Loading…

Aphasia in Persian: Implications for cognitive models of lexical processing

Current models of oral reading assume that different routes (sublexical, lexical, and semantic) mediate oral reading performance and reliance on different routes during oral reading depends on the characteristics of print to sound mappings. Studies of single cases of acquired dyslexia in aphasia hav...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of neuropsychology 2017-09, Vol.11 (3), p.414-435
Main Authors: Bakhtiar, Mehdi, Jafary, Reyhane, Weekes, Brendan S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3605-fa8a9f2405a75e061cb0b46450765d801d8e551d900bb594dc93b43bebaa1e353
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3605-fa8a9f2405a75e061cb0b46450765d801d8e551d900bb594dc93b43bebaa1e353
container_end_page 435
container_issue 3
container_start_page 414
container_title Journal of neuropsychology
container_volume 11
creator Bakhtiar, Mehdi
Jafary, Reyhane
Weekes, Brendan S.
description Current models of oral reading assume that different routes (sublexical, lexical, and semantic) mediate oral reading performance and reliance on different routes during oral reading depends on the characteristics of print to sound mappings. Studies of single cases of acquired dyslexia in aphasia have contributed to the development of such models by revealing patterns of double dissociation in object naming and oral reading skill that follow brain damage in Indo‐European and Sino‐Tibetan languages. Print to sound mapping in Persian varies in transparency because orthography to phonology translation depends uniquely on the presence or absence of vowel letters in print. Here a hypothesis is tested that oral reading in Persian requires a semantic reading pathway that is independent of a direct non‐semantic reading pathway, by investigating whether Persian speakers with aphasia show selective impairments to object naming and reading aloud. A sample of 21 Persian speakers with aphasia ranging in age from 18 to 77 (mean = 53, SD = 16.9) was asked to name a same set of 200 objects and to read aloud the printed names of these objects in different sessions. As an additional measure of sublexical reading, patients were asked to read aloud 30 non‐word stimuli. Results showed that oral reading is significantly more preserved than object naming in Persian speakers with aphasia. However, more preserved object naming than oral reading was also observed in some cases. There was a moderate positive correlation between picture naming and oral reading success (p 
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jnp.12095
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1111_jnp_12095</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>JNP12095</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3605-fa8a9f2405a75e061cb0b46450765d801d8e551d900bb594dc93b43bebaa1e353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EEqUw8A-8MqQ9J3E-2KqKj0IFHWCObOdSXDl2ZFdA_z2GIDZuuXd43tPpIeSSwYzFme_sMGMp1PyITFiZV0lR8Oz4L-f8lJyFsAMoIGXVhDwuhjcRtKDa0g36mOw1XfWD0UrstbOBds5T5bZW7_U70t61aAJ1HTX4GRlDB-8UhqDt9pycdMIEvPjdU_J6e_OyvE_Wz3er5WKdqKwAnnSiEnWX5sBFyREKpiTIPL4GZcHbClhbIeesrQGk5HXeqjqTeSZRCsEw49mUXI13lXcheOyawete-EPDoPm20EQLzY-FyM5H9kMbPPwPNg9Pm7HxBbTGXuA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Aphasia in Persian: Implications for cognitive models of lexical processing</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Bakhtiar, Mehdi ; Jafary, Reyhane ; Weekes, Brendan S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bakhtiar, Mehdi ; Jafary, Reyhane ; Weekes, Brendan S.</creatorcontrib><description>Current models of oral reading assume that different routes (sublexical, lexical, and semantic) mediate oral reading performance and reliance on different routes during oral reading depends on the characteristics of print to sound mappings. Studies of single cases of acquired dyslexia in aphasia have contributed to the development of such models by revealing patterns of double dissociation in object naming and oral reading skill that follow brain damage in Indo‐European and Sino‐Tibetan languages. Print to sound mapping in Persian varies in transparency because orthography to phonology translation depends uniquely on the presence or absence of vowel letters in print. Here a hypothesis is tested that oral reading in Persian requires a semantic reading pathway that is independent of a direct non‐semantic reading pathway, by investigating whether Persian speakers with aphasia show selective impairments to object naming and reading aloud. A sample of 21 Persian speakers with aphasia ranging in age from 18 to 77 (mean = 53, SD = 