Loading…
The be‐auxiliary's categorial status in Old Russian1
This article proposes that the present tense forms of the be‐auxiliary byti (AUX) in Old Russian should be identified as weak pronouns, based on their prosodic, morphological, and syntactic properties. The loss of AUX in Old Russian, which distinguishes East Slavic from West and South Slavic languag...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Studia linguistica 2020-12, Vol.74 (3), p.613-644 |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | |
|---|---|
| cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1476-c0314983ea44eb29aab8701b33dbaef03f287850282d2f81432cf160fc8514813 |
| container_end_page | 644 |
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 613 |
| container_title | Studia linguistica |
| container_volume | 74 |
| creator | Jung, Hakyung |
| description | This article proposes that the present tense forms of the be‐auxiliary byti (AUX) in Old Russian should be identified as weak pronouns, based on their prosodic, morphological, and syntactic properties. The loss of AUX in Old Russian, which distinguishes East Slavic from West and South Slavic languages, is ascribed to the competition between AUX and strong subject pronouns as a consequence of the reanalysis of AUX as a weak subject pronoun. This reanalysis was triggered by the early loss of synthetic past tenses in Old Russian. The AUX's position to the right of pronominal clitics indicates that the AUX remains in its initial merge position either as an auxiliary verb or as a subject pronoun. The co‐occurrence of AUXin situ and a null subject in Old Russian implies that rich verbal agreement and null subjects are unrelated with verb raising to I0. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/stul.12136 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1111_stul_12136</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>STUL12136</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1476-c0314983ea44eb29aab8701b33dbaef03f287850282d2f81432cf160fc8514813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9j8FKxDAQhoMoWFcvPkFugpA1k6RpepRFV6GwoN1zSNNEI3FXmhbdm4_gM_okdq1n5zIMfPPzfwidA53DOFepH-IcGHB5gDIQsiBlrtghyijlJeFQ8mN0ktILHW-pZIZk_exw474_v8zwEWIw3e4iYWt697Ttgok49aYfEg4bvIotfhhSCmYDp-jIm5jc2d-eofXtTb24I9Vqeb-4rogFUUhiKQdRKu6MEK5hpTGNKig0nLeNcZ5yz1ShcsoUa5lXIDizHiT1VuUgFPAZupxybbdNqXNev3XhdSypgeq9sd4b61_jEYYJfg_R7f4h9WO9rqafH79qWLo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The be‐auxiliary's categorial status in Old Russian1</title><source>EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Jung, Hakyung</creator><creatorcontrib>Jung, Hakyung</creatorcontrib><description>This article proposes that the present tense forms of the be‐auxiliary byti (AUX) in Old Russian should be identified as weak pronouns, based on their prosodic, morphological, and syntactic properties. The loss of AUX in Old Russian, which distinguishes East Slavic from West and South Slavic languages, is ascribed to the competition between AUX and strong subject pronouns as a consequence of the reanalysis of AUX as a weak subject pronoun. This reanalysis was triggered by the early loss of synthetic past tenses in Old Russian. The AUX's position to the right of pronominal clitics indicates that the AUX remains in its initial merge position either as an auxiliary verb or as a subject pronoun. The co‐occurrence of AUXin situ and a null subject in Old Russian implies that rich verbal agreement and null subjects are unrelated with verb raising to I0.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0039-3193</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9582</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/stul.12136</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Studia linguistica, 2020-12, Vol.74 (3), p.613-644</ispartof><rights>2020 The Editorial Board of</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1476-c0314983ea44eb29aab8701b33dbaef03f287850282d2f81432cf160fc8514813</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jung, Hakyung</creatorcontrib><title>The be‐auxiliary's categorial status in Old Russian1</title><title>Studia linguistica</title><description>This article proposes that the present tense forms of the be‐auxiliary byti (AUX) in Old Russian should be identified as weak pronouns, based on their prosodic, morphological, and syntactic properties. The loss of AUX in Old Russian, which distinguishes East Slavic from West and South Slavic languages, is ascribed to the competition between AUX and strong subject pronouns as a consequence of the reanalysis of AUX as a weak subject pronoun. This reanalysis was triggered by the early loss of synthetic past tenses in Old Russian. The AUX's position to the right of pronominal clitics indicates that the AUX remains in its initial merge position either as an auxiliary verb or as a subject pronoun. The co‐occurrence of AUXin situ and a null subject in Old Russian implies that rich verbal agreement and null subjects are unrelated with verb raising to I0.</description><issn>0039-3193</issn><issn>1467-9582</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9j8FKxDAQhoMoWFcvPkFugpA1k6RpepRFV6GwoN1zSNNEI3FXmhbdm4_gM_okdq1n5zIMfPPzfwidA53DOFepH-IcGHB5gDIQsiBlrtghyijlJeFQ8mN0ktILHW-pZIZk_exw474_v8zwEWIw3e4iYWt697Ttgok49aYfEg4bvIotfhhSCmYDp-jIm5jc2d-eofXtTb24I9Vqeb-4rogFUUhiKQdRKu6MEK5hpTGNKig0nLeNcZ5yz1ShcsoUa5lXIDizHiT1VuUgFPAZupxybbdNqXNev3XhdSypgeq9sd4b61_jEYYJfg_R7f4h9WO9rqafH79qWLo</recordid><startdate>202012</startdate><enddate>202012</enddate><creator>Jung, Hakyung</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202012</creationdate><title>The be‐auxiliary's categorial status in Old Russian1</title><author>Jung, Hakyung</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1476-c0314983ea44eb29aab8701b33dbaef03f287850282d2f81432cf160fc8514813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jung, Hakyung</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Studia linguistica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jung, Hakyung</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The be‐auxiliary's categorial status in Old Russian1</atitle><jtitle>Studia linguistica</jtitle><date>2020-12</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>613</spage><epage>644</epage><pages>613-644</pages><issn>0039-3193</issn><eissn>1467-9582</eissn><abstract>This article proposes that the present tense forms of the be‐auxiliary byti (AUX) in Old Russian should be identified as weak pronouns, based on their prosodic, morphological, and syntactic properties. The loss of AUX in Old Russian, which distinguishes East Slavic from West and South Slavic languages, is ascribed to the competition between AUX and strong subject pronouns as a consequence of the reanalysis of AUX as a weak subject pronoun. This reanalysis was triggered by the early loss of synthetic past tenses in Old Russian. The AUX's position to the right of pronominal clitics indicates that the AUX remains in its initial merge position either as an auxiliary verb or as a subject pronoun. The co‐occurrence of AUXin situ and a null subject in Old Russian implies that rich verbal agreement and null subjects are unrelated with verb raising to I0.</abstract><doi>10.1111/stul.12136</doi><tpages>32</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0039-3193 |
| ispartof | Studia linguistica, 2020-12, Vol.74 (3), p.613-644 |
| issn | 0039-3193 1467-9582 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1111_stul_12136 |
| source | EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text; Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
| title | The be‐auxiliary's categorial status in Old Russian1 |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T12%3A21%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20be%E2%80%90auxiliary's%20categorial%20status%20in%20Old%20Russian1&rft.jtitle=Studia%20linguistica&rft.au=Jung,%20Hakyung&rft.date=2020-12&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=613&rft.epage=644&rft.pages=613-644&rft.issn=0039-3193&rft.eissn=1467-9582&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/stul.12136&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3ESTUL12136%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1476-c0314983ea44eb29aab8701b33dbaef03f287850282d2f81432cf160fc8514813%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |