Loading…

Comparison of the performance of classical and quantum machine‐learning methods on the detection of sugar beet Cercospora leaf disease

Image processing and machine‐learning (ML) techniques are essential for the detection of diseases and pests in plants. This study explored the application of quantum ML (QML) algorithms for the early detection of Cercospora beticola leaf disease in sugar beet, which causes significant impact on glob...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Plant pathology 2024-11
Main Authors: Katirci, Ramazan, Adem, Kemal, Tatar, Muhammed, Ölmez, Fatih
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c119t-5fb00939b611c6b865850345ad6363765be07ada13a62db62aa13fa647a8a5153
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Plant pathology
container_volume
creator Katirci, Ramazan
Adem, Kemal
Tatar, Muhammed
Ölmez, Fatih
description Image processing and machine‐learning (ML) techniques are essential for the detection of diseases and pests in plants. This study explored the application of quantum ML (QML) algorithms for the early detection of Cercospora beticola leaf disease in sugar beet, which causes significant impact on global sugar production. Using a dataset of 1065 images (739 diseased and 326 healthy), we extracted 70 ML statistical features, including 10 from the grey‐level co‐occurrence matrix (GLCM) and 60 colour‐related features. Performance evaluations of classical ML algorithms, such as random forest (RF; 91.95% accuracy) and extreme gradient boosting (91.95% accuracy), demonstrated strong results compared to quantum approaches. Notably, the quantum support vector classifier (QSVC) achieved an accuracy of 85% with perfect recall of 1.00, while the variational quantum classifier (VQC) recorded an accuracy of 88.73%. Dimensionality reduction via principal component analysis reduced features from 70 to 5, enabling effective classification with competitive results: ML (RF) 91.41%, VQC with limited‐memory Broyden–Fletcher–Goldfarb–Shanno with box constraints (L_BFGS_B) 88.73% and QSVC 85%. These findings highlight the potential of QML algorithms in improving agricultural disease identification and aiding in the advancement of more efficient, sustainable farming techniques.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ppa.14036
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1111_ppa_14036</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1111_ppa_14036</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c119t-5fb00939b611c6b865850345ad6363765be07ada13a62db62aa13fa647a8a5153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkLFOwzAURS0EEqUw8AdeGVLsuHaTEUVAkSqxwBy92M-tUWIH2x3YGBn5Rr6ElPKW-3Sle4ZDyDVnCz7d7TjCgi-ZUCdkxoWShWCyPiUzxkRZsEqV5-QipTfGuKzraka-mjCMEF0KngZL8w7piNGGOIDXeKh0Dyk5DT0Fb-j7HnzeD3QAvXMefz6_e4Tond_SAfMumEQn0gFjMKPO7shN-y1E2iFm2mDUIY0hAp2mlhqXEBJekjMLfcKr_5yT14f7l2ZdbJ4fn5q7TaE5r3MhbcdYLepOca5VVylZSSaWEowSSqyU7JCtwAAXoErTqRKm14JarqACyaWYk5sjV8eQUkTbjtENED9aztqDwnZS2P4pFL-usmeG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the performance of classical and quantum machine‐learning methods on the detection of sugar beet Cercospora leaf disease</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Katirci, Ramazan ; Adem, Kemal ; Tatar, Muhammed ; Ölmez, Fatih</creator><creatorcontrib>Katirci, Ramazan ; Adem, Kemal ; Tatar, Muhammed ; Ölmez, Fatih</creatorcontrib><description>Image processing and machine‐learning (ML) techniques are essential for the detection of diseases and pests in plants. This study explored the application of quantum ML (QML) algorithms for the early detection of Cercospora beticola leaf disease in sugar beet, which causes significant impact on global sugar production. Using a dataset of 1065 images (739 diseased and 326 healthy), we extracted 70 ML statistical features, including 10 from the grey‐level co‐occurrence matrix (GLCM) and 60 colour‐related features. Performance evaluations of classical ML algorithms, such as random forest (RF; 91.95% accuracy) and extreme gradient boosting (91.95% accuracy), demonstrated strong results compared to quantum approaches. Notably, the quantum support vector classifier (QSVC) achieved an accuracy of 85% with perfect recall of 1.00, while the variational quantum classifier (VQC) recorded an accuracy of 88.73%. Dimensionality reduction via principal component analysis reduced features from 70 to 5, enabling effective classification with competitive results: ML (RF) 91.41%, VQC with limited‐memory Broyden–Fletcher–Goldfarb–Shanno with box constraints (L_BFGS_B) 88.73% and QSVC 85%. These findings highlight the potential of QML algorithms in improving agricultural disease identification and aiding in the advancement of more efficient, sustainable farming techniques.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-0862</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-3059</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ppa.14036</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Plant pathology, 2024-11</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c119t-5fb00939b611c6b865850345ad6363765be07ada13a62db62aa13fa647a8a5153</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3752-7354</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Katirci, Ramazan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adem, Kemal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tatar, Muhammed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ölmez, Fatih</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the performance of classical and quantum machine‐learning methods on the detection of sugar beet Cercospora leaf disease</title><title>Plant pathology</title><description>Image processing and machine‐learning (ML) techniques are essential