Loading…

Horizontal-plane localization of a target in the presence of a distractor: Effect of onset asynchrony

Listeners localized a target in isolation and in the presence of a distractor. The target consisted of 10 10-ms Gaussian pulses (energy between 3–5kHz); the distractor was either a 100- or 500-ms narrowband (1–2 kHz) noise burst. The listener, with head unrestrained, was seated in the center of 36 l...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2023-03, Vol.153 (3_supplement), p.A329-A329
Main Authors: Stellmack, Mark A., Sheft, Stanley, Chadaga, Mallika
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page A329
container_issue 3_supplement
container_start_page A329
container_title The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
container_volume 153
creator Stellmack, Mark A.
Sheft, Stanley
Chadaga, Mallika
description Listeners localized a target in isolation and in the presence of a distractor. The target consisted of 10 10-ms Gaussian pulses (energy between 3–5kHz); the distractor was either a 100- or 500-ms narrowband (1–2 kHz) noise burst. The listener, with head unrestrained, was seated in the center of 36 loudspeakers spaced every 10 degrees on the horizontal plane and obscured by screens. On each trial, the target was played through a randomly selected loudspeaker. Listeners used a laser pointer to indicate target location. Pointer position was detected by infrared cameras and the response angle calculated. In separate conditions, distractor position was either fixed or randomized across trials, with target-to-distractor onset synchrony an additional parameter. The left-right component of responses was essentially unaffected by the presence of the distractor in any condition. With notable inter-subject variability, the front-back response component also showed little effect of the distractor. This absence of consistent effect of the distractor contrasts with previously reported work. The target and distractor in the present research, however, were generally more discriminable than in past studies, which likely mitigated at least some of the deleterious effect of the distractor on target localization ability.
doi_str_mv 10.1121/10.0019031
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1121_10_0019031</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1121_10_0019031</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-crossref_primary_10_1121_10_00190313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVj01uwjAQha0KJAJ0wwm8rhSwE4JItxUVB2AfjcwYjFxPNONNOH0TlQt09en9LZ5SG2u21lZ2N9IY25ravqnCNpUpj021n6nCjHa5bw-HhVqKPEbZHOu2UHgmDk9KGWLZR0ioIzmI4Qk5UNLkNegMfMOsQ9L5jrpnFEwO_7JrkMzgMvGnPnmPLk8-JRkHIENyd6Y0rNXcQxR8f3GlPr5Pl69z6ZhEGH3Xc_gBHjpruunIxNeR-l_lXw9JTpI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Horizontal-plane localization of a target in the presence of a distractor: Effect of onset asynchrony</title><source>American Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:Transitional Journals Agreement 2021-23 (Reading list)</source><creator>Stellmack, Mark A. ; Sheft, Stanley ; Chadaga, Mallika</creator><creatorcontrib>Stellmack, Mark A. ; Sheft, Stanley ; Chadaga, Mallika</creatorcontrib><description>Listeners localized a target in isolation and in the presence of a distractor. The target consisted of 10 10-ms Gaussian pulses (energy between 3–5kHz); the distractor was either a 100- or 500-ms narrowband (1–2 kHz) noise burst. The listener, with head unrestrained, was seated in the center of 36 loudspeakers spaced every 10 degrees on the horizontal plane and obscured by screens. On each trial, the target was played through a randomly selected loudspeaker. Listeners used a laser pointer to indicate target location. Pointer position was detected by infrared cameras and the response angle calculated. In separate conditions, distractor position was either fixed or randomized across trials, with target-to-distractor onset synchrony an additional parameter. The left-right component of responses was essentially unaffected by the presence of the distractor in any condition. With notable inter-subject variability, the front-back response component also showed little effect of the distractor. This absence of consistent effect of the distractor contrasts with previously reported work. The target and distractor in the present research, however, were generally more discriminable than in past studies, which likely mitigated at least some of the deleterious effect of the distractor on target localization ability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-4966</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-8524</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1121/10.0019031</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2023-03, Vol.153 (3_supplement), p.A329-A329</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stellmack, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheft, Stanley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chadaga, Mallika</creatorcontrib><title>Horizontal-plane localization of a target in the presence of a distractor: Effect of onset asynchrony</title><title>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</title><description>Listeners localized a target in isolation and in the presence of a distractor. The target consisted of 10 10-ms Gaussian pulses (energy between 3–5kHz); the distractor was either a 100- or 500-ms narrowband (1–2 kHz) noise burst. The listener, with head unrestrained, was seated in the center of 36 loudspeakers spaced every 10 degrees on the horizontal plane and obscured by screens. On each trial, the target was played through a randomly selected loudspeaker. Listeners used a laser pointer to indicate target location. Pointer position was detected by infrared cameras and the response angle calculated. In separate conditions, distractor position was either fixed or randomized across trials, with target-to-distractor onset synchrony an additional parameter. The left-right component of responses was essentially unaffected by the presence of the distractor in any condition. With notable inter-subject variability, the front-back response component also showed little effect of the distractor. This absence of consistent effect of the distractor contrasts with previously reported work. The target and distractor in the present research, however, were generally more discriminable than in past studies, which likely mitigated at least some of the deleterious effect of the distractor on target localization ability.</description><issn>0001-4966</issn><issn>1520-8524</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVj01uwjAQha0KJAJ0wwm8rhSwE4JItxUVB2AfjcwYjFxPNONNOH0TlQt09en9LZ5SG2u21lZ2N9IY25ravqnCNpUpj021n6nCjHa5bw-HhVqKPEbZHOu2UHgmDk9KGWLZR0ioIzmI4Qk5UNLkNegMfMOsQ9L5jrpnFEwO_7JrkMzgMvGnPnmPLk8-JRkHIENyd6Y0rNXcQxR8f3GlPr5Pl69z6ZhEGH3Xc_gBHjpruunIxNeR-l_lXw9JTpI</recordid><startdate>20230301</startdate><enddate>20230301</enddate><creator>Stellmack, Mark A.</creator><creator>Sheft, Stanley</creator><creator>Chadaga, Mallika</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230301</creationdate><title>Horizontal-plane localization of a target in the presence of a distractor: Effect of onset asynchrony</title><author>Stellmack, Mark A. ; Sheft, Stanley ; Chadaga, Mallika</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-crossref_primary_10_1121_10_00190313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stellmack, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheft, Stanley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chadaga, Mallika</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stellmack, Mark A.</au><au>Sheft, Stanley</au><au>Chadaga, Mallika</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Horizontal-plane localization of a target in the presence of a distractor: Effect of onset asynchrony</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle><date>2023-03-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>153</volume><issue>3_supplement</issue><spage>A329</spage><epage>A329</epage><pages>A329-A329</pages><issn>0001-4966</issn><eissn>1520-8524</eissn><abstract>Listeners localized a target in isolation and in the presence of a distractor. The target consisted of 10 10-ms Gaussian pulses (energy between 3–5kHz); the distractor was either a 100- or 500-ms narrowband (1–2 kHz) noise burst. The listener, with head unrestrained, was seated in the center of 36 loudspeakers spaced every 10 degrees on the horizontal plane and obscured by screens. On each trial, the target was played through a randomly selected loudspeaker. Listeners used a laser pointer to indicate target location. Pointer position was detected by infrared cameras and the response angle calculated. In separate conditions, distractor position was either fixed or randomized across trials, with target-to-distractor onset synchrony an additional parameter. The left-right component of responses was essentially unaffected by the presence of the distractor in any condition. With notable inter-subject variability, the front-back response component also showed little effect of the distractor. This absence of consistent effect of the distractor contrasts with previously reported work. The target and distractor in the present research, however, were generally more discriminable than in past studies, which likely mitigated at least some of the deleterious effect of the distractor on target localization ability.</abstract><doi>10.1121/10.0019031</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-4966
ispartof The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2023-03, Vol.153 (3_supplement), p.A329-A329
issn 0001-4966
1520-8524
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1121_10_0019031
source American Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:Transitional Journals Agreement 2021-23 (Reading list)
title Horizontal-plane localization of a target in the presence of a distractor: Effect of onset asynchrony
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T02%3A09%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Horizontal-plane%20localization%20of%20a%20target%20in%20the%20presence%20of%20a%20distractor:%20Effect%20of%20onset%20asynchrony&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20the%20Acoustical%20Society%20of%20America&rft.au=Stellmack,%20Mark%20A.&rft.date=2023-03-01&rft.volume=153&rft.issue=3_supplement&rft.spage=A329&rft.epage=A329&rft.pages=A329-A329&rft.issn=0001-4966&rft.eissn=1520-8524&rft_id=info:doi/10.1121/10.0019031&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1121_10_0019031%3C/crossref%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-crossref_primary_10_1121_10_00190313%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true