The validity and reliability of a novel isotope ratio infrared spectrometer to quantify 13 C enrichment of expired breath samples in exercise

• Published in: Journal of applied physiology (1985) 2021-05, Vol.130 (5), p.1421-1426
• Main Authors: Sutehall, Shaun, Muniz-Pardos, Borja, Smajgl, Danijela, Mandic, Magda, Jeglinski, Cedric, Bosch, Andrew, Galloway, Stuart D, Pitsiladis, Yannis
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• ISSN: 8750-7587; 1522-1601
• DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00805.2020

The traditional method to measure CO enrichment in breath involves isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS), which has several limitations such as cost, extensive training, and large space requirements. Here, we present the validity and reliability data of an isotope ratio infrared spectrometer (IRIS)-based method developed to combat these limitations. Eight healthy male runners performed 105 min of continuous running on a motorized treadmill while ingesting various carbohydrate beverages enriched with C and expired breath samples were obtained every 15 min in triplicates. A total of 213 breath samples were analyzed using both methods, whereas 212 samples were repeated using IRIS to determine test-retest reliability. Bland-Altman analysis was performed to determine systematic and proportional bias, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and coefficient of variation (CV) to assess level of agreement and magnitude of error. The IRIS method demonstrated a small but significant systematic bias to overestimate δ CO (0.18‰; < 0.05) compared with IRMS, without any proportional bias or heteroscedasticity and a small CV (0.5%). There was a small systematic bias during the test-retest of the IRIS method (-0.07‰; < 0.05), no proportional bias, an excellent ICC (1.00), and small CV (0.4%). The use of the Delta Ray IRIS to determine C enrichment in expired breath samples captured during exercise has excellent validity and reliability when compared with the gold standard IRMS. The use of IRIS to determine C enrichment in expired breath samples captured during exercise to determine exogenous glucose oxidation during exercise has excellent validity and reliability when compared with the gold standard IRMS.