Narrative, Ontological Security, and Foreign Policy Change

• Published in: Foreign policy analysis 2016-10, Vol.12 (4), p.610-627
• Main Author: Subotić, Jelena
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• ISSN: 1743-8586; 1743-8594
• DOI: 10.1111/fpa.12089

While the recent IR “narrative turn” has greatly improved our understanding of how narratives influence state policy choices, we need to deepen our understanding of how narratives explain policy change. If state “autobiographies” provide such powerful explanations of why states do what they do, how can they change their policies and practices? To understand the relationship between policy change and state narrative continuity, I build on existing scholarship on narrative analysis and ontological security to examine ways in which state autobiographical narratives are used by political actors to confront state insecurities. My principal argument is that at times of great crises and threats to multiple state securities (physical, social, and ontological), narratives are selectively activated to provide a cognitive bridge between policy change that resolves the physical security challenge, while also preserving state ontological security through offering autobiographical continuity, a sense of routine, familiarity, and calm. I illustrate the argument with an analysis of Serbia’s changing foreign policy behavior regarding the disputed status of Kosovo.