Hope for Cities or Hope for People: Neighborhood Development and Demographic Change

This study, recognizing the longstanding criticisms of HOPE VI as a vehicle for gentrification, compares the goals of local officials with the stated goals of HOPE VI in order to investigate the extent to which local officials are using or misusing HOPE VI to achieve local development and revitaliza...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:City & community 2017-06, Vol.16 (2), p.169-188
Main Authors: Clark, Jelisa, Negrey, Cynthia
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3056-bb4b920de68c640ff69aae33aa88ec743351514f19a17688367ca03ea26578be3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3056-bb4b920de68c640ff69aae33aa88ec743351514f19a17688367ca03ea26578be3
container_end_page 188
container_issue 2
container_start_page 169
container_title City & community
container_volume 16
creator Clark, Jelisa
Negrey, Cynthia
description This study, recognizing the longstanding criticisms of HOPE VI as a vehicle for gentrification, compares the goals of local officials with the stated goals of HOPE VI in order to investigate the extent to which local officials are using or misusing HOPE VI to achieve local development and revitalization goals. HOPE VI positioned itself as a program intended to deconcentrate poverty, however, in the case of Liberty Green, the focus on neighborhood development embedded within the federal policy results in HOPE VI developments being described as successful based on physical changes at the site rather than outcomes for public housing residents, who largely do not benefit from these changes. Evidence from this study suggests that most of the emphasis for the Liberty Green HOPE VI development revolves around neighborhood and community development goals. And self–sufficiency, while a goal of the HOPE VI program, remains secondary.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/cico.12236
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1111_cico_12236</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1111_cico.12236</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1111_cico.12236</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3056-bb4b920de68c640ff69aae33aa88ec743351514f19a17688367ca03ea26578be3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UE1LxDAQDaLgunrxF-QmCF2TJk1Tb1I_dmFxBfUc0uy0zdJtSrIq--9trXoS5zJvhvceMw-hc0pmtK8rY42b0Thm4gBNaMJJJAgnhwNmSSQkp8foJIQNITRLaDJBz3PXAS6dx7ndWQi4R7-rJ3BdA9f4EWxVF87Xzq3xLbxD47ottDus22HeusrrrrYG57VuKzhFR6VuApx99yl6vb97yefRcvWwyG-WkWEkEVFR8CKLyRqENIKTshSZ1sCY1lKCSTlj_YWUlzTTNBVSMpEaTRjoWCSpLIBN0eXoa7wLwUOpOm-32u8VJWqIQw1xqK84ejIdyR-2gf0_TJUv8tWP5mLUBF2B2rg33_b__OX-CfrrboI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hope for Cities or Hope for People: Neighborhood Development and Demographic Change</title><source>SAGE:Jisc Collections:SAGE Journals Read and Publish 2023-2024:2025 extension (reading list)</source><creator>Clark, Jelisa ; Negrey, Cynthia</creator><creatorcontrib>Clark, Jelisa ; Negrey, Cynthia</creatorcontrib><description>This study, recognizing the longstanding criticisms of HOPE VI as a vehicle for gentrification, compares the goals of local officials with the stated goals of HOPE VI in order to investigate the extent to which local officials are using or misusing HOPE VI to achieve local development and revitalization goals. HOPE VI positioned itself as a program intended to deconcentrate poverty, however, in the case of Liberty Green, the focus on neighborhood development embedded within the federal policy results in HOPE VI developments being described as successful based on physical changes at the site rather than outcomes for public housing residents, who largely do not benefit from these changes. Evidence from this study suggests that most of the emphasis for the Liberty Green HOPE VI development revolves around neighborhood and community development goals. And self–sufficiency, while a goal of the HOPE VI program, remains secondary.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1535-6841</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-6040</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/cico.12236</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>City &amp; community, 2017-06, Vol.16 (2), p.169-188</ispartof><rights>2017 American Sociological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3056-bb4b920de68c640ff69aae33aa88ec743351514f19a17688367ca03ea26578be3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3056-bb4b920de68c640ff69aae33aa88ec743351514f19a17688367ca03ea26578be3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27900,27901</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Clark, Jelisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Negrey, Cynthia</creatorcontrib><title>Hope