Loading…

Hunting for Animal Alternatives: Scientists in product testing and research are trying to reduce animal experiments, but face roadblocks ranging from regulatory sluggishness to the scientific value of a whole-animal response

Scientists in product testing and research are trying to reduce the number of animal experiments performed, such as the Draize rabbit eye irritation test, but they face roadblocks ranging from regulatory sluggishness to the scientific value of a whole-animal response. Still, in recent years the numb...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science) 1996-10, Vol.274 (5285), p.168-171
Main Author: Roush, Wade
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 171
container_issue 5285
container_start_page 168
container_title Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science)
container_volume 274
creator Roush, Wade
description Scientists in product testing and research are trying to reduce the number of animal experiments performed, such as the Draize rabbit eye irritation test, but they face roadblocks ranging from regulatory sluggishness to the scientific value of a whole-animal response. Still, in recent years the number of animals used in research has dropped substantially, with a 35% drop in the United States in the past decade, and even more dramatic reductions in Europe.
doi_str_mv 10.1126/science.274.5285.168
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1126_science_274_5285_168</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1126_science_274_5285_168</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-crossref_primary_10_1126_science_274_5285_1683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdzksKwjAUheGLKFgfOxDsBhpvkqaPYRGlC3AeSkklUlPJrYK7N4WuwNEZHH74AA4cGeciO1FrjWsNE3nKlCgU41mxgIhjqZJSoFxChCizpMBcrWFD9EAMXykjONZvN1p3j7vBx5Wzz6aPq3403jWj_RjawaprejL7ebeQXi-3c520fiDyptMvHyL_1Rz1hNEzRgeMnjA6YOSf2Q9oDz_-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hunting for Animal Alternatives: Scientists in product testing and research are trying to reduce animal experiments, but face roadblocks ranging from regulatory sluggishness to the scientific value of a whole-animal response</title><source>American Association for the Advancement of Science</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection【Remote access available】</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>Roush, Wade</creator><creatorcontrib>Roush, Wade</creatorcontrib><description>Scientists in product testing and research are trying to reduce the number of animal experiments performed, such as the Draize rabbit eye irritation test, but they face roadblocks ranging from regulatory sluggishness to the scientific value of a whole-animal response. Still, in recent years the number of animals used in research has dropped substantially, with a 35% drop in the United States in the past decade, and even more dramatic reductions in Europe.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0036-8075</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1126/science.274.5285.168</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science), 1996-10, Vol.274 (5285), p.168-171</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2884,2885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Roush, Wade</creatorcontrib><title>Hunting for Animal Alternatives: Scientists in product testing and research are trying to reduce animal experiments, but face roadblocks ranging from regulatory sluggishness to the scientific value of a whole-animal response</title><title>Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science)</title><description>Scientists in product testing and research are trying to reduce the number of animal experiments performed, such as the Draize rabbit eye irritation test, but they face roadblocks ranging from regulatory sluggishness to the scientific value of a whole-animal response. Still, in recent years the number of animals used in research has dropped substantially, with a 35% drop in the United States in the past decade, and even more dramatic reductions in Europe.</description><issn>0036-8075</issn><issn>1095-9203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqdzksKwjAUheGLKFgfOxDsBhpvkqaPYRGlC3AeSkklUlPJrYK7N4WuwNEZHH74AA4cGeciO1FrjWsNE3nKlCgU41mxgIhjqZJSoFxChCizpMBcrWFD9EAMXykjONZvN1p3j7vBx5Wzz6aPq3403jWj_RjawaprejL7ebeQXi-3c520fiDyptMvHyL_1Rz1hNEzRgeMnjA6YOSf2Q9oDz_-</recordid><startdate>19961011</startdate><enddate>19961011</enddate><creator>Roush, Wade</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19961011</creationdate><title>Hunting for Animal Alternatives</title><author>Roush, Wade</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-crossref_primary_10_1126_science_274_5285_1683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Roush, Wade</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Roush, Wade</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hunting for Animal Alternatives: Scientists in product testing and research are trying to reduce animal experiments, but face roadblocks ranging from regulatory sluggishness to the scientific value of a whole-animal response</atitle><jtitle>Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science)</jtitle><date>1996-10-11</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>274</volume><issue>5285</issue><spage>168</spage><epage>171</epage><pages>168-171</pages><issn>0036-8075</issn><eissn>1095-9203</eissn><abstract>Scientists in product testing and research are trying to reduce the number of animal experiments performed, such as the Draize rabbit eye irritation test, but they face roadblocks ranging from regulatory sluggishness to the scientific value of a whole-animal response. Still, in recent years the number of animals used in research has dropped substantially, with a 35% drop in the United States in the past decade, and even more dramatic reductions in Europe.</abstract><doi>10.1126/science.274.5285.168</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0036-8075
ispartof Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science), 1996-10, Vol.274 (5285), p.168-171
issn 0036-8075
1095-9203
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1126_science_274_5285_168
source American Association for the Advancement of Science; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection【Remote access available】; Social Science Premium Collection; Education Collection
title Hunting for Animal Alternatives: Scientists in product testing and research are trying to reduce animal experiments, but face roadblocks ranging from regulatory sluggishness to the scientific value of a whole-animal response
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T02%3A56%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hunting%20for%20Animal%20Alternatives:%20Scientists%20in%20product%20testing%20and%20research%20are%20trying%20to%20reduce%20animal%20experiments,%20but%20face%20roadblocks%20ranging%20from%20regulatory%20sluggishness%20to%20the%20scientific%20value%20of%20a%20whole-animal%20response&rft.jtitle=Science%20(American%20Association%20for%20the%20Advancement%20of%20Science)&rft.au=Roush,%20Wade&rft.date=1996-10-11&rft.volume=274&rft.issue=5285&rft.spage=168&rft.epage=171&rft.pages=168-171&rft.issn=0036-8075&rft.eissn=1095-9203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1126/science.274.5285.168&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1126_science_274_5285_168%3C/crossref%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-crossref_primary_10_1126_science_274_5285_1683%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true