Behavioral Economics and Psychology of Incentives

Monetary incentives can backfire while nonstandard interventions, such as framing, can be effective in influencing behavior. I review the empirical evidence on these two sets of anomalies. Paying for inherently interesting tasks, paying for prosocial behavior, paying too much, paying too little, and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Annual review of economics 2012-01, Vol.4 (1), p.427-452
Main Author: Kamenica, Emir
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Airway obstruction
Behavioral economics
Blood donation
Empirical evidence
Field experiments
Financial incentives
Inference
Motivation
Prosocial behavior
Sunk costs
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a420t-c86021aacb11bc6891cd9165575b396f22230845c6178e6f861bb5bb9c91e3f43
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a420t-c86021aacb11bc6891cd9165575b396f22230845c6178e6f861bb5bb9c91e3f43
container_end_page 452
container_issue 1
container_start_page 427
container_title Annual review of economics
container_volume 4
creator Kamenica, Emir
description Monetary incentives can backfire while nonstandard interventions, such as framing, can be effective in influencing behavior. I review the empirical evidence on these two sets of anomalies. Paying for inherently interesting tasks, paying for prosocial behavior, paying too much, paying too little, and providing too many options can all be counterproductive. At the same time, proper design of the decision-making environment can be a potent way to induce certain behaviors. After presenting the empirical evidence, I discuss the relative role of beliefs, preferences, and technology in the anomalous impacts of incentives. I argue that inference, signaling, loss aversion, dynamic inconsistency, and choking are the primary factors that explain the data.
doi_str_mv 10.1146/annurev-economics-080511-110909
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1146_annurev_economics_080511_110909</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>42949944</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>42949944</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a420t-c86021aacb11bc6891cd9165575b396f22230845c6178e6f861bb5bb9c91e3f43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo90D1PwzAQgGELgUQp_ASkbEwBX_xR34SgaqFSJRhgtmzXpqnSGNklUv49RSmZ7m64d3gIuQN6D8Dlg2nbn-S70rvYxn3tckkVFQAlAEWKZ2QCyI8XQzgfd8UuyVXOO0qllAgTAs9-a7o6JtMUi_9SYdpN8Z57t41N_OqLGIpV63x7qDufr8lFME32N6c5JZ_Lxcf8tVy_vazmT-vS8IoeSqckrcAYZwGskwrBbRCkEDNhGcpQVRWjigsnYaa8DEqCtcJadAieBc6m5HHouhRzTj7o71TvTeo1UP0noE8CehTQg4AeBI6F26Gwy4eYxndeIUfknP0CX1VetA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Behavioral Economics and Psychology of Incentives</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Kamenica, Emir</creator><creatorcontrib>Kamenica, Emir</creatorcontrib><description>Monetary incentives can backfire while nonstandard interventions, such as framing, can be effective in influencing behavior. I review the empirical evidence on these two sets of anomalies. Paying for inherently interesting tasks, paying for prosocial behavior, paying too much, paying too little, and providing too many options can all be counterproductive. At the same time, proper design of the decision-making environment can be a potent way to induce certain behaviors. After presenting the empirical evidence, I discuss the relative role of beliefs, preferences, and technology in the anomalous impacts of incentives. I argue that inference, signaling, loss aversion, dynamic inconsistency, and choking are the primary factors that explain the data.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1941-1383</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1941-1391</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1146/annurev-economics-080511-110909</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Annual Reviews</publisher><subject>Airway obstruction ; Behavioral economics ; Blood donation ; Empirical evidence ; Field experiments ; Financial incentives ; Inference ; Motivation ; Prosocial behavior ; Sunk costs</subject><ispartof>Annual review of economics, 2012-01, Vol.4 (1), p.427-452</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT © 2012 ANNUAL REVIEWS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a420t-c86021aacb11bc6891cd9165575b396f22230845c6178e6f861bb5bb9c91e3f43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a420t-c86021aacb11bc6891cd9165575b396f22230845c6178e6f861bb5bb9c91e3f43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/42949944$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/42949944$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,58213,58446</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kamenica, Emir</creatorcontrib><title>Behavioral Economics and Psychology of Incentives</title><title>Annual review of economics</title><description>Monetary