16.9) was asked to name a same set of 200 objects and to read aloud the printed names of these objects in different sessions. As an additional measure of sublexical reading, patients were asked to read aloud 30 non‐word stimuli. Results showed that oral reading is significantly more preserved than object naming in Persian speakers with aphasia. However, more preserved object naming than oral reading was also observed in some cases. There was a moderate positive correlation between picture naming and oral reading success (p &lt; .05). Mixed‐effects logistic regression revealed that word frequency, age of acquisition and imageability predict success across both tasks and there is an interaction between these variables and orthographic transparency in oral reading. Furthermore, opaque words were read less accurately than transparent words. The results reveal different patterns of acquired dyslexia in some cases that closely resemble phonological, deep, and surface dyslexia in other scripts – reported here in Persian for the first time.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1748-6645</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-6653</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jnp.12095</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>aphasia ; orthographic transparency ; Persian</subject><ispartof>Journal of neuropsychology, 2017-09, Vol.11 (3), p.414-435</ispartof><rights>2016 The British Psychological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3605-fa8a9f2405a75e061cb0b46450765d801d8e551d900bb594dc93b43bebaa1e353</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3605-fa8a9f2405a75e061cb0b46450765d801d8e551d900bb594dc93b43bebaa1e353</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bakhtiar, Mehdi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jafary, Reyhane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weekes, Brendan S.</creatorcontrib><title>Aphasia in Persian: Implications for cognitive models of lexical processing</title><title>Journal of neuropsychology</title><description>Current models of oral reading assume that different routes (sublexical, lexical, and semantic) mediate oral reading performance and reliance on different routes during oral reading depends on the characteristics of print to sound mappings. Studies of single cases of acquired dyslexia in aphasia have contributed to the development of such models by revealing patterns of double dissociation in object naming and oral reading skill that follow brain damage in Indo‐European and Sino‐Tibetan languages. Print to sound mapping in Persian varies in transparency because orthography to phonology translation depends uniquely on the presence or absence of vowel letters in print. Here a hypothesis is tested that oral reading in Persian requires a semantic reading pathway that is independent of a direct non‐semantic reading pathway, by investigating whether Persian speakers with aphasia show selective impairments to object naming and reading aloud. A sample of 21 Persian speakers with aphasia ranging in age from 18 to 77 (mean = 53, SD = 16.9) was asked to name a same set of 200 objects and to read aloud the printed names of these objects in different sessions. As an additional measure of sublexical reading, patients were asked to read aloud 30 non‐word stimuli. Results showed that oral reading is significantly more preserved than object naming in Persian speakers with aphasia. However, more preserved object naming than oral reading was also observed in some cases. There was a moderate positive correlation between picture naming and oral reading success (p &lt; .05). Mixed‐effects logistic regression revealed that word frequency, age of acquisition and imageability predict success across both tasks and there is an interaction between these variables and orthographic transparency in oral reading. Furthermore, opaque words were read less accurately than transparent words. The results reveal different patterns of acquired dyslexia in some cases that closely resemble phonological, deep, and surface dyslexia in other scripts – reported here in Persian for the first time.</description><subject>aphasia</subject><subject>orthographic transparency</subject><subject>Persian</subject><issn>1748-6645</issn><issn>1748-6653</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EEqUw8A-8MqQ9J3E-2KqKj0IFHWCObOdSXDl2ZFdA_z2GIDZuuXd43tPpIeSSwYzFme_sMGMp1PyITFiZV0lR8Oz4L-f8lJyFsAMoIGXVhDwuhjcRtKDa0g36mOw1XfWD0UrstbOBds5T5bZW7_U70t61aAJ1HTX4GRlDB-8UhqDt9pycdMIEvPjdU_J6e_OyvE_Wz3er5WKdqKwAnnSiEnWX5sBFyREKpiTIPL4GZcHbClhbIeesrQGk5HXeqjqTeSZRCsEw49mUXI13lXcheOyawete-EPDoPm20EQLzY-FyM5H9kMbPPwPNg9Pm7HxBbTGXuA</recordid><startdate>201709</startdate><enddate>201709</enddate><creator>Bakhtiar, Mehdi</creator><creator>Jafary, Reyhane</creator><creator>Weekes, Brendan S.