Comparison of Intravenous Buprenorphine and Methadone Self-Administration by Recently Detoxified Heroin-Dependent Individuals

• Published in: The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics 2005-12, Vol.315 (3), p.1320-1330
• Main Authors: Comer, Sandra D, Sullivan, Maria A, Walker, Ellen A
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; African Continental Ancestry Group - genetics; Blood Pressure - drug effects; Buprenorphine - administration & dosage; Buprenorphine - pharmacology; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; European Continental Ancestry Group - genetics; Female; Heroin Dependence - psychology; Heroin Dependence - rehabilitation; Hispanic Americans - genetics; Humans; Injections, Intravenous; Male; Methadone - administration & dosage; Methadone - pharmacology; Narcotics - administration & dosage; Narcotics - pharmacology; Oximetry; Pupil - drug effects; Reinforcement (Psychology); Self Administration; Surveys and Questionnaires
• ISSN: 0022-3565; 1521-0103
• DOI: 10.1124/jpet.105.090423

Although buprenorphine is used worldwide as a safe and effective maintenance medication for opioid dependence, some countries have reported a growing incidence of abuse of this medication. Buprenorphine is considered to have lower abuse potential because of its partial agonist profile, but no studies have directly compared the reinforcing effects of buprenorphine with those of full μ opioid agonists in humans. The present double-blind, placebo-controlled inpatient study compared the reinforcing and subjective effects of intravenously administered buprenorphine (0.5, 2, and 8 mg) and methadone (5, 10, and 20 mg). Participants ( n = 6) were detoxified from heroin during the first 1 to 2 weeks after admission. During subsequent weeks, participants received a sample drug dose and $20 on Monday, and they could self-administer either the sampled dose or $20 during one choice session per day on Thursday and Friday. Participants responded under a modified progressive ratio schedule during each choice session. All active doses maintained higher progressive ratio break points (largest completed ratio) than placebo. There were no significant differences in break point values between buprenorphine and methadone or among the different doses of drug. However, several subjective ratings, including “good drug effect”, “high”, and “liking” dose-dependently increased after administration of buprenorphine and methadone. The peak ratings for these effects did not significantly differ for the two drugs. These results demonstrate that under these experimental conditions, buprenorphine and methadone were equally effective in producing reinforcing and subjective effects.