Loading…
Use of Left Ventricular Assist Device ( H eart M ate II ): A S ingapore Experience
Recent advances in medical and device therapies in heart failure have improved the survival of patients with heart failure. However, due to the limited availability of suitable heart donors, left ventricular assist devices ( LVAD s) have become an important tool as a bridge‐to‐heart transplantation...
Saved in:
Published in: | Artificial organs 2014-07, Vol.38 (7), p.543-548 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c747-b3a50a4408549f97def4fa5b2782fedb5d471f4ebaed811e3f55487b450ff0ca3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c747-b3a50a4408549f97def4fa5b2782fedb5d471f4ebaed811e3f55487b450ff0ca3 |
container_end_page | 548 |
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 543 |
container_title | Artificial organs |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Lim, Choon Pin Sivathasan, Cumaraswamy Tan, Teing Ee Lim, Chong Hee Kerk, Ka Lee Sim, David Kheng Leng |
description | Recent advances in medical and device therapies in heart failure have improved the survival of patients with heart failure. However, due to the limited availability of suitable heart donors, left ventricular assist devices (
LVAD
s) have become an important tool as a bridge‐to‐heart transplantation for patients with refractory heart failure in
S
ingapore. We report our experience with the
H
eart
M
ate
II
(
HMII
)
LVAD
(Thoratec Corporation, Pleasanton, CA, USA) as a bridge‐to‐heart transplant in our center from 2009 to 2012. This was a retrospective review of 23 consecutive patients who underwent
HMII LVAD
implantation in our center between
M
ay 2009 and
D
ecember 2012. All patients were classified as
I
nteragency
R
egistry for
M
echanically
A
ssisted
C
irculatory
S
upport (
INTERMACS
) levels 1 to 3 and underwent
LVAD
implantation as a bridge‐to‐heart transplant. There were 17 male and 6 female patients. The mean age was 43.6 years old (range 14 to 64). The etiologies of heart failure included ischemic heart disease [8], idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy [11], viral myocarditis [2], and chemotherapy‐induced cardiomyopathy [2]. Nine patients were
INTERMACS
level 1, 12 patients level 2, and two patients level 3. All patients successfully underwent
HMII LVAD
implantation. There was no mortality within the first 30 postoperative days. Postoperative complications included stroke with full neurological recovery (21.7%), mediastinal infection (21.7%), cardiac tamponade or mediastinal collection requiring reopening of the chest (39.1%), cardiac arrhythmia (13.0%), and pump thrombosis with pump replacement (4.3%). All patients were discharged from hospital after
LVAD
implantation. Three patients experienced driveline infections during outpatient follow‐up. There were 19 readmissions due to the following conditions: sub‐therapeutic anticoagulation (13.0%), gastrointestinal bleeding (13.0%), suspected pump thrombosis (13.0%), transient ischemic attack (8.7%), arrhythmia (8.7%), congestive cardiac failure due to severe aortic regurgitation (8.7%), right ventricular failure (4.3%), rhabdomyolysis (4.3%), and hematuria (4.3%). Post‐
LVAD
implantation, 20 patients were functionally New York Heart Association (
NYHA
) class I, while 3 reported
NYHA III
symptoms. Three patients were successfully bridged to heart transplantation. One patient was successfully explanted 11 months after
LVAD
implantation. There were two mortalities during the follow‐up period. The average dur |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/aor.12247 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1111_aor_12247</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1111_aor_12247</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c747-b3a50a4408549f97def4fa5b2782fedb5d471f4ebaed811e3f55487b450ff0ca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNot0D1PwzAUhWELgUQoDPyDO9IhxU6u44QtKoVGCkKCgtgix7lGRiWJ7FDBv6d8nOXdzvAwdi74Qux3qQe_EEmC6oBFQiYyFrLAQxZxkfFYZvhyzE5CeOOcK-RZxB6eAsFgoSY7wTP1k3fmY6s9lCG4MME17ZwhuIA1kPYT3IGeCKoK5ldQwiO4_lWPgydYfY7kHfWGTtmR1dtAZ_-dsc3NarNcx_X9bbUs69goVHGbask1Is8lFrZQHVm0WraJyhNLXSs7VMIitZq6XAhKrZSYqxYlt5Ybnc7Y_O_W-CEET7YZvXvX_qsRvPmxaPYWza9F-g3POVAO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Use of Left Ventricular Assist Device ( H eart M ate II ): A S ingapore Experience</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Lim, Choon Pin ; Sivathasan, Cumaraswamy ; Tan, Teing Ee ; Lim, Chong Hee ; Kerk, Ka Lee ; Sim, David Kheng Leng</creator><creatorcontrib>Lim, Choon Pin ; Sivathasan, Cumaraswamy ; Tan, Teing Ee ; Lim, Chong Hee ; Kerk, Ka Lee ; Sim, David Kheng Leng</creatorcontrib><description>Recent advances in medical and device therapies in heart failure have improved the survival of patients with heart failure. However, due to the limited availability of suitable heart donors, left ventricular assist devices (