incentives can backfire while nonstandard interventions, such as framing, can be effective in influencing behavior. I review the empirical evidence on these two sets of anomalies. Paying for inherently interesting tasks, paying for prosocial behavior, paying too much, paying too little, and providing too many options can all be counterproductive. At the same time, proper design of the decision-making environment can be a potent way to induce certain behaviors. After presenting the empirical evidence, I discuss the relative role of beliefs, preferences, and technology in the anomalous impacts of incentives. I argue that inference, signaling, loss aversion, dynamic inconsistency, and choking are the primary factors that explain the data.</description><subject>Airway obstruction</subject><subject>Behavioral economics</subject><subject>Blood donation</subject><subject>Empirical evidence</subject><subject>Field experiments</subject><subject>Financial incentives</subject><subject>Inference</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Prosocial behavior</subject><subject>Sunk costs</subject><issn>1941-1383</issn><issn>1941-1391</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo90D1PwzAQgGELgUQp_ASkbEwBX_xR34SgaqFSJRhgtmzXpqnSGNklUv49RSmZ7m64d3gIuQN6D8Dlg2nbn-S70rvYxn3tckkVFQAlAEWKZ2QCyI8XQzgfd8UuyVXOO0qllAgTAs9-a7o6JtMUi_9SYdpN8Z57t41N_OqLGIpV63x7qDufr8lFME32N6c5JZ_Lxcf8tVy_vazmT-vS8IoeSqckrcAYZwGskwrBbRCkEDNhGcpQVRWjigsnYaa8DEqCtcJadAieBc6m5HHouhRzTj7o71TvTeo1UP0noE8CehTQg4AeBI6F26Gwy4eYxndeIUfknP0CX1VetA</recordid><startdate>20120101</startdate><enddate>20120101</enddate><creator>Kamenica, Emir</creator><general>Annual Reviews</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120101</creationdate><title>Behavioral Economics and Psychology of Incentives</title><author>Kamenica, Emir</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a420t-c86021aacb11bc6891cd9165575b396f22230845c6178e6f861bb5bb9c91e3f43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Airway obstruction</topic><topic>Behavioral economics</topic><topic>Blood donation</topic><topic>Empirical evidence</topic><topic>Field experiments</topic><topic>Financial incentives</topic><topic>Inference</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Prosocial behavior</topic><topic>Sunk costs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kamenica, Emir</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Annual review of economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kamenica, Emir</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Behavioral Economics and Psychology of Incentives</atitle><jtitle>Annual review of economics</jtitle><date>2012-01-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>427</spage><epage>452</epage><pages>427-452</pages><issn>1941-1383</issn><eissn>1941-1391</eissn><abstract>Monetary incentives can backfire while nonstandard interventions, such as framing, can be effective in influencing behavior. I review the empirical evidence on these two sets of anomalies. Paying for inherently interesting tasks, paying for prosocial behavior, paying too much, paying too little, and providing too many options can all be counterproductive. At the same time, proper design of the decision-making environment can be a potent way to induce certain behaviors. After presenting the empirical evidence, I discuss the relative role of beliefs, preferences, and technology in the anomalous impacts of incentives. I argue that inference, signaling, loss aversion, dynamic inconsistency, and choking are the primary factors that explain the data.</abstract><pub>Annual Reviews</pub><doi>10.1146/annurev-economics-080511-110909</doi><tpages>26</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1941-1383
ispartof Annual review of economics, 2012-01, Vol.4 (1), p.427-452
issn 1941-1383
1941-1391
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1146_annurev_economics_080511_110909
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection
subjects Airway obstruction
Behavioral economics
Blood donation
Empirical evidence
Field experiments
Financial incentives
Inference
Motivation
Prosocial behavior
Sunk costs
title Behavioral Economics and Psychology of Incentives
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T14%3A10%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Behavioral%20Economics%20and%20Psychology%20of%20Incentives&rft.jtitle=Annual%20review%20of%20economics&rft.au=Kamenica,%20Emir&rft.date=2012-01-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=427&rft.epage=452&rft.pages=427-452&rft.issn=1941-1383&rft.eissn=1941-1391&rft_id=info:doi/10.1146/annurev-economics-080511-110909&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E42949944%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a420t-c86021aacb11bc6891cd9165575b396f22230845c6178e6f861bb5bb9c91e3f43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=42949944&rfr_iscdi=true