Why Has the Cyclicality of Productivity Changed? What Does It Mean?

US labor and total factor productivity have historically been procyclical-rising in booms and falling in recessions. After the mid-1980s, however, total factor productivity became much less procyclical with respect to hours while labor productivity turned strongly countercyclical. We find that the k...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Annual review of economics 2016-01, Vol.8 (1), p.465-496
Main Authors: Fernald, John G, Wang, J. Christina
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
business cycles
DSGE models
Economic history
growth accounting
Labor economics
labor hoarding
Labor productivity
procyclical productivity
Productivity
Public policy
Recessions
Studies
Technological change
Working hours
Workweeks
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Request full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a506t-268347f68e3379c747f1ed4aa4046d58c8d2dc437780a378239ccc28ab1184423
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a506t-268347f68e3379c747f1ed4aa4046d58c8d2dc437780a378239ccc28ab1184423
container_end_page 496
container_issue 1
container_start_page 465
container_title Annual review of economics
container_volume 8
creator Fernald, John G
Wang, J. Christina
description US labor and total factor productivity have historically been procyclical-rising in booms and falling in recessions. After the mid-1980s, however, total factor productivity became much less procyclical with respect to hours while labor productivity turned strongly countercyclical. We find that the key empirical "fact" driving these changes is reduced variation in factor utilization-conceptually, the workweek of capital and labor effort. We discuss a range of theories that seek to explain the changes in productivity's cyclicality. Increased flexibility, changes in the structure of the economy, and shifts in relative variances of technology and "demand" shocks all play key roles.
doi_str_mv 10.1146/annurev-economics-080315-015018
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_ZYWBE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1146_annurev_economics_080315_015018</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26774377</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26774377</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a506t-268347f68e3379c747f1ed4aa4046d58c8d2dc437780a378239ccc28ab1184423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkEFLwzAUx4soOKcfQQh48FTNa9IkPQ3p1A0melB2DDFNbUfXzKSd9Nvb2rG7p7zw_u_3Hr8guAV8B0DZvarr1pl9aLSt7bbUPsQCE4hDDDEGcRJMIKEQAkng9FgLch5ceL_BmDGWwCRI10WHFsqjpjAo7XRValWVTYdsjt6czVrdlPvhnxaq_jLZDK0L1aC5NR4tG_RiVD27DM5yVXlzdXinwcfT43u6CFevz8v0YRWqGLMmjJgglOdMGEJ4onlfg8moUhRTlsVCiyzKNCWcC6wIFxFJtNaRUJ8AgtKITIObkbtz9rs1vpEb27q6Xyn_AgCExn1qNqa0s947k8udK7fKdRKwHMzJgzl5NCdHc3I01xOuR8LGN9YdxyPG-XBd35-P_QGkqh5Vmh__7zW_5rmG0A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1844211345</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Why Has the Cyclicality of Productivity Changed? What Does It Mean?</title><source>Annual Reviews Open Access</source><creator>Fernald, John G ; Wang, J. Christina</creator><creatorcontrib>Fernald, John G ; Wang, J. Christina</creatorcontrib><description>US labor and total factor productivity have historically been procyclical-rising in booms and falling in recessions. After the mid-1980s, however, total factor productivity became much less procyclical with respect to hours while labor productivity turned strongly countercyclical. We find that the key empirical "fact" driving these changes is reduced variation in factor utilization-conceptually, the workweek of capital and labor effort. We discuss a range of theories that seek to explain the changes in productivity's cyclicality. Increased flexibility, changes in the structure of the economy, and shifts in relative variances of technology and "demand" shocks all play key roles.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1941-1383</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1941-1391</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1146/annurev-economics-080315-015018</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Palo Alto: Annual Reviews</publisher><subject>business cycles ; DSGE models ; Economic history ; growth accounting ; Labor economics ; labor hoarding ; Labor productivity ; procyclical productivity ; Productivity ; Public policy ; Recessions ; Studies ; Technological change ; Working hours ; Workweeks</subject><ispartof>Annual review of economics, 2016-01, Vol.8 (1), p.465-496</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved 2016</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 by Annual Reviews</rights><rights>Copyright Annual Reviews, Inc. 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a506t-268347f68e3379c747f1ed4aa4046d58c8d2dc437780a378239ccc28ab1184423</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a506t-268347f68e3379c747f1ed4aa4046d58c8d2dc437780a378239ccc28ab1184423</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-080315-015018?crawler=true&amp;mimetype=application/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gannualreviews$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-080315-015018$$EHTML$$P50$$Gannualreviews$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27845,27871,27903,27904,58216,58449,78106,78211</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080315-015018$$EView_record_in_Annual_Reviews$$FView_record_in_$$GAnnual_Reviews</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fernald, John G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, J. Christina</creatorcontrib><title>Why Has the Cyclicality of Productivity Changed? What Does It Mean?</title><title>Annual review of economics</title><description>US labor and total factor productivity have historically been procyclical-rising in booms and falling in recessions. After the mid-1980s, however, total factor productivity became much less procyclical with respect to hours while labor productivity turned strongly countercyclical. We find that the key empirical "fact" driving these changes is reduced variation in factor utilization-conceptually, the workweek of capital and labor effort. We discuss a range of theories that seek to explain the changes in productivity's cyclicality. Increased flexibility, changes in the structure of the economy, and shifts in relative variances of technology and "demand" shocks all play key roles.</description><subject>business cycles</subject><subject>DSGE models</subject><subject>Economic history</subject><subject>growth accounting</subject><subject>Labor economics</subject><subject>labor hoarding</subject><subject>Labor productivity</subject><subject>procyclical productivity</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>Recessions</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Technological change</subject><subject>Working hours</subject><subject>Workweeks</subject><issn>1941-1383</issn><issn>1941-1391</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkEFLwzAUx4soOKcfQQh48FTNa9IkPQ3p1A0melB2DDFNbUfXzKSd9Nvb2rG7p7zw_u_3Hr8guAV8B0DZvarr1pl9aLSt7bbUPsQCE4hDDDEGcRJMIKEQAkng9FgLch5ceL_BmDGWwCRI10WHFsqjpjAo7XRValWVTYdsjt6czVrdlPvhnxaq_jLZDK0L1aC5NR4tG_RiVD27DM5yVXlzdXinwcfT43u6CFevz8v0YRWqGLMmjJgglOdMGEJ4onlfg8moUhRTlsVCiyzKNCWcC6wIFxFJtNaRUJ8AgtKITIObkbtz9rs1vpEb27q6Xyn_AgCExn1qNqa0s947k8udK7fKdRKwHMzJgzl5NCdHc3I01xOuR8LGN9YdxyPG-XBd35-P_QGkqh5Vmh__7zW_5rmG0A</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Fernald, John G</creator><creator>Wang, J. Christina</creator><general>Annual Reviews</general><general>Annual Reviews, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>Why Has the Cyclicality of Productivity Changed? What Does It Mean?</title><author>Fernald, John G ; Wang, J. Christina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a506t-268347f68e3379c747f1ed4aa4046d58c8d2dc437780a378239ccc28ab1184423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>business cycles</topic><topic>DSGE models</topic><topic>Economic history</topic><topic>growth accounting</topic><topic>Labor economics</topic><topic>labor hoarding</topic><topic>Labor productivity</topic><topic>procyclical productivity</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>Recessions</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Technological change</topic><topic>Working hours</topic><topic>Workweeks</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fernald, John G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, J. Christina</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Annual review of economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fernald, John G</au><au>Wang, J. Christina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Why Has the Cyclicality of Productivity Changed? What Does It Mean?</atitle><jtitle>Annual review of economics</jtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>465</spage><epage>496</epage><pages>465-496</pages><issn>1941-1383</issn><eissn>1941-1391</eissn><abstract>US labor and total factor productivity have historically been procyclical-rising in booms and falling in recessions. After the mid-1980s, however, total factor productivity became much less procyclical with respect to hours while labor productivity turned strongly countercyclical. We find that the key empirical "fact" driving these changes is reduced variation in factor utilization-conceptually, the workweek of capital and labor effort. We discuss a range of theories that seek to explain the changes in productivity's cyclicality. Increased flexibility, changes in the structure of the economy, and shifts in relative variances of technology and "demand" shocks all play key roles.</abstract><cop>Palo Alto</cop><pub>Annual Reviews</pub><doi>10.1146/annurev-economics-080315-015018</doi><tpages>32</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1941-1383
ispartof Annual review of economics, 2016-01, Vol.8 (1), p.465-496
issn 1941-1383
1941-1391
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1146_annurev_economics_080315_015018
source Annual Reviews Open Access
subjects business cycles
DSGE models
Economic history
growth accounting
Labor economics
labor hoarding
Labor productivity
procyclical productivity
Productivity
Public policy
Recessions
Studies
Technological change
Working hours
Workweeks
title Why Has the Cyclicality of Productivity Changed? What Does It Mean?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T21%3A35%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_ZYWBE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Why%20Has%20the%20Cyclicality%20of%20Productivity%20Changed?%20What%20Does%20It%20Mean?&rft.jtitle=Annual%20review%20of%20economics&rft.au=Fernald,%20John%20G&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=465&rft.epage=496&rft.pages=465-496&rft.issn=1941-1383&rft.eissn=1941-1391&rft_id=info:doi/10.1146/annurev-economics-080315-015018&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_ZYWBE%3E26774377%3C/jstor_ZYWBE%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a506t-268347f68e3379c747f1ed4aa4046d58c8d2dc437780a378239ccc28ab1184423%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1844211345&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26774377&rfr_iscdi=true