Loading…
Case Series of Inappropriate Concentration of Intraocular Sulfur Hexafluoride
Due to high complexity, vitreoretinal surgery presents a higher number of patient safety incidents compared with other ophthalmic procedures. Intraocular gases are one of the most useful adjuncts to vitrectomy and surprisingly, surgeons commonly admit to having occasional problems with incorrect gas...
Saved in:
Published in: | Case reports in ophthalmology 2018-08, Vol.9 (2), p.405-410 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-ff33cce22d424d088c62044273247722d7a9ba48e60bf129a6a9aef87b562a023 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-ff33cce22d424d088c62044273247722d7a9ba48e60bf129a6a9aef87b562a023 |
container_end_page | 410 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 405 |
container_title | Case reports in ophthalmology |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Kanclerz, Piotr Grzybowski, Andrzej |
description | Due to high complexity, vitreoretinal surgery presents a higher number of patient safety incidents compared with other ophthalmic procedures. Intraocular gases are one of the most useful adjuncts to vitrectomy and surprisingly, surgeons commonly admit to having occasional problems with incorrect gas concentration. The aim of this study is to present a consecutive case series of patients with improper concentration of sulfur hexafluoride (SF 6 ) applied during vitrectomy. Three patients underwent 27-gauge vitrectomy and at the end of surgery inappropriate dilution of 100% SF 6 was administered. It was attributed to a calculation error, change in the gas supplier, or increased partial pressure of SF 6 before dilution. Postoperatively, due to IOP increase, two eyes required intravitreal gas-air exchange. Subsequently, cataract surgery was performed in one eye with concomitant vitrectomy and silicone oil tamponade due to retinal detachment. To prevent such complications, we suggest using intraocular gases with great care, training of ophthalmic personnel, and prompting manufacturers to provide SF 6 in a prepared concentration of 20%. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1159/000492746 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1159_000492746</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_2c50eec889cb4b59982d779f9caceb7b</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2117146470</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-ff33cce22d424d088c62044273247722d7a9ba48e60bf129a6a9aef87b562a023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkc1r1UAQwBdRbGl78C4S6MnD0_3KflwECdY-qFSonpfJZvaZZ5qNm6S0_323poYWPO3uzG9_M8MQ8obRD4yV9iOlVFqupXpBDplSYsOVtS-f3A_IyTjuM0aF5YaVr8mBoNwIwfUh-VbBiMUVphbHIoZi28MwpDikFiYsqth77KcEUxv7JZ0f0c8dpOJq7sKcinO8hdDNMbUNHpNXAboRTx7PI_Lz7MuP6nxzcfl1W32-2HhpymkTghDeI-eN5LKhxnjFqZRcCy61zmENtgZpUNE6MG5BgQUMRtel4kC5OCLbxdtE2Lvc7DWkOxehdX8DMe0cpKn1HTruS4rojbG-lnVprcl6bYP14LHWdXZ9WlzDXF9js8zbPZM-z_TtL7eLN04xlZtlWXD6KEjxz4zj5PZxTn2e33HGNJNKapqp9wvlUxzHhGGtwKh7WKRbF5nZd09bWsl_a8vA2wX4DWmHaQXW_6f_TVeX3xfCDU0Q938SrYM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2117146470</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Case Series of Inappropriate Concentration of Intraocular Sulfur Hexafluoride</title><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Karger Open Access Journals</source><creator>Kanclerz, Piotr ; Grzybowski, Andrzej</creator><creatorcontrib>Kanclerz, Piotr ; Grzybowski, Andrzej</creatorcontrib><description>Due to high complexity, vitreoretinal surgery presents a higher number of patient safety incidents compared with other ophthalmic procedures. Intraocular gases are one of the most useful adjuncts to vitrectomy and surprisingly, surgeons commonly admit to having occasional problems with incorrect gas concentration. The aim of this study is to present a consecutive case series of patients with improper concentration of sulfur hexafluoride (SF 6 ) applied during vitrectomy. Three patients underwent 27-gauge vitrectomy and at the end of surgery inappropriate dilution of 100% SF 6 was administered. It was attributed to a calculation error, change in the gas supplier, or increased partial pressure of SF 6 before dilution. Postoperatively, due to IOP increase, two eyes required intravitreal gas-air exchange. Subsequently, cataract surgery was performed in one eye with concomitant vitrectomy and silicone oil tamponade due to retinal detachment. To prevent such complications, we suggest using intraocular gases with great care, training of ophthalmic personnel, and prompting manufacturers to provide SF 6 in a prepared concentration of 20%.