Loading…
Evaluation of Simulation Methods for Analysis of Geomagnetic Disturbance System Impacts
Geomagnetic Disturbance (GMD) impacts a power system by causing the circulation of quasi-dc Geomagnetically-induced Currents (GICs) in transmission lines and high-voltage transformer windings leading to transformer saturation, increased reactive power losses, and voltage regulation problems. Utility...
Saved in:
Published in: | IEEE transactions on power delivery 2021-06, Vol.36 (3), p.1509-1516 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-d3a08cfab2d32d526760eb0ec776ccb96d90d67bbbc1a2d06f38b1f888aae7c13 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-d3a08cfab2d32d526760eb0ec776ccb96d90d67bbbc1a2d06f38b1f888aae7c13 |
container_end_page | 1516 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 1509 |
container_title | IEEE transactions on power delivery |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Haddadi, Aboutaleb Hassani, Reza Mahseredjian, Jean Gerin-Lajoie, Luc Rezaei-Zare, Afshin |
description | Geomagnetic Disturbance (GMD) impacts a power system by causing the circulation of quasi-dc Geomagnetically-induced Currents (GICs) in transmission lines and high-voltage transformer windings leading to transformer saturation, increased reactive power losses, and voltage regulation problems. Utility planners use various analysis methods and simulation tools to analyze GMD system impacts. These techniques can be broadly categorized into load-flow-based (LF), transient stability type (TS), and electromagnetic transient type (EMT) methods. These methods are based on different modeling assumptions and solution techniques. There is a need for evaluation of these assumptions and cross-examination of results to ensure their accuracy. Such an evaluation is essential to ensure that planners performing required GMD vulnerability assessments have confidence in the results. This paper evaluates the LF, TS, and EMT methods through cross-examination of their results. The objective is to identify their limitations, assess the consistency of their results, and provide assumptions on their use for analysis of GMD system impacts. The study is conducted in consistence with the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) GMD guidelines and standards. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/TPWRD.2020.3010195 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1109_TPWRD_2020_3010195</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>9145646</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>2530113108</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-d3a08cfab2d32d526760eb0ec776ccb96d90d67bbbc1a2d06f38b1f888aae7c13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kNFKwzAUQIMoOKc_oC8FnztvkrZJHsemczBR3GSPJUlT7WibmaTC_t7ODp8uF865XA5CtxgmGIN42Lxt3-cTAgQmFDBgkZ6hERaUxQkBfo5GwHkac8HYJbryfgcACQgYoe3jj6w7GSrbRraM1lXT1cP2YsKXLXxUWhdNW1kffOWPyMLYRn62JlQ6mlc-dE7JVptoffDBNNGy2Usd_DW6KGXtzc1pjtHH0-Nm9hyvXhfL2XQVayLSEBdUAtelVKSgpEhJxjIwCoxmLNNaiawQUGRMKaWxJAVkJeUKl5xzKQ3TmI7R_XB37-x3Z3zId7Zz_bs-J2mfAlMMvKfIQGlnvXemzPeuaqQ75BjyY8D8L2B-DJifAvbS3SBVxph_QeAkzZKM_gKASG4F</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2530113108</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of Simulation Methods for Analysis of Geomagnetic Disturbance System Impacts</title><source>IEEE Xplore (Online service)</source><creator>Haddadi, Aboutaleb ; Hassani, Reza ; Mahseredjian, Jean ; Gerin-Lajoie, Luc ; Rezaei-Zare, Afshin</creator><creatorcontrib>Haddadi, Aboutaleb ; Hassani, Reza ; Mahseredjian, Jean ; Gerin-Lajoie, Luc ; Rezaei-Zare, Afshin</creatorcontrib><description>Geomagnetic Disturbance (GMD) impacts a power system by causing the circulation of quasi-dc Geomagnetically-induced Currents (GICs) in transmission lines and high-voltage transformer windings leading to transformer saturation, increased reactive power losses, and voltage regulation problems. Utility planners use various analysis methods and simulation tools to analyze GMD system impacts. These techniques can be broadly categorized into load-flow-based (LF), transient stability type (TS), and electromagnetic transient type (EMT) methods. These methods are based on different modeling assumptions and solution techniques. There is a need for evaluation of these assumptions and cross-examination of results to ensure their accuracy. Such an evaluation is essential to ensure that planners performing required GMD vulnerability assessments have confidence in the results. This paper evaluates the LF, TS, and EMT methods through cross-examination of their results. The objective is to identify their limitations, assess the consistency of their results, and provide assumptions on their use for analysis of GMD system impacts. The study is conducted in consistence with the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) GMD guidelines and standards.