When Is Anger Helpful or Hurtful? Status and Role Impact on Anger Expression and Outcomes

Anger expressers and targets often experience anger as an unpleasant and potentially damaging emotion. However, emerging social functional perspectives on workplace anger suggest that anger expressions can promote valued dialogue, facilitating the airing of differences that can lead to improved work...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Negotiation and conflict management research 2017-05, Vol.10 (2), p.69-87
Main Authors: Callister, Ronda Roberts, Geddes, Deanna, Gibson, Donald F.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
conflict management
emotions
power
status
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Anger expressers and targets often experience anger as an unpleasant and potentially damaging emotion. However, emerging social functional perspectives on workplace anger suggest that anger expressions can promote valued dialogue, facilitating the airing of differences that can lead to improved working relationship and movement toward organizational goals and beneficial change. While supervisors typically express work‐related anger with impunity, subordinate anger may be challenged and sanctioned more frequently. Hypotheses tested status (supervisor vs. subordinate) and role (expresser vs. target) effects on perceived outcomes. Findings indicate a significant main effect for status and significant interaction with role such that subordinates who are targets of supervisor anger, reported significantly more negative outcomes from anger expression than any other type of anger interaction. We also found that existing strong relationships between supervisors and subordinates contribute to outcomes that are more favorable following anger expressions at work.
ISSN:1750-4708
1750-4716
DOI:10.1111/ncmr.12090