Validity of voice identification

Courts often need expert opinion as to whether two recordings were made by the same speaker or not. Typically one voice has been recorded by an unknown speaker on a telephone answering machine and the other somehow obtained from a suspect, When such an opinion has been given, the court is bound to a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2003-10, Vol.114 (4_Supplement), p.2403-2403
Main Author: Ladefoged, Peter
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c742-1914d37da9d98c30ea8e88d727ee07d4639449d894635df1896df4aa744fdf153
cites
container_end_page 2403
container_issue 4_Supplement
container_start_page 2403
container_title The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
container_volume 114
creator Ladefoged, Peter
description Courts often need expert opinion as to whether two recordings were made by the same speaker or not. Typically one voice has been recorded by an unknown speaker on a telephone answering machine and the other somehow obtained from a suspect, When such an opinion has been given, the court is bound to ask how reliable it is. There is no answer to this question. There are too many unknown factors. Were the recording conditions similar? Were both the speakers talking in the same style? Was one speaker trying for a disguise? Was there any background noise? How long was the recording? Does the suspect have family or friends with very similar voices? It would be almost impossible to set up a valid experiment that can take all the variables into account. Given two 15 minute recordings of similar material made under studio conditions an expert could state beyond a reasonable doubt whether they were made by the same speaker or not. Given a 5 second bomb threat on a noisy phone line there is no way that this could be done.
doi_str_mv 10.1121/1.4778312
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1121_1_4778312</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1121_1_4778312</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c742-1914d37da9d98c30ea8e88d727ee07d4639449d894635df1896df4aa744fdf153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj8FKAzEURYMoOFYX_sFsXaTmJS-Tl6UUtULBTXEbQl4CkdqRySD07x2xq3vP5sAR4h7UGkDDI6zROTKgL0QHVitJVuOl6JRSINEPw7W4ae1zQUvGd6L_iIfKdT71Y-l_xppyXzkf51pqinMdj7fiqsRDy3fnXYn9y_N-s5W799e3zdNOJodaggdk4zh69pSMypEyETvtclaOcTAe0TP55VkuQH7ggjE6xLKgNSvx8K9N09jalEv4nupXnE4BVPgrCxDOZeYXONw-cw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validity of voice identification</title><source>American Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:Transitional Journals Agreement 2021-23 (Reading list)</source><creator>Ladefoged, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>Ladefoged, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>Courts often need expert opinion as to whether two recordings were made by the same speaker or not. Typically one voice has been recorded by an unknown speaker on a telephone answering machine and the other somehow obtained from a suspect, When such an opinion has been given, the court is bound to ask how reliable it is. There is no answer to this question. There are too many unknown factors. Were the recording conditions similar? Were both the speakers talking in the same style? Was one speaker trying for a disguise? Was there any background noise? How long was the recording? Does the suspect have family or friends with very similar voices? It would be almost impossible to set up a valid experiment that can take all the variables into account. Given two 15 minute recordings of similar material made under studio conditions an expert could state beyond a reasonable doubt whether they were made by the same speaker or not. Given a 5 second bomb threat on a noisy phone line there is no way that this could be done.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-4966</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-8524</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1121/1.4778312</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2003-10, Vol.114 (4_Supplement), p.2403-2403</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c742-1914d37da9d98c30ea8e88d727ee07d4639449d894635df1896df4aa744fdf153</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ladefoged, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>Validity of voice identification</title><title>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</title><description>Courts often need expert opinion as to whether two recordings were made by the same speaker or not. Typically one voice has been recorded by an unknown speaker on a telephone answering machine and the other somehow obtained from a suspect, When such an opinion has been given, the court is bound to ask how reliable it is. There is no answer to this question. There are too many unknown factors. Were the recording conditions similar? Were both the speakers talking in the same style? Was one speaker trying for a disguise? Was there any background noise? How long was the recording? Does the suspect have family or friends with very similar voices? It would be almost impossible to set up a valid experiment that can take all the variables into account. Given two 15 minute recordings of similar material made under studio conditions an expert could state beyond a reasonable doubt whether they were made by the same speaker or not. Given a 5 second bomb threat on a noisy phone line there is no way that this could be done.</description><issn>0001-4966</issn><issn>1520-8524</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotj8FKAzEURYMoOFYX_sFsXaTmJS-Tl6UUtULBTXEbQl4CkdqRySD07x2xq3vP5sAR4h7UGkDDI6zROTKgL0QHVitJVuOl6JRSINEPw7W4ae1zQUvGd6L_iIfKdT71Y-l_xppyXzkf51pqinMdj7fiqsRDy3fnXYn9y_N-s5W799e3zdNOJodaggdk4zh69pSMypEyETvtclaOcTAe0TP55VkuQH7ggjE6xLKgNSvx8K9N09jalEv4nupXnE4BVPgrCxDOZeYXONw-cw</recordid><startdate>20031001</startdate><enddate>20031001</enddate><creator>Ladefoged, Peter</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20031001</creationdate><title>Validity of voice identification</title><author>Ladefoged, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c742-1914d37da9d98c30ea8e88d727ee07d4639449d894635df1896df4aa744fdf153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ladefoged, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ladefoged, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validity of voice identification</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle><date>2003-10-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>114</volume><issue>4_Supplement</issue><spage>2403</spage><epage>2403</epage><pages>2403-2403</pages><issn>0001-4966</issn><eissn>1520-8524</eissn><abstract>Courts often need expert opinion as to whether two recordings were made by the same speaker or not. Typically one voice has been recorded by an unknown speaker on a telephone answering machine and the other somehow obtained from a suspect, When such an opinion has been given, the court is bound to ask how reliable it is. There is no answer to this question. There are too many unknown factors. Were the recording conditions similar? Were both the speakers talking in the same style? Was one speaker trying for a disguise? Was there any background noise? How long was the recording? Does the suspect have family or friends with very similar voices? It would be almost impossible to set up a valid experiment that can take all the variables into account. Given two 15 minute recordings of similar material made under studio conditions an expert could state beyond a reasonable doubt whether they were made by the same speaker or not. Given a 5 second bomb threat on a noisy phone line there is no way that this could be done.</abstract><doi>10.1121/1.4778312</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-4966
ispartof The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2003-10, Vol.114 (4_Supplement), p.2403-2403
issn 0001-4966
1520-8524
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1121_1_4778312
source American Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:Transitional Journals Agreement 2021-23 (Reading list)
title Validity of voice identification
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T21%3A30%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validity%20of%20voice%20identification&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20the%20Acoustical%20Society%20of%20America&rft.au=Ladefoged,%20Peter&rft.date=2003-10-01&rft.volume=114&rft.issue=4_Supplement&rft.spage=2403&rft.epage=2403&rft.pages=2403-2403&rft.issn=0001-4966&rft.eissn=1520-8524&rft_id=info:doi/10.1121/1.4778312&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1121_1_4778312%3C/crossref%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c742-1914d37da9d98c30ea8e88d727ee07d4639449d894635df1896df4aa744fdf153%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true