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201709</creationdate><title>Aphasia in Persian: Implications for cognitive models of lexical processing</title><author>Bakhtiar, Mehdi ; Jafary, Reyhane ; Weekes, Brendan S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3605-fa8a9f2405a75e061cb0b46450765d801d8e551d900bb594dc93b43bebaa1e353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>aphasia</topic><topic>orthographic transparency</topic><topic>Persian</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bakhtiar, Mehdi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jafary, Reyhane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weekes, Brendan S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of neuropsychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bakhtiar, Mehdi</au><au>Jafary, Reyhane</au><au>Weekes, Brendan S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Aphasia in Persian: Implications for cognitive models of lexical processing</atitle><jtitle>Journal of neuropsychology</jtitle><date>2017-09</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>414</spage><epage>435</epage><pages>414-435</pages><issn>1748-6645</issn><eissn>1748-6653</eissn><abstract>Current models of oral reading assume that different routes (sublexical, lexical, and semantic) mediate oral reading performance and reliance on different routes during oral reading depends on the characteristics of print to sound mappings. Studies of single cases of acquired dyslexia in aphasia have contributed to the development of such models by revealing patterns of double dissociation in object naming and oral reading skill that follow brain damage in Indo‐European and Sino‐Tibetan languages. Print to sound mapping in Persian varies in transparency because orthography to phonology translation depends uniquely on the presence or absence of vowel letters in print. Here a hypothesis is tested that oral reading in Persian requires a semantic reading pathway that is independent of a direct non‐semantic reading pathway, by investigating whether Persian speakers with aphasia show selective impairments to object naming and reading aloud. A sample of 21 Persian speakers with aphasia ranging in age from 18 to 77 (mean = 53, SD = 16.9) was asked to name a same set of 200 objects and to read aloud the printed names of these objects in different sessions. As an additional measure of sublexical reading, patients were asked to read aloud 30 non‐word stimuli. Results showed that oral reading is significantly more preserved than object naming in Persian speakers with aphasia. However, more preserved object naming than oral reading was also observed in some cases. There was a moderate positive correlation between picture naming and oral reading success (p &lt; .05). Mixed‐effects logistic regression revealed that word frequency, age of acquisition and imageability predict success across both tasks and there is an interaction between these variables and orthographic transparency in oral reading. Furthermore, opaque words were read less accurately than transparent words. The results reveal different patterns of acquired dyslexia in some cases that closely resemble phonological, deep, and surface dyslexia in other scripts – reported here in Persian for the first time.</abstract><doi>10.1111/jnp.12095</doi><tpages>22</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1748-6645
ispartof Journal of neuropsychology, 2017-09, Vol.11 (3), p.414-435
issn 1748-6645
1748-6653
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1111_jnp_12095
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects aphasia
orthographic transparency
Persian
title Aphasia in Persian: Implications for cognitive models of lexical processing
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T21%3A48%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Aphasia%20in%20Persian:%20Implications%20for%20cognitive%20models%20of%20lexical%20processing&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20neuropsychology&rft.au=Bakhtiar,%20Mehdi&rft.date=2017-09&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=414&rft.epage=435&rft.pages=414-435&rft.issn=1748-6645&rft.eissn=1748-6653&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jnp.12095&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3EJNP12095%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3605-fa8a9f2405a75e061cb0b46450765d801d8e551d900bb594dc93b43bebaa1e353%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true