-0074 ; 0000-0003-2924-049X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9145646$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,54796</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Haddadi, Aboutaleb</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassani, Reza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahseredjian, Jean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerin-Lajoie, Luc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rezaei-Zare, Afshin</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of Simulation Methods for Analysis of Geomagnetic Disturbance System Impacts</title><title>IEEE transactions on power delivery</title><addtitle>TPWRD</addtitle><description>Geomagnetic Disturbance (GMD) impacts a power system by causing the circulation of quasi-dc Geomagnetically-induced Currents (GICs) in transmission lines and high-voltage transformer windings leading to transformer saturation, increased reactive power losses, and voltage regulation problems. Utility planners use various analysis methods and simulation tools to analyze GMD system impacts. These techniques can be broadly categorized into load-flow-based (LF), transient stability type (TS), and electromagnetic transient type (EMT) methods. These methods are based on different modeling assumptions and solution techniques. There is a need for evaluation of these assumptions and cross-examination of results to ensure their accuracy. Such an evaluation is essential to ensure that planners performing required GMD vulnerability assessments have confidence in the results. This paper evaluates the LF, TS, and EMT methods through cross-examination of their results. The objective is to identify their limitations, assess the consistency of their results, and provide assumptions on their use for analysis of GMD system impacts. The study is conducted in consistence with the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) GMD guidelines and standards.</description><subject>Circuit faults</subject><subject>Coils (windings)</subject><subject>Electric power systems</subject><subject>Electromagnetic transient</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Flow stability</subject><subject>geomagnetic disturbance</subject><subject>geomagnetically induced current</subject><subject>Geomagnetism</subject><subject>Load modeling</subject><subject>Load-Flow</subject><subject>Magnetization</subject><subject>power system modeling</subject><subject>power system simulation</subject><subject>Power system stability</subject><subject>Reactive power</subject><subject>Stability analysis</subject><subject>System reliability</subject><subject>Transient stability</subject><subject>Transmission lines</subject><subject>Voltage control</subject><subject>Voltage transformers</subject><issn>0885-8977</issn><issn>1937-4208</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kNFKwzAUQIMoOKc_oC8FnztvkrZJHsemczBR3GSPJUlT7WibmaTC_t7ODp8uF865XA5CtxgmGIN42Lxt3-cTAgQmFDBgkZ6hERaUxQkBfo5GwHkac8HYJbryfgcACQgYoe3jj6w7GSrbRraM1lXT1cP2YsKXLXxUWhdNW1kffOWPyMLYRn62JlQ6mlc-dE7JVptoffDBNNGy2Usd_DW6KGXtzc1pjtHH0-Nm9hyvXhfL2XQVayLSEBdUAtelVKSgpEhJxjIwCoxmLNNaiawQUGRMKaWxJAVkJeUKl5xzKQ3TmI7R_XB37-x3Z3zId7Zz_bs-J2mfAlMMvKfIQGlnvXemzPeuaqQ75BjyY8D8L2B-DJifAvbS3SBVxph_QeAkzZKM_gKASG4F</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>Haddadi, Aboutaleb</creator><creator>Hassani, Reza</creator><creator>Mahseredjian, Jean</creator><creator>Gerin-Lajoie, Luc</creator><creator>Rezaei-Zare, Afshin</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0534-561X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6791-0074</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2924-049X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>Evaluation of Simulation Methods for Analysis of Geomagnetic Disturbance System Impacts</title><author>Haddadi, Aboutaleb ; Hassani, Reza ; Mahseredjian, Jean ; Gerin-Lajoie, Luc ; Rezaei-Zare, Afshin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-d3a08cfab2d32d526760eb0ec776ccb96d90d67bbbc1a2d06f38b1f888aae7c13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Circuit faults</topic><topic>Coils (windings)</topic><topic>Electric power systems</topic><topic>Electromagnetic transient</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Flow stability</topic><topic>geomagnetic disturbance</topic><topic>geomagnetically induced current</topic><topic>Geomagnetism</topic><topic>Load modeling</topic><topic>Load-Flow</topic><topic>Magnetization</topic><topic>power system modeling</topic><topic>power system simulation</topic><topic>Power system stability</topic><topic>Reactive power</topic><topic>Stability analysis</topic><topic>System reliability</topic><topic>Transient stability</topic><topic>Transmission lines</topic><topic>Voltage control</topic><topic>Voltage transformers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Haddadi, Aboutaleb</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassani, Reza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahseredjian, Jean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerin-Lajoie, Luc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rezaei-Zare, Afshin</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE/IET Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on power delivery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Haddadi, Aboutaleb</au><au>Hassani, Reza</au><au>Mahseredjian, Jean</au><au>Gerin-Lajoie, Luc</au><au>Rezaei-Zare, Afshin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of Simulation Methods for Analysis of Geomagnetic Disturbance System Impacts</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on power delivery</jtitle><stitle>TPWRD</stitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1509</spage><epage>1516</epage><pages>1509-1516</pages><issn>0885-8977</issn><eissn>1937-4208</eissn><coden>ITPDE5</coden><abstract>Geomagnetic Disturbance (GMD) impacts a power system by causing the circulation of quasi-dc Geomagnetically-induced Currents (GICs) in transmission lines and high-voltage transformer windings leading to transformer saturation, increased reactive power losses, and voltage regulation problems. Utility planners use various analysis methods and simulation tools to analyze GMD system impacts. These techniques can be broadly categorized into load-flow-based (LF), transient stability type (TS), and electromagnetic transient type (EMT) methods. These methods are based on different modeling assumptions and solution techniques. There is a need for evaluation of these assumptions and cross-examination of results to ensure their accuracy. Such an evaluation is essential to ensure that planners performing required GMD vulnerability assessments have confidence in the results. This paper evaluates the LF, TS, and EMT methods through cross-examination of their results. The objective is to identify their limitations, assess the consistency of their results, and provide assumptions on their use for analysis of GMD system impacts. The study is conducted in consistence with the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) GMD guidelines and standards.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TPWRD.2020.3010195</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0534-561X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6791-0074</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2924-049X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0885-8977
ispartof IEEE transactions on power delivery, 2021-06, Vol.36 (3), p.1509-1516
issn 0885-8977
1937-4208
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1109_TPWRD_2020_3010195
source IEEE Xplore (Online service)
subjects Circuit faults
Coils (windings)
Electric power systems
Electromagnetic transient
Evaluation
Flow stability
geomagnetic disturbance
geomagnetically induced current
Geomagnetism
Load modeling
Load-Flow
Magnetization
power system modeling
power system simulation
Power system stability
Reactive power
Stability analysis
System reliability
Transient stability
Transmission lines
Voltage control
Voltage transformers
title Evaluation of Simulation Methods for Analysis of Geomagnetic Disturbance System Impacts
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T13%3A19%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20Simulation%20Methods%20for%20Analysis%20of%20Geomagnetic%20Disturbance%20System%20Impacts&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20power%20delivery&rft.au=Haddadi,%20Aboutaleb&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1509&rft.epage=1516&rft.pages=1509-1516&rft.issn=0885-8977&rft.eissn=1937-4208&rft.coden=ITPDE5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TPWRD.2020.3010195&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2530113108%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-d3a08cfab2d32d526760eb0ec776ccb96d90d67bbbc1a2d06f38b1f888aae7c13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2530113108&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=9145646&rfr_iscdi=true