Loading…

Ultrasound coherent plane-wave compound imaging: Image quality evaluation in phantoms and breast lesions

Coherent plane-wave compound imaging (CPWCI) can achieve high temporal resolution (e.g., to prevent breathing artefacts in volumetric scanning). It has to be verified that CPWCI using a limited number of steering angles (na) can achieve at least similar image quality as conventional focused imaging...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2021-10, Vol.150 (4), p.A88-A88
Main Authors: Hendriks, Gijs, Weijers, Gert, Chen, Chuan, Hertel, Madeleine, Lee, Chi-Yin, Dueppenbecker, Peter, Radicke, Marcus, Milkowski, Andy, Hansen, Hendrik, de Korte, Chris L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Coherent plane-wave compound imaging (CPWCI) can achieve high temporal resolution (e.g., to prevent breathing artefacts in volumetric scanning). It has to be verified that CPWCI using a limited number of steering angles (na) can achieve at least similar image quality as conventional focused imaging (CFI). The aim is to compare image quality between CPWCI and CFI in phantom and in breast lesions. In CPWCI, plane-wave channel data were recorded (na = 15, ±11 deg) by a Sequoia Ultrasound system (10L4, 14L5; Siemens Healthineers); beamformed (delay-and-sum (DAS), Lu’s-fk and Stolt’s-fk) for each steering angle, and coherently compounded. For comparison, images were recorded by CFI (10, 35 mm focus). Image quality metrics were obtained in images of a multipurpose phantom (CIRS Model057). We have just initiated a reader study (n = 200) to investigate how these phantom results translate to in vivo. Phantom results showed that contrast sensitivity (CS) and resolution (CR), lateral resolution (LR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR, depth 45 mm), LR and penetration were improved. In CPWCI, Lu’s f-k and DAS resulted in optimal CS (10L4) and LR, and CNR, respectively. In the ongoing reader study, image quality of breast lesions will be evaluated.
ISSN:0001-4966
1520-8524
DOI:10.1121/10.0007719