Loading…

TH‐A‐WAB‐11: A Novel Method to Determine Alpha/beta for Irradiated Normal Lung Tissue Using Computed Tomography Scans

Purpose: To propose a novel method to determine α/β from post radiation CT scans for different fractionations that does not rely on binary endpoint analysis. Methods: Pre‐and post‐RT (12mo) CT images from patients with lung cancer treated at 3 institutions, using conventional RT (Duke/North Carolina...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Medical Physics 2013-06, Vol.40 (6), p.522-522
Main Authors: Diot, Q, Bentzen, S, Palma, D, Marks, L, Senan, S, Kavanagh, B, Miften, M, Lawrence, M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 522
container_issue 6
container_start_page 522
container_title Medical Physics
container_volume 40
creator Diot, Q
Bentzen, S
Palma, D
Marks, L
Senan, S
Kavanagh, B
Miften, M
Lawrence, M
description Purpose: To propose a novel method to determine α/β from post radiation CT scans for different fractionations that does not rely on binary endpoint analysis. Methods: Pre‐and post‐RT (12mo) CT images from patients with lung cancer treated at 3 institutions, using conventional RT (Duke/North Carolina, VU Medical center Netherlands) and hypofractionated RT (VU and University of Colorado) were compared. Changes in normal lung tissue density were assessed and related to the regional RT dose (considered as a continuous variable) to generate a dose‐density response curves (DRC). Principal Component Analysis was used to characterize the deviation of each of the 449 DRCs to the mean DRC. In the low dose region ( 6 mo was 3.9 at (173 Conv‐fx / 131 Hypo‐fx). Restricted to the two VU fractionation sets, α/β was 2.3 (12 Conv‐fx/ 50 Hypo‐fx) at < 6mo. Adding the CU data to the VU data, α/β ratio became 2.8 (12 Conv‐fx/102 Hypo‐fx) indicating relative Result stability with regard to sample size. To be consistent with other institutions, the Duke/North Carolina data needed to be corrected by the density value in non‐irradiated regions. Conclusion: The estimated α/β value of 3.7 based on CT density changes is endpoint independent and compatible with published values for clinical endpoints. Despite inter‐institution processing variations, values from different subsets were consistent suggesting tolerance to noise.
doi_str_mv 10.1118/1.4815705
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1118_1_4815705</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>MP5705</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1775-51639fa8b823110ae1df2f6a9f8b45892a62742fb135f4d1685b4f4a7478dbf33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90EtOwzAQBmALgUQpLLiBtyCl9Th2HuxCebRSC0ikYhk5iU2NkjiyU1DFhiNwRk5CqnYLi5nRSN_8i0HoHMgIAKIxjFgEPCT8AA0oC32PURIfogEhMfMoI_wYnTj3RggJfE4G6DOd_nx9J329JNd9B7jCCX4w77LCC9mtTIk7g29kJ22tG4mTql2JcS47gZWxeGatKLXoZNnf2FpUeL5uXnGqnVtLvHS6XyambtdbkZravFrRrjb4uRCNO0VHSlROnu3nEC3vbtPJ1Js_3s8mydwrIAy5xyHwYyWiPKI-ABESSkVVIGIV5YxHMRUBDRlVOfhcsRKCiOdMMRGyMCpz5ftDdLHLLaxxzkqVtVbXwm4yINn2axlk-6_11tvZD13Jzd8wWzzt_eXOu0J3otOm-Sf8F2K1e6I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>TH‐A‐WAB‐11: A Novel Method to Determine Alpha/beta for Irradiated Normal Lung Tissue Using Computed Tomography Scans</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Diot, Q ; Bentzen, S ; Palma, D ; Marks, L ; Senan, S ; Kavanagh, B ; Miften, M ; Lawrence, M</creator><creatorcontrib>Diot, Q ; Bentzen, S ; Palma, D ; Marks, L ; Senan, S ; Kavanagh, B ; Miften, M ; Lawrence, M</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: To propose a novel method to determine α/β from post radiation CT scans for different fractionations that does not rely on binary endpoint analysis. Methods: Pre‐and post‐RT (&lt;6mo, 6‐12mo and &gt;12mo) CT images from patients with lung cancer treated at 3 institutions, using conventional RT (Duke/North Carolina, VU Medical center Netherlands) and hypofractionated RT (VU and University of Colorado) were compared. Changes in normal lung tissue density were assessed and related to the regional RT dose (considered as a continuous variable) to generate a dose‐density response curves (DRC). Principal Component Analysis was used to characterize the deviation of each of the 449 DRCs to the mean DRC. In the low dose region (&lt;50Gy in 2Gy), we hypothesized that the distributions for conventional (Conv‐fx) and hypofractionated (Hypo‐fx) DRCs corrected for biologically equivalent dose were similar. Since α/β adjusts the equivalent dose its optimal value maximized the similarity between the Conv‐fx‐based and Hypo‐fx‐based DRC distributions. Results: The 3 institution time‐aggregated data set returned an α/β of 3.7 (233 Conv‐fx DRCs / 216 Hypo‐fx). The data at &lt; 6 mo was α/β of 2.7 (60 Conv‐fx/ 85 Hypo‐fx), and at &gt; 6 mo was 3.9 at (173 Conv‐fx / 131 Hypo‐fx). Restricted to the two VU fractionation sets, α/β was 2.3 (12 Conv‐fx/ 50 Hypo‐fx) at &lt; 6mo. Adding the CU data to the VU data, α/β ratio became 2.8 (12 Conv‐fx/102 Hypo‐fx) indicating relative Result stability with regard to sample size. To be consistent with other institutions, the Duke/North Carolina data needed to be corrected by the density value in non‐irradiated regions. Conclusion: The estimated α/β value of 3.7 based on CT density changes is endpoint independent and compatible with published values for clinical endpoints. Despite inter‐institution processing variations, values from different subsets were consistent suggesting tolerance to noise.