Loading…

Case Series of Inappropriate Concentration of Intraocular Sulfur Hexafluoride

Due to high complexity, vitreoretinal surgery presents a higher number of patient safety incidents compared with other ophthalmic procedures. Intraocular gases are one of the most useful adjuncts to vitrectomy and surprisingly, surgeons commonly admit to having occasional problems with incorrect gas...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Case reports in ophthalmology 2018-08, Vol.9 (2), p.405-410
Main Authors: Kanclerz, Piotr, Grzybowski, Andrzej
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-ff33cce22d424d088c62044273247722d7a9ba48e60bf129a6a9aef87b562a023
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-ff33cce22d424d088c62044273247722d7a9ba48e60bf129a6a9aef87b562a023
container_end_page 410
container_issue 2
container_start_page 405
container_title Case reports in ophthalmology
container_volume 9
creator Kanclerz, Piotr
Grzybowski, Andrzej
description Due to high complexity, vitreoretinal surgery presents a higher number of patient safety incidents compared with other ophthalmic procedures. Intraocular gases are one of the most useful adjuncts to vitrectomy and surprisingly, surgeons commonly admit to having occasional problems with incorrect gas concentration. The aim of this study is to present a consecutive case series of patients with improper concentration of sulfur hexafluoride (SF 6 ) applied during vitrectomy. Three patients underwent 27-gauge vitrectomy and at the end of surgery inappropriate dilution of 100% SF 6 was administered. It was attributed to a calculation error, change in the gas supplier, or increased partial pressure of SF 6 before dilution. Postoperatively, due to IOP increase, two eyes required intravitreal gas-air exchange. Subsequently, cataract surgery was performed in one eye with concomitant vitrectomy and silicone oil tamponade due to retinal detachment. To prevent such complications, we suggest using intraocular gases with great care, training of ophthalmic personnel, and prompting manufacturers to provide SF 6 in a prepared concentration of 20%.
doi_str_mv 10.1159/000492746
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1159_000492746</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_2c50eec889cb4b59982d779f9caceb7b</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2117146470</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-ff33cce22d424d088c62044273247722d7a9ba48e60bf129a6a9aef87b562a023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkc1r1UAQwBdRbGl78C4S6MnD0_3KflwECdY-qFSonpfJZvaZZ5qNm6S0_323poYWPO3uzG9_M8MQ8obRD4yV9iOlVFqupXpBDplSYsOVtS-f3A_IyTjuM0aF5YaVr8mBoNwIwfUh-VbBiMUVphbHIoZi28MwpDikFiYsqth77KcEUxv7JZ0f0c8dpOJq7sKcinO8hdDNMbUNHpNXAboRTx7PI_Lz7MuP6nxzcfl1W32-2HhpymkTghDeI-eN5LKhxnjFqZRcCy61zmENtgZpUNE6MG5BgQUMRtel4kC5OCLbxdtE2Lvc7DWkOxehdX8DMe0cpKn1HTruS4rojbG-lnVprcl6bYP14LHWdXZ9WlzDXF9js8zbPZM-z_TtL7eLN04xlZtlWXD6KEjxz4zj5PZxTn2e33HGNJNKapqp9wvlUxzHhGGtwKh7WKRbF5nZd09bWsl_a8vA2wX4DWmHaQXW_6f_TVeX3xfCDU0Q938SrYM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2117146470</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Case Series of Inappropriate Concentration of Intraocular Sulfur Hexafluoride</title><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Karger Open Access Journals</source><creator>Kanclerz, Piotr ; Grzybowski, Andrzej</creator><creatorcontrib>Kanclerz, Piotr ; Grzybowski, Andrzej</creatorcontrib><description>Due to high complexity, vitreoretinal surgery presents a higher number of patient safety incidents compared with other ophthalmic procedures. Intraocular gases are one of the most useful adjuncts to vitrectomy and surprisingly, surgeons commonly admit to having occasional problems with incorrect gas concentration. The aim of this study is to present a consecutive case series of patients with improper concentration of sulfur hexafluoride (SF 6 ) applied during vitrectomy. Three patients underwent 27-gauge vitrectomy and at the end of surgery inappropriate dilution of 100% SF 6 was administered. It was attributed to a calculation error, change in the gas supplier, or increased partial pressure of SF 6 before dilution. Postoperatively, due to IOP increase, two eyes required intravitreal gas-air exchange. Subsequently, cataract surgery was performed in one eye with concomitant vitrectomy and silicone oil tamponade due to retinal detachment. To prevent such complications, we suggest using intraocular gases with great care, training of ophthalmic personnel, and prompting manufacturers to provide SF 6 in a prepared concentration of 20%.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1663-2699</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1663-2699</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1159/000492746</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30283327</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel, Switzerland: S. Karger AG</publisher><subject>Case Report ; Case reports ; Cataracts ; Expandable gas ; Eye surgery ; Gases ; Human error ; Intraocular pressure ; Intraocular tamponade ; Ophthalmology ; Patient safety ; Sulfur ; Sulfur hexafluoride ; Surgeons ; Vitrectomy</subject><ispartof>Case reports in ophthalmology, 2018-08, Vol.9 (2), p.405-410</ispartof><rights>2018 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 by S. Karger AG, Basel 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-ff33cce22d424d088c62044273247722d7a9ba48e60bf129a6a9aef87b562a023</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-ff33cce22d424d088c62044273247722d7a9ba48e60bf129a6a9aef87b562a023</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8036-7691</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6167721/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6167721/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27634,27923,27924,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30283327$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kanclerz, Piotr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grzybowski, Andrzej</creatorcontrib><title>Case Series of Inappropriate Concentration of Intraocular Sulfur Hexafluoride</title><title>Case reports in ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Case Rep Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>Due to high complexity, vitreoretinal surgery presents a higher number of patient safety incidents compared with other ophthalmic procedures. Intraocular gases are one of the most useful adjuncts to vitrectomy and surprisingly, surgeons commonly admit to having occasional problems with incorrect gas concentration. The aim of this study is to present a consecutive case series of patients with improper concentration of sulfur hexafluoride (SF 6 ) applied during vitrectomy. Three patients underwent 27-gauge vitrectomy and at the end of surgery inappropriate dilution of 100% SF 6 was administered. It was attributed to a calculation error, change in the gas supplier, or increased partial pressure of SF 6 before dilution. Postoperatively, due to IOP increase, two eyes required intravitreal gas-air exchange. Subsequently, cataract surgery was performed in one eye with concomitant vitrectomy and silicone oil tamponade due to retinal detachment. To prevent such complications, we suggest using intraocular gases with great care, training of ophthalmic personnel, and prompting manufacturers to provide SF 6 in a prepared concentration of 20%.</description><subject>Case Report</subject><subject>Case reports</subject><subject>Cataracts</subject><subject>Expandable gas</subject><subject>Eye surgery</subject><subject>Gases</subject><subject>Human error</subject><subject>Intraocular pressure</subject><subject>Intraocular tamponade</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Patient safety</subject><subject>Sulfur</subject><subject>Sulfur hexafluoride</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Vitrectomy</subject><issn>1663-2699</issn><issn>1663-2699</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M--</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkc1r1UAQwBdRbGl78C4S6MnD0_3KflwECdY-qFSonpfJZvaZZ5qNm6S0_323poYWPO3uzG9_M8MQ8obRD4yV9iOlVFqupXpBDplSYsOVtS-f3A_IyTjuM0aF5YaVr8mBoNwIwfUh-VbBiMUVphbHIoZi28MwpDikFiYsqth77KcEUxv7JZ0f0c8dpOJq7sKcinO8hdDNMbUNHpNXAboRTx7PI_Lz7MuP6nxzcfl1W32-2HhpymkTghDeI-eN5LKhxnjFqZRcCy61zmENtgZpUNE6MG5BgQUMRtel4kC5OCLbxdtE2Lvc7DWkOxehdX8DMe0cpKn1HTruS4rojbG-lnVprcl6bYP14LHWdXZ9WlzDXF9js8zbPZM-z_TtL7eLN04xlZtlWXD6KEjxz4zj5PZxTn2e33HGNJNKapqp9wvlUxzHhGGtwKh7WKRbF5nZd09bWsl_a8vA2wX4DWmHaQXW_6f_TVeX3xfCDU0Q938SrYM</recordid><startdate>20180831</startdate><enddate>20180831</enddate><creator>Kanclerz, Piotr</creator><creator>Grzybowski, Andrzej</creator><general>S. Karger AG</general><general>Karger Publishers</general><scope>M--</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8036-7691</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180831</creationdate><title>Case Series of Inappropriate Concentration of Intraocular Sulfur Hexafluoride</title><author>Kanclerz, Piotr ; Grzybowski, Andrzej</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-ff33cce22d424d088c62044273247722d7a9ba48e60bf129a6a9aef87b562a023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Case Report</topic><topic>Case reports</topic><topic>Cataracts</topic><topic>Expandable gas</topic><topic>Eye surgery</topic><topic>Gases</topic><topic>Human error</topic><topic>Intraocular pressure</topic><topic>Intraocular tamponade</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Patient safety</topic><topic>Sulfur</topic><topic>Sulfur hexafluoride</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Vitrectomy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kanclerz, Piotr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grzybowski, Andrzej</creatorcontrib><collection>Karger Open Access Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Case reports in ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kanclerz, Piotr</au><au>Grzybowski, Andrzej</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Case Series of Inappropriate Concentration of Intraocular Sulfur Hexafluoride</atitle><jtitle>Case reports in ophthalmology</jtitle><addtitle>Case Rep Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2018-08-31</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>405</spage><epage>410</epage><pages>405-410</pages><issn>1663-2699</issn><eissn>1663-2699</eissn><abstract>Due to high complexity, vitreoretinal surgery presents a higher number of patient safety incidents compared with other ophthalmic procedures. Intraocular gases are one of the most useful adjuncts to vitrectomy and surprisingly, surgeons commonly admit to having occasional problems with incorrect gas concentration. The aim of this study is to present a consecutive case series of patients with improper concentration of sulfur hexafluoride (SF 6 ) applied during vitrectomy. Three patients underwent 27-gauge vitrectomy and at the end of surgery inappropriate dilution of 100% SF 6 was administered. It was attributed to a calculation error, change in the gas supplier, or increased partial pressure of SF 6 before dilution. Postoperatively, due to IOP increase, two eyes required intravitreal gas-air exchange. Subsequently, cataract surgery was performed in one eye with concomitant vitrectomy and silicone oil tamponade due to retinal detachment. To prevent such complications, we suggest using intraocular gases with great care, training of ophthalmic personnel, and prompting manufacturers to provide SF 6 in a prepared concentration of 20%.</abstract><cop>Basel, Switzerland</cop><pub>S. Karger AG</pub><pmid>30283327</pmid><doi>10.1159/000492746</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8036-7691</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1663-2699
ispartof Case reports in ophthalmology, 2018-08, Vol.9 (2), p.405-410
issn 1663-2699
1663-2699
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1159_000492746
source PubMed Central; Karger Open Access Journals
subjects Case Report
Case reports
Cataracts
Expandable gas
Eye surgery
Gases
Human error
Intraocular pressure
Intraocular tamponade
Ophthalmology
Patient safety
Sulfur
Sulfur hexafluoride
Surgeons
Vitrectomy
title Case Series of Inappropriate Concentration of Intraocular Sulfur Hexafluoride
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T16%3A22%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Case%20Series%20of%20Inappropriate%20Concentration%20of%20Intraocular%20Sulfur%20Hexafluoride&rft.jtitle=Case%20reports%20in%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Kanclerz,%20Piotr&rft.date=2018-08-31&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=405&rft.epage=410&rft.pages=405-410&rft.issn=1663-2699&rft.eissn=1663-2699&rft_id=info:doi/10.1159/000492746&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2117146470%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-ff33cce22d424d088c62044273247722d7a9ba48e60bf129a6a9aef87b562a023%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2117146470&rft_id=info:pmid/30283327&rfr_iscdi=true