Loading…

Abstract 2215: Detection of novel markers of transitional cell carcinoma of the ovary, the TCC-like variant of high grade serous carcinoma, using proteomics and immunohistochemistry

Background: The current WHO classification does not separate transitional carcinoma of the ovary (TCCO) from conventional high grade serous carcinoma of the ovary (HGSC). TCCO has a better prognosis, possibly due to better chemosensitivity or less infiltrative growth pattern. The available immunohis...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cancer research (Chicago, Ill.) Ill.), 2017-07, Vol.77 (13_Supplement), p.2215-2215
Main Authors: Tessier-Cloutier, Basile, Magrill, Jamie, Kommoss, Stefan, Gilks, Blake C., Huntsman, David G., Cochrane, Dawn R., Talhouk, Aline, Soslow, Robert, Morin, Gregg B., Hughes, Chris J., Karnezis, Anthony N., Chow, Christine, Cheng, Angela S., Bois, Andreas du, Pfisterer, Jacobus, Kommoss, Friedrich
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background: The current WHO classification does not separate transitional carcinoma of the ovary (TCCO) from conventional high grade serous carcinoma of the ovary (HGSC). TCCO has a better prognosis, possibly due to better chemosensitivity or less infiltrative growth pattern. The available immunohistochemical (IHC) markers do not differentiate between the two subtypes. Therefore, we sought to compare the proteomic profiles of conventional HGSC and TCCO to identify surrogate biomarkers of good prognosis from TCCO that could identify conventional HGSC tumors with a better prognosis. Design: Full proteome analysis of 12 cases of TCCO and 12 cases of HGSC was performed using SP3-clinical proteomics, run on an ThermoFisher Orbitrap Fusion. For validation, tissue microarrays of TCCO (n=89) and HGSC (n=237) were immunostained with antibodies against proteins found to be enriched in TCCO. All cases and immunostains were scored by a gynecologic pathologist. Univariate analysis was performed comparing IHC expression in TCCO vs. HGSC. Results: We identified 1220 proteins that were significantly enriched in TCCO over HGSC. Claudin 4 and Ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal esterase L1 (UCHL1) were selected as potential markers of TCCO-like biology (p=0.0017, 0.0322). By IHC, Claudin 4 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.171, 0.430) and UCHL1 (95% CI 0.291, 0.550) showed a significantly higher expression in TCCO as compared to HGSC (see table). % of tumors with high immunoreactivity scoresClaudin 4UCHL1Pure TCCO34/59 (58%)26/59 (44%)Mixed TCCO-HGSC, TCCO component14/29 (48%)8/29 (28%)Mixed TCCO-HGSC, HGSC component19/28 (68%)6/28 (21%)Conventional HGSC33/235 (14%)32/237 (14%) Legend: Mixed TCCO: TCCO with minor component of conventional HGSC Conclusion: Proteomic analysis showed differing protein profiles for TCCO and HGSC. By IHC, Claudin 4 and UCHL1 were identified as potential markers for TCC-like differentiation of high-grade serous carcinomas. Further studies will focus on the prognostic significance of these and other markers in larger cohorts of HGSC. This study presents a novel approach at identifying potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers as well as therapeutic targets. Citation Format: Basile Tessier-Cloutier, Jamie Magrill, Stefan Kommoss, Blake C. Gilks, David G. Huntsman, Dawn R. Cochrane, Aline Talhouk, Robert Soslow, Gregg B. Morin, Chris J. Hughes, Anthony N. Karnezis, Christine Chow, Angela S. Cheng, Andreas du Bois, Jacobus Pfisterer, Friedrich Kommoss. De
ISSN:0008-5472
1538-7445
DOI:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-2215