Dosimetric evaluation of a commercial 3D treatment planning system using the AAPM Task Group 23 test package

• Published in: Medical physics (Lancaster) 2005-03, Vol.32 (3), p.744-751
• Main Authors: Casanova Borca, Valeria, Pasquino, Massimo, Bresciani, Sara, Catuzzo, Paola, Ozzello, Franca, Tofani, Santi
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Algorithms; Calibration; cancer; computational accuracy; dosimetry; Dosimetry/exposure assessment; Guidelines as Topic; Lungs; Materials properties; Medical treatment planning; Multileaf collimators; Photons; quality assurance; Quality assurance in radiotherapy; Quality Assurance, Health Care - methods; Quality Assurance, Health Care - standards; radiation therapy; Radiometry - methods; Radiometry - standards; Radiotherapy Dosage - standards; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - standards; Reference Standards; Societies, Scientific; task group-23; treatment planning; tumours
• ISSN: 0094-2405; 2473-4209
• DOI: 10.1118/1.1863460

The accuracy of the dose calculation algorithm is one of the most critical steps in assessing the radiotherapy treatment to achieve the 5% accuracy in dose delivery, which represents the suggested limit to increase the complication-free local control of tumor. We have used the AAPM Task Group 23 (TG-23) test package for clinical photon external beam therapy to evaluate the accuracy of the new version of the PLATO TPS algorithm. The comparison between tabulated values and calculated ones has been performed for 266 and 297 dose values for the 4 and 18 MV photon beams, respectively. Dose deviations less than 2% were found in the 98.5%- and 90.6% analyzed dose points for the two considered energies, respectively. Larger deviations were obtained for both energies, in large dose gradients, such as the build-up region or near the field edges and blocks. As far as the radiological field width is concerned, 64 points were analyzed for both the energies: 53 points (83%) and 64 points (100%) were within ± 2 millimeters for the 4 and 18 MV photon beams, respectively. The results show the good accuracy of the algorithm either in simple geometry beam conditions or in complex ones, in homogeneous medium, and in the presence of inhomogeneities, for low and high energy beams. Our results fit well the data reported by several authors related to the calculation accuracy of different treatment planning systems (TPSs) (within a mean value of 0.7% and 1.2% for 4 and 18 MV respectively). The TG-23 test package can be considered a powerful instrument to evaluate dose calculation accuracy, and as such may play an important role in a quality assurance program related to the commissioning of a new TPS.