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-8977</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-4208</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TPWRD.2020.3010195</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ITPDE5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Circuit faults ; Coils (windings) ; Electric power systems ; Electromagnetic transient ; Evaluation ; Flow stability ; geomagnetic disturbance ; geomagnetically induced current ; Geomagnetism ; Load modeling ; Load-Flow ; Magnetization ; power system modeling ; power system simulation ; Power system stability ; Reactive power ; Stability analysis ; System reliability ; Transient stability ; Transmission lines ; Voltage control ; Voltage transformers</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on power delivery, 2021-06, Vol.36 (3), p.1509-1516</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-d3a08cfab2d32d526760eb0ec776ccb96d90d67bbbc1a2d06f38b1f888aae7c13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-d3a08cfab2d32d526760eb0ec776ccb96d90d67bbbc1a2d06f38b1f888aae7c13</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0534-561X ; 0000-0001-6791-0074 ; 0000-0003-2924-049X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9145646$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,54796</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Haddadi, Aboutaleb</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassani, Reza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahseredjian, Jean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerin-Lajoie, Luc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rezaei-Zare, Afshin</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of Simulation Methods for Analysis of Geomagnetic Disturbance System Impacts</title><title>IEEE transactions on power delivery</title><addtitle>TPWRD</addtitle><description>Geomagnetic Disturbance (GMD) impacts a power system by causing the circulation of quasi-dc Geomagnetically-induced Currents (GICs) in transmission lines and high-voltage transformer windings leading to transformer saturation, increased reactive power losses, and voltage regulation problems. Utility planners use various analysis methods and simulation tools to analyze GMD system impacts. These techniques can be broadly categorized into load-flow-based (LF), transient stability type (TS), and electromagnetic transient type (EMT) methods. These methods are based on different modeling assumptions and solution techniques. There is a need for evaluation of these assumptions and cross-examination of results to ensure their accuracy. Such an evaluation is essential to ensure that planners performing required GMD vulnerability assessments have confidence in the results. This paper evaluates the LF, TS, and EMT methods through cross-examination of their results. The objective is to identify their limitations, assess the consistency of their results, and provide assumptions on their use for analysis of GMD system impacts. The study is conducted in consistence with the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) GMD guidelines and standards.</description><subject>Circuit faults</subject><subject>Coils (windings)</subject><subject>Electric power systems</subject><subject>Electromagnetic transient</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Flow stability</subject><subject>geomagnetic disturbance</subject><subject>geomagnetically induced current</subject><subject>Geomagnetism</subject><subject>Load modeling</subject><subject>Load-Flow</subject><subject>Magnetization</subject><subject>power system modeling</subject><subject>power system simulation</subject><subject>Power system stability</subject><subject>Reactive power</subject><subject>Stability analysis</subject><subject>System reliability</subject><subject>Transient stability</subject><subject>Transmission lines</subject><subject>Voltage control</subject><subject>Voltage transformers</subject><issn>0885-8977</issn><issn>1937-4208</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kNFKwzAUQIMoOKc_oC8FnztvkrZJHsemczBR3GSPJUlT7WibmaTC_t7ODp8uF865XA5CtxgmGIN42Lxt3-cTAgQmFDBgkZ6hERaUxQkBfo5GwHkac8HYJbryfgcACQgYoe3jj6w7GSrbRraM1lXT1cP2YsKXLXxUWhdNW1kffOWPyMLYRn62JlQ6mlc-dE7JVptoffDBNNGy2Usd_DW6KGXtzc1pjtHH0-Nm9hyvXhfL2XQVayLSEBdUAtelVKSgpEhJxjIwCoxmLNNaiawQUGRMKaWxJAVkJeUKl5xzKQ3TmI7R_XB37-x3Z3zId7Zz_bs-J2mfAlMMvKfIQGlnvXemzPeuaqQ75BjyY8D8L2B-DJifAvbS3SBVxph_QeAkzZKM_gKASG4F</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>Haddadi, Aboutaleb</creator><creator>Hassani, Reza</creator><creator>Mahseredjian, Jean</creator><creator>Gerin-Lajoie, Luc</creator><creator>Rezaei-Zare, Afshin</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0534-561X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6791-0074</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2924-049X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>Evaluation of Simulation Methods for Analysis of Geomagnetic Disturbance System Impacts</title><author>Haddadi, Aboutaleb ; Hassani, Reza ; Mahseredjian, Jean ; Gerin-Lajoie, Luc ; Rezaei-Zare, Afshin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-d3a08cfab2d32d526760eb0ec776ccb96d90d67bbbc1a2d06f38b1f888aae7c13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Circuit faults</topic><topic>Coils (windings)</topic><topic>Electric power systems</topic><topic>Electromagnetic transient</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Flow stability</topic><topic>geomagnetic disturbance</topic><topic>geomagnetically induced current</topic><topic>Geomagnetism</topic><topic>Load modeling</topic><topic>Load-Flow</topic><topic>Magnetization</topic><topic>power system modeling</topic><topic>power system simulation</topic><topic>Power system stability</topic><topic>Reactive power</topic><topic>Stability analysis</topic><topic>System reliability</topic><topic>Transient stability</topic><topic>Transmission lines</topic><topic>Voltage control</topic><topic>Voltage transformers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Haddadi, Aboutaleb</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassani, Reza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahseredjian, Jean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerin-Lajoie, Luc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rezaei-Zare, Afshin</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE/IET Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on power delivery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Haddadi, Aboutaleb</au><au>Hassani, Reza</au><au>Mahseredjian, Jean</au><au>Gerin-Lajoie, Luc</au><au>Rezaei-Zare, Afshin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of Simulation Methods for Analysis of Geomagnetic Disturbance System Impacts</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on power delivery</jtitle><stitle>TPWRD</stitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1509</spage><epage>1516</epage><pages>1509-1516</pages><issn>0885-8977</issn><eissn>1937-4208</eissn><coden>ITPDE5</coden><abstract>Geomagnetic Disturbance (GMD) impacts a power system by causing the circulation of quasi-dc Geomagnetically-induced Currents (GICs) in transmission lines and high-voltage transformer windings leading to transformer saturation, increased reactive power losses, and voltage regulation problems. Utility planners use various analysis methods and simulation tools to analyze GMD system impacts. These techniques can be broadly categorized into load-flow-based (LF), transient stability type (TS), and electromagnetic transient type (EMT) methods. These methods are based on different modeling assumptions and solution techniques. There is a need for evaluation of these assumptions and cross-examination of results to ensure their accuracy. Such an evaluation is essential to ensure that planners performing required GMD vulnerability assessments have confidence in the results. This paper evaluates the LF, TS, and EMT methods through cross-examination of their results. The objective is to identify their limitations, assess the consistency of their results, and provide assumptions on their use for analysis of GMD system impacts. The study is conducted in consistence with the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) GMD guidelines and standards.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TPWRD.2020.3010195</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0534-561X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6791-0074</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2924-049X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0885-8977 |
ispartof | IEEE transactions on power delivery, 2021-06, Vol.36 (3), p.1509-1516 |
issn | 0885-8977 1937-4208 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1109_TPWRD_2020_3010195 |
source | IEEE Xplore (Online service) |
subjects | Circuit faults Coils (windings) Electric power systems Electromagnetic transient Evaluation Flow stability geomagnetic disturbance geomagnetically induced current Geomagnetism Load modeling Load-Flow Magnetization power system modeling power system simulation Power system stability Reactive power Stability analysis System reliability Transient stability Transmission lines Voltage control Voltage transformers |
title | Evaluation of Simulation Methods for Analysis of Geomagnetic Disturbance System Impacts |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T13%3A19%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20Simulation%20Methods%20for%20Analysis%20of%20Geomagnetic%20Disturbance%20System%20Impacts&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20power%20delivery&rft.au=Haddadi,%20Aboutaleb&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1509&rft.epage=1516&rft.pages=1509-1516&rft.issn=0885-8977&rft.eissn=1937-4208&rft.coden=ITPDE5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TPWRD.2020.3010195&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2530113108%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-d3a08cfab2d32d526760eb0ec776ccb96d90d67bbbc1a2d06f38b1f888aae7c13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2530113108&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=9145646&rfr_iscdi=true |