Loading…

Use of Left Ventricular Assist Device ( H eart M ate II ): A S ingapore Experience

Recent advances in medical and device therapies in heart failure have improved the survival of patients with heart failure. However, due to the limited availability of suitable heart donors, left ventricular assist devices ( LVAD s) have become an important tool as a bridge‐to‐heart transplantation...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Artificial organs 2014-07, Vol.38 (7), p.543-548
Main Authors: Lim, Choon Pin, Sivathasan, Cumaraswamy, Tan, Teing Ee, Lim, Chong Hee, Kerk, Ka Lee, Sim, David Kheng Leng
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c747-b3a50a4408549f97def4fa5b2782fedb5d471f4ebaed811e3f55487b450ff0ca3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c747-b3a50a4408549f97def4fa5b2782fedb5d471f4ebaed811e3f55487b450ff0ca3
container_end_page 548
container_issue 7
container_start_page 543
container_title Artificial organs
container_volume 38
creator Lim, Choon Pin
Sivathasan, Cumaraswamy
Tan, Teing Ee
Lim, Chong Hee
Kerk, Ka Lee
Sim, David Kheng Leng
description Recent advances in medical and device therapies in heart failure have improved the survival of patients with heart failure. However, due to the limited availability of suitable heart donors, left ventricular assist devices ( LVAD s) have become an important tool as a bridge‐to‐heart transplantation for patients with refractory heart failure in S ingapore. We report our experience with the H eart M ate II ( HMII ) LVAD (Thoratec Corporation, Pleasanton, CA, USA) as a bridge‐to‐heart transplant in our center from 2009 to 2012. This was a retrospective review of 23 consecutive patients who underwent HMII LVAD implantation in our center between M ay 2009 and D ecember 2012. All patients were classified as I nteragency R egistry for M echanically A ssisted C irculatory S upport ( INTERMACS ) levels 1 to 3 and underwent LVAD implantation as a bridge‐to‐heart transplant. There were 17 male and 6 female patients. The mean age was 43.6 years old (range 14 to 64). The etiologies of heart failure included ischemic heart disease [8], idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy [11], viral myocarditis [2], and chemotherapy‐induced cardiomyopathy [2]. Nine patients were INTERMACS level 1, 12 patients level 2, and two patients level 3. All patients successfully underwent HMII LVAD implantation. There was no mortality within the first 30 postoperative days. Postoperative complications included stroke with full neurological recovery (21.7%), mediastinal infection (21.7%), cardiac tamponade or mediastinal collection requiring reopening of the chest (39.1%), cardiac arrhythmia (13.0%), and pump thrombosis with pump replacement (4.3%). All patients were discharged from hospital after LVAD implantation. Three patients experienced driveline infections during outpatient follow‐up. There were 19 readmissions due to the following conditions: sub‐therapeutic anticoagulation (13.0%), gastrointestinal bleeding (13.0%), suspected pump thrombosis (13.0%), transient ischemic attack (8.7%), arrhythmia (8.7%), congestive cardiac failure due to severe aortic regurgitation (8.7%), right ventricular failure (4.3%), rhabdomyolysis (4.3%), and hematuria (4.3%). Post‐ LVAD implantation, 20 patients were functionally New York Heart Association ( NYHA ) class I, while 3 reported NYHA III symptoms. Three patients were successfully bridged to heart transplantation. One patient was successfully explanted 11 months after LVAD implantation. There were two mortalities during the follow‐up period. The average dur
doi_str_mv 10.1111/aor.12247
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1111_aor_12247</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1111_aor_12247</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c747-b3a50a4408549f97def4fa5b2782fedb5d471f4ebaed811e3f55487b450ff0ca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNot0D1PwzAUhWELgUQoDPyDO9IhxU6u44QtKoVGCkKCgtgix7lGRiWJ7FDBv6d8nOXdzvAwdi74Qux3qQe_EEmC6oBFQiYyFrLAQxZxkfFYZvhyzE5CeOOcK-RZxB6eAsFgoSY7wTP1k3fmY6s9lCG4MME17ZwhuIA1kPYT3IGeCKoK5ldQwiO4_lWPgydYfY7kHfWGTtmR1dtAZ_-dsc3NarNcx_X9bbUs69goVHGbask1Is8lFrZQHVm0WraJyhNLXSs7VMIitZq6XAhKrZSYqxYlt5Ybnc7Y_O_W-CEET7YZvXvX_qsRvPmxaPYWza9F-g3POVAO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Use of Left Ventricular Assist Device ( H eart M ate II ): A S ingapore Experience</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Lim, Choon Pin ; Sivathasan, Cumaraswamy ; Tan, Teing Ee ; Lim, Chong Hee ; Kerk, Ka Lee ; Sim, David Kheng Leng</creator><creatorcontrib>Lim, Choon Pin ; Sivathasan, Cumaraswamy ; Tan, Teing Ee ; Lim, Chong Hee ; Kerk, Ka Lee ; Sim, David Kheng Leng</creatorcontrib><description>Recent advances in medical and device therapies in heart failure have improved the survival of patients with heart failure. However, due to the limited availability of suitable heart donors, left ventricular assist devices ( LVAD s) have become an important tool as a bridge‐to‐heart transplantation for patients with refractory heart failure in S ingapore. We report our experience with the H eart M ate II ( HMII ) LVAD (Thoratec Corporation, Pleasanton, CA, USA) as a bridge‐to‐heart transplant in our center from 2009 to 2012. This was a retrospective review of 23 consecutive patients who underwent HMII LVAD implantation in our center between M ay 2009 and D ecember 2012. All patients were classified as I nteragency R egistry for M echanically A ssisted C irculatory S upport ( INTERMACS ) levels 1 to 3 and underwent LVAD implantation as a bridge‐to‐heart transplant. There were 17 male and 6 female patients. The mean age was 43.6 years old (range 14 to 64). The etiologies of heart failure included ischemic heart disease [8], idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy [11], viral myocarditis [2], and chemotherapy‐induced cardiomyopathy [2]. Nine patients were INTERMACS level 1, 12 patients level 2, and two patients level 3. All patients successfully underwent HMII LVAD implantation. There was no mortality within the first 30 postoperative days. Postoperative complications included stroke with full neurological recovery (21.7%), mediastinal infection (21.7%), cardiac tamponade or mediastinal collection requiring reopening of the chest (39.1%), cardiac arrhythmia (13.0%), and pump thrombosis with pump replacement (4.3%). All patients were discharged from hospital after LVAD implantation. Three patients experienced driveline infections during outpatient follow‐up. There were 19 readmissions due to the following conditions: sub‐therapeutic anticoagulation (13.0%), gastrointestinal bleeding (13.0%), suspected pump thrombosis (13.0%), transient ischemic attack (8.7%), arrhythmia (8.7%), congestive cardiac failure due to severe aortic regurgitation (8.7%), right ventricular failure (4.3%), rhabdomyolysis (4.3%), and hematuria (4.3%). Post‐ LVAD implantation, 20 patients were functionally New York Heart Association ( NYHA ) class I, while 3 reported NYHA III symptoms. Three patients were successfully bridged to heart transplantation. One patient was successfully explanted 11 months after LVAD implantation. There were two mortalities during the follow‐up period. The average duration of LVAD support was 522 days (range 47 to 1316 days). The H eart M ate II LVAD has proven to be effective in our Asian population. Driveline infection rate remains low even in the tropical hot, humid climate in S ingapore. With more patients ending up on extended periods of LVAD support, increased emphasis in the detection and management of long‐term complications of ventricular assist devices will be needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0160-564X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-1594</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/aor.12247</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Artificial organs, 2014-07, Vol.38 (7), p.543-548</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c747-b3a50a4408549f97def4fa5b2782fedb5d471f4ebaed811e3f55487b450ff0ca3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c747-b3a50a4408549f97def4fa5b2782fedb5d471f4ebaed811e3f55487b450ff0ca3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lim, Choon Pin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sivathasan, Cumaraswamy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Teing Ee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Chong Hee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerk, Ka Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sim, David Kheng Leng</creatorcontrib><title>Use of Left Ventricular Assist Device ( H eart M ate II ): A S ingapore Experience</title><title>Artificial organs</title><description>Recent advances in medical and device therapies in heart failure have improved the survival of patients with heart failure. However, due to the limited availability of suitable heart