for Cities or Hope for People: Neighborhood Development and Demographic Change</title><title>City &amp; community</title><description>This study, recognizing the longstanding criticisms of HOPE VI as a vehicle for gentrification, compares the goals of local officials with the stated goals of HOPE VI in order to investigate the extent to which local officials are using or misusing HOPE VI to achieve local development and revitalization goals. HOPE VI positioned itself as a program intended to deconcentrate poverty, however, in the case of Liberty Green, the focus on neighborhood development embedded within the federal policy results in HOPE VI developments being described as successful based on physical changes at the site rather than outcomes for public housing residents, who largely do not benefit from these changes. Evidence from this study suggests that most of the emphasis for the Liberty Green HOPE VI development revolves around neighborhood and community development goals. And self–sufficiency, while a goal of the HOPE VI program, remains secondary.</description><issn>1535-6841</issn><issn>1540-6040</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UE1LxDAQDaLgunrxF-QmCF2TJk1Tb1I_dmFxBfUc0uy0zdJtSrIq--9trXoS5zJvhvceMw-hc0pmtK8rY42b0Thm4gBNaMJJJAgnhwNmSSQkp8foJIQNITRLaDJBz3PXAS6dx7ndWQi4R7-rJ3BdA9f4EWxVF87Xzq3xLbxD47ottDus22HeusrrrrYG57VuKzhFR6VuApx99yl6vb97yefRcvWwyG-WkWEkEVFR8CKLyRqENIKTshSZ1sCY1lKCSTlj_YWUlzTTNBVSMpEaTRjoWCSpLIBN0eXoa7wLwUOpOm-32u8VJWqIQw1xqK84ejIdyR-2gf0_TJUv8tWP5mLUBF2B2rg33_b__OX-CfrrboI</recordid><startdate>201706</startdate><enddate>201706</enddate><creator>Clark, Jelisa</creator><creator>Negrey, Cynthia</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201706</creationdate><title>Hope for Cities or Hope for People: Neighborhood Development and Demographic Change</title><author>Clark, Jelisa ; Negrey, Cynthia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3056-bb4b920de68c640ff69aae33aa88ec743351514f19a17688367ca03ea26578be3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Clark, Jelisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Negrey, Cynthia</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>City &amp; community</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Clark, Jelisa</au><au>Negrey, Cynthia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hope for Cities or Hope for People: Neighborhood Development and Demographic Change</atitle><jtitle>City &amp; community</jtitle><date>2017-06</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>169</spage><epage>188</epage><pages>169-188</pages><issn>1535-6841</issn><eissn>1540-6040</eissn><abstract>This study, recognizing the longstanding criticisms of HOPE VI as a vehicle for gentrification, compares the goals of local officials with the stated goals of HOPE VI in order to investigate the extent to which local officials are using or misusing HOPE VI to achieve local development and revitalization goals. HOPE VI positioned itself as a program intended to deconcentrate poverty, however, in the case of Liberty Green, the focus on neighborhood development embedded within the federal policy results in HOPE VI developments being described as successful based on physical changes at the site rather than outcomes for public housing residents, who largely do not benefit from these changes. Evidence from this study suggests that most of the emphasis for the Liberty Green HOPE VI development revolves around neighborhood and community development goals. And self–sufficiency, while a goal of the HOPE VI program, remains secondary.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1111/cico.12236</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1535-6841
ispartof City & community, 2017-06, Vol.16 (2), p.169-188
issn 1535-6841
1540-6040
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1111_cico_12236
source SAGE:Jisc Collections:SAGE Journals Read and Publish 2023-2024:2025 extension (reading list)
title Hope for Cities or Hope for People: Neighborhood Development and Demographic Change
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-24T20%3A47%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hope%20for%20Cities%20or%20Hope%20for%20People:%20Neighborhood%20Development%20and%20Demographic%20Change&rft.jtitle=City%20&%20community&rft.au=Clark,%20Jelisa&rft.date=2017-06&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=169&rft.epage=188&rft.pages=169-188&rft.issn=1535-6841&rft.eissn=1540-6040&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/cico.12236&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1111_cico.12236%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3056-bb4b920de68c640ff69aae33aa88ec743351514f19a17688367ca03ea26578be3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1111_cico.12236&rfr_iscdi=true