LVAD
s) have become an important tool as a bridge‐to‐heart transplantation for patients with refractory heart failure in
S
ingapore. We report our experience with the
H
eart
M
ate
II
(
HMII
)
LVAD
(Thoratec Corporation, Pleasanton, CA, USA) as a bridge‐to‐heart transplant in our center from 2009 to 2012. This was a retrospective review of 23 consecutive patients who underwent
HMII LVAD
implantation in our center between
M
ay 2009 and
D
ecember 2012. All patients were classified as
I
nteragency
R
egistry for
M
echanically
A
ssisted
C
irculatory
S
upport (
INTERMACS
) levels 1 to 3 and underwent
LVAD
implantation as a bridge‐to‐heart transplant. There were 17 male and 6 female patients. The mean age was 43.6 years old (range 14 to 64). The etiologies of heart failure included ischemic heart disease [8], idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy [11], viral myocarditis [2], and chemotherapy‐induced cardiomyopathy [2]. Nine patients were
INTERMACS
level 1, 12 patients level 2, and two patients level 3. All patients successfully underwent
HMII LVAD
implantation. There was no mortality within the first 30 postoperative days. Postoperative complications included stroke with full neurological recovery (21.7%), mediastinal infection (21.7%), cardiac tamponade or mediastinal collection requiring reopening of the chest (39.1%), cardiac arrhythmia (13.0%), and pump thrombosis with pump replacement (4.3%). All patients were discharged from hospital after
LVAD
implantation. Three patients experienced driveline infections during outpatient follow‐up. There were 19 readmissions due to the following conditions: sub‐therapeutic anticoagulation (13.0%), gastrointestinal bleeding (13.0%), suspected pump thrombosis (13.0%), transient ischemic attack (8.7%), arrhythmia (8.7%), congestive cardiac failure due to severe aortic regurgitation (8.7%), right ventricular failure (4.3%), rhabdomyolysis (4.3%), and hematuria (4.3%). Post‐
LVAD
implantation, 20 patients were functionally New York Heart Association (
NYHA
) class I, while 3 reported
NYHA III
symptoms. Three patients were successfully bridged to heart transplantation. One patient was successfully explanted 11 months after
LVAD
implantation. There were two mortalities during the follow‐up period. The average duration of
LVAD
support was 522 days (range 47 to 1316 days). The
H
eart
M
ate
II LVAD
has proven to be effective in our Asian population. Driveline infection rate remains low even in the tropical hot, humid climate in
S
ingapore. With more patients ending up on extended periods of
LVAD
support, increased emphasis in the detection and management of long‐term complications of ventricular assist devices will be needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0160-564X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-1594</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/aor.12247</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Artificial organs, 2014-07, Vol.38 (7), p.543-548</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c747-b3a50a4408549f97def4fa5b2782fedb5d471f4ebaed811e3f55487b450ff0ca3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c747-b3a50a4408549f97def4fa5b2782fedb5d471f4ebaed811e3f55487b450ff0ca3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lim, Choon Pin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sivathasan, Cumaraswamy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Teing Ee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Chong Hee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerk, Ka Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sim, David Kheng Leng</creatorcontrib><title>Use of Left Ventricular Assist Device ( H eart M ate II ): A S ingapore Experience</title><title>Artificial organs</title><description>Recent advances in medical and device therapies in heart failure have improved the survival of patients with heart failure. However, due to the limited availability of suitable heart donors, left ventricular assist devices (
LVAD
s) have become an important tool as a bridge‐to‐heart transplantation for patients with refractory heart failure in
S
ingapore. We report our experience with the
H
eart
M
ate
II
(
HMII
)
LVAD
(Thoratec Corporation, Pleasanton, CA, USA) as a bridge‐to‐heart transplant in our center from 2009 to 2012. This was a retrospective review of 23 consecutive patients who underwent
HMII LVAD
implantation in our center between
M
ay 2009 and
D
ecember 2012. All patients were classified as
I
nteragency
R
egistry for
M
echanically
A
ssisted
C
irculatory
S
upport (
INTERMACS
) levels 1 to 3 and underwent
LVAD
implantation as a bridge‐to‐heart transplant. There were 17 male and 6 female patients. The mean age was 43.6 years old (range 14 to 64). The etiologies of heart failure included ischemic heart disease [8], idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy [11], viral myocarditis [2], and chemotherapy‐induced cardiomyopathy [2]. Nine patients were
INTERMACS
level 1, 12 patients level 2, and two patients level 3. All patients successfully underwent
HMII LVAD
implantation. There was no mortality within the first 30 postoperative days. Postoperative complications included stroke with full neurological recovery (21.7%), mediastinal infection (21.7%), cardiac tamponade or mediastinal collection requiring reopening of the chest (39.1%), cardiac arrhythmia (13.0%), and pump thrombosis with pump replacement (4.3%). All patients were discharged from hospital after
LVAD
implantation. Three patients experienced driveline infections during outpatient follow‐up. There were 19 readmissions due to the following conditions: sub‐therapeutic anticoagulation (13.0%), gastrointestinal bleeding (13.0%), suspected pump thrombosis (13.0%), transient ischemic attack (8.7%), arrhythmia (8.7%), congestive cardiac failure due to severe aortic regurgitation (8.7%), right ventricular failure (4.3%), rhabdomyolysis (4.3%), and hematuria (4.3%). Post‐
LVAD
implantation, 20 patients were functionally New York Heart Association (
NYHA
) class I, while 3 reported
NYHA III
symptoms. Three patients were successfully bridged to heart transplantation. One patient was successfully explanted 11 months after
LVAD
implantation. There were two mortalities during the follow‐up period. The average duration of
LVAD
support was 522 days (range 47 to 1316 days). The
H
eart
M
ate
II LVAD
has proven to be effective in our Asian population. Driveline infection rate remains low even in the tropical hot, humid climate in
S
ingapore. With more patients ending up on extended periods of
LVAD
support, increased emphasis in the detection and management of long‐term complications of ventricular assist devices will be needed.</description><issn>0160-564X</issn><issn>1525-1594</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNot0D1PwzAUhWELgUQoDPyDO9IhxU6u44QtKoVGCkKCgtgix7lGRiWJ7FDBv6d8nOXdzvAwdi74Qux3qQe_EEmC6oBFQiYyFrLAQxZxkfFYZvhyzE5CeOOcK-RZxB6eAsFgoSY7wTP1k3fmY6s9lCG4MME17ZwhuIA1kPYT3IGeCKoK5ldQwiO4_lWPgydYfY7kHfWGTtmR1dtAZ_-dsc3NarNcx_X9bbUs69goVHGbask1Is8lFrZQHVm0WraJyhNLXSs7VMIitZq6XAhKrZSYqxYlt5Ybnc7Y_O_W-CEET7YZvXvX_qsRvPmxaPYWza9F-g3POVAO</recordid><startdate>201407</startdate><enddate>201407</enddate><creator>Lim, Choon Pin</creator><creator>Sivathasan, Cumaraswamy</creator><creator>Tan, Teing Ee</creator><creator>Lim, Chong Hee</creator><creator>Kerk, Ka Lee</creator><creator>Sim, David Kheng Leng</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201407</creationdate><title>Use of Left Ventricular Assist Device ( H eart M ate II ): A S ingapore Experience</title><author>Lim, Choon Pin ; Sivathasan, Cumaraswamy ; Tan, Teing Ee ; Lim, Chong Hee ; Kerk, Ka Lee ; Sim, David Kheng Leng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c747-b3a50a4408549f97def4fa5b2782fedb5d471f4ebaed811e3f55487b450ff0ca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lim, Choon Pin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sivathasan, Cumaraswamy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Teing Ee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Chong Hee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerk, Ka Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sim, David Kheng Leng</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Artificial organs</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lim, Choon Pin</au><au>Sivathasan, Cumaraswamy</au><au>Tan, Teing Ee</au><au>Lim, Chong Hee</au><au>Kerk, Ka Lee</au><au>Sim, David Kheng Leng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Use of Left Ventricular Assist Device ( H eart M ate II ): A S ingapore Experience</atitle><jtitle>Artificial organs</jtitle><date>2014-07</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>543</spage><epage>548</epage><pages>543-548</pages><issn>0160-564X</issn><eissn>1525-1594</eissn><abstract>Recent advances in medical and device therapies in heart failure have improved the survival of patients with heart failure. However, due to the limited availability of suitable heart donors, left ventricular assist devices (