for the detection of diseases and pests in plants. This study explored the application of quantum ML (QML) algorithms for the early detection of Cercospora beticola leaf disease in sugar beet, which causes significant impact on global sugar production. Using a dataset of 1065 images (739 diseased and 326 healthy), we extracted 70 ML statistical features, including 10 from the grey‐level co‐occurrence matrix (GLCM) and 60 colour‐related features. Performance evaluations of classical ML algorithms, such as random forest (RF; 91.95% accuracy) and extreme gradient boosting (91.95% accuracy), demonstrated strong results compared to quantum approaches. Notably, the quantum support vector classifier (QSVC) achieved an accuracy of 85% with perfect recall of 1.00, while the variational quantum classifier (VQC) recorded an accuracy of 88.73%. Dimensionality reduction via principal component analysis reduced features from 70 to 5, enabling effective classification with competitive results: ML (RF) 91.41%, VQC with limited‐memory Broyden–Fletcher–Goldfarb–Shanno with box constraints (L_BFGS_B) 88.73% and QSVC 85%. These findings highlight the potential of QML algorithms in improving agricultural disease identification and aiding in the advancement of more efficient, sustainable farming techniques.</description><issn>0032-0862</issn><issn>1365-3059</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkLFOwzAURS0EEqUw8AdeGVLsuHaTEUVAkSqxwBy92M-tUWIH2x3YGBn5Rr6ElPKW-3Sle4ZDyDVnCz7d7TjCgi-ZUCdkxoWShWCyPiUzxkRZsEqV5-QipTfGuKzraka-mjCMEF0KngZL8w7piNGGOIDXeKh0Dyk5DT0Fb-j7HnzeD3QAvXMefz6_e4Tond_SAfMumEQn0gFjMKPO7shN-y1E2iFm2mDUIY0hAp2mlhqXEBJekjMLfcKr_5yT14f7l2ZdbJ4fn5q7TaE5r3MhbcdYLepOca5VVylZSSaWEowSSqyU7JCtwAAXoErTqRKm14JarqACyaWYk5sjV8eQUkTbjtENED9aztqDwnZS2P4pFL-usmeG</recordid><startdate>20241117</startdate><enddate>20241117</enddate><creator>Katirci, Ramazan</creator><creator>Adem, Kemal</creator><creator>Tatar, Muhammed</creator><creator>Ölmez, Fatih</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3752-7354</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241117</creationdate><title>Comparison of the performance of classical and quantum machine‐learning methods on the detection of sugar beet Cercospora leaf disease</title><author>Katirci, Ramazan ; Adem, Kemal ; Tatar, Muhammed ; Ölmez, Fatih</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c119t-5fb00939b611c6b865850345ad6363765be07ada13a62db62aa13fa647a8a5153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Katirci, Ramazan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adem, Kemal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tatar, Muhammed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ölmez, Fatih</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Plant pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Katirci, Ramazan</au><au>Adem, Kemal</au><au>Tatar, Muhammed</au><au>Ölmez, Fatih</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the performance of classical and quantum machine‐learning methods on the detection of sugar beet Cercospora leaf disease</atitle><jtitle>Plant pathology</jtitle><date>2024-11-17</date><risdate>2024</risdate><issn>0032-0862</issn><eissn>1365-3059</eissn><abstract>Image processing and machine‐learning (ML) techniques are essential for the detection of diseases and pests in plants. This study explored the application of quantum ML (QML) algorithms for the early detection of Cercospora beticola leaf disease in sugar beet, which causes significant impact on global sugar production. Using a dataset of 1065 images (739 diseased and 326 healthy), we extracted 70 ML statistical features, including 10 from the grey‐level co‐occurrence matrix (GLCM) and 60 colour‐related features. Performance evaluations of classical ML algorithms, such as random forest (RF; 91.95% accuracy) and extreme gradient boosting (91.95% accuracy), demonstrated strong results compared to quantum approaches. Notably, the quantum support vector classifier (QSVC) achieved an accuracy of 85% with perfect recall of 1.00, while the variational quantum classifier (VQC) recorded an accuracy of 88.73%. Dimensionality reduction via principal component analysis reduced features from 70 to 5, enabling effective classification with competitive results: ML (RF) 91.41%, VQC with limited‐memory Broyden–Fletcher–Goldfarb–Shanno with box constraints (L_BFGS_B) 88.73% and QSVC 85%. These findings highlight the potential of QML algorithms in improving agricultural disease identification and aiding in the advancement of more efficient, sustainable farming techniques.</abstract><doi>10.1111/ppa.14036</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3752-7354</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0032-0862
ispartof Plant pathology, 2024-11
issn 0032-0862
1365-3059
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1111_ppa_14036
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
title Comparison of the performance of classical and quantum machine‐learning methods on the detection of sugar beet Cercospora leaf disease
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T14%3A48%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20performance%20of%20classical%20and%20quantum%20machine%E2%80%90learning%20methods%20on%20the%20detection%20of%20sugar%20beet%20Cercospora%20leaf%20disease&rft.jtitle=Plant%20pathology&rft.au=Katirci,%20Ramazan&rft.date=2024-11-17&rft.issn=0032-0862&rft.eissn=1365-3059&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ppa.14036&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1111_ppa_14036%3C/crossref%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c119t-5fb00939b611c6b865850345ad6363765be07ada13a62db62aa13fa647a8a5153%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true