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1663-2699</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1663-2699</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1159/000492746</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30283327</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel, Switzerland: S. Karger AG</publisher><subject>Case Report ; Case reports ; Cataracts ; Expandable gas ; Eye surgery ; Gases ; Human error ; Intraocular pressure ; Intraocular tamponade ; Ophthalmology ; Patient safety ; Sulfur ; Sulfur hexafluoride ; Surgeons ; Vitrectomy</subject><ispartof>Case reports in ophthalmology, 2018-08, Vol.9 (2), p.405-410</ispartof><rights>2018 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 by S. Karger AG, Basel 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-ff33cce22d424d088c62044273247722d7a9ba48e60bf129a6a9aef87b562a023</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-ff33cce22d424d088c62044273247722d7a9ba48e60bf129a6a9aef87b562a023</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8036-7691</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6167721/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6167721/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27634,27923,27924,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30283327$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kanclerz, Piotr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grzybowski, Andrzej</creatorcontrib><title>Case Series of Inappropriate Concentration of Intraocular Sulfur Hexafluoride</title><title>Case reports in ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Case Rep Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>Due to high complexity, vitreoretinal surgery presents a higher number of patient safety incidents compared with other ophthalmic procedures. Intraocular gases are one of the most useful adjuncts to vitrectomy and surprisingly, surgeons commonly admit to having occasional problems with incorrect gas concentration. The aim of this study is to present a consecutive case series of patients with improper concentration of sulfur hexafluoride (SF 6 ) applied during vitrectomy. Three patients underwent 27-gauge vitrectomy and at the end of surgery inappropriate dilution of 100% SF 6 was administered. It was attributed to a calculation error, change in the gas supplier, or increased partial pressure of SF 6 before dilution. Postoperatively, due to IOP increase, two eyes required intravitreal gas-air exchange. Subsequently, cataract surgery was performed in one eye with concomitant vitrectomy and silicone oil tamponade due to retinal detachment. To prevent such complications, we suggest using intraocular gases with great care, training of ophthalmic personnel, and prompting manufacturers to provide SF 6 in a prepared concentration of 20%.</description><subject>Case Report</subject><subject>Case reports</subject><subject>Cataracts</subject><subject>Expandable gas</subject><subject>Eye surgery</subject><subject>Gases</subject><subject>Human error</subject><subject>Intraocular pressure</subject><subject>Intraocular tamponade</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Patient safety</subject><subject>Sulfur</subject><subject>Sulfur hexafluoride</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Vitrectomy</subject><issn>1663-2699</issn><issn>1663-2699</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M--</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkc1r1UAQwBdRbGl78C4S6MnD0_3KflwECdY-qFSonpfJZvaZZ5qNm6S0_323poYWPO3uzG9_M8MQ8obRD4yV9iOlVFqupXpBDplSYsOVtS-f3A_IyTjuM0aF5YaVr8mBoNwIwfUh-VbBiMUVphbHIoZi28MwpDikFiYsqth77KcEUxv7JZ0f0c8dpOJq7sKcinO8hdDNMbUNHpNXAboRTx7PI_Lz7MuP6nxzcfl1W32-2HhpymkTghDeI-eN5LKhxnjFqZRcCy61zmENtgZpUNE6MG5BgQUMRtel4kC5OCLbxdtE2Lvc7DWkOxehdX8DMe0cpKn1HTruS4rojbG-lnVprcl6bYP14LHWdXZ9WlzDXF9js8zbPZM-z_TtL7eLN04xlZtlWXD6KEjxz4zj5PZxTn2e33HGNJNKapqp9wvlUxzHhGGtwKh7WKRbF5nZd09bWsl_a8vA2wX4DWmHaQXW_6f_TVeX3xfCDU0Q938SrYM</recordid><startdate>20180831</startdate><enddate>20180831</enddate><creator>Kanclerz, Piotr</creator><creator>Grzybowski, Andrzej</creator><general>S. Karger