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1118/1.4815705</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MPHYA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</publisher><subject>Cancer ; Computed tomography ; Copper ; Lungs ; Medical imaging ; Radiation treatment ; Tissues</subject><ispartof>Medical Physics, 2013-06, Vol.40 (6), p.522-522</ispartof><rights>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><rights>2013 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Diot, Q</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bentzen, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palma, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marks, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senan, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kavanagh, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miften, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawrence, M</creatorcontrib><title>TH‐A‐WAB‐11: A Novel Method to Determine Alpha/beta for Irradiated Normal Lung Tissue Using Computed Tomography Scans</title><title>Medical Physics</title><description>Purpose: To propose a novel method to determine α/β from post radiation CT scans for different fractionations that does not rely on binary endpoint analysis. Methods: Pre‐and post‐RT (&lt;6mo, 6‐12mo and &gt;12mo) CT images from patients with lung cancer treated at 3 institutions, using conventional RT (Duke/North Carolina, VU Medical center Netherlands) and hypofractionated RT (VU and University of Colorado) were compared. Changes in normal lung tissue density were assessed and related to the regional RT dose (considered as a continuous variable) to generate a dose‐density response curves (DRC). Principal Component Analysis was used to characterize the deviation of each of the 449 DRCs to the mean DRC. In the low dose region (&lt;50Gy in 2Gy), we hypothesized that the distributions for conventional (Conv‐fx) and hypofractionated (Hypo‐fx) DRCs corrected for biologically equivalent dose were similar. Since α/β adjusts the equivalent dose its optimal value maximized the similarity between the Conv‐fx‐based and Hypo‐fx‐based DRC distributions. Results: The 3 institution time‐aggregated data set returned an α/β of 3.7 (233 Conv‐fx DRCs / 216 Hypo‐fx). The data at &lt; 6 mo was α/β of 2.7 (60 Conv‐fx/ 85 Hypo‐fx), and at &gt; 6 mo was 3.9 at (173 Conv‐fx / 131 Hypo‐fx). Restricted to the two VU fractionation sets, α/β was 2.3 (12 Conv‐fx/ 50 Hypo‐fx) at &lt; 6mo. Adding the CU data to the VU data, α/β ratio became 2.8 (12 Conv‐fx/102 Hypo‐fx) indicating relative Result stability with regard to sample size. To be consistent with other institutions, the Duke/North Carolina data needed to be corrected by the density value in non‐irradiated regions. Conclusion: The estimated α/β value of 3.7 based on CT density changes is endpoint independent and compatible with published values for clinical endpoints. Despite inter‐institution processing variations, values from different subsets were consistent suggesting tolerance to noise.</description><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Copper</subject><subject>Lungs</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Radiation treatment</subject><subject>Tissues</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90EtOwzAQBmALgUQpLLiBtyCl9Th2HuxCebRSC0ikYhk5iU2NkjiyU1DFhiNwRk5CqnYLi5nRSN_8i0HoHMgIAKIxjFgEPCT8AA0oC32PURIfogEhMfMoI_wYnTj3RggJfE4G6DOd_nx9J329JNd9B7jCCX4w77LCC9mtTIk7g29kJ22tG4mTql2JcS47gZWxeGatKLXoZNnf2FpUeL5uXnGqnVtLvHS6XyambtdbkZravFrRrjb4uRCNO0VHSlROnu3nEC3vbtPJ1Js_3s8mydwrIAy5xyHwYyWiPKI-ABESSkVVIGIV5YxHMRUBDRlVOfhcsRKCiOdMMRGyMCpz5ftDdLHLLaxxzkqVtVbXwm4yINn2axlk-6_11tvZD13Jzd8wWzzt_eXOu0J3otOm-Sf8F2K1e6I</recordid><startdate>201306</startdate><enddate>201306</enddate><creator>Diot, Q</creator><creator>Bentzen, S</creator><creator>Palma, D</creator><creator>Marks, L</creator><creator>Senan, S</creator><creator>Kavanagh, B</creator><creator>Miften, M</creator><creator>Lawrence, M</creator><general>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201306</creationdate><title>TH‐A‐WAB‐11: A Novel Method to Determine Alpha/beta for Irradiated Normal Lung Tissue Using Computed Tomography Scans</title><author>Diot, Q ; Bentzen, S ; Palma, D ; Marks, L ; Senan, S ; Kavanagh, B ; Miften, M ; Lawrence, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1775-51639fa8b823110ae1df2f6a9f8b45892a62742fb135f4d1685b4f4a7478dbf33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Copper</topic><topic>Lungs</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Radiation treatment</topic><topic>Tissues</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Diot, Q</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bentzen, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palma, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marks, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senan, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kavanagh, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miften, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawrence, M</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Medical Physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Diot, Q</au><au>Bentzen, S</au><au>Palma, D</au><au>Marks, L</au><au>Senan, S</au><au>Kavanagh, B</au><au>Miften, M</au><au>Lawrence, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>TH‐A‐WAB‐11: A Novel Method to Determine Alpha/beta for Irradiated Normal Lung Tissue Using Computed Tomography Scans</atitle><jtitle>Medical Physics</jtitle><date>2013-06</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>522</spage><epage>522</epage><pages>522-522</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><eissn>2473-4209</eissn><coden>MPHYA6</coden><abstract>Purpose: To propose a novel method to determine α/β from post radiation CT scans for different fractionations that does not rely on binary endpoint analysis. Methods: Pre‐and post‐RT (&lt;6mo, 6‐12mo and &gt;12mo) CT images from patients with lung cancer treated at 3 institutions, using conventional RT (Duke/North Carolina, VU Medical center Netherlands) and hypofractionated RT (VU and University of Colorado) were compared. Changes in normal lung tissue density were assessed and related to the regional RT dose (considered as a continuous variable) to generate a dose‐density response curves (DRC). Principal Component Analysis was used to characterize the deviation of each of the 449 DRCs to the mean DRC. In the low dose region (&lt;50Gy in 2Gy), we hypothesized that the distributions for conventional (Conv‐fx) and hypofractionated (Hypo‐fx) DRCs corrected for biologically equivalent dose were similar. Since α/β adjusts the equivalent dose its optimal value maximized the similarity between the Conv‐fx‐based and Hypo‐fx‐based DRC distributions. Results: The 3 institution time‐aggregated data set returned an α/β of 3.7 (233 Conv‐fx DRCs / 216 Hypo‐fx). The data at &lt; 6 mo was α/β of 2.7 (60 Conv‐fx/ 85 Hypo‐fx), and at &gt; 6 mo was 3.9 at (173 Conv‐fx / 131 Hypo‐fx). Restricted to the two VU fractionation sets, α/β was 2.3 (12 Conv‐fx/ 50 Hypo‐fx) at &lt; 6mo. Adding the CU data to the VU data, α/β ratio became 2.8 (12 Conv‐fx/102 Hypo‐fx) indicating relative Result stability with regard to sample size. To be consistent with other institutions, the Duke/North Carolina data needed to be corrected by the density value in non‐irradiated regions. Conclusion: The estimated α/β value of 3.7 based on CT density changes is endpoint independent and compatible with published values for clinical endpoints. Despite inter‐institution processing variations, values from different subsets were consistent suggesting tolerance to noise.</abstract><pub>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</pub><doi>10.1118/1.4815705</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-2405
ispartof Medical Physics, 2013-06, Vol.40 (6), p.522-522
issn 0094-2405
2473-4209
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1118_1_4815705
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Cancer
Computed tomography
Copper
Lungs
Medical imaging
Radiation treatment
Tissues
title TH‐A‐WAB‐11: A Novel Method to Determine Alpha/beta for Irradiated Normal Lung Tissue Using Computed Tomography Scans
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T17%3A02%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=TH%E2%80%90A%E2%80%90WAB%E2%80%9011:%20A%20Novel%20Method%20to%20Determine%20Alpha/beta%20for%20Irradiated%20Normal%20Lung%20Tissue%20Using%20Computed%20Tomography%20Scans&rft.jtitle=Medical%20Physics&rft.au=Diot,%20Q&rft.date=2013-06&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=522&rft.epage=522&rft.pages=522-522&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft.coden=MPHYA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118/1.4815705&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3EMP5705%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1775-51639fa8b823110ae1df2f6a9f8b45892a62742fb135f4d1685b4f4a7478dbf33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true