LVAD
s) have become an important tool as a bridge‐to‐heart transplantation for patients with refractory heart failure in
S
ingapore. We report our experience with the
H
eart
M
ate
II
(
HMII
)
LVAD
(Thoratec Corporation, Pleasanton, CA, USA) as a bridge‐to‐heart transplant in our center from 2009 to 2012. This was a retrospective review of 23 consecutive patients who underwent
HMII LVAD
implantation in our center between
M
ay 2009 and
D
ecember 2012. All patients were classified as
I
nteragency
R
egistry for
M
echanically
A
ssisted
C
irculatory
S
upport (
INTERMACS
) levels 1 to 3 and underwent
LVAD
implantation as a bridge‐to‐heart transplant. There were 17 male and 6 female patients. The mean age was 43.6 years old (range 14 to 64). The etiologies of heart failure included ischemic heart disease [8], idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy [11], viral myocarditis [2], and chemotherapy‐induced cardiomyopathy [2]. Nine patients were
INTERMACS
level 1, 12 patients level 2, and two patients level 3. All patients successfully underwent
HMII LVAD
implantation. There was no mortality within the first 30 postoperative days. Postoperative complications included stroke with full neurological recovery (21.7%), mediastinal infection (21.7%), cardiac tamponade or mediastinal collection requiring reopening of the chest (39.1%), cardiac arrhythmia (13.0%), and pump thrombosis with pump replacement (4.3%). All patients were discharged from hospital after
LVAD
implantation. Three patients experienced driveline infections during outpatient follow‐up. There were 19 readmissions due to the following conditions: sub‐therapeutic anticoagulation (13.0%), gastrointestinal bleeding (13.0%), suspected pump thrombosis (13.0%), transient ischemic attack (8.7%), arrhythmia (8.7%), congestive cardiac failure due to severe aortic regurgitation (8.7%), right ventricular failure (4.3%), rhabdomyolysis (4.3%), and hematuria (4.3%). Post‐
LVAD
implantation, 20 patients were functionally New York Heart Association (
NYHA
) class I, while 3 reported
NYHA III
symptoms. Three patients were successfully bridged to heart transplantation. One patient was successfully explanted 11 months after
LVAD
implantation. There were two mortalities during the follow‐up period. The average duration of
LVAD
support was 522 days (range 47 to 1316 days). The
H
eart
M
ate
II LVAD
has proven to be effective in our Asian population. Driveline infection rate remains low even in the tropical hot, humid climate in
S
ingapore. With more patients ending up on extended periods of
LVAD
support, increased emphasis in the detection and management of long‐term complications of ventricular assist devices will be needed.</abstract><doi>10.1111/aor.12247</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0160-564X |
ispartof | Artificial organs, 2014-07, Vol.38 (7), p.543-548 |
issn | 0160-564X 1525-1594 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1111_aor_12247 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
title | Use of Left Ventricular Assist Device ( H eart M ate II ): A S ingapore Experience |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T07%3A00%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use%20of%20Left%20Ventricular%20Assist%20Device%20(%20H%20eart%20M%20ate%20II%20):%20A%20S%20ingapore%20Experience&rft.jtitle=Artificial%20organs&rft.au=Lim,%20Choon%20Pin&rft.date=2014-07&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=543&rft.epage=548&rft.pages=543-548&rft.issn=0160-564X&rft.eissn=1525-1594&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/aor.12247&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1111_aor_12247%3C/crossref%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c747-b3a50a4408549f97def4fa5b2782fedb5d471f4ebaed811e3f55487b450ff0ca3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |