Loading…
What Makes Inventions Become Traditions?
Although anthropology was the first academic discipline to investigate cultural change, many other disciplines have made noteworthy contributions to understanding what influences the adoption of new behaviors. Drawing on a broad, interdisciplinary literature covering both humans and nonhumans, we ex...
Saved in:
Published in: | Annual review of anthropology 2022-01, Vol.51 (1), p.419-436 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Request full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a441t-7aa794395d33e4560654add9a13eda0e473d1b4e15d6b774d85610706b403c803 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a441t-7aa794395d33e4560654add9a13eda0e473d1b4e15d6b774d85610706b403c803 |
container_end_page | 436 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 419 |
container_title | Annual review of anthropology |
container_volume | 51 |
creator | Perry, Susan E Carter, Alecia Foster, Jacob G Nöbel, Sabine Smolla, Marco |
description | Although anthropology was the first academic discipline to investigate cultural change, many other disciplines have made noteworthy contributions to understanding what influences the adoption of new behaviors. Drawing on a broad, interdisciplinary literature covering both humans and nonhumans, we examine (
a
) which features of behavioral traits make them more transmissible, (
b
) which individual characteristics of inventors promote copying of their inventions, (
c
) which characteristics of individuals make them more prone to adopting new behaviors, (
d
) which characteristics of dyadic relationships promote cultural transmission, (
e
) which properties of groups (e.g., network structures) promote transmission of traits, and (
f
) which characteristics of groups promote retention, rather than extinction, of cultural traits. One of anthropology's strengths is its readiness to adopt and improve theories and methods from other disciplines, integrating them into a more holistic approach; hence, we identify approaches that might be particularly useful to biological and cultural anthropologists, and knowledge gaps that should be filled. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1146/annurev-anthro-012121-012127 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_ZYWBE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1146_annurev_anthro_012121_012127</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2737162518</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a441t-7aa794395d33e4560654add9a13eda0e473d1b4e15d6b774d85610706b403c803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkE9Lw0AQxRdRsFa_Q0APeojOZP8lIEhb1BYqXioel2l3S1PbpO6mFb-9qVu8yxwePH7vMTzGrhBuEYW6o6raerdLqWoWvk4Bs_ai6CPWQSlkKrICjlkHIBepkhpO2VkISwDgiqsOu35fUJO80IcLyajauaop6yokfTer1y6ZeLLlr_Nwzk7mtAru4qBd9vb0OBkM0_Hr82jQG6ckBDapJtKF4IW0nDshFSgpyNqCkDtL4ITmFqfCobRqqrWwuVQIGtRUAJ_lwLvsJvYuaGU2vlyT_zY1lWbYG5u9BwIKQK122LKXkd34-nPrQmOW9dZX7Xsm01yjyiTmLXUfqZmvQ_Bu_leLYPY7msOOJu5o4o5RdBvvxfieolXLle4r_K_jB7VQfiM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2737162518</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What Makes Inventions Become Traditions?</title><source>Annual Reviews Open Access</source><creator>Perry, Susan E ; Carter, Alecia ; Foster, Jacob G ; Nöbel, Sabine ; Smolla, Marco</creator><creatorcontrib>Perry, Susan E ; Carter, Alecia ; Foster, Jacob G ; Nöbel, Sabine ; Smolla, Marco</creatorcontrib><description>Although anthropology was the first academic discipline to investigate cultural change, many other disciplines have made noteworthy contributions to understanding what influences the adoption of new behaviors. Drawing on a broad, interdisciplinary literature covering both humans and nonhumans, we examine (
a
) which features of behavioral traits make them more transmissible, (
b
) which individual characteristics of inventors promote copying of their inventions, (
c
) which characteristics of individuals make them more prone to adopting new behaviors, (
d
) which characteristics of dyadic relationships promote cultural transmission, (
e
) which properties of groups (e.g., network structures) promote transmission of traits, and (
f
) which characteristics of groups promote retention, rather than extinction, of cultural traits. One of anthropology's strengths is its readiness to adopt and improve theories and methods from other disciplines, integrating them into a more holistic approach; hence, we identify approaches that might be particularly useful to biological and cultural anthropologists, and knowledge gaps that should be filled.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0084-6570</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-4290</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0084-6570</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1146/annurev-anthro-012121-012127</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Palo Alto: Annual Reviews</publisher><subject>Academic disciplines ; Anthropologists ; Anthropology ; Behavior ; Cultural change ; cultural diffusion ; Cultural groups ; Cultural transmission ; Dyadic relationships ; Extinction ; Holistic approach ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; innovation ; Interdisciplinary aspects ; Inventions ; Social Anthropology and ethnology ; social learning</subject><ispartof>Annual review of anthropology, 2022-01, Vol.51 (1), p.419-436</ispartof><rights>Copyright Annual Reviews, Inc. 2022</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a441t-7aa794395d33e4560654add9a13eda0e473d1b4e15d6b774d85610706b403c803</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a441t-7aa794395d33e4560654add9a13eda0e473d1b4e15d6b774d85610706b403c803</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-012121-012127?crawler=true&mimetype=application/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gannualreviews$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-012121-012127$$EHTML$$P50$$Gannualreviews$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27892,27924,27925,33223,33774,78360,78465</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-012121-012127$$EView_record_in_Annual_Reviews$$FView_record_in_$$GAnnual_Reviews</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-04090176$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Perry, Susan E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carter, Alecia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foster, Jacob G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nöbel, Sabine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smolla, Marco</creatorcontrib><title>What Makes Inventions Become Traditions?</title><title>Annual review of anthropology</title><description>Although anthropology was the first academic discipline to investigate cultural change, many other disciplines have made noteworthy contributions to understanding what influences the adoption of new behaviors. Drawing on a broad, interdisciplinary literature covering both humans and nonhumans, we examine (
a
) which features of behavioral traits make them more transmissible, (
b
) which individual characteristics of inventors promote copying of their inventions, (
c
) which characteristics of individuals make them more prone to adopting new behaviors, (
d
) which characteristics of dyadic relationships promote cultural transmission, (
e
) which properties of groups (e.g., network structures) promote transmission of traits, and (
f
) which characteristics of groups promote retention, rather than extinction, of cultural traits. One of anthropology's strengths is its readiness to adopt and improve theories and methods from other disciplines, integrating them into a more holistic approach; hence, we identify approaches that might be particularly useful to biological and cultural anthropologists, and knowledge gaps that should be filled.</description><subject>Academic disciplines</subject><subject>Anthropologists</subject><subject>Anthropology</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Cultural change</subject><subject>cultural diffusion</subject><subject>Cultural groups</subject><subject>Cultural transmission</subject><subject>Dyadic relationships</subject><subject>Extinction</subject><subject>Holistic approach</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>innovation</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary aspects</subject><subject>Inventions</subject><subject>Social Anthropology and ethnology</subject><subject>social learning</subject><issn>0084-6570</issn><issn>1545-4290</issn><issn>0084-6570</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkE9Lw0AQxRdRsFa_Q0APeojOZP8lIEhb1BYqXioel2l3S1PbpO6mFb-9qVu8yxwePH7vMTzGrhBuEYW6o6raerdLqWoWvk4Bs_ai6CPWQSlkKrICjlkHIBepkhpO2VkISwDgiqsOu35fUJO80IcLyajauaop6yokfTer1y6ZeLLlr_Nwzk7mtAru4qBd9vb0OBkM0_Hr82jQG6ckBDapJtKF4IW0nDshFSgpyNqCkDtL4ITmFqfCobRqqrWwuVQIGtRUAJ_lwLvsJvYuaGU2vlyT_zY1lWbYG5u9BwIKQK122LKXkd34-nPrQmOW9dZX7Xsm01yjyiTmLXUfqZmvQ_Bu_leLYPY7msOOJu5o4o5RdBvvxfieolXLle4r_K_jB7VQfiM</recordid><startdate>20220101</startdate><enddate>20220101</enddate><creator>Perry, Susan E</creator><creator>Carter, Alecia</creator><creator>Foster, Jacob G</creator><creator>Nöbel, Sabine</creator><creator>Smolla, Marco</creator><general>Annual Reviews</general><general>Annual Reviews, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>BXJBU</scope><scope>IHQJB</scope><scope>VOOES</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220101</creationdate><title>What Makes Inventions Become Traditions?