Loading…

Testing the beam focusing hypothesis in a false killer whale using hydrophone arrays

The odontocete sound production system is complex and composed of tissues, air sacs, and a fatty melon. Previous studies suggested that the emitted sonar beam might be actively focused, narrowing depending on target distance. In this study, we further tested this beam focusing hypothesis in a false...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2014-10, Vol.136 (4_Supplement), p.2093-2093
Main Authors: Kloepper, Laura N., Nachtigall, Paul E., Smith, Adam B., Buck, John R., Gaudette, Jason E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 2093
container_issue 4_Supplement
container_start_page 2093
container_title The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
container_volume 136
creator Kloepper, Laura N.
Nachtigall, Paul E.
Smith, Adam B.
Buck, John R.
Gaudette, Jason E.
description The odontocete sound production system is complex and composed of tissues, air sacs, and a fatty melon. Previous studies suggested that the emitted sonar beam might be actively focused, narrowing depending on target distance. In this study, we further tested this beam focusing hypothesis in a false killer whale (Pseudorca crassidens) in a laboratory setting. Using three linear arrays, we recorded the same emitted click at 2, 4, and 7 m distance while the animal performed a target detection task with the target distance varying between 2, 4, and 7 m. For each click, we calculated the beamwidth, intensity, center frequency, and bandwidth as recorded on each array. As the distance from the whale to the array increased, the received click intensity was higher than predicted by spreading loss. Moreover, the beamwidth varied with range as predicted by the focusing model and contrary to a piston model or spherical spreading. These results support the hypothesis that the false killer whale adaptively focuses its sonar beam according to target range. [Work supported by ONR and NSF.]
doi_str_mv 10.1121/1.4899524
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1121_1_4899524</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1121_1_4899524</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-crossref_primary_10_1121_1_48995243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVjksOgjAURRujifgZuIM3dQD28QuMjcYFMG8qFqkCJX0Yw-4FgwtwdO89OYPL2A65h-jjAb0wSdPID2fMwcjnbjL0OXM45-iGaRwv2YroMcwoCVKHZZmiTjd36EoFVyVrKEz-opGUfWsGSppANyChkBUpeOqqUhbepawU_MSbNW1pGgXSWtnThi2-8nbKNdufT9nx4ubWEFlViNbqWtpeIBfjbYFiuh38434A8K9ITg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Testing the beam focusing hypothesis in a false killer whale using hydrophone arrays</title><source>American Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:Transitional Journals Agreement 2021-23 (Reading list)</source><creator>Kloepper, Laura N. ; Nachtigall, Paul E. ; Smith, Adam B. ; Buck, John R. ; Gaudette, Jason E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kloepper, Laura N. ; Nachtigall, Paul E. ; Smith, Adam B. ; Buck, John R. ; Gaudette, Jason E.</creatorcontrib><description>The odontocete sound production system is complex and composed of tissues, air sacs, and a fatty melon. Previous studies suggested that the emitted sonar beam might be actively focused, narrowing depending on target distance. In this study, we further tested this beam focusing hypothesis in a false killer whale (Pseudorca crassidens) in a laboratory setting. Using three linear arrays, we recorded the same emitted click at 2, 4, and 7 m distance while the animal performed a target detection task with the target distance varying between 2, 4, and 7 m. For each click, we calculated the beamwidth, intensity, center frequency, and bandwidth as recorded on each array. As the distance from the whale to the array increased, the received click intensity was higher than predicted by spreading loss. Moreover, the beamwidth varied with range as predicted by the focusing model and contrary to a piston model or spherical spreading. These results support the hypothesis that the false killer whale adaptively focuses its sonar beam according to target range. [Work supported by ONR and NSF.]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-4966</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-8524</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1121/1.4899524</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2014-10, Vol.136 (4_Supplement), p.2093-2093</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kloepper, Laura N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nachtigall, Paul E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Adam B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buck, John R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaudette, Jason E.</creatorcontrib><title>Testing the beam focusing hypothesis in a false killer whale using hydrophone arrays</title><title>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</title><description>The odontocete sound production system is complex and composed of tissues, air sacs, and a fatty melon. Previous studies suggested that the emitted sonar beam might be actively focused, narrowing depending on target distance. In this study, we further tested this beam focusing hypothesis in a false killer whale (Pseudorca crassidens) in a laboratory setting. Using three linear arrays, we recorded the same emitted click at 2, 4, and 7 m distance while the animal performed a target detection task with the target distance varying between 2, 4, and 7 m. For each click, we calculated the beamwidth, intensity, center frequency, and bandwidth as recorded on each array. As the distance from the whale to the array increased, the received click intensity was higher than predicted by spreading loss. Moreover, the beamwidth varied with range as predicted by the focusing model and contrary to a piston model or spherical spreading. These results support the hypothesis that the false killer whale adaptively focuses its sonar beam according to target range. [Work supported by ONR and NSF.]</description><issn>0001-4966</issn><issn>1520-8524</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVjksOgjAURRujifgZuIM3dQD28QuMjcYFMG8qFqkCJX0Yw-4FgwtwdO89OYPL2A65h-jjAb0wSdPID2fMwcjnbjL0OXM45-iGaRwv2YroMcwoCVKHZZmiTjd36EoFVyVrKEz-opGUfWsGSppANyChkBUpeOqqUhbepawU_MSbNW1pGgXSWtnThi2-8nbKNdufT9nx4ubWEFlViNbqWtpeIBfjbYFiuh38434A8K9ITg</recordid><startdate>20141001</startdate><enddate>20141001</enddate><creator>Kloepper, Laura N.</creator><creator>Nachtigall, Paul E.</creator><creator>Smith, Adam B.</creator><creator>Buck, John R.</creator><creator>Gaudette, Jason E.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141001</creationdate><title>Testing the beam focusing hypothesis in a false killer whale using hydrophone arrays</title><author>Kloepper, Laura N. ; Nachtigall, Paul E. ; Smith, Adam B. ; Buck, John R. ; Gaudette, Jason E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-crossref_primary_10_1121_1_48995243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kloepper, Laura N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nachtigall, Paul E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Adam B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buck, John R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaudette, Jason E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kloepper, Laura N.</au><au>Nachtigall, Paul E.</au><au>Smith, Adam B.</au><au>Buck, John R.</au><au>Gaudette, Jason E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Testing the beam focusing hypothesis in a false killer whale using hydrophone arrays</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle><date>2014-10-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>136</volume><issue>4_Supplement</issue><spage>2093</spage><epage>2093</epage><pages>2093-2093</pages><issn>0001-4966</issn><eissn>1520-8524</eissn><abstract>The odontocete sound production system is complex and composed of tissues, air sacs, and a fatty melon. Previous studies suggested that the emitted sonar beam might be actively focused, narrowing depending on target distance. In this study, we further tested this beam focusing hypothesis in a false killer whale (Pseudorca crassidens) in a laboratory setting. Using three linear arrays, we recorded the same emitted click at 2, 4, and 7 m distance while the animal performed a target detection task with the target distance varying between 2, 4, and 7 m. For each click, we calculated the beamwidth, intensity, center frequency, and bandwidth as recorded on each array. As the distance from the whale to the array increased, the received click intensity was higher than predicted by spreading loss. Moreover, the beamwidth varied with range as predicted by the focusing model and contrary to a piston model or spherical spreading. These results support the hypothesis that the false killer whale adaptively focuses its sonar beam according to target range. [Work supported by ONR and NSF.]</abstract><doi>10.1121/1.4899524</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-4966
ispartof The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2014-10, Vol.136 (4_Supplement), p.2093-2093
issn 0001-4966
1520-8524
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1121_1_4899524
source American Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:Transitional Journals Agreement 2021-23 (Reading list)
title Testing the beam focusing hypothesis in a false killer whale using hydrophone arrays
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T14%3A16%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Testing%20the%20beam%20focusing%20hypothesis%20in%20a%20false%20killer%20whale%20using%20hydrophone%20arrays&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20the%20Acoustical%20Society%20of%20America&rft.au=Kloepper,%20Laura%20N.&rft.date=2014-10-01&rft.volume=136&rft.issue=4_Supplement&rft.spage=2093&rft.epage=2093&rft.pages=2093-2093&rft.issn=0001-4966&rft.eissn=1520-8524&rft_id=info:doi/10.1121/1.4899524&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1121_1_4899524%3C/crossref%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-crossref_primary_10_1121_1_48995243%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true