donors, left ventricular assist devices ( LVAD s) have become an important tool as a bridge‐to‐heart transplantation for patients with refractory heart failure in S ingapore. We report our experience with the H eart M ate II ( HMII ) LVAD (Thoratec Corporation, Pleasanton, CA, USA) as a bridge‐to‐heart transplant in our center from 2009 to 2012. This was a retrospective review of 23 consecutive patients who underwent HMII LVAD implantation in our center between M ay 2009 and D ecember 2012. All patients were classified as I nteragency R egistry for M echanically A ssisted C irculatory S upport ( INTERMACS ) levels 1 to 3 and underwent LVAD implantation as a bridge‐to‐heart transplant. There were 17 male and 6 female patients. The mean age was 43.6 years old (range 14 to 64). The etiologies of heart failure included ischemic heart disease [8], idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy [11], viral myocarditis [2], and chemotherapy‐induced cardiomyopathy [2]. Nine patients were INTERMACS level 1, 12 patients level 2, and two patients level 3. All patients successfully underwent HMII LVAD implantation. There was no mortality within the first 30 postoperative days. Postoperative complications included stroke with full neurological recovery (21.7%), mediastinal infection (21.7%), cardiac tamponade or mediastinal collection requiring reopening of the chest (39.1%), cardiac arrhythmia (13.0%), and pump thrombosis with pump replacement (4.3%). All patients were discharged from hospital after LVAD implantation. Three patients experienced driveline infections during outpatient follow‐up. There were 19 readmissions due to the following conditions: sub‐therapeutic anticoagulation (13.0%), gastrointestinal bleeding (13.0%), suspected pump thrombosis (13.0%), transient ischemic attack (8.7%), arrhythmia (8.7%), congestive cardiac failure due to severe aortic regurgitation (8.7%), right ventricular failure (4.3%), rhabdomyolysis (4.3%), and hematuria (4.3%). Post‐ LVAD implantation, 20 patients were functionally New York Heart Association ( NYHA ) class I, while 3 reported NYHA III symptoms. Three patients were successfully bridged to heart transplantation. One patient was successfully explanted 11 months after LVAD implantation. There were two mortalities during the follow‐up period. The average duration of LVAD support was 522 days (range 47 to 1316 days). The H eart M ate II LVAD has proven to be effective in our Asian population. Driveline infection rate remains low even in the tropical hot, humid climate in S ingapore. With more patients ending up on extended periods of LVAD support, increased emphasis in the detection and management of long‐term complications of ventricular assist devices will be needed.</description><issn>0160-564X</issn><issn>1525-1594</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNot0D1PwzAUhWELgUQoDPyDO9IhxU6u44QtKoVGCkKCgtgix7lGRiWJ7FDBv6d8nOXdzvAwdi74Qux3qQe_EEmC6oBFQiYyFrLAQxZxkfFYZvhyzE5CeOOcK-RZxB6eAsFgoSY7wTP1k3fmY6s9lCG4MME17ZwhuIA1kPYT3IGeCKoK5ldQwiO4_lWPgydYfY7kHfWGTtmR1dtAZ_-dsc3NarNcx_X9bbUs69goVHGbask1Is8lFrZQHVm0WraJyhNLXSs7VMIitZq6XAhKrZSYqxYlt5Ybnc7Y_O_W-CEET7YZvXvX_qsRvPmxaPYWza9F-g3POVAO</recordid><startdate>201407</startdate><enddate>201407</enddate><creator>Lim, Choon Pin</creator><creator>Sivathasan, Cumaraswamy</creator><creator>Tan, Teing Ee</creator><creator>Lim, Chong Hee</creator><creator>Kerk, Ka Lee</creator><creator>Sim, David Kheng Leng</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201407</creationdate><title>Use of Left Ventricular Assist Device ( H eart M ate II ): A S ingapore Experience</title><author>Lim, Choon Pin ; Sivathasan, Cumaraswamy ; Tan, Teing Ee ; Lim, Chong Hee ; Kerk, Ka Lee ; Sim, David Kheng Leng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c747-b3a50a4408549f97def4fa5b2782fedb5d471f4ebaed811e3f55487b450ff0ca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lim, Choon Pin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sivathasan, Cumaraswamy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Teing Ee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Chong Hee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerk, Ka Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sim, David Kheng Leng</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Artificial organs</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lim, Choon Pin</au><au>Sivathasan, Cumaraswamy</au><au>Tan, Teing Ee</au><au>Lim, Chong Hee</au><au>Kerk, Ka Lee</au><au>Sim, David Kheng Leng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Use of Left Ventricular Assist Device ( H eart M ate II ): A S ingapore Experience</atitle><jtitle>Artificial organs</jtitle><date>2014-07</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>543</spage><epage>548</epage><pages>543-548</pages><issn>0160-564X</issn><eissn>1525-1594</eissn><abstract>Recent advances in medical and device therapies in heart failure have improved the survival of patients with heart failure. However, due to the limited availability of suitable heart donors, left ventricular assist devices ( LVAD s) have become an important tool as a bridge‐to‐heart transplantation for patients with refractory heart failure in S ingapore. We report our experience with the H eart M ate II ( HMII ) LVAD (Thoratec Corporation, Pleasanton, CA, USA) as a bridge‐to‐heart transplant in our center from 2009 to 2012. This was a retrospective review of 23 consecutive patients who underwent HMII LVAD implantation in our center between M ay 2009 and D ecember 2012. All patients were classified as I nteragency R egistry for M echanically A ssisted C irculatory S upport ( INTERMACS ) levels 1 to 3 and underwent LVAD implantation as a bridge‐to‐heart transplant. There were 17 male and 6 female patients. The mean age was 43.6 years old (range 14 to 64). The etiologies of heart failure included ischemic heart disease [8], idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy [11], viral myocarditis [2], and chemotherapy‐induced cardiomyopathy [2]. Nine patients were INTERMACS level 1, 12 patients level 2, and two patients level 3. All patients successfully underwent HMII LVAD implantation. There was no mortality within the first 30 postoperative days. Postoperative complications included stroke with full neurological recovery (21.7%), mediastinal infection (21.7%), cardiac tamponade or mediastinal collection requiring reopening of the chest (39.1%), cardiac arrhythmia (13.0%), and pump thrombosis with pump replacement (4.3%). All patients were discharged from hospital after LVAD implantation. Three patients experienced driveline infections during outpatient follow‐up. There were 19 readmissions due to the following conditions: sub‐therapeutic anticoagulation (13.0%), gastrointestinal bleeding (13.0%), suspected pump thrombosis (13.0%), transient ischemic attack (8.7%), arrhythmia (8.7%), congestive cardiac failure due to severe aortic regurgitation (8.7%), right ventricular failure (4.3%), rhabdomyolysis (4.3%), and hematuria (4.3%). Post‐ LVAD implantation, 20 patients were functionally New York Heart Association ( NYHA ) class I, while 3 reported NYHA III symptoms. Three patients were successfully bridged to heart transplantation. One patient was successfully explanted 11 months after LVAD implantation. There were two mortalities during the follow‐up period. The average duration of LVAD support was 522 days (range 47 to 1316 days). The H eart M ate II LVAD has proven to be effective in our Asian population. Driveline infection rate remains low even in the tropical hot, humid climate in S ingapore. With more patients ending up on extended periods of LVAD support, increased emphasis in the detection and management of long‐term complications of ventricular assist devices will be needed.</abstract><doi>10.1111/aor.12247</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0160-564X
ispartof Artificial organs, 2014-07, Vol.38 (7), p.543-548
issn 0160-564X
1525-1594
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1111_aor_12247
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
title Use of Left Ventricular Assist Device ( H eart M ate II ): A S ingapore Experience
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T07%3A00%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use%20of%20Left%20Ventricular%20Assist%20Device%20(%20H%20eart%20M%20ate%20II%20):%20A%20S%20ingapore%20Experience&rft.jtitle=Artificial%20organs&rft.au=Lim,%20Choon%20Pin&rft.date=2014-07&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=543&rft.epage=548&rft.pages=543-548&rft.issn=0160-564X&rft.eissn=1525-1594&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/aor.12247&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1111_aor_12247%3C/crossref%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c747-b3a50a4408549f97def4fa5b2782fedb5d471f4ebaed811e3f55487b450ff0ca3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true