</title><author>Perry, Susan E ; Carter, Alecia ; Foster, Jacob G ; Nöbel, Sabine ; Smolla, Marco</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a441t-7aa794395d33e4560654add9a13eda0e473d1b4e15d6b774d85610706b403c803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Academic disciplines</topic><topic>Anthropologists</topic><topic>Anthropology</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Cultural change</topic><topic>cultural diffusion</topic><topic>Cultural groups</topic><topic>Cultural transmission</topic><topic>Dyadic relationships</topic><topic>Extinction</topic><topic>Holistic approach</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>innovation</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary aspects</topic><topic>Inventions</topic><topic>Social Anthropology and ethnology</topic><topic>social learning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Perry, Susan E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carter, Alecia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foster, Jacob G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nöbel, Sabine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smolla, Marco</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société (Open Access)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Annual review of anthropology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Perry, Susan E</au><au>Carter, Alecia</au><au>Foster, Jacob G</au><au>Nöbel, Sabine</au><au>Smolla, Marco</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What Makes Inventions Become Traditions?</atitle><jtitle>Annual review of anthropology</jtitle><date>2022-01-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>419</spage><epage>436</epage><pages>419-436</pages><issn>0084-6570</issn><eissn>1545-4290</eissn><eissn>0084-6570</eissn><abstract>Although anthropology was the first academic discipline to investigate cultural change, many other disciplines have made noteworthy contributions to understanding what influences the adoption of new behaviors. Drawing on a broad, interdisciplinary literature covering both humans and nonhumans, we examine (
a
) which features of behavioral traits make them more transmissible, (
b
) which individual characteristics of inventors promote copying of their inventions, (
c
) which characteristics of individuals make them more prone to adopting new behaviors, (
d
) which characteristics of dyadic relationships promote cultural transmission, (
e
) which properties of groups (e.g., network structures) promote transmission of traits, and (
f
) which characteristics of groups promote retention, rather than extinction, of cultural traits. One of anthropology's strengths is its readiness to adopt and improve theories and methods from other disciplines, integrating them into a more holistic approach; hence, we identify approaches that might be particularly useful to biological and cultural anthropologists, and knowledge gaps that should be filled.</abstract><cop>Palo Alto</cop><pub>Annual Reviews</pub><doi>10.1146/annurev-anthro-012121-012127</doi><tpages>18</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 0084-6570 |
ispartof | Annual review of anthropology, 2022-01, Vol.51 (1), p.419-436 |
issn | 0084-6570 1545-4290 0084-6570 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1146_annurev_anthro_012121_012127 |
source | Annual Reviews Open Access |
subjects | Academic disciplines Anthropologists Anthropology Behavior Cultural change cultural diffusion Cultural groups Cultural transmission Dyadic relationships Extinction Holistic approach Humanities and Social Sciences innovation Interdisciplinary aspects Inventions Social Anthropology and ethnology social learning |
title | What Makes Inventions Become Traditions? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T00%3A04%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_ZYWBE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20Makes%20Inventions%20Become%20Traditions?&rft.jtitle=Annual%20review%20of%20anthropology&rft.au=Perry,%20Susan%20E&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=419&rft.epage=436&rft.pages=419-436&rft.issn=0084-6570&rft.eissn=1545-4290&rft_id=info:doi/10.1146/annurev-anthro-012121-012127&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_ZYWBE%3E2737162518%3C/proquest_ZYWBE%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a441t-7aa794395d33e4560654add9a13eda0e473d1b4e15d6b774d85610706b403c803%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2737162518&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |