Loading…

Evaluating the Efficacy of a Special Education Advocacy Training Program

Increasingly, parents are relying on advocates to ensure that children with disabilities receive appropriate educational services. As agencies begin to train advocates to work with families, it is necessary to evaluate the efficacy of such advocacy training programs. This study evaluated the efficac...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of policy and practice in intellectual disabilities 2016-12, Vol.13 (4), p.269-276
Main Authors: Burke, Meghan M., Goldman, Samantha E., Hart, Melanie S., Hodapp, Robert M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3113-5e1251c915b63c14b4df34eb42fa3e3b85ebaa44bba9913fc832c9e5c0210c533
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3113-5e1251c915b63c14b4df34eb42fa3e3b85ebaa44bba9913fc832c9e5c0210c533
container_end_page 276
container_issue 4
container_start_page 269
container_title Journal of policy and practice in intellectual disabilities
container_volume 13
creator Burke, Meghan M.
Goldman, Samantha E.
Hart, Melanie S.
Hodapp, Robert M.
description Increasingly, parents are relying on advocates to ensure that children with disabilities receive appropriate educational services. As agencies begin to train advocates to work with families, it is necessary to evaluate the efficacy of such advocacy training programs. This study evaluated the efficacy of the Volunteer Advocacy Project (VAP), a 40‐h training workshop that has been delivered since 2008 to six cohorts live and via webcasts. The aim of the study was to determine whether the VAP increased the knowledge and advocacy skills of its trainees and how trainee and training characteristics related to the effectiveness of the training. This study examined changes from pretest to posttest knowledge and advocacy skills of 90 trainees of the VAP. We also examined interactions between pre/post change and trainee and training characteristics. Participants demonstrated significant gains from pre‐ to posttests in their knowledge of special education and in their advocacy skills. Those participants who partook of the training in latter cohorts and at distance sites showed more progress in special education knowledge. Increases in advocacy skills differed by type of participant: compared to parent participants, professionals demonstrated significantly greater pre/post test increases in advocacy skills. This study has important implications for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jppi.12183
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>istex_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1111_jppi_12183</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ark_67375_WNG_JP1MBJ86_9</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3113-5e1251c915b63c14b4df34eb42fa3e3b85ebaa44bba9913fc832c9e5c0210c533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1PAjEQhhujiYhe_AU9myx2-rHsHpGsfASVRIzHpi0tFhd20wV0_70LKEfnMpPM80wmL0K3QDrQ1P2yLH0HKCTsDLWgyyECYOT8NFN6ia6qakkITYWIW2iY7VS-VRu_XuDNh8WZc94oU-PCYYVfS2u8ynE235qGKda4N98Vh_0sKL_eW9NQLIJaXaMLp_LK3vz2Nnp7zGb9YTR5GYz6vUlkWPNKJCxQASYFoWNmgGs-d4xbzalTzDKdCKuV4lxrlabAnEkYNakVhlAgRjDWRnfHuyYUVRWsk2XwKxVqCUTuM5D7DOQhgwaGI_zlc1v_Q8rxdDr6c6Kj46uN_T45KnzKuMu6Qr4_Dxocnh7GSSxT9gOyxm2w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating the Efficacy of a Special Education Advocacy Training Program</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Burke, Meghan M. ; Goldman, Samantha E. ; Hart, Melanie S. ; Hodapp, Robert M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Burke, Meghan M. ; Goldman, Samantha E. ; Hart, Melanie S. ; Hodapp, Robert M.</creatorcontrib><description>Increasingly, parents are relying on advocates to ensure that children with disabilities receive appropriate educational services. As agencies begin to train advocates to work with families, it is necessary to evaluate the efficacy of such advocacy training programs. This study evaluated the efficacy of the Volunteer Advocacy Project (VAP), a 40‐h training workshop that has been delivered since 2008 to six cohorts live and via webcasts. The aim of the study was to determine whether the VAP increased the knowledge and advocacy skills of its trainees and how trainee and training characteristics related to the effectiveness of the training. This study examined changes from pretest to posttest knowledge and advocacy skills of 90 trainees of the VAP. We also examined interactions between pre/post change and trainee and training characteristics. Participants demonstrated significant gains from pre‐ to posttests in their knowledge of special education and in their advocacy skills. Those participants who partook of the training in latter cohorts and at distance sites showed more progress in special education knowledge. Increases in advocacy skills differed by type of participant: compared to parent participants, professionals demonstrated significantly greater pre/post test increases in advocacy skills. This study has important implications for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1741-1122</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-1130</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jppi.12183</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>advocacy ; intellectual disability ; parent ; training</subject><ispartof>Journal of policy and practice in intellectual disabilities, 2016-12, Vol.13 (4), p.269-276</ispartof><rights>2016 International Association for the Scientific Study of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities and Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3113-5e1251c915b63c14b4df34eb42fa3e3b85ebaa44bba9913fc832c9e5c0210c533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3113-5e1251c915b63c14b4df34eb42fa3e3b85ebaa44bba9913fc832c9e5c0210c533</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Burke, Meghan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldman, Samantha E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hart, Melanie S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodapp, Robert M.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating the Efficacy of a Special Education Advocacy Training Program</title><title>Journal of policy and practice in intellectual disabilities</title><addtitle>Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities</addtitle><description>Increasingly, parents are relying on advocates to ensure that children with disabilities receive appropriate educational services. As agencies begin to train advocates to work with families, it is necessary to evaluate the efficacy of such advocacy training programs. This study evaluated the efficacy of the Volunteer Advocacy Project (VAP), a 40‐h training workshop that has been delivered since 2008 to six cohorts live and via webcasts. The aim of the study was to determine whether the VAP increased the knowledge and advocacy skills of its trainees and how trainee and training characteristics related to the effectiveness of the training. This study examined changes from pretest to posttest knowledge and advocacy skills of 90 trainees of the VAP. We also examined interactions between pre/post change and trainee and training characteristics. Participants demonstrated significant gains from pre‐ to posttests in their knowledge of special education and in their advocacy skills. Those participants who partook of the training in latter cohorts and at distance sites showed more progress in special education knowledge. Increases in advocacy skills differed by type of participant: compared to parent participants, professionals demonstrated significantly greater pre/post test increases in advocacy skills. This study has important implications for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers.</description><subject>advocacy</subject><subject>intellectual disability</subject><subject>parent</subject><subject>training</subject><issn>1741-1122</issn><issn>1741-1130</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1PAjEQhhujiYhe_AU9myx2-rHsHpGsfASVRIzHpi0tFhd20wV0_70LKEfnMpPM80wmL0K3QDrQ1P2yLH0HKCTsDLWgyyECYOT8NFN6ia6qakkITYWIW2iY7VS-VRu_XuDNh8WZc94oU-PCYYVfS2u8ynE235qGKda4N98Vh_0sKL_eW9NQLIJaXaMLp_LK3vz2Nnp7zGb9YTR5GYz6vUlkWPNKJCxQASYFoWNmgGs-d4xbzalTzDKdCKuV4lxrlabAnEkYNakVhlAgRjDWRnfHuyYUVRWsk2XwKxVqCUTuM5D7DOQhgwaGI_zlc1v_Q8rxdDr6c6Kj46uN_T45KnzKuMu6Qr4_Dxocnh7GSSxT9gOyxm2w</recordid><startdate>201612</startdate><enddate>201612</enddate><creator>Burke, Meghan M.</creator><creator>Goldman, Samantha E.</creator><creator>Hart, Melanie S.</creator><creator>Hodapp, Robert M.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201612</creationdate><title>Evaluating the Efficacy of a Special Education Advocacy Training Program</title><author>Burke, Meghan M. ; Goldman, Samantha E. ; Hart, Melanie S. ; Hodapp, Robert M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3113-5e1251c915b63c14b4df34eb42fa3e3b85ebaa44bba9913fc832c9e5c0210c533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>advocacy</topic><topic>intellectual disability</topic><topic>parent</topic><topic>training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Burke, Meghan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldman, Samantha E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hart, Melanie S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodapp, Robert M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of policy and practice in intellectual disabilities</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Burke, Meghan M.</au><au>Goldman, Samantha E.</au><au>Hart, Melanie S.</au><au>Hodapp, Robert M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating the Efficacy of a Special Education Advocacy Training Program</atitle><jtitle>Journal of policy and practice in intellectual disabilities</jtitle><addtitle>Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities</addtitle><date>2016-12</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>269</spage><epage>276</epage><pages>269-276</pages><issn>1741-1122</issn><eissn>1741-1130</eissn><abstract>Increasingly, parents are relying on advocates to ensure that children with disabilities receive appropriate educational services. As agencies begin to train advocates to work with families, it is necessary to evaluate the efficacy of such advocacy training programs. This study evaluated the efficacy of the Volunteer Advocacy Project (VAP), a 40‐h training workshop that has been delivered since 2008 to six cohorts live and via webcasts. The aim of the study was to determine whether the VAP increased the knowledge and advocacy skills of its trainees and how trainee and training characteristics related to the effectiveness of the training. This study examined changes from pretest to posttest knowledge and advocacy skills of 90 trainees of the VAP. We also examined interactions between pre/post change and trainee and training characteristics. Participants demonstrated significant gains from pre‐ to posttests in their knowledge of special education and in their advocacy skills. Those participants who partook of the training in latter cohorts and at distance sites showed more progress in special education knowledge. Increases in advocacy skills differed by type of participant: compared to parent participants, professionals demonstrated significantly greater pre/post test increases in advocacy skills. This study has important implications for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers.</abstract><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/jppi.12183</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1741-1122
ispartof Journal of policy and practice in intellectual disabilities, 2016-12, Vol.13 (4), p.269-276
issn 1741-1122
1741-1130
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1111_jppi_12183
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects advocacy
intellectual disability
parent
training
title Evaluating the Efficacy of a Special Education Advocacy Training Program
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T10%3A09%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-istex_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20the%20Efficacy%20of%20a%20Special%20Education%20Advocacy%20Training%20Program&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20policy%20and%20practice%20in%20intellectual%20disabilities&rft.au=Burke,%20Meghan%20M.&rft.date=2016-12&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=269&rft.epage=276&rft.pages=269-276&rft.issn=1741-1122&rft.eissn=1741-1130&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jppi.12183&rft_dat=%3Cistex_cross%3Eark_67375_WNG_JP1MBJ86_9%3C/istex_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3113-5e1251c915b63c14b4df34eb42fa3e3b85ebaa44bba9913fc832c9e5c0210c533%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true