AG</general><general>Karger Publishers</general><scope>M--</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8036-7691</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180831</creationdate><title>Case Series of Inappropriate Concentration of Intraocular Sulfur Hexafluoride</title><author>Kanclerz, Piotr ; Grzybowski, Andrzej</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-ff33cce22d424d088c62044273247722d7a9ba48e60bf129a6a9aef87b562a023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Case Report</topic><topic>Case reports</topic><topic>Cataracts</topic><topic>Expandable gas</topic><topic>Eye surgery</topic><topic>Gases</topic><topic>Human error</topic><topic>Intraocular pressure</topic><topic>Intraocular tamponade</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Patient safety</topic><topic>Sulfur</topic><topic>Sulfur hexafluoride</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Vitrectomy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kanclerz, Piotr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grzybowski, Andrzej</creatorcontrib><collection>Karger Open Access Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Case reports in ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kanclerz, Piotr</au><au>Grzybowski, Andrzej</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Case Series of Inappropriate Concentration of Intraocular Sulfur Hexafluoride</atitle><jtitle>Case reports in ophthalmology</jtitle><addtitle>Case Rep Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2018-08-31</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>405</spage><epage>410</epage><pages>405-410</pages><issn>1663-2699</issn><eissn>1663-2699</eissn><abstract>Due to high complexity, vitreoretinal surgery presents a higher number of patient safety incidents compared with other ophthalmic procedures. Intraocular gases are one of the most useful adjuncts to vitrectomy and surprisingly, surgeons commonly admit to having occasional problems with incorrect gas concentration. The aim of this study is to present a consecutive case series of patients with improper concentration of sulfur hexafluoride (SF 6 ) applied during vitrectomy. Three patients underwent 27-gauge vitrectomy and at the end of surgery inappropriate dilution of 100% SF 6 was administered. It was attributed to a calculation error, change in the gas supplier, or increased partial pressure of SF 6 before dilution. Postoperatively, due to IOP increase, two eyes required intravitreal gas-air exchange. Subsequently, cataract surgery was performed in one eye with concomitant vitrectomy and silicone oil tamponade due to retinal detachment. To prevent such complications, we suggest using intraocular gases with great care, training of ophthalmic personnel, and prompting manufacturers to provide SF 6 in a prepared concentration of 20%.</abstract><cop>Basel, Switzerland</cop><pub>S. Karger AG</pub><pmid>30283327</pmid><doi>10.1159/000492746</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8036-7691</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1663-2699 |
ispartof | Case reports in ophthalmology, 2018-08, Vol.9 (2), p.405-410 |
issn | 1663-2699 1663-2699 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1159_000492746 |
source | PubMed Central; Karger Open Access Journals |
subjects | Case Report Case reports Cataracts Expandable gas Eye surgery Gases Human error Intraocular pressure Intraocular tamponade Ophthalmology Patient safety Sulfur Sulfur hexafluoride Surgeons Vitrectomy |
title | Case Series of Inappropriate Concentration of Intraocular Sulfur Hexafluoride |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T16%3A22%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Case%20Series%20of%20Inappropriate%20Concentration%20of%20Intraocular%20Sulfur%20Hexafluoride&rft.jtitle=Case%20reports%20in%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Kanclerz,%20Piotr&rft.date=2018-08-31&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=405&rft.epage=410&rft.pages=405-410&rft.issn=1663-2699&rft.eissn=1663-2699&rft_id=info:doi/10.1159/000492746&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2117146470%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-ff33cce22d424d088c62044273247722d7a9ba48e60bf129a6a9aef87b562a023%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2117146470&rft_id=info:pmid/30283327&rfr_iscdi=true |