Use of introspection in scientific psychological research

The use of introspection is unavoidable even in psychological research on animals. Difficulties may arise from the absence of reliable introspective data; it is suggested that this could be the case for the so-called “reward system”. In other circumstances confusion comes from using introspection wi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Behavioural neurology 1992, Vol.5 (4), p.199-203
Main Author: LAPLANE, D
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Biological and medical sciences
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-fc225592152f12bbcf2f22a97d04c477bac06df934529fecc5a9272307cc3c3a3
cites
container_end_page 203
container_issue 4
container_start_page 199
container_title Behavioural neurology
container_volume 5
creator LAPLANE, D
description The use of introspection is unavoidable even in psychological research on animals. Difficulties may arise from the absence of reliable introspective data; it is suggested that this could be the case for the so-called “reward system”. In other circumstances confusion comes from using introspection without being aware of it: speaking and thinking have for many years been considered as the same operation, but the reason for this belief is not clearly documented and it may be suspected of being only introspection. Amongst other evidence, a careful and conscious use of introspection demonstrated by auto-analyses of former aphasic patients strongly suggests that language and thought are quite distinct entities.
doi_str_mv 10.1155/1992/604053
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pascalfrancis_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1155_1992_604053</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4671342</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-fc225592152f12bbcf2f22a97d04c477bac06df934529fecc5a9272307cc3c3a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9j0FLxDAUhIMoWFdP_oEevEncl5ekaY6y6CoseHHPJX2buJHalqSX_fd2qXgaBmaG-Ri7F_AkhNZrYS2uK1Cg5QUrRG00r3WtLlkBVkuuRA3X7CbnbwBQQpqC2X325RDK2E9pyKOnKQ797MpM0fdTDJHKMZ_oOHTDVyTXlcln7xIdb9lVcF32d3-6YvvXl8_NG999bN83zztOaO3EAyFqbVFoDALblgIGRGfNARQpY1pHUB2ClUqjDZ5IO4sGJRgiSdLJFXtcdmk-mJMPzZjij0unRkBzpm7O1M1CPacflvTo8vw2JNdTzP8VVRkhFcpfSUFWcA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Use of introspection in scientific psychological research</title><source>Wiley_OA刊</source><creator>LAPLANE, D</creator><creatorcontrib>LAPLANE, D</creatorcontrib><description>The use of introspection is unavoidable even in psychological research on animals. Difficulties may arise from the absence of reliable introspective data; it is suggested that this could be the case for the so-called “reward system”. In other circumstances confusion comes from using introspection without being aware of it: speaking and thinking have for many years been considered as the same operation, but the reason for this belief is not clearly documented and it may be suspected of being only introspection. Amongst other evidence, a careful and conscious use of introspection demonstrated by auto-analyses of former aphasic patients strongly suggests that language and thought are quite distinct entities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0953-4180</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1875-8584</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1155/1992/604053</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Clinical Neuroscience</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><ispartof>Behavioural neurology, 1992, Vol.5 (4), p.199-203</ispartof><rights>1993 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-fc225592152f12bbcf2f22a97d04c477bac06df934529fecc5a9272307cc3c3a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4022,27922,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=4671342$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>LAPLANE, D</creatorcontrib><title>Use of introspection in scientific psychological research</title><title>Behavioural neurology</title><description>The use of introspection is unavoidable even in psychological research on animals. Difficulties may arise from the absence of reliable introspective data; it is suggested that this could be the case for the so-called “reward system”. In other circumstances confusion comes from using introspection without being aware of it: speaking and thinking have for many years been considered as the same operation, but the reason for this belief is not clearly documented and it may be suspected of being only introspection. Amongst other evidence, a careful and conscious use of introspection demonstrated by auto-analyses of former aphasic patients strongly suggests that language and thought are quite distinct entities.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><issn>0953-4180</issn><issn>1875-8584</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9j0FLxDAUhIMoWFdP_oEevEncl5ekaY6y6CoseHHPJX2buJHalqSX_fd2qXgaBmaG-Ri7F_AkhNZrYS2uK1Cg5QUrRG00r3WtLlkBVkuuRA3X7CbnbwBQQpqC2X325RDK2E9pyKOnKQ797MpM0fdTDJHKMZ_oOHTDVyTXlcln7xIdb9lVcF32d3-6YvvXl8_NG999bN83zztOaO3EAyFqbVFoDALblgIGRGfNARQpY1pHUB2ClUqjDZ5IO4sGJRgiSdLJFXtcdmk-mJMPzZjij0unRkBzpm7O1M1CPacflvTo8vw2JNdTzP8VVRkhFcpfSUFWcA</recordid><startdate>1992</startdate><enddate>1992</enddate><creator>LAPLANE, D</creator><general>Clinical Neuroscience</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1992</creationdate><title>Use of introspection in scientific psychological research</title><author>LAPLANE, D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-fc225592152f12bbcf2f22a97d04c477bac06df934529fecc5a9272307cc3c3a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>LAPLANE, D</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Behavioural neurology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>LAPLANE, D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Use of introspection in scientific psychological research</atitle><jtitle>Behavioural neurology</jtitle><date>1992</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>199</spage><epage>203</epage><pages>199-203</pages><issn>0953-4180</issn><eissn>1875-8584</eissn><abstract>The use of introspection is unavoidable even in psychological research on animals. Difficulties may arise from the absence of reliable introspective data; it is suggested that this could be the case for the so-called “reward system”. In other circumstances confusion comes from using introspection without being aware of it: speaking and thinking have for many years been considered as the same operation, but the reason for this belief is not clearly documented and it may be suspected of being only introspection. Amongst other evidence, a careful and conscious use of introspection demonstrated by auto-analyses of former aphasic patients strongly suggests that language and thought are quite distinct entities.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Clinical Neuroscience</pub><doi>10.1155/1992/604053</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0953-4180
ispartof Behavioural neurology, 1992, Vol.5 (4), p.199-203
issn 0953-4180
1875-8584
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1155_1992_604053
source Wiley_OA刊
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
title Use of introspection in scientific psychological research
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T08%3A34%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pascalfrancis_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use%20of%20introspection%20in%20scientific%20psychological%20research&rft.jtitle=Behavioural%20neurology&rft.au=LAPLANE,%20D&rft.date=1992&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=199&rft.epage=203&rft.pages=199-203&rft.issn=0953-4180&rft.eissn=1875-8584&rft_id=info:doi/10.1155/1992/604053&rft_dat=%3Cpascalfrancis_cross%3E4671342%3C/pascalfrancis_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-fc225592152f12bbcf2f22a97d04c477bac06df934529fecc5a9272307cc3c3a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true