Loading…
Hunting for Animal Alternatives: Scientists in product testing and research are trying to reduce animal experiments, but face roadblocks ranging from regulatory sluggishness to the scientific value of a whole-animal response
Scientists in product testing and research are trying to reduce the number of animal experiments performed, such as the Draize rabbit eye irritation test, but they face roadblocks ranging from regulatory sluggishness to the scientific value of a whole-animal response. Still, in recent years the numb...
Saved in:
Published in: | Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science) 1996-10, Vol.274 (5285), p.168-171 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 171 |
container_issue | 5285 |
container_start_page | 168 |
container_title | Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science) |
container_volume | 274 |
creator | Roush, Wade |
description | Scientists in product testing and research are trying to reduce the number of animal experiments performed, such as the Draize rabbit eye irritation test, but they face roadblocks ranging from regulatory sluggishness to the scientific value of a whole-animal response. Still, in recent years the number of animals used in research has dropped substantially, with a 35% drop in the United States in the past decade, and even more dramatic reductions in Europe. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1126/science.274.5285.168 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1126_science_274_5285_168</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1126_science_274_5285_168</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-crossref_primary_10_1126_science_274_5285_1683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdzksKwjAUheGLKFgfOxDsBhpvkqaPYRGlC3AeSkklUlPJrYK7N4WuwNEZHH74AA4cGeciO1FrjWsNE3nKlCgU41mxgIhjqZJSoFxChCizpMBcrWFD9EAMXykjONZvN1p3j7vBx5Wzz6aPq3403jWj_RjawaprejL7ebeQXi-3c520fiDyptMvHyL_1Rz1hNEzRgeMnjA6YOSf2Q9oDz_-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hunting for Animal Alternatives: Scientists in product testing and research are trying to reduce animal experiments, but face roadblocks ranging from regulatory sluggishness to the scientific value of a whole-animal response</title><source>American Association for the Advancement of Science</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection【Remote access available】</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>Roush, Wade</creator><creatorcontrib>Roush, Wade</creatorcontrib><description>Scientists in product testing and research are trying to reduce the number of animal experiments performed, such as the Draize rabbit eye irritation test, but they face roadblocks ranging from regulatory sluggishness to the scientific value of a whole-animal response. Still, in recent years the number of animals used in research has dropped substantially, with a 35% drop in the United States in the past decade, and even more dramatic reductions in Europe.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0036-8075</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1126/science.274.5285.168</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science), 1996-10, Vol.274 (5285), p.168-171</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2884,2885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Roush, Wade</creatorcontrib><title>Hunting for Animal Alternatives: Scientists in product testing and research are trying to reduce animal experiments, but face roadblocks ranging from regulatory sluggishness to the scientific value of a whole-animal response</title><title>Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science)</title><description>Scientists in product testing and research are trying to reduce the number of animal experiments performed, such as the Draize rabbit eye irritation test, but they face roadblocks ranging from regulatory sluggishness to the scientific value of a whole-animal response. Still, in recent years the number of animals used in research has dropped substantially, with a 35% drop in the United States in the past decade, and even more dramatic reductions in Europe.</description><issn>0036-8075</issn><issn>1095-9203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqdzksKwjAUheGLKFgfOxDsBhpvkqaPYRGlC3AeSkklUlPJrYK7N4WuwNEZHH74AA4cGeciO1FrjWsNE3nKlCgU41mxgIhjqZJSoFxChCizpMBcrWFD9EAMXykjONZvN1p3j7vBx5Wzz6aPq3403jWj_RjawaprejL7ebeQXi-3c520fiDyptMvHyL_1Rz1hNEzRgeMnjA6YOSf2Q9oDz_-</recordid><startdate>19961011</startdate><enddate>19961011</enddate><creator>Roush, Wade</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19961011</creationdate><title>Hunting for Animal Alternatives</title><author>Roush, Wade</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-crossref_primary_10_1126_science_274_5285_1683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Roush, Wade</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Roush, Wade</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hunting for Animal Alternatives: Scientists in product testing and research are trying to reduce animal experiments, but face roadblocks ranging from regulatory sluggishness to the scientific value of a whole-animal response</atitle><jtitle>Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science)</jtitle><date>1996-10-11</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>274</volume><issue>5285</issue><spage>168</spage><epage>171</epage><pages>168-171</pages><issn>0036-8075</issn><eissn>1095-9203</eissn><abstract>Scientists in product testing and research are trying to reduce the number of animal experiments performed, such as the Draize rabbit eye irritation test, but they face roadblocks ranging from regulatory sluggishness to the scientific value of a whole-animal response. Still, in recent years the number of animals used in research has dropped substantially, with a 35% drop in the United States in the past decade, and even more dramatic reductions in Europe.</abstract><doi>10.1126/science.274.5285.168</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0036-8075 |
ispartof | Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science), 1996-10, Vol.274 (5285), p.168-171 |
issn | 0036-8075 1095-9203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1126_science_274_5285_168 |
source | American Association for the Advancement of Science; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection【Remote access available】; Social Science Premium Collection; Education Collection |
title | Hunting for Animal Alternatives: Scientists in product testing and research are trying to reduce animal experiments, but face roadblocks ranging from regulatory sluggishness to the scientific value of a whole-animal response |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T02%3A56%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hunting%20for%20Animal%20Alternatives:%20Scientists%20in%20product%20testing%20and%20research%20are%20trying%20to%20reduce%20animal%20experiments,%20but%20face%20roadblocks%20ranging%20from%20regulatory%20sluggishness%20to%20the%20scientific%20value%20of%20a%20whole-animal%20response&rft.jtitle=Science%20(American%20Association%20for%20the%20Advancement%20of%20Science)&rft.au=Roush,%20Wade&rft.date=1996-10-11&rft.volume=274&rft.issue=5285&rft.spage=168&rft.epage=171&rft.pages=168-171&rft.issn=0036-8075&rft.eissn=1095-9203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1126/science.274.5285.168&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1126_science_274_5285_168%3C/crossref%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-crossref_primary_10_1126_science